Lower Risk Of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Research Articles

Association between achieved cholesterol levels and the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events after acute coronary syndromes

Abstract Background European guidelines recommend reducing lipid levels to defined targets to lower cardiovascular risk after acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Purpose This study aims to evaluate the association of achieved and reduced lipid levels one year post-ACS with the risk of subsequent major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in a real-world setting. Methods Data from SPUM-ACS, a Swiss multicentric cohort of patients hospitalized with ACS between 2007 and 2021, were used to assess the association between lipid levels (LDL-C, non-HDL-C, HDL-C, triglycerides), relative difference from baseline lipid levels, and lipid targets achievement (LDL-C <1.8 and ≥50% reduction from baseline, non-HDL-C <2.2 and triglycerides <1.7mmol/l) one year after ACS with the risk of MACE (myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, and cardiovascular death). The observation period for MACE started after a follow-up visit one year post-ACS, during which lipid levels were measured, extending over a median duration of 5.5 years. Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted age, sex, BMI, smoking status, statin therapy intensity, diabetes, systemic inflammatory disease, and creatinine were used. Predicted adjusted hazard ratios (HR) were represented graphically for continuous exposures. Analyses were repeated with interaction terms for predefined subgroups. Results 2579 ACS survivors (mean age 62 years; 80% male), primarily undergoing percutaneous revascularization, attended a follow-up visit one year after ACS and were followed up for a median of 5.5 years. 98% were prescribed statin therapy (59% high-intensity) at discharge. During the first year post-ACS, median LDL-C decreased from 3.7 to 2.4 mmol/l (-34%, p<0.001), non-HDL-C from 3.9 to 2.6 mmol/l (-32%, p<0.001), and triglycerides from 1.21 to 1.16 mmol/l (-6%, p<0.001); HDL-C increased from 1.1 to 1.2 mmol/l (+6%, p<0.001). 92% of patients were on statin therapy (50% high-intensity) one year after ACS. In log-linear models, one year after ACS, a 1 mmol/l reduction of LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and triglycerides levels to the target was associated with a lower risk of subsequent MACE by 23%, 24%, and 14%, respectively (p values <0.001). A 10% relative reduction from baseline levels of LDL-C, non-HDL-C and triglycerides was associated with a lower risk of MACE by 8%, 9%, and 4%, respectively (p values <0.001). Achieving LDL-C <1.8 mmol/l (21%, HR=0.71 [0.54, 0.93]), LDL-C reduction ≥50% from baseline (26%, HR=0.63 [0.48, 0.84]), non-HDL-C <2.2 mmol/l (30%, HR=0.65 [0.51, 0.83]), and triglycerides <1.7 mmol/l (76%, HR=0.76 [0.62, 0.94]) were all associated with a reduction in the risk of MACE. Neither age, sex, BMI, diabetes, or smoking status affected the results (p for interaction ≥0.05). Conclusion These findings affirm current recommendations and underscore lipid reduction and targets achievement as critical strategies for mitigating residual cardiovascular risk in patients with ACS.

Intravascular imaging-guided PCI in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock

Abstract Background There are no clinical data regarding efficacy of intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with angiography-guided PCI in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and cardiogenic shock. Purpose The current study sought to evaluate the impact of intravascular imaging-guided PCI in patients with AMI and cardiogenic shock. Methods Among a total of 28,732 patients from the nationwide pooled registry of KAMIR-NIH and KAMIR-Ⅴ, a total of 1,833 patients (6.4%) with AMI and cardiogenic shock who underwent PCI of the culprit vessel were selected. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 1 year, a composite of cardiac death, MI, repeat revascularization, and definite or probable stent thrombosis. Results Among the study population, 375 patients (20.5%) underwent intravascular imaging-guided PCI and 1,458 patients (79.5%) underwent angiography-guided PCI. Intravascular imaging-guided PCI showed significantly lower risk of 1-year MACE compared with angiography-guided PCI (19.5% vs 28.2%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-0.77; P<0.001), mainly driven by lower risk of cardiac death (13.7% vs. 24.0%; adjusted HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.39-0.72; P<0.001). These results were consistent in propensity score matching (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.46-0.99), inverse probability weighting (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.45-0.83), and Bayesian analysis (odds ratio, 0.66, 95% credible interval, 0.49-0.88). Conclusion In AMI patients with cardiogenic shock, intravascular imaging-guided PCI was associated with lower risk of MACE at 1-year than angiography-guided PCI, mainly driven by the lower risk of cardiac death. Further randomized controlled trial is warranted to confirm these findings.Central illustration

Association of HbA1C with mortality and cardiovascular outcome in patients with type 2 diabetes using drugs with different hypoglycemic risk

Abstract Background Previous clinical trials showed that intensive glucose control did not reduce macrovascular events and mortality. It was speculated that severe hypoglycaemia contributed to these adverse outcomes. More contemporary clinical trials using newer anti-diabetic agents with less hypoglycaemic potential showed a linear relationship between major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and HbA1c reduction according to a meta-regression analysis. Purpose The aim of this study was to examine the association between clinical outcomes and HbA1c under different treatment backgrounds in the real-world setting. We hypothesised that when using drugs with minimal hypoglycaemic risk, lower HbA1c would be associated with better outcomes. Methods This was a retrospective population-based cohort study using a multi-centre electronic medical record database. Eligible patients were those diagnosed with type 2 diabetes between 2009 and 2020 who received non-insulin antidiabetic drugs. Patients were stratified into two groups based on the drugs received: drugs with high hypoglycaemic risk (sulphonylurea, meglitinide) and drugs with low hypoglycaemic risk (thiazolidinediones, acarbose, DPP4 inhibitors, GLP1 agonists, SGLT-2 inhibitors). Patients were excluded if they had received these drugs for less than 180 days or had received both high and low hypoglycaemic risk oral drugs simultaneously. HbA1c levels were assessed from the index date to the date of the interested outcome or the end of the study period (31 December 2021), whichever came first. The relationship between HbA1c and clinical outcomes was examined using a Cox proportional hazards model. The outcomes of interest included all-cause mortality and MACE. Results The study population consisted of 6,923 patients, including 3,639 high hypoglycaemic risk drug users and 3,284 low hypoglycaemic risk drug users. Patients with lower HbA1c levels during the follow-up period were older and frailer. After adjusting for baseline covariates, the association between the risk of death and HbA1c presented a U-shaped pattern, and this U-shaped association was similar in the two treatment cohorts (Table 1). On the other hand, the association between the risk of MACE and HbA1c presented a J-shaped pattern. In the high hypoglycaemic risk drug cohort, patients with the highest HbA1c levels (mean HbA1c 9.6%) were associated with a higher risk of MACE compared to the group with a mean HbA1c of 7.2% (hazard ratio [HR] 4.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.07-8.37); lower HbA1c levels were not associated with a lower risk of MACE (Table 2). In contrast, in the low hypoglycaemic risk drug cohort, lower HbA1c levels were associated with a higher risk of MACE (HR 3.82, 95% CI 1.29-11.28). Conclusion Lower HbA1c levels were not associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality and MACE. Furthermore, this phenomenon was independent of the hypoglycaemic risk of anti-diabetic drugs.

Clinical characteristics and predictors of adverse cardiovascular events from the australia-new zealand spontaneous coronary artery dissection (ANZ-SCAD) registry

Abstract Background Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an increasingly recognised cause of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), predominantly affecting women. Our understanding of SCAD remains incomplete with limited prospective data on determinants of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Purpose We aimed to describe the clinical characteristics of patients with SCAD from a large, multicentre SCAD registry. We aimed to identify the predictors of MACE (defined as the composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, and revascularisation). Methods Observational, multi-centre prospective and retrospective cohort study recruiting patients with SCAD from 23 hospitals in Australia and New Zealand. Patients aged=>18 years with SCAD and an ACS were eligible for inclusion. Prospectively recruited patients gave their informed consent with a waiver of consent for retrospectively recruited patients. All invasive coronary angiography imaging was adjudicated by an independent core laboratory to confirm the diagnosis of SCAD. Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to evaluate the association between MACE and SCAD recurrence with predefined clinical variables. Results From a total 487 patients recruited, 423 (132 prospective and 291 retrospective) patients with SCAD confirmed on core laboratory review were included for analysis. Mean age was 52.4±10.7 years, 89.7% were female and 73.1% were Caucasian. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed in 10.6% of patients. On discharge, 64% of conservatively managed patients were on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). At 15 (interquartile range 5-36) months median follow-up, the accumulated MACE rate was 6.6%. On multivariate analysis, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was associated with a higher risk of MACE [hazard ratio (HR) 3.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.56-7.89, p=0.002], while discharge on at least one antiplatelet medication was associated with a lower risk of MACE (HR 0.13, 95% CI, 0.05-0.36, p<0.001). In patients managed conservatively (n=353), discharge on at least one antiplatelet medication (n=337) was associated with lower MACE (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.1-0.73, p=0.01), with no difference between single and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) (p=0.74). In patients managed conservatively and on DAPT (n=226), aspirin and clopidogrel was associated with a lower risk of MACE (HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.10-0.93, p=0.038) compared with DAPT consisting of aspirin and ticagrelor (HR 3.25, 95%CI 1.07-9.85 p=0.038) on multivariate analysis. Conclusion Patients with SCAD are at significant risk of MACE. In conservatively managed patients treated with DAPT, aspirin and clopidogrel was independently associated with a lower risk of MACE than aspirin and ticagrelor

Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin as Monotherapy Following Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Receiving a Drug-Eluting Stent: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.

This study aimed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of clopidogrel versus aspirin as monotherapy following adequate dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched from database inception to September 1, 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies evaluating the effectiveness or safety of clopidogrel versus aspirin as monotherapy following DAPT in patients with ACS who received a drug-eluting stent were included. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to compare risks of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and clinically relevant bleeding. Of 6242 abstracts identified, three unique studies were included: one RCT and two retrospective cohort studies. Studies included a total of 7081 post-percutaneous coronary intervention ACS patients, 4260 of whom received aspirin monotherapy and 2821 received clopidogrel monotherapy. Studies included variable proportions of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-STEMI, and unstable angina. From the meta-analysis, clopidogrel was associated with a 28% reduction in the risk of MACE compared with aspirin (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54, 0.98), with no significant difference in clinically relevant bleeding (HR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.68, 1.24). Despite the paucity of published evidence on the effectiveness and safety of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients with ACS post-drug-eluting stent implantation, this meta-analysis suggests that clopidogrel versus aspirin may result in a lower risk of MACE, with a similar risk of major bleeding. The present results are hypothesis-generating and further large RCTs comparing antiplatelet monotherapy options in ACS patients are warranted.

Counseling Intervention and Cardiovascular Events in People With Peripheral Artery Disease

It is unclear whether counseling to promote walking reduces the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in people with peripheral artery disease (PAD). To test whether a counseling intervention designed to increase walking reduced the risk of MACE in patients with PAD. The BIP trial was a randomized clinical trial, with recruitment performed between January 2015 and July 2018 and follow-up concluded in August 2023. Participants with walking impairment due to PAD from vascular departments in the Australian cities of Brisbane, Sydney, and Townsville were randomly allocated 1:1 to the intervention or control group. Data were originally analyzed in March 2024. Four brief counseling sessions aimed to help patients with the challenges of increasing physical activity. The primary outcome was the between-group difference in risk of MACE, which included myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and cardiovascular death. The relationship between Intermittent Claudication Questionnaire (ICQ) scores, PAD Quality of Life (PADQOL) scores, and MACE was examined with Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. A total of 200 participants were included, with 102 allocated to the counseling intervention (51.0%) and 98 to the control group (49.0%).Participants were followed up for a mean (SD) duration of 3.5 (2.6) years. Median (IQR) participant age was 70 (63-76) years, and 56 of 200 participants (28.0%) were female. A total of 31 individuals had a MACE (composed of 19 MIs, 4 strokes, and 8 cardiovascular deaths). Participants allocated to the intervention were significantly less likely to have a MACE than participants in the control group (10 of 102 participants [9.8%] vs 21 of 98 [21.4%]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.43; 95% CI, 0.20-0.91; P = .03). Greater disease-specific quality of life (QOL) scores at 4 months (ICQ: HR per 1-percentage point increase, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-0.99; P < .001; PADQOL factor 3 [symptoms and limitations in physical functioning]: HR per 1-unit increase, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84-0.98; P = .01) and at 12 months (ICQ: HR per 1-percentage point increase, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-0.99; P = .003; PADQOL factor 3: HR per 1-unit increase, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84-0.98; P = .02) were associated with a lower risk of MACE. In analyses adjusted for ICQ or PADQOL factor 3 scores at either 4 or 12 months, allocation to the counseling intervention was no longer significantly associated with a lower risk of MACE. This post hoc exploratory analysis of the BIP randomized clinical trial suggested that the brief counseling intervention designed to increase walking may reduce the risk of MACE, possibly due to improvement in QOL. anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12614000592640.

Complete vs. incomplete percutaneous revascularization in patients with chronic total coronary artery occlusion.

There is current controversy surrounding the benefits of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of chronic total coronary occlusions (CTO). We aimed to evaluate the impact of complete percutaneous revascularization on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with CTO. A retrospective observational study was conducted of consecutive patients referred for invasive coronary angiography at a single center between January 2018 and December 2019 and at least a CTO. The patients were divided into two groups according to the result of the procedure: complete revascularization of CTO (CR-CTO) versus incomplete revascularization (ICR-CTO) (patients with at least one non-recanalized CTO). Short- and mid-term clinical outcomes were evaluated. The primary endpoint was a composite of MACE that included all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or unplanned revascularization. In total, 359 patients with CTO were included. The median age was 68 years [interquartile range (IQR) 60-77 years], 66 (18%) were women and 169 (47.3%) had diabetes mellitus. In all, 167 (46.5%) patients received complete revascularization. After a median follow-up of 42 months (IQR 46-50 months), the primary endpoint occurred in 39 (23.4%) patients in the CR-CTO group and in 75 (39.1%) in the ICR-CTO group (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.34-0.74; p < 0.001). This association remained significant in an inverse probability weighted model considering prognostic factors (adjusted HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.41-0.92; p = 0.018) and was driven by lower rates of all-cause death (adjusted OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.23-0.84; p = 0.01). Complete revascularization of CTO was associated with a lower risk of MACE in the midterm follow up.

Periodic Fasting and Acute Cardiac Events in Patients Evaluated for COVID-19: An Observational Prospective Cohort Study.

Periodic fasting was previously associated with greater longevity and a lower incidence of heart failure (HF) in a pre-pandemic population. In patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), periodic fasting was associated with a lower risk of death or hospitalization. This study evaluated the association between periodic fasting and HF hospitalization and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Patients enrolled in the INSPIRE registry from February 2013 to March 2020 provided periodic fasting information and were followed into the pandemic (n = 5227). Between March 2020 and February 2023, N = 2373 patients were studied, with n = 601 COVID-positive patients being the primary study population (2836 had no COVID-19 test; 18 were excluded due to fasting <5 years). A Cox regression was used to evaluate HF admissions, MACEs, and other endpoints through March 2023, adjusting for covariables, including time-varying COVID-19 vaccination. In patients positive for COVID-19, periodic fasting was reported by 180 (30.0% of 601), who periodically fasted over 43.1 ± 19.2 years (min: 7, max: 83). HF hospitalization (n = 117, 19.5%) occurred in 13.3% of fasters and 22.1% of non-fasters [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 0.63, CI = 0.40, 0.99; p = 0.044]. Most HF admissions were exacerbations, with a prior HF diagnosis in 111 (94.9%) patients hospitalized for HF. Fasting was also associated with a lower MACE risk (aHR = 0.64, CI = 0.43, 0.96; p = 0.030). In n = 1772 COVID-negative patients (29.7% fasters), fasting was not associated with HF hospitalization (aHR = 0.82, CI = 0.64, 1.05; p = 0.12). In COVID-positive and negative patients combined, periodic fasting was associated with lower mortality (aHR = 0.60, CI = 0.39, 0.93; p = 0.021). Routine periodic fasting was associated with less HF hospitalization in patients positive for COVID-19.

Symptom-to-balloon time and risk of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with STEMI undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: The VERY-STEMI study

BackgroundVentricular arrhythmias (VAs) mainly occur in the early post-myocardial infarction (MI) period. However, studies examining the association between total myocardial ischemia time interval and the risk of new-onset VAs during a long-term follow-up are scarce. MethodsThis study (symptom-to-balloon time and VEntricular aRrhYthmias in patients with STEMI, VERY-STEMI study) was a multicenter, observational cohort and real-world study, which included patients with ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The primary endpoint was cumulative new-onset VAs during follow-up. The secondary endpoints were the major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (ΔLVEF, %). ResultsA total of 517 patients with STEMI were included and 236 primary endpoint events occurred. After multivariable adjustments, compared to patients with S2BT of 24 h-7d, those with S2BT ≤ 24 h and S2BT > 7d had a lower risk of primary endpoint. RCS showed an inverted U-shaped relationship between S2BT and the primary endpoint, with an S2BT of 68.4 h at the inflection point. Patients with S2BT ≤ 24 h were associated with a lower risk of MACE and a 4.44 increase in LVEF, while there was no significant difference in MACE and LVEF change between the S2BT > 7d group and S2BT of 24 h-7d group. ConclusionsS2BT of 24 h-7d in STEMI patients was associated with a higher risk of VAs during follow-up. There was an inverted U-shaped relationship between S2BT and VAs, with the highest risk at an S2BT of 68.4 h.

Cardioprotective Effect of SGLT2 Inhibitor in Diabetic Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Multicenter Propensity Score Matched Study

BackgroundKidney transplantation improves the cardiovascular outcomes of patients with end-stage kidney disease. However, cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of premature death and graft loss in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with diabetes. We evaluated the cardioprotective effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in KTRs with diabetes. MethodsA total of 750 KTRs with diabetes were enrolled from six tertiary hospitals. Among them, 129 (17.2%) patients were prescribed SGLT2i. The primary outcome was the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), which comprised of myocardial infarction (MI), death from cardiovascular causes, hospitalization for heart failure, and stroke. Multivariable Cox regression analysis and propensity score matching were used to investigate the effect of SGLT2i on clinical outcomes. ResultsIn the matched cohort, MACE occurred in 5 (3.9%) patients in the SGLT2i group and 15 (11.8%) patients in the non-SGLT2i group, out of 127 patients in each group over 55.3 months. The incidence of MACE and MI was lower in the SGLT2i group than in the non-SGLT2i group (P=0.036 and 0.008, respectively). In multivariate analysis, the SGLT2i group had a lower risk of MACE and MI than the non-SGLT2i group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.30 and 0.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.10–0.88 and 0.004–0.40; P=0.028 and 0.006, respectively). There was no difference in the incidence of urinary tract infection between the two groups. ConclusionsSGLT2i significantly decreased the risk of cardiovascular events in KTRs with diabetes, particularly lowering the incidence of MI and death from cardiovascular causes. Therefore, SGLT2i can be used to reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease in KTRs with diabetes.

The Beverage Quality Index and risk of cardiometabolic outcomes after a myocardial infarction: A prospective analysis in the Alpha Omega Cohort

Background and aimsIndividual beverages have varying associations with cardiometabolic outcomes, but little is known about overall beverage quality and cardiometabolic risk after myocardial infarction (MI). We created the Beverage Quality Index (BQI) to assess beverage quality and examined its association with cardiometabolic outcomes after MI. Methods and resultsWe included 4365 Dutch post-MI patients from the Alpha Omega Cohort, aged 60–80 years. Diet was assessed at baseline (2002–2006) with a 203-item FFQ. The BQI included eight components (coffee, tea, milk, juices, sugar-sweetened beverages, alcohol, added sugar to coffee and tea, and energy from beverages), and ranged from 0 to 80. Multivariable Cox models were used to estimate HRs for the BQI in relation to incident diabetes mellitus (DM), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), recurrent cardiovascular disease (CVD) and fatal CVD over 3.4 y of follow-up, with follow-up for fatal CVD extended through 2018 (12.4 y). The average BQI was 50.0 ± 12.5. During 3.4 y of follow-up, we identified 186 incident cases of DM, 601 of MACE, 310 of recurrent CVD and 140 of fatal CVD. In multivariable models, a higher BQI (T3 vs. T1) was associated with lower risk of MACE [HR: 0.73 (0.59–0.90)], and recurrent CVD [HR: 0.67 (0.50–0.91)], but not with DM or CVD mortality. After 12.4 y of follow-up, 903 CVD deaths occurred. A significant inverse association with CVD mortality during long-term follow-up was found [HR: 0.81 (0.68–0.96)]. ConclusionOverall beverage intake quality, as assessed by the BQI, may represent an important target for the prevention of recurrent CVD.

Intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock

Introduction and objectivesThere are no clinical data on the efficacy of intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with angiography-guided PCI in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and cardiogenic shock. The current study sought to evaluate the impact of intravascular imaging-guided PCI in patients with AMI and cardiogenic shock. MethodsAmong a total of 28 732 patients from the nationwide pooled registry of KAMIR-NIH (November, 2011 to December, 2015) and KAMIR-V (January, 2016 to June, 2020), we selected a total of 1833 patients (6.4%) with AMI and cardiogenic shock who underwent PCI of the culprit vessel. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 1 year, a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and definite or probable stent thrombosis. ResultsAmong the study population, 375 patients (20.5%) underwent intravascular imaging-guided PCI and 1458 patients (79.5%) underwent angiography-guided PCI. Intravascular imaging-guided PCI was associated with a significantly lower risk of 1-year MACE than angiography-guided PCI (19.5% vs 28.2%; HR, 0.59; 95%CI, 0.45-0.77; P<.001), mainly driven by a lower risk of cardiac death (13.7% vs 24.0%; adjusted HR, 0.53; 95%CI, 0.39-0.72; P<.001). These results were consistent in propensity score matching (HR, 0.68; 95%CI, 0.46-0.99), inverse probability weighting (HR, 0.61; 95%CI, 0.45-0.83), and Bayesian analysis (Odds ratio, 0.66, 95% credible interval, 0.49-0.88). ConclusionsIn AMI patients with cardiogenic shock, intravascular imaging-guided PCI was associated with a lower risk of MACE at 1-year than angiography-guided PCI, mainly driven by the lower risk of cardiac death.

Comparison of risk profiles of participants in the Women's IschemiA TRial to Reduce events In non-ObstRuctive CAD (WARRIOR) trial, using Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography vs Invasive Coronary Angiography

ObjectiveTo compare baseline characteristics of participants in the Women's IschemiA TRial to Reduce Events In Non-ObstRuctive CAD (WARRIOR) trial by qualification by Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) or Invasive Coronary Angiography (ICA). MethodsThe WARRIOR trial (NCT03417388) is an ongoing multicenter, prospective, randomized, blinded outcome evaluation of intensive medical therapy vs. usual care in women with suspected Ischemia and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease (INOCA) identified by either CCTA or ICA on the outcome of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). No obstructive coronary artery disease is defined as <50% luminal stenosis and normal coronary arteries is defined as no evidence of atherosclerosis including calcified and non-calcified plaque. Data presented was extracted on May 27, 2020. No clinical outcomes were assessed. ResultsAn initial sample cohort of 797 women was included. The majority were younger than 65 years, White participants (73.3%), 159 had diabetes (19.9%), and 676 had angina (84.8%) with the remainder having symptoms of suspected ischemic heart disease. Over 50% of randomized participants had normal coronaries without luminal irregularities by ICA or CCTA. Participants randomized to ICA were more likely to have worse baseline clinical risk profiles with older age, higher burden of cardiac risk factors and poor quality of life with disabling angina. ConclusionsAmong this initial sample of women with suspected INOCA randomized in the WARRIOR trial, there is a differential baseline cardiac risk of participants enrolled after CCTA or ICA. However, the majority had no evidence of atherosclerotic plaque or obstructive stenosis, after evaluation by ICA or CCTA. These results suggest that non-invasive evaluation with CCTA is likely to be associated with lower risk of MACE.

Outcomes of SGLT-2i and GLP-1RA Therapy Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Varying NAFLD Status

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a cardiovascular risk factor, but whether sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) are associated with reduced cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and concomitant NAFLD remains uncertain. To investigate the outcomes of SGLT-2i and GLP-1RA therapy among patients with T2D varied by the presence or absence of NAFLD. This retrospective, population-based, nationwide cohort study used an active-comparator new-user design. Two distinct new-user active-comparator cohorts of patients aged 40 years and older who initiated SGLT-2i or GLP-1RA were propensity score matched to patients who initiated dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i). The study was conducted in South Korea from January 2013 to December 2020, and data analysis was conducted from October 2022 to March 2023. The main outcomes were (1) major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite end point of hospitalization for myocardial infarction, hospitalization for stroke, and cardiovascular death, and (2) hospitalization for heart failure (HHF). Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs). The Wald test was applied to assess heterogeneity by NAFLD. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 140 438 patients were retrieved in the first cohort (SGLT-2i vs DPP-4i; mean [SD] age, 57.5 [10.3] years; 79 633 [56.7%] male) and 34 886 patients were identified in the second cohort (GLP-1RA vs DPP-4i; mean [SD] age, 59.5 [10.5] years; 17 894 [51.3%] male). Compared with DPP-4i, SGLT-2i therapy was associated with a lower risk of MACE (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.71-0.85]) and HHF (HR, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.48-0.81]). GLP-1RA therapy was associated with a decreased risk of MACE (HR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.39-0.62]) but had statistically nonsignificant findings regarding HHF (HR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.39-1.07]). Stratified analysis by NAFLD status yielded consistent results for SGLT-2i (MACE with NAFLD: HR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.62-0.86]; without NAFLD: HR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.72-0.91]; HHF with NAFLD: HR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.49-1.17]; without NAFLD: HR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.40-0.78]) and for GLP-1RA (MACE with NAFLD: HR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.32-0.77]; without NAFLD: HR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.37-0.65]; HHF with NAFLD: HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.38-1.76]; without NAFLD: HR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.27-1.06]). In this population-based cohort study, SGLT-2i therapy was associated with a decreased risk of MACE and HHF, while GLP-1RA therapy was associated with a decreased risk of MACE among patients with T2D, irrespective of baseline NAFLD status.

Intensity of and adherence to lipid-lowering therapy as predictors of goal attainment and major adverse cardiovascular events in primary prevention

The effectiveness of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in routine care may depend on treatment intensity and adherence. Observational study of adults with newly initiated LLT for primary prevention of ASCVD in Stockholm, Sweden, during 2017-2021. Study exposures were LLT adherence [proportion of days covered (PDC)], LLT intensity (expected reduction of LDL cholesterol), and the combined measure of adherence and intensity. At each LLT fill, adherence and intensity were calculated during the previous 12 months, and the patients estimated ASCVD risk was categorized. Study outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and LDL-C goal attainment. Thirty-six thousand two hundred eighty-three individuals (mean age 63 years, 47% women, median follow-up 2 years), with a baseline low-moderate (40%), high (49%), and very-high (11%) ASCVD risk started LLT. Increases in LLT adherence, intensity, or adherence-adjusted intensity of 10% over 1 year were associated with lower risks of MACE (with hazard ratios of 0.95 [95% CI, 0.93-0.98]; 0.93 [0.86-1.00]; and 0.90 [0.85-0.95], respectively) and higher odds of attaining LDL goals. Patients with good adherence (≥80%) had similar risks of MACE and similar odds ratios for LDL-C goal attainment with low-moderate and high-intensity LLT. Treatment discontinuation was associated with increased MACE risk. The relative and absolute benefits of good adherence were greatest in patients with very high ASCVD risk. In routine-care primary prevention, better adherence to LLT was associated with a lower risk of MACE across all treatment intensities. Improving adherence is especially important among patients with very high ASCVD risk.

Coffee consumption and adverse outcome events in patients with atrial fibrillation

Abstract Background/Introduction Moderate coffee consumption has been associated with a lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in the general population. However, there are some concerns that coffee consumption might be harmful for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Purpose The aim of this study was to investigate the association of coffee consumption with MACE and other adverse outcome events in AF patients. Methods Data of AF patients from two large prospective, multicenter cohort studies (yearly based follow-up data from Swiss-AF and Beat-AF) were used for this analysis. Coffee consumption was assessed and categorized into two main groups "not-daily" and "daily" consumers and subcategories (&amp;lt;1, 1, 2-3 and ≥4cups/day). The primary endpoint was defined as a composite of stroke or systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, hospitalization for acute heart failure and cardiovascular death (MACE). We performed time-updated multivariable adjusted Cox regression analyses to investigate the association of coffee consumption with MACE and other adverse outcome events. Results Among 3,835 patients (mean age 71.4 years, 28.0% females), 3,095 (80.7%) reported daily coffee consumption. The incidence rate for MACE was 5.09 in daily and 7.49 per 100py in not-daily consumers. Cumulative incidence curves are presented in Figure 1. After comprehensive multivariable adjustment, daily coffee consumption was associated with a 23% relative risk reduction for MACE compared to not-daily consumption (hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval (CI)) 0.77 (0.67-0.89), p&amp;lt;0.001;). Compared to patients with not-daily coffee consumption, patients with moderate coffee consumption (2-3 cups/day) had the lowest hazard for MACE (HR (95%CI) 0.73 (0.62; 0.85), p&amp;lt;0.001). The associations between coffee consumption and all adverse outcome events are presented in Figure 2. Conclusion In a population of AF patients, daily coffee consumption was associated with a lower risk of MACE and other adverse outcomes. These findings seem to be similar to those in the general population.

Exercise performance and the risk of incident atrial fibrillation

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a global health problem that correlates with the increased risks of cardiovascular diseases, quality of life, mortality and global health expenditures. While many of cardiovascular risk factors have been related to the development of AF, a satisfied lifestyle behavior, including regular exercise and a good cardiorespiratory fitness, could be the upstream intervention to modify the risk factors and reduce the AF incidence. Purpose We examined the relationship of the exercise performance with risk of incident atrial fibrillation and its subsequent comorbidities. Methods From 2003 to 2012, we retrospectively included 19,680 consecutive patients without previous diagnosis of AF, who were referred to exercise treadmill testing for clinical reasons. The baseline characteristics and the exercise parameters during exercise testing were accessed in all enrolled subjects. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models identified the independent association between exercise performance and risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation, risk of ischemic stroke and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Cubic spline regression model assessed the risk of new-onset AF across fitness level. Results Among a total of 15,450 subjects (mean age, 54.9 ± 11 years; 59% male) with a median follow-up duration of 137 months, 515 (3.33%) new-onset AF cases were found. There was an 8% lower risk of AF incidence (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-0.97), a 12% lower risk of ischemic stroke incidence (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-0.94), and a 14% lower risk of MACE (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.84-0.88) for every 1 peak achieved metabolic equivalents (METs) increase in the exercise treadmill testing after adjusting confounding factors. In the subgroup analysis, the peak achieved METs during exercise treadmill testing was significantly associated with the risk of new-onset AF across various subgroups, including age, gender, body mass index (BMI) and underlying diseases. There were significant interactions in age subgroup (P for interaction 0.0047) and subgroup stratified by the presence of chronotropic incompetence (P for interaction 0.0212). Conclusions Exercise capacity is inversely correlated with AF incidence across fitness level. A better exercise performance indicates a lower AF incidence, ischemic stroke incidence and MACE. Regular physical activity may help to reduce inflammation and improve the function of the heart, which may help to prevent the development of AF. Further research is needed to fully understand the underlying mechanisms.Kaplan–Meier curveSubgroup analysis

Association of medical therapy with cardiovascular outcomes in patients with myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries

Abstract Background Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is a disease that has been poorly characterized with unclear clinical and therapeutic outcomes. The association of medical therapy with cardiovascular outcomes in patients with MINOCA has been inadequately assessed. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the association of medical therapy with cardiovascular outcomes in patients with MINOCA. Methods A literature search was conducted for studies reporting on the association of medical therapy with clinical endpoints in patients with MINOCA. Clinical endpoints include all-cause mortality, recurrence of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Databases searched included Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Results A total of 9 studies with 27731 MINOCA patients (17816 on medical therapy, 9915 not on medical therapy) met inclusion criteria. Mean follow-up duration was 56 months, mean age was 63 years old, 52% were men. Medical therapy did not significantly reduce risk of MACE compared to no medical therapy (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.91-1.07; p=0.73). Subgroup analysis demonstrated no significant reduction in risk of MACE regardless of ACE inhibitors/ARBs, antiplatelet therapy, or beta blocker therapy (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.91-1.17; p=0.62; OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.87-1.14; p=0.98; OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.79-1.06; p=0.22). However, there is a trend toward lower risk of MACE in MINOCA patients on beta blocker therapy. Analysis of MINOCA patients by presence of vasospasm did not demonstrate any significant reduction in risk of MACE with antiplatelet use in either subgroups (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.71-1.49; p=0.89 without vasospasm; OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.74-1.14; p=0.44 with vasospasm). Use of antiplatelet therapy in patients with vasospasm did not significantly reduce risk of mortality or recurrent ACS (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.37-1.75; p=0.58; OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.89-1.64; p=0.22). Conclusions Standard medical therapy using antiplatelet agents, beta blockers, or ACE inhibitors/ARBs are not associated with lower risk of cardiovascular outcomes in patients with MINOCA regardless of presence of vasospasm. However, there is a paucity in literature evaluating agents other than antiplatelet therapies. Additional high-quality studies are required to evaluate the utility of specific medication classes for treatment of specific etiologies of MINOCA.

Adherence to guideline-directed medical therapy and 3-year clinical outcome following acute myocardial infarction

Abstract Aims Despite the well-established clinical benefits and strong recommendations in clinical guidelines, adherence to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) is known to be insufficient. We investigated the adherence to GDMT and its impact on the 3-year clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods and results Source data were obtained from KAMIR-NIH, a Korean multicenter observational registry. GDMT was defined according to the ACC/AHA class I recommendations. Adherence to GDMT was assessed at discharge and every year thereafter. The differences in clinical characteristics between patients receiving and those not receiving GDMT were adjusted using propensity score matching (PSM) or inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), which was a composite of all-cause death and non-fatal MACE, including MI, revascularization, or stroke. Of 12,815 patients, GDMT adherence was 70.2% at discharge, and decreased gradually into 54.6% at 3-year. GDMT at discharge was associated with lower MACE risk in the unadjusted analysis (HR=0.51, 95%CI=0.47–0.55, p&amp;lt;0.001) and also in the PSM- or IPTW-adjusted analyses (HR=0.77, 95%CI=0.69–0.86; HR=0.79, 95%CI=0.72–0.86; p&amp;lt;0.001, all). These findings were replicated in the 1-year or 2-year landmark analyses (HR=0.58 to 0.82, p&amp;lt;0.01, all). Conclusion Adherence to GDMT was suboptimal among patients with AMI in Korea. As the adherence to GDMT was associated with a lower incidence of MACE during 3-year follow-up, the maintenance of long-term GDMT might be crucial for patients with AMI.Structured Graphical Abstract

An Updated Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials and Observational Studies of Intravascular Ultrasound- versus Angiography-guided Left Main Stenting

Objectives: This updated meta-analysis aimed to consolidate clinical evidence comparing the clinical outcomes of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided LMCA stenting versus conventional angiography-guided LMCA stenting. Methodology: We included “randomized controlled trials” and “observational studies” published in peer-reviewed English language journals that compared the clinical outcomes of LMCA revascularization using “drug-eluting stents (DES)” via “IVUS-guided” versus “angiography-guided” stenting. The primary outcome of interest was “major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)”, while secondary outcome variables included “all-cause mortality”, “myocardial infarction (MI)”, “target vessel/lesion revascularization (TVR/TLR)”, and “stent thrombosis (ST)”. Risk ratios (RRs) for each outcome variable were calculated using the “Mantel-Haenszel method”. Results: The analysis included nine studies involving a total of 5,344 patients, with 2,282 undergoing “IVUS-guided” LMCA stenting and 3,062 undergoing “angiography-guided” LMCA stenting. “IVUS-guided” LMCA stenting showed a significant reduction in the risk of MACE compared to “angiography-guided” LMCA stenting, with a RR of 0.46 [95% CI: 0.27 - 0.79]. However, a high level of heterogeneity (I2=94%; p&lt;0.01) was observed among the included studies. Additionally, “IVUS-guided” LMCA stenting was associated with significant reductions in all-cause mortality, MI, and ST, with RRs of 0.38 [0.21 - 0.66], 0.45 [0.26 - 0.77], and 0.24 [0.10 - 0.57], respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in TVR/TLR between “IVUS-guided” and “angiography-guided” LMCA stenting, with an RR of 0.64 [0.27 - 1.51]. Conclusion: “IVUS-guided” LMCA revascularization using DES was associated with a lower risk of MACE, death, MI, and ST compared to conventional “angiography-guided” LMCA stenting.