Intravascular imaging-guided PCI in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock

Abstract

Abstract Background There are no clinical data regarding efficacy of intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with angiography-guided PCI in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and cardiogenic shock. Purpose The current study sought to evaluate the impact of intravascular imaging-guided PCI in patients with AMI and cardiogenic shock. Methods Among a total of 28,732 patients from the nationwide pooled registry of KAMIR-NIH and KAMIR-Ⅴ, a total of 1,833 patients (6.4%) with AMI and cardiogenic shock who underwent PCI of the culprit vessel were selected. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 1 year, a composite of cardiac death, MI, repeat revascularization, and definite or probable stent thrombosis. Results Among the study population, 375 patients (20.5%) underwent intravascular imaging-guided PCI and 1,458 patients (79.5%) underwent angiography-guided PCI. Intravascular imaging-guided PCI showed significantly lower risk of 1-year MACE compared with angiography-guided PCI (19.5% vs 28.2%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-0.77; P<0.001), mainly driven by lower risk of cardiac death (13.7% vs. 24.0%; adjusted HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.39-0.72; P<0.001). These results were consistent in propensity score matching (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.46-0.99), inverse probability weighting (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.45-0.83), and Bayesian analysis (odds ratio, 0.66, 95% credible interval, 0.49-0.88). Conclusion In AMI patients with cardiogenic shock, intravascular imaging-guided PCI was associated with lower risk of MACE at 1-year than angiography-guided PCI, mainly driven by the lower risk of cardiac death. Further randomized controlled trial is warranted to confirm these findings.Central illustration