Fluvio-deltaic sedimentary systems are of great interest for explorationists because they can form prolific hydrocarbon plays. However, they are also among the most complex and heterogeneous ones encountered in the subsurface. Reservoirs in clinoform systems are difficult to characterize because they show two main types of complexity: complex sedimentology and poor seismic imaging. The former is due to complex internal architecture with many small sedimentary elements often at a sub-seismic scale. Poor seismic imaging occurs because the internal layers of the clinoform often do not differ much in their acoustic properties, in addition, they have thicknesses that are below the vertical resolution of seismic data, and therefore such features do not show up very well on seismic images. Obviously, the most unfavorable situation occurs when both conditions interact. The static model of a fluvio-deltaic (clinoform) reservoir is extremely important because it plays a critical role in the field development planning. There are many ways to build a static model but the most effective way is by integrating seismic and well data through the construction of an acoustic impedance model by inversion of seismic data within a sequence stratigraphic framework. There are several reasons to integrate well-log data into the inverse process in the reservoir characterization workflow, such as the integration of different sources of information in a common earth model, the estimation of the seismic distortion (also known as the wavelet filter), etc. In addition, the low vertical resolution of seismic data is an important motivation to integrate well-log information into the inverse process and thereby complement the relatively dense horizontal coverage of seismic data with high-resolution borehole data (Van Riel and Mesdag, 1988; Van Riel and Pendrel, 2000; Van Riel, 2000; Bosch et al., 2009). Another potential benefit of seismic inversion is the ability to incorporate structural and stratigraphic information of the reservoir in order to differentiate between similar mathematical solutions on the basis of their geological viability. We present two different inversion approaches for poststack, time migrated seismic data and apply them to a clinoform sequence in the North Sea. Both inversion methods are not fully 2D, but more than a series of independently processed 1D inversions. To stress the enforced continuity along the geological structure, we use the name pseudo 2D inversion. The methods use well data as a priori constraints but differ in the way they incorporate structural information. One method uses a discrete layer model from the well that is then propagated laterally along the clinoform layers, which are modeled as sigmoids. The second method uses a constant sampling rate from the well data and employs horizontal and vertical regularization parameters for lateral propagation. Both methods obtain an acoustic impedance image with a high level of detail. The first method has a low level of parameterization embedded in a geological framework and is computationally fast. The second method has a much higher degree of parameterization but is flexible enough to detect deviations in the geological settings of the reservoir, however there is no explicit geological significance and it is computationally much less efficient. Forward seismic modeling of the two inversion results indicates a good match of both methods with the actual seismic data. The methods are especially considered to be useful when seismic data alone do not reveal the actual detailed reservoir architecture, which can be the case either because of their low vertical resolution or exceedingly thin layering.
Read full abstract