Low-risk Papillary Thyroid Cancer Research Articles

Ablation techniques or active surveillance compared to surgical resection in patients with low-risk papillary thyroid cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The global prevalence of thyroid cancer is on the rise. About one-third of newly diagnosed thyroid cancer cases comprise low-risk papillary thyroid cancer (1.5 cm or more minor). While surgical removal remains the prevailing approach for managing low-risk papillary thyroid cancer (LPTC) in patients, other options such as active surveillance (AS), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), and laser ablation (LA) are also being considered as viable alternatives. This study evaluated and compared surgical thyroid resection (TSR) versus non-surgical (NS) methods for treating patients with LPTC. The study encompassed an analysis of comparisons between surgical thyroid resection (TSR) and alternative approaches, including active surveillance (AS), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), or laser ablation (LA). The focus was on patients with biopsy-confirmed low-risk papillary thyroid cancer (LPTC) of less than 1.5 cm without preoperative indications of local or distant metastasis. The primary outcomes assessed were recurrence rates, disease-specific mortality, and quality of life (QoL). Data were collected from prominent databases, including Cochrane Database, Embase, MEDLINE, and Scopus, from inception to June 3rd, 2020. The CLARITY tool was utilized to evaluate bias risk. The analysis involved odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes, as well as mean differences (MD) and standardized mean differences (SMD) for continuous outcomes. The study is registered on PROSPERO under the identifier CRD42021235657. The study incorporated 13 retrospective cohort studies involving 4034 patients. Surgical thyroid resection (TSR), active surveillance (AS), and minimally invasive techniques like radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), and laser ablation (LA) were performed in varying proportions of cases. The analysis indicated that specific disease mortality rates were comparable among AS, MWA, and TSR groups. The risk of recurrence, evaluated over different follow-up periods, showed no significant differences when comparing AS, RFA, MWA, or LA against TSR. Patients undergoing AS demonstrated better physical health-related quality of life (QoL) than those undergoing TSR. However, no substantial differences were observed in the overall mental health domain of QoL when comparing AS or RFA with TSR. The risk of bias was moderate in nine studies and high in four. Low-quality evidence indicates comparable recurrence and disease-specific mortality risks among patients with LPTC who underwent ablation techniques or active surveillance (AS) compared to surgery. Nevertheless, individuals who opted for AS exhibited enhanced physical quality of life (QoL). Subsequent investigations are warranted to validate these findings.

Practice of low risk papillary thyroid cancer treatment: Active surveillance vs immediate surgery

Practice of low risk papillary thyroid cancer treatment: Active surveillance vs immediate surgery

Re: "Barriers and Facilitators to the Choice of Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Papillary Thyroid Cancer in China: A Qualitative Study Examining Patient Perspectives" by Zhu et al.: Clinical Factors Affecting Patients' Decision Between Active Surveillance and Surgery: A Surgeon's View from China.

Re: "Barriers and Facilitators to the Choice of Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Papillary Thyroid Cancer in China: A Qualitative Study Examining Patient Perspectives" by Zhu et al.: Clinical Factors Affecting Patients' Decision Between Active Surveillance and Surgery: A Surgeon's View from China.

Surgical management of low-risk papillary thyroid cancer in real life in Spain: a nationwide survey of endocrine neck surgeons and endocrinologists.

The extent of surgery in patients with papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) is a subject of ongoing debate. We aimed to explore the attitude of Spanish specialists (endocrinologists, surgeons, and otolaryngologists) in real life on the surgical management of low-risk PTC. We designed an anonymous, web-based survey to inquire information regarding the preferences of interviewees for hemithyroidectomy (Hem), total thyroidectomy (TT) and prophylactic central neck dissection (pCND) in one standard patient with PTC and six clinical variants. We differentiated between small (1.1-2.5 cm) and large (2.6-4.0 cm) tumors. A total of 278 valid responses were received and divided into two groups: group END (n = 135) and group SUR (n = 143, 101 general surgeons and 42 otolaryngologists). The preference for Hem was low in the standard patient and similar between both groups (40.6 vs 49.0%, NS). This preference decreased for tumors measuring 2.6-4.0 cm, multifocal, with risk location, family history of thyroid cancer, or history of irradiation, and increased in patients older than 65 years or with comorbidity. Preference for pCND ranged from 12.6-71.1% in the group END and from 22.4-65.0% in the group SUR, with few differences between the two. In multivariate analysis, being a high-volume specialist was associated with a lower preference for Hem, while having private practice was associated with a more favorable opinion of Hem. The real clinical practice of Spanish specialists is far from what is recommended by the clinical guidelines in patients with low-risk PTC, especially among high-volume professionals.

Evolving variation in the extent of surgery for low-risk papillary thyroid cancer in the United States

BackgroundThe continued debate over total thyroidectomy versus lobectomy and declining favor for prophylactic central neck dissection for patients with clinically node-negative papillary thyroid cancer ≤4 cm is ongoing after the 2015 guideline updates from the American Thyroid Association. This study aimed to evaluate contemporary trends in the extent of surgery in this low-risk cohort. MethodsRetrospective data from the National Cancer Database were used to identify adult patients with clinically node-negative papillary thyroid cancer ≤4 cm who underwent resection from 2012 to 2020. The primary outcome was the extent of surgery (lobectomy or total thyroidectomy, with or without prophylactic central neck dissection). Multivariable regression was performed to identify characteristics associated with variation in the extent of surgery. ResultsOf 83,464 included patients, 79.3% were female patients with a median age of 51 years. The majority underwent total thyroidectomy either with prophylactic central neck dissection (39.1%) or without (37.5%) versus lobectomy with prophylactic central neck dissection (7.2%) or without (16.2%). Lobectomy rates increased from 18.3% in 2012 to 29.9% in 2020. Prophylactic central neck dissection rates also increased (42.9% to 52.1%). Patients who were male sex, Asian American, had smaller tumors or were treated at community cancer programs had a decreased likelihood of total thyroidectomy. Patients who were older, male sex, Black race, with smaller tumors, or were treated at community cancer programs or mid- or low-volume facilities had decreased likelihood of prophylactic central neck dissection. ConclusionProportional use rates of operative approaches for low-risk, clinically node-negative papillary thyroid cancer have changed in recent years after the American Thyroid Association guideline changes, including increasing overall rates of lobectomy as well as prophylactic central neck dissection, with differences noted based on patient- and facility-level factors.

Gender Differences in Fears Related to Low-Risk Papillary Thyroid Cancer and Its Treatment

Fear is commonly experienced by individuals newly diagnosed with papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). To explore the association between gender and fears of low-risk PTC disease progression, as well as its potential surgical treatment. This single-center prospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary care referral hospital in Toronto, Canada, and enrolled patients with untreated small low risk PTC (<2 cm in maximal diameter) that was confined to the thyroid. All patients had a surgical consultation. Study participants were enrolled between May 2016 and February 2021. Data analysis was performed from December 16, 2022, to May 8, 2023. Gender was self-reported by patients with low-risk PTC who were offered the choice of thyroidectomy or active surveillance. Baseline data were collected prior to the patient deciding on disease management. Baseline patient questionnaires included the Fear of Progression-Short Form and Surgical Fear (referring to thyroidectomy) questionnaires. The fears of women and men were compared after adjustment for age. Decision-related variables, including Decision Self-Efficacy, and the ultimate treatment decisions were also compared between genders. The study included 153 women (mean [SD] age, 50.7 [15.0] years) and 47 men (mean [SD] age, 56.3 [13.8] years). There were no significant differences in primary tumor size, marital status, education, parental status, or employment status between the women and men. After adjustment for age, there was no significant difference observed in the level of fear of disease progression between men and women. However, women reported greater surgical fear compared with men. There was no meaningful difference observed between women and men with respect to decision self-efficacy or the ultimate treatment choice. In this cohort study of patients with low-risk PTC, women reported a higher level of surgical fear but not fear of the disease compared with men (after adjustment for age). Women and men were similarly confident and satisfied with their disease management choice. Furthermore, the decisions of women and men were generally not significantly different. The context of gender may contribute to the emotional experience of being diagnosed with thyroid cancer and its treatment perception.

Probability of a Residual Contralateral Lesion and Association of Multifocality and Bilaterality on the Recurrence of Low-Risk Papillary Thyroid Cancer

Probability of a Residual Contralateral Lesion and Association of Multifocality and Bilaterality on the Recurrence of Low-Risk Papillary Thyroid Cancer

Patients Electing Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Papillary Thyroid Cancer Have Lower Baseline Anxiety

Patients Electing Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Papillary Thyroid Cancer Have Lower Baseline Anxiety

Bilaterality, not multifocality, is an independent risk factor for recurrence in low-risk papillary thyroid cancer.

The impact of multifocality and bilaterality on recurrence in patients with low-risk papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) is relevant when considering patients for a de-escalated treatment strategy: hemithyroidectomy instead of total thyroidectomy followed with or without radioactive iodine. This study aims to analyze contralateral tumor probability in patients treated for low-risk PTC and assess multifocality and bilaterality as possible predictors for recurrence. Patients with low-risk PTC treated with total thyroidectomy followed with or without radioactive iodine in the Netherlands between 2005 and 2015 were included in this study. Patients were identified from the Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL) and linked with the nationwide network and registry of Pathology in the Netherlands (PALGA). Contralateral tumor probability and recurrence were assessed. Of 791 included patients, 41.8% (331 of 791) had multifocal disease, with 68.9% (228 of 331) of those patients having bilateral disease. The contralateral tumor probability after hemithyroidectomy was 24.6% (150 of 610) for patients with unifocal disease and 43.1% (78 of 181) for patients with multifocal disease. We found a higher trend of recurrence in patients with bilateral disease, regardless of multifocality: in patients with contralateral disease after precompletion diagnosed unifocal disease 7.3% (11 of 150) had recurrent disease, and patients without contralateral disease after precompletion diagnosed multifocal disease 1.9% (2 per 103) had recurrence. Cox regression analysis showed that bilaterality (hazard ratio = 3.621, 95% confidence interval = 1.548 to 8.471) was the sole statistically significant risk factor for recurrence. Low recurrence rates are found in patients with either multifocal or bilateral disease with low-risk PTC. Bilaterality should be taken into account when considering these patients for de-escalated treatment strategy.

Factors Affecting Ablation Success After I-131 Radioactive Iodine Therapy in Low and Intermediate Risk Papillary Thyroid Cancer.

The study was to evaluate the effect of radioactive iodine (RAI) treatment application time and clinical, histopathological factors on ablation success in patients with operated papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) in low and intermediate-risk. One hundred sixty-one patients with PTC in the low and intermediate-risk were evaluated. Most patients (89.4%) were in the low-risk, and 10.6% were in the intermediate-risk. When the patients were divided into two groups according to the date of receiving RAI treatment after surgery, those who received early treatment (≤3 months) constituted the majority of the patients (72.7%). Seventeen patients received 1.85 Gigabecquerel (GBq), 119 3.7 GBq, 25 5.55 GBq RAI. Most patients (82%) achieved ablation success after the first RAI treatment. The time interval between surgery and RAI treatment did not affect ablation success. Stimulated Tg level measured on the RAI treatment day was an independent predictive factor for successful ablation (p<0.001). The cut-off value of Tg found to predict ablation failure was 5.86 ng/ml. It was concluded that 5.55 GBq RAI treatment could predict ablation success compared to 1.85 GBq dose (p=0.017). It was concluded that having a T1 tumor may predict treatment success compared to a T2 or T3 tumor (p=0.001, p<0.001, retrospectively). The time interval does not affect ablation success in low and intermediate-risk PTC. The ablation success rate may decrease in patients who receive low-dose RAI and have high Tg levels before treatment. The most crucial factor in achieving ablation success is giving enough doses of RAI to ablate the residual tissue.

The Relationship between Oxidative Status and Radioiodine Treatment Qualification among Papillary Thyroid Cancer Patients.

Total oxidative status (TOS), total antioxidant capacity (TAC), tumor protein 53 (p53), nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB), forkhead box protein O1 (FOXO), and sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) play crucial roles in oxidative homeostasis and the progression of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC), as previously demonstrated in the literature. Therefore, profiling these markers among PTC patients may be useful in determining their eligibility for radioiodine (RAI) treatment. Since treatment indications are based on multiple and dynamic recommendations, additional criteria for adjuvant RAI therapy are still needed. In our study, we evaluated the TOS, TAC, and serum concentrations of p53, NF-κB, FOXO, and SIRT1 to analyze the relationship between oxidative status and qualification for RAI treatment. For the purpose of this study, we enrolled 60 patients with PTC allocated for RAI treatment as the study group and 25 very low-risk PTC patients not allocated for RAI treatment as a reference group. The serum TOS and SIRT1 concentrations were significantly higher in the study group compared to the reference group (both p < 0.001), whereas the TAC and p53, NK-κB, and FOXO concentrations were significantly lower (all p < 0.05). We also demonstrated the diagnostic utility of TAC (AUC = 0.987), FOXO (AUC = 0.648), TOS (AUC = 0.664), SIRT1 (AUC = 0.709), p53 (AUC = 0.664), and NF-κB (AUC = 0.651) measurements as indications for RAI treatment based on American Thyroid Association recommendations. Our study revealed that oxidative status-related markers may become additional criteria for RAI treatment in PTC patients.

Barriers and Facilitators to the Choice of Active Surveillance for Low-risk Papillary Thyroid Cancer in China: A Qualitative Study Examining Patient Perspectives.

Internationally, several clinical practice guidelines recommend active surveillance as a non-surgical management strategy for select patients with low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma. However, patient's decision making when choosing active surveillance as a management approach is not well understood. Thus, our aim was to examine the barriers and facilitators to selecting active surveillance amongst patients with low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma in China. Thirty-nine participants diagnosed with low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma were purposively recruited between July - Nov 2021 for semi-structured interviews; 24 of whom rejected and 15 patients chose 'active surveillance' as a management approach in our sample. Inductive content analysis illustrated emerging themes. Audit trails, member checks and thematic discussions were used to assert rigor. Barriers and facilitators were classified as patient-related, disease-related, and external factors. Patient-related factors included patient's knowledge, attitudes and emotions. Disease-related factors included the response to having cancer, the constant state of being diseased and perceived value of the thyroid gland. External factors included the residual effects of surgery, the active surveillance protocol and physicians' recommendations. Patient's the acceptability of the active surveillance as a management approach are complex with many influencing factors. The public acceptance of active surveillance as a disease management approach needs to be improved, through the presentation of active surveillance as an evidence-based and optimized dynamic management strategy. Clinicians must address their patients' psychological struggles when patients choosing active surveillance and patients require more attention and supportive intervention.

Lobectomy and completion thyroidectomy rates increase after the 2015 American Thyroid Association Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Guidelines update.

The 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) Guidelines permit thyroid lobectomy (TL) or total thyroidectomy in the management of low-risk papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). As definitive risk-stratification is only possible post-operatively, some patients may require completion thyroidectomy (CT) after final histopathological analysis. A retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing surgery for low-risk PTC in a tertiary referral centre was undertaken. Consecutive adult patients treated from January 2013 to March 2021 were divided into two groups (pre- and post-publication of ATA Guidelines on 01/01/2016). Only those eligible for lobectomy under rule 35(B) of the ATA Guidelines were included: Bethesda V/VI cytology, 1-4 cm post-operative size and without pre-operative evidence of extrathyroidal extension or nodal metastases. We examined rates of TL, CT, local recurrence and surgical complications. There were 1488 primary surgical procedures performed for PTC on consecutive adult patients during the study period, of which 461 were eligible for TL. Mean tumour size (P = 0.20) and mean age (P = 0.78) were similar between time periods. The TL rate increased significantly from 4.5 to 18% in the post-publication period (P < 0.001). The proportion of TL patients requiring CT (43 vs 38%) was similar between groups (P = 1.0). There was no significant change in complications (P = 0.55) or local recurrence rates (P = 0.24). The introduction of the 2015 ATA Guidelines resulted in a modest but significant increase in the rate of lobectomy for eligible PTC patients. In the post-publication period, 38% of patients who underwent TL ultimately required CT after complete pathological analysis.

Percutaneous ablation of low-risk papillary thyroid cancer.

Minimalistic management options such as active surveillance and thyroid lobectomy are increasingly being accepted as reasonable management options for properly selected patients with low-risk papillary thyroid cancer. Leveraging technologies developed for the treatment of benign thyroid nodules, ultrasound-guided percutaneous thermal ablation is now being evaluated as a potential additional minimalistic management option for small, intrathyroidal, low-risk papillary thyroid cancer. Published retrospective data on more than 5000 low-risk papillary thyroid cancer patients treated with thermal ablation indicate that with appropriate training and proper patient selection, these technologies can be safely and effectively applied to papillary microcarcinomas. When compared to immediate surgery, thermal ablation appears to have lower complication rates with similar short-term rates of recurrence. Proper patient selection is facilitated by the use of a clinical framework which integrates imaging characteristics, patient characteristics, and medical team characteristics to classify a patient as ideal, appropriate, or inappropriate for minimalistic management options (active surveillance, thyroid lobectomy, or thermal ablation). While retrospective in nature and lacking randomized prospective clinical trial data, currently available data do support the proposition that thermal ablation technologies reliably destroy papillary thyroid microcarcinoma lesions and are associated with clinically acceptable oncologic outcomes when done by experienced teams in properly selected patients.

Endoscopic hemithyroidectomy plus prophylactic central neck dissection via breast approach versus gasless transaxillary approach in treating low-risk papillary thyroid cancer: a retrospective series.

Hemithyroidectomy plus prophylactic central neck dissection (pCND) has been adopted as a de-escalating surgical strategy for low-risk papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). This study aimed to evaluate and compare the outcomes of these two different endoscopic approaches in the treatment of PTC with hemithyroidectomy plus pCND. This retrospective study reviewed medical records of 545 patients receiving breast approach (ETBA) (n = 263) or gasless transaxillary approach (ETGTA) (n = 282) in treating PTC. Demographics and outcomes were compared between the two groups. Preoperatively, the two groups were similar in demographics. Regarding surgical outcomes, no differences were found in terms of intraoperative bleeding, total amount of drainage, duration of drainage, postoperative pain, hospital stay, vocal cord palsy, hypoparathyroidism, hemorrhage, wound infection, chyle leakage, or subcutaneous ecchymosis. Conversely, ETBA recorded fewer skin paresthesia (1.5% vs. 5.0%, respectively) but longer operative times (138.1 ± 27.0 vs. 130.9 ± 30.8min,) and more swallowing disturbances (3.4% vs. 0.7%) compared to ETGTA (p < 0.05). No difference in scar cosmetic results, but ETBA had lower neck assessment score than ETGTA (2.6 ± 1.2 vs. 3.2 ± 2.0, p < 0.05). For low-risk PTC, endoscopic hemithyroidectomy plus pCND using either ETBA or ETGTA is both feasible and safe. Although the two approaches are comparable in terms of most surgical and oncological outcomes, ETBA is superior to ETGTA in terms of neck cosmetic results and skin paresthesia but is associated with more swallowing disturbances and requires a longer operative time.

Greetings From the Editor of Clinical Thyroidology

Greetings From the Editor of <i>Clinical Thyroidology</i>

Early Dynamic Risk Stratification Decreases Rate of Ablative and Adjuvant Radioiodine Use in ATA Low and Intermediate Risk Papillary Thyroid Cancer Patients.

In differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), radioiodine (RAI) therapy is most frequently employed for remnant ablation or as adjuvant therapy for the remaining disease. The application of RAI to patients classified as intermediate risk (InR) is still a matter of debate. The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of early postoperative risk assessment on RAI use on papillary thyroid cancer patients who are classified as low risk (LoR) or InR. This is a single-center, prospective registry study. One-hundred-eighty-six patients operated between January 2012 and August 2021 and categorized as LoR or InR were included in this study. All patients had total thyroidectomy and central lymph node dissection by the same endocrine surgeon. An early dynamic risk assessment (EDRA) consisting of neck ultrasonography, serum thyroglobulin (Tg) and anti-Tg levels was performed 6 weeks after surgery. Most of the patients were either followed up without RAI or received ablative low activity (30-50 mCi) RAI based on predetermined criteria. Median follow-up was 63 months. Sixty-six (61%) patients in the LoR group and 43 (56%) patients in the InR group did not receive RAI treatment. Thirty-eight (35%) and 22 (29%) patients in LoR and InR groups received ablative (30-50 mCi) RAI therapy, respectively. In LoR group 5 (4.6%) patients and in InR group 12 (16%) patients received 100 mCi or more RAI activity. Only one patient in the InR group recurred during follow-up. No statistically significant difference regarding local recurrence was found between patients who didn't receive RAI or were treated with RAI within both LoR (p=0.152) and InR (p=0.272) groups. There is consensus for LoR patients about omitting RAI therapy after surgery. Indications for RAI treatment in InR DTC are still under debate. RAI use based on EDRA seems to be a better option than decisions solely made on histopathological risk factors and decreases adjuvant high-activity RAI use without increasing recurrence risk.

Low-Risk Papillary Thyroid Cancer Presents a Treatment Dilemma in the Dutch Healthcare System.

Low-Risk Papillary Thyroid Cancer Presents a Treatment Dilemma in the Dutch Healthcare System.

Is multifocality a risk factor in low-risk papillary thyroid cancer?

Multifocality in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) is a common event, ranging from 18% to 87%. Additional multiple foci are frequently very small and generally detected in pathology specimens. The mechanisms of intrathyroidal spread, and its correlation with age, gender, tumour size, and lymph node metastases remain unclear. Moreover, studies assessing the prognostic impact of PTC multifocality have yielded non-univocal results. We aimed to evaluate the following: a) the histopathological and clinical characteristics associated with multifocal PTC; and b) the impact of multifocality on the long-term outcome. We analysed a consecutive series of 2814 PTC patients without evidence of microscopic extrathyroidal extension (T1a, T1b, and T2), all of whom had undergone total thyroidectomy and were followed-up (median 4.7 years) in our thyroid clinic. Females comprised 81.3% and males 18.7% (F/M = 4.4/1), with a median age at diagnosis of 45.0 years. Patients were subdivided into 2 groups: 72.7% unifocal tumour and 27.3% multifocal tumour. Post-surgical radioiodine ablation (RAI) (30-100 mCi of 131-I) was performed in 1425 (50.6%) patients. All patients were periodically followed with thyroglobulin and anti-thyroglobulin antibodies measurements and with neck ultrasonography under L-thyroxine therapy and subjected to additional radioiodine administration or another therapeutic measure if not cured. Patients in the multifocal group were older (median age 46.4 vs. 44.5 years, respectively, p < 0.05) and presented a lower F/M ratio (F/M = 3.7/1 and 4.7/1; p = 0.01). T1a and T1b tumours showed no significant difference in multifocality rate whereas T2 tumours were less frequently multifocal (14.2% vs. 10.9%, p < 0.05). Multifocal tumours were more frequent in N1b (11.3% vs. 7.8%, p < 0.01) and less frequent in Nx (50.5% vs. 56.8%, p < 0.01), with no difference between the N0 and N1a groups. The clinical outcome was similar in the 2 group of patients (88.2 % in the unifocal group vs. 90.2% in the multifocal group). Multifocality is more frequent in older and male patients, in smaller tumours, and in N1b. However, multifocality "per se" was not associated, in our study, with worse clinical outcome in PTC patients.

Understanding Hospital-Level Patterns of Nonoperative Management for Low-risk Thyroid and Kidney Cancer

There is a growing trend toward conservative management for certain low-risk cancers. Hospital and health-system factors may play a role in determining how these patients are managed. To explore the contribution of hospitals on patients' odds of nonoperative management for low-risk cancer. In this cross-sectional study, individuals with low-risk papillary thyroid cancer and solitary kidney masses were identified, and those receiving nonoperative management vs surgery were compared. Patients with low-risk thyroid cancer and kidney cancer from 2015 to 2017 eligible for nonoperative management according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines within the National Cancer Database were included. Data were analyzed from October 2021 to March 2022. For each facility, the proportion of these patients who received operative and nonoperative management was calculated. A mixed-effects logistic regression model with a hospital-level random effects term was used to calculate factors associated with nonoperative management. Between-hospital variability was assessed using ranked caterpillar plots. There were 19 570 individuals with low-risk thyroid cancer (15 344 women [78.4%]; mean [SD] age, 51.74 [95% CI, 51.39-52.08] years) and 41 403 with kidney cancer (25 253 men [61.0%]; mean [SD] age, 61.93 [95% CI, 61.70-62.17] years). In the group with low-risk thyroid cancer, 2.1% (419 patients) received nonoperative management, and in the group with kidney cancer, 9.5% (3928 patients) received nonoperative management. This varied between hospitals from 1.1% (95% CI, 1.0%-1.1%) in the bottom decile to 10.3% (95% CI, 8.0%-12.4%) in the top decile for low-risk thyroid cancer, and from 4.3% (95% CI, 4.1%-4.4%) in the bottom decile to 24.6% (95% CI, 22.7%-26.5%) in the top decile for small kidney masses. For both cancers, age was associated with increased odds of nonoperative treatment. The hospital-level odds of nonoperative management of thyroid and kidney cancer using unadjusted probabilities (observed proportions) were minimally correlated (Spearman ρ = .33; P < .001). The findings of this study suggest that although health systems factors may be associated with the tendency to pursue nonoperative management, hospital-level factors may differ when comparing unrelated cancers.