Surgical management of low-risk papillary thyroid cancer in real life in Spain: a nationwide survey of endocrine neck surgeons and endocrinologists.

Abstract

The extent of surgery in patients with papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) is a subject of ongoing debate. We aimed to explore the attitude of Spanish specialists (endocrinologists, surgeons, and otolaryngologists) in real life on the surgical management of low-risk PTC. We designed an anonymous, web-based survey to inquire information regarding the preferences of interviewees for hemithyroidectomy (Hem), total thyroidectomy (TT) and prophylactic central neck dissection (pCND) in one standard patient with PTC and six clinical variants. We differentiated between small (1.1-2.5 cm) and large (2.6-4.0 cm) tumors. A total of 278 valid responses were received and divided into two groups: group END (n = 135) and group SUR (n = 143, 101 general surgeons and 42 otolaryngologists). The preference for Hem was low in the standard patient and similar between both groups (40.6 vs 49.0%, NS). This preference decreased for tumors measuring 2.6-4.0 cm, multifocal, with risk location, family history of thyroid cancer, or history of irradiation, and increased in patients older than 65 years or with comorbidity. Preference for pCND ranged from 12.6-71.1% in the group END and from 22.4-65.0% in the group SUR, with few differences between the two. In multivariate analysis, being a high-volume specialist was associated with a lower preference for Hem, while having private practice was associated with a more favorable opinion of Hem. The real clinical practice of Spanish specialists is far from what is recommended by the clinical guidelines in patients with low-risk PTC, especially among high-volume professionals.