Low Leg Research Articles

309 patients treated with fluoroscopy-guided caudal epidural injection for lumbar disc herniation.

ObjectiveTo present our experience, discuss the complications, and assess early vs long-term outcomes of fluoroscopy-guided caudal epidural injection for lumbar disc herniation (LDH).MethodsThis was a prospective study of 309 patients who underwent fluoroscopy-guided caudal epidural injection from 2014 to 2020. The inclusion criteria were LDH diagnosis by magnetic resonance imaging, surgical treatment not required, age >18 years, and history of low back or leg pain despite >6 weeks of treatment comprising a combination of analgesics, anti-inflammatories, and physical therapy. The epidural injection solution comprised 8 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride (HCL), 2 mL dexamethasone, and 10 mL saline. Each patient completed a questionnaire comprising a visual analog scale (VAS) and the Back Pain Functional Scale (BPFS) at baseline, and 1 month and 1 year after injection.ResultsThe VAS and BPFS scores indicated significantly less pain at 1 month and 1 year compared with the pre-procedure baseline values. Complications developed in 11 patients (reversible paresis in 7 patients, arrhythmia in 1 patient, headache in 1 patient, seizure in 1 patient, spondylodiscitis in 1 patient).ConclusionsFluoroscopy-guided caudal epidural injection for LDH is safe, and the procedure reduced pain and improved functional capacity compared with baseline.

The clinical efficacy of biportal endoscopy is comparable to that of uniportal endoscopy via the interlaminar approach for the treatment of L5/S1 lumbar disc herniation.

ObjectiveTo compare the clinical outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopy/biportal endoscopic spinal surgery (UBE/BESS) via the posterior approach with those of interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy (IELD) for the treatment of L5/S1 lumbar disc herniation.MethodsWe collected the clinical data of patients with L5/S1 lumbar disc herniation who had undergone endoscopic surgery at our center from January 2020 to July 2021, and 92 patients were included. They were divided into UBE/BESS (n = 42) and IELD (n = 50) groups. The incision length, operative time (overall operative, extracanal operative, and intracanal decompression times), intraoperative radiation exposure dose, changes in hemoglobin before and after surgery, postoperative hospital stay, visual analog scale (VAS) score for low back pain and leg, and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were statistically analyzed.ResultsOne case incurred dural tear in the UBE/BESS group, and one case developed recurrence in the IELD group. Postoperatively, the VAS score and ODI index decreased significantly in both groups (P < 0.01). VAS and ODI scores (preoperative as well as 3 days, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery), the overall operative time, and postoperative hospital stay were not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05). No statistical difference in intraoperative radiation exposure dose was noted between the two groups (P > 0.05). The surgical incision length was greater in the UBE/BESS group (P < 0.01), and pre- and postoperative hemoglobin changes were more pronounced in the UBE/BESS group (P < 0.01). The UBE/BESS group had a longer extracanal operative time and shorter intracanal decompression time (P < 0.01).ConclusionsThe clinical efficacy of UBE/BESS for L5/S1 lumbar disc herniation is comparable to that of IELD. Intraoperative radiation exposure doses were similar in both techniques. UBE/BESS required more time to identify tissue structures and a larger working space when operating outside the spinal canal; however, the efficiency of nucleus pulposus removal and nerve root release inside the spinal canal superseded that in IELD. Furthermore, the surgical incision in the UBE/BESS technique was longer, with greater actual blood loss during surgery, thus rendering UBE/BESS inferior to the IELD technique in terms of surgical trauma. Nonetheless, no significant difference was noted between the two techniques in the postoperative recovery time of patients.

Long-Term Outcomes after Selective Microendoscopic Laminotomy for Multilevel Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with and without Remaining Radiographic Stenosis: A 10-Year Follow-Up Study.

Long-term clinical outcomes of microendoscopic laminotomy (MEL) for patients with multilevel radiographic lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSS) have not been widely explored. The clinical significance and natural progression of additional untreated levels (e.g., remaining radiographic (RR)-LSS not addressed by selective MEL) remain unknown. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the long-term clinical outcomes of selective MEL in LSS patients and compare outcomes between patients with and without remaining RR-LSS to determine the efficacy of this procedure. Forty-nine patients at a single center underwent posterior spinal microendoscopic decompression surgery for neurogenic claudication or radicular leg pain in moderate-to-severe spinal stenosis. The patients were categorized into the RR-LSS-positive and RR-LSS-negative cohorts based on unaddressed levels of stenosis. Pre-operative and 10-year follow-up evaluations, including the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, visual analog scale (VAS) score for low back pain and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and satisfaction, were compared between the groups. Additionally, the need for reoperation was determined. MEL significantly improved JOA scores, lumbar VAS, and ODI over the 10-year postoperative period. Pre-operative characteristics and postoperative outcomes were not significantly different between the cohorts. Overall, 18.4% (9/49) of patients required reoperation during the follow-up period. The reoperation rate in the RR-LSS-positive (13.8%; 4/29) group was similar to that in the RR-LL-negative (15.0%; 3/20) group. MEL is effective for lumbar stenosis, with improved clinical outcomes up to 10 years following surgery. Selective MEL, addressing only symptomatic levels in multilevel stenosis, with residual remaining lumbar stenosis, is similarly effective without increased reoperation rates. Surgeons may consider more limited selective decompression in patients with multilevel stenosis, avoiding the risk and invasiveness of extensive procedures. Level III.

Biportal endoscopic versus microscopic discectomy for lumbar herniated disc: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND CONTEXTBiportal endoscopic discectomy has been frequently performed in recent years and has shown acceptable clinical outcomes. However, evidence regarding its efficacy and safety remains limited. PURPOSEThis study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of biportal endoscopic with that of open microscopic discectomy in patients with single-level herniated lumbar discs. STUDY DESIGNProspective, randomized, multicenter, open-label, assessor-blind, non-inferiority controlled trial. PATIENT SAMPLESixty-four participants suffering from low back and leg pain with a single-level herniated lumbar disc and required discectomy. OUTCOME MEASURESOutcomes were assessed with the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), visual analog scale (VAS) pain score for surgical site, low back and lower extremity, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for lumbar disabilities, European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions value for quality of life, and painDETECT for neuropathic pain. Surgery-related outcomes such as hospital stay, operation time, and opioid usage were collected. Adverse events occurring during the follow-up period were also noted. METHODSAll participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo biportal endoscopic (biportal group) or microscopic discectomy (microscopy group). The primary outcome was the difference in ODI scores at 12-months post surgically based on a modified intention-to-treat strategy, with a non-inferiority margin of 12.8 points. The secondary outcomes included PROMs, surgery-related outcomes, and adverse events. RESULTSThe ODI score at the 12-month follow-up was 11.97 in the microscopy group and 13.89 in the biportal group (mean difference, 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.50 to 7.34), showing the non-inferiority of biportal group. The results for the secondary outcomes were similar to those for the primary outcome. Creatinine phosphokinase ratios were low in the biportal group. Early surgical site pain was slightly lower in the biportal group (mean difference of VAS pain score at 48-hr, -0.98; 95% CI, -1.77 to -0.19). Adverse events including reoperation showed no significant difference between the groups. CONCLUSIONBiportal endoscopic discectomy was non-inferior to microscopic discectomy over a 12 month period. Biportal endoscopic discectomy is suggested to be a relatively safe and effective surgical technique with the slight advantage of reduced muscle damage. However, the clinical implications of surgical site pain should be carefully considered.

The Use of Cannabidiol in Patients With Low Back Pain Caused by Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: An Observational Study.

Background Spinal stenosis is a degenerative narrowing of the spinal canal with encroachment on the neural structures by surrounding bone and soft tissue. This chronic low back condition can cause restrictions in mobility, impairment of daily activities, opioid dependence, anxiety, depression, and reduced quality of life. Spinal stenosis can be treated through surgical and nonsurgical methods, but neither has proven consistently reliable. Cannabidiol (CBD) has also been observed to have anxiolytic, anti-inflammatory, antiemetic, and antipsychotic behaviors. CBD may provide greater nonsurgical treatment options for the pain associated with spinal stenosis while minimizing the need for opioids. An observational study was undertaken to assess the effects of CBD on patients suffering from chronic spinal stenosis. Methodology This observational study was investigator-initiated and designed to determine the effect of hemp-derived CBD gel caps for patients with spinal stenosis related to low back pain and leg pain relative to patient outcomes, medication utilization, and quality of life outcome measures. A total of six physician visits would be required where a set of surveys would be filled out each four weeks apart. Results The study population consisted of 48 patients. The patient population's age ranged from 63 to 95 years and was normally distributed, with a mean age of 75 ± 7.13 years. The sex distribution was 33% male and 67% female patients. The pain was broken down between the six visits for each of the following four questions: pain right now, usual pain level during the week, best pain level during the week, and worst pain level during the week. Usual pain levels (p < 0.001) and worst pain levels (p < 0.005) demonstrated statistically significant improvement over time, while pain right now (p > 0.05) and best pain level (p > 0.05) stayed consistent throughout without statistical significance. Conclusions This open-label, prospective, observational study found that treatment with hemp-derived CBD gel caps was associated with significant improvements in pain scores and several quality-of-life measures for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Evaluation of neurotrophic factor secreting mesenchymal stem cells in progressive multiple sclerosis

Background: Autologous mesenchymal stem cell neurotrophic factor–secreting cells (NurOwn®) have the potential to modify underlying disease mechanisms in progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS). Objective: This open-label phase II study was conducted to evaluate safety/efficacy of three intrathecal cell treatments. Methods: Eighteen participants with non-relapsing PMS were treated. The primary endpoint was safety. Secondary endpoints included: cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers; timed 25-foot walk speed, nine-hole peg test (9-HPT), low-contrast letter acuity, symbol digit modalities test, and 12-item multiple sclerosis (MS) walking scale. Seventeen participants received all treatments. Results: No deaths/adverse events related to worsening of MS, clinical/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evidence of disease activation, and clinically significant changes in safety lab results were reported. Two participants developed symptoms of low back and leg pain, consistent with a diagnosis of arachnoiditis, occurring in one of three intrathecal treatments in both participants. Nineteen percent of treated participants achieved pre-specified ⩾ 25% improvements in timed 25-foot walk speed/nine-HPT at 28 weeks compared to baseline, along with consistent efficacy signals for pre-specified response criteria across other secondary efficacy outcomes. CSF neuroprotective factors increased, and inflammatory biomarkers decreased after treatment, consistent with the proposed mechanism of action. Conclusion: Based on these encouraging preliminary findings, further confirmation in a randomized study is warranted.

Analysis of Chronic Low Back Pain Caused by Lumbar Microinstability After Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy: A Retrospective Study.

ObjectiveChronic low back pain (CLBP) after percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PTED) surgery may be caused by preoperative lumbar microinstability (MI). However, there is a paucity of research on the relationship between lumbar microinstability and chronic low back pain. The purpose of this article is to assess the preoperative radiographic characteristics of patients and evaluate the effects of lumbar microinstability on patient-reported outcomes among single-level lumbar disc herniation (LDH) patients who underwent PTED.MethodsThis study retrospectively reviewed the radiographic characteristics of a consecutive series of 127 patients with low back pain and leg pain caused by single-level LDH underwent PTED from August 2018 to March 2021. They were divided into three groups according to the radiographic parameters: the stable group (Group S), the dysfunctional group (Group D), and the microinstability group (Group M). The visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for leg and low back pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for CLBP.ResultsCompared with Group D and Group S, Group M had the highest ODI scores (P < 0.01) and VAS scores (low back pain) (P < 0.01) after 1 year, while there were no significant differences in the VAS scores for leg pain at different time points after surgery (P > 0.05). In addition, the logistic regression analysis results regarding CLBP revealed that muscle fatty degeneration on MRI (95% CI, 1.20–8.51, P = 0.02), and facet tropism (95% CI, 1.39 −11.37, P = 0.01) may be independent risk factors.ConclusionPatients with lumbar microinstability may have CLBP after PTED, so patients with lumbar microinstability may need to take internal fixation surgery to solve their symptoms.

Spinal degeneration is associated with lumbar multifidus morphology in secondary care patients with low back or leg pain

Associations between multifidus muscle morphology and degenerative pathologies have been implied in patients with non-specific low back pain, but it is unknown how these are influenced by pathology severity, number, or distribution. MRI measures of pure multifidus muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) were acquired from 522 patients presenting with low back and/or leg symptoms in an outpatient clinic. We explored cross-sectional associations between the presence, distribution, and/or severity of lumbar degenerative pathologies (individually and in aggregate) and muscle outcomes in multivariable analyses (beta coefficients [95% CI]). We identified associations between lower pure multifidus muscle CSA and disc degeneration (at two or more levels): − 4.51 [− 6.72; − 2.3], Modic 2 changes: − 4.06 [− 6.09; − 2.04], endplate defects: − 2.74 [− 4.58; − 0.91], facet arthrosis: − 4.02 [− 6.26; − 1.78], disc herniations: − 3.66 [− 5.8; − 1.52], and when > 5 pathologies were present: − 6.77 [− 9.76; − 3.77], with the last supporting a potential dose–response relationship between number of spinal pathologies and multifidus morphology. Our findings could hypothetically indicate that these spinal and muscle findings: (1) are part of the same degenerative process, (2) result from prior injury or other common antecedent events, or (3) have a directional relationship. Future longitudinal studies are needed to further examine the complex nature of these relationships.

Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease by Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients Under and Over 80 Years of Age

The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and radiological results of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) for lumbar degenerative disease in patients under the age of 80years with those over the age of 80years. One hundred two patients who underwent LLIF without direct decompression were enrolled, including 92 patients who were less than 80years (group A) and 10 over 80years (group B). All patients were evaluated using numerical evaluation scale scores for low back pain, leg pain, and leg numbness, as well as demographic data, surgical data, and imaging data before and after LLIF surgery. Patients over the age of 80 years were found to have longer hospital stays (P= 0.006) and more postoperative muscle weakness (P= 0.011) and endplate injuries (P= 0.038). In addition, each numerical evaluation scale score improved significantly from preoperative to postoperative (P < 0.001). However, the changes in scores between preoperative and postoperative for each numerical evaluation scale were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Statistically significant increases in lumbar lordosis preoperatively compared with postoperatively were observed in patients under 80years but did not change in those over 80years. These data suggest a need for awareness of intraoperative endplate injury and postoperative motor weakness. Critically, indirect decompression with LLIF in lumbar degenerative disease in patients over age 80 as well as those under age 80 has shown satisfactory clinical and radiological results. This study shows that age alone should not prevent older people from undergoing LLIF.

Surgical Treatment of Far Lateral Lumbar Disc Herniation: Outcomes of the Safe and Simple Midline Approach.

ObjectiveSurgery for far lateral lumbar disc herniation (FLLDH) hernias is different than surgery for median and paramedian disc hernias. Our study offers a minimally invasive surgical technic for far lateral disc herniations.MethodsThe results of the midline surgical approach in 18 patients diagnosed with FLLDH were evaluated retrospectively.ResultsA total of 18 patients (7 females, 11 males), with a mean age of 57.9±9.4 years (range: 35-71 years), were included in the analyses. Three patients (16.7%) had lesions at the left L3-L4 level, six patients (33.3%) on the left L4-L5 level, five patients (27.8%) on the right L3-L4 level, and four patients (22.2%) on the right L4-L5 level. All patients had low back and leg pain. These complaints completely regressed after surgery.ConclusionThis study presents a review of a consecutive series of patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery for FLLDH using a midline approach.

Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Effects of Differential Target MultiplexedTM SCS in Treating Intractable Chronic Low Back and Leg Pain

DTMTM programming differentially modulate neurons and glia to balance interactions perturbed by neuropathic pain in preclinical studies. DTM spinal cord stimulation (SCS) provide significant back pain relief in patients in a feasibility trial. Here, we report a large randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing the effectiveness of DTM SCS to traditional SCS.

The Difference of Disease Injury and Postoperative Recovery in the Occupational Characteristics of Thoracolumbar Fracture Patients: A Retrospective Study.

ObjectivesUnderstanding the occupational characteristics of patients is not only related to patients' life and health, but also conducive to improving their happiness. However, there were no studies that had been conducted on the relationship between occupation characteristic and postoperative recovery in patients with spinal fractures. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between the occupation characteristics of patients with thoracolumbar fracture and the characteristics of disease injury, treatment, and recovery so as to reduce the incidence and improve postoperative rehabilitation.MethodsPatients (n = 719) with thoracolumbar fractures were recruited. Patients were grouped according to the characteristic of occupations: unemployed group (n = 299), white‐collar worker group (n = 20), and blue‐collar worker group (n = 400). Data were collected, including the characteristics, injury and treatment information, and the recovery records for 1 year after operation. One‐way ANOVA analysis, χ 2 test, and binary logistic regression analysis was used to explore the relationship among these factors.ResultsMale, high‐falling injuries and single segment injury (mainly T 11, T 12 and L2) were common in patients with thoracolumbar fractures, especially in the blue‐collar worker group (70.8%, 78.3%, and 85.4%). Compared with the unemployed group, the patients in the white‐collar worker group and blue‐collar worker group had a higher proportion of young patients, a higher height and weight, a lesser rate of hypertension or diabetes. One week after injury, 73.4% of patients underwent surgery, with the blue‐collar worker group accounted for the largest proportion. One month after surgery, 77.1% of patients were able to get out of bed, with the white‐collar worker group accounted for the largest proportion. In the postoperative recovery information, patients in the blue‐collar worker group were more likely to have severe low back pain (OR = 2.023, 95% CI: 1.440‐2.284) and pain‐disturbed sleep (OR = 2.287, 95% CI: 1.585‐3.299) than those who in the unemployed group.ConclusionsBlue‐collar workers, with a high risk of thoracolumbar fracture, have a higher incidence of low back leg pain and pain‐disturbed sleep in the recovery after thoracolumbar fracture surgery, and this requires more attention.

Does Simultaneous Fusion of Preexisting Spinal Canal Stenosis Adjacent to Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Achieve a Better Clinical Outcome? A Retrospective Study with More than 5-year Follow-Up.

In this study, we investigate the effect of simultaneous fusion of preexisting adjacent spinal canal stenosis on the outcome of patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis. Patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis who underwent transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) from August 2013 to March 2016 were included. The inclusion criteria were the following: single-level spondylolisthesis (L4 or L5) and mild to moderate spinal stenosis at cranial adjacent segment of the spondylolisthesis segment before operation. According to whether the adjacent stenotic segment was included in the scope of surgery, the patients were divided into two groups: group A, only the spondylolisthesis was treated with single-level TLIF, and the adjacent stenosis was not treated with any surgery; In group B, TLIF were performed in the spondylolisthesis segment and the adjacent stenotic level; no spinal stenosis was found in other levels. The patients were followed up for more than 5 years. The general information before operation, visual analog scale (VAS) scores of low back pain and leg pain, and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores before operation and at the last follow-up were recorded. A total of 23 patients were included in group A, and 24 patients were included in group B. There was no significant difference between the two groups in gender distribution, age, course of disease, level of slippage, length of stay, degree of spondylolisthesis, stenotic grade of adjacent segment, and intervertebral disk degeneration grade (p> 0.05). The blood loss during surgery in group B was significantly higher than that in group A (p< 0.05). The operation time of group B was longer than that of group A, but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.245). There was no significant difference in preoperative VAS and ODI scores between the two groups. At the last follow-up, the VAS scores of low back pain in the two groups were almost the same. However, the VAS scores of leg pain and ODI scores in group B were slightly higher than those in group A at the last follow-up, but the difference was not statistically significant (p> 0.05). If relatives and friends have the similar disease, all the patients of group A and 87.5% of patients in group B would recommend that type of surgery. The satisfaction of group A (100%) was higher than that of group B (79.17%), but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.068). For single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis with mild to moderate spinal stenosis in adjacent segment before operation, decompression and fusion on the level of spondylolisthesis only is a safe, less invasive, and economical surgical option, with good long-term clinical efficacy and high satisfaction rates.

Relationship Between Clinical Symptoms and Skin Autofluorescence in Hemodialysis Patients as a Measure of Advanced Glycation End-Product Accumulation.

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between skin autofluorescence (SAF), as a measure of advanced glycation end-product (AGE) accumulation and osteoporosis and clinical symptoms in hemodialysis patients.MethodologyThe study participants were 156 hemodialysis patients (97 males, 59 females, mean = 66.9 years, range = 25-92 years) who visited our hospital between October 2019 and March 2020. The average dialysis period was 10.4 years (range = 1-40 years). Age, years of dialysis, bone mineral density, bone metabolism markers (Ca, P, intact parathyroid hormone, total N-terminal propeptide of type 1 collagen, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b), clinical symptoms, and SAF were evaluated. Clinical symptoms were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) score for low back pain (LBP) and leg pain ranging from 10 mm (extreme amount of pain) to 0 mm (no pain); the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ; 0-100 points); and the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ; 0-24 points). We calculated Pearson correlation coefficients to assess the correlation of SAF with age, years of hemodialysis, bone density, bone metabolism markers, clinical symptoms, and biochemical markers.ResultsThe SAF of dialysis patients averaged 4.11, higher than previous reports for non-dialysis patients. Age (r = 0.435, p = 0.0001) was moderately positively correlated and hemodialysis period (r = 0.214, p = 0.00907) was weakly positively correlated with SAF. Among the clinical symptoms measured by the JOABPEQ, social life dysfunction (r = -0.257, p = 0.0108) had a weak negative correlation with SAF.ConclusionsThe level of AGEs implied by SAF was elevated in hemodialysis patients. SAF correlated with social life disorders, suggesting that SAF may be involved in disorders of activities of daily living in hemodialysis dialysis patients.

Unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy for high-grade migrated lumbar disc herniation

To investigate the effectiveness of the unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) technique in the treatment of high-grade migrated lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Between January 2020 and February 2021, 23 cases of high-grade migrated LDH were treated with discectomy via UBE. There were 14 males and 9 females, with a mean age of 48.7 years (range, 32-76 years). All patients had low back and leg pain. The disease duration ranged from 2 months to 7 years (median, 13 months). Lesion segments were L 3, 4 in 2 cases, L 4, 5 in 15 cases, and L 5, S 1 in 6 cases. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, the time when the patients started to move off the floor, and postoperative complications were recorded. The effectiveness was evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS) score, the modified Oswestry disability index (ODI), and the modified MacNab criteria. All operations were completed successfully, and no complication such as dural tear, epidural hematoma, nerve injury, or vascular injury occurred. The operation time ranged from 53 to 96 minutes, with an average of 71.0 minutes. The intraoperative blood loss ranged from 32 to 56 mL, with an average of 39.3 mL. All patients were removed the drainage tube and wore a lumbar brace to move off the floor around 1 to 2 days after operation. All patients were followed up 3-12 months after operation, with an average of 5.7 months. The VAS scores of low back pain and leg pain and the modified ODI at all postoperative time points were lower than those before operation, and the differences were significant ( P<0.05). The differences were significant ( P<0.05) when comparing the above indexes between the time points after operation. At last follow-up, the effectiveness was evaluated according to the modified MacNab criteria, and 17 cases were excellent, 4 cases were good, and 2 cases were fair, with an excellent and good rate of 91.3%. There was no recurrence of LDH during follow-up. Discectomy via UBE is an effective method for the treatment of high-grade migrated LDH because of its flexibility, clear view, and wide range of intraoperative exploration, which can effectively reduce the risk of residual nucleus pulposus after operation.

The Effect of Exercise Using A Float And Leg Length On The Results Of The 50 M Breaststroke Swimming Speed

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of using a buoy on the results of the 50-meter breaststroke swimming exercise, to determine the difference in the effect of high, medium and low leg length on the results of the 50-meter breaststroke swimming exercise for beginners KU IV Club Spectrum Semarang. This research method is experimental with a 3x3 design sample of 29 novice athletes for the pretest. The highest and lowest results were omitted, so a sample of 27 KU IV novice athletes was taken by purposive sampling. The instrument for the test is to provide exercise treatment using a pull buoy, fishing net and board. Associated with the length of the category of leg length are high, medium and low. The results showed (1) There was a significant difference in the effect of the results for students who used a pull buoy, fishing net, or board in the 50-meter breaststroke swimming exercise (2) There was a significant difference in results for students with high, medium, and long leg lengths. low in the 50-meter breaststroke. (3) There is no interaction between the legs' length and the buoy type in determining the results of the 50-meter breaststroke swimming exercise. Conclusion: The fishing net buoy results are more significant than using the board buoy and pull buoy; it can be seen that the average result is 56.67 seconds, compared to the pull buoy 72.33 seconds and the board buoy 72.33 seconds. Leg length in the high category has more significant results than in the medium and low leg length category; there is no interaction between leg length and the type of buoy in the 50-meter breaststroke swimming speed results..

ID:16593 Burst-SCS Placed at the T12 DRG to Treat Chronic Low Back and Leg Pain

Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-S) has been utilized in treating axial low back pain (LBP) with T12 lead placement. Unfortunately, patients are not candidates for the Proclaim DRG-S system if they cannot use the handheld patient controller or require routine truncal MRI exams. The aim of this report is to describe the use of a Burst spinal cord stimulation (Burst-SCS) system with leads placed at the DRG in two patients with contraindications for the DRG-S system.

ID:16437 Upper Extremity Improvement With High Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for Low Back and Leg Pain

High frequency spinal cord stimulation (HFSCS) does not utilize paresthesia induction to modulate pain signals for clinical efficacy.1 HFSCS frequencies typically range from 1-10 kHz, unlike traditional SCS, which range from 20-120 Hz. HFSCS at 10-kHz has been shown to provide superior pain reduction for low back and lower extremity (LE) pain compared to traditional SCS.2 Herein, the authors present an interesting case of a 63-year-old female who underwent HFSCS for her low back and LE pain. During the trial and even post-implant, the patient reported significant improvement in her upper extremity pain symptoms as well.

Full-Endoscopic versus Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

ObjectiveAlthough full-endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-LIF) has been tried as the latest alternative technique to minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interobody fusion (MIS-TLIF) since mid-2010, the evidence is still lacking. We compared the clinical outcome and safety of Endo-LIF to MIS-TLIF for lumbar degenerative disease. MethodsWe systematically searched electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library to find literature comparing Endo-LIF to MIS-TLIF. The results retrieved were last updated on December 11, 2020. The perioperative outcome included the operation time, blood loss, complication, and hospital stay. The clinical outcomes included Visual analog scale (VAS) of low back pain and leg pain and Oswestry disability index (ODI), and the radiological outcome included pseudoarthosis rate with 12-month minimum follow-up. ResultsFour retrospective observational studies and one prospective observational study comprising 423 patients (183 Endo-LIF and 241 MIS-TLIF) were included, and the pooled data analysis revealed low heterogeneity between studies in our review. Baseline characteristics including age and sex were not different between the two groups. Operation time was significantly longer in Endo-LIF (mean difference [MD], 23.220 minutes; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10.669–35.771; p=0.001). However, Endo-LIF resulted in less perioperative blood loss (MD, -144.710 mL; 95% CI, 247.941–41.478; p=0.023). Although VAS back pain at final (MD, -0.120; p=0.586), leg pain within 2 weeks (MD, 0.005; p=0.293), VAS leg pain at final (MD, 0.099; p=0.099), ODI at final (MD, 0.141; p=0.093) were not different, VAS back pain within 2 weeks was more favorable in the Endo-LIF (MD, -1.538; 95% CI, -2.044 to -1.032; p<0.001). On the other hand, no statistically significant group difference in complication rate (relative risk [RR], 0.709; p=0.774), hospital stay (MD, -2.399; p=0.151), and pseudoarthrosis rate (RR, 1.284; p=0.736) were found. ConclusionRelative to MIS-TLIF, immediate outcomes were favorable in Endo-LIF in terms of blood loss and immediate VAS back pain, although complication rate, mid-term clinical outcomes, and fusion rate were not different. However, the challenges for Endo-LIF include longer operation time which means a difficult learning curve and limited surgical indication which means patient selection bias. Larger-scale, well-designed study with long-term follow-up and randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm and update the results of this systematic review.

Virtual McKenzie extension exercises for low back and leg pain: a prospective pilot exploratory case series

ABSTRACT Introduction Current evidence supports the inclusion of directional preference exercises for a subgroup of patients with low back (LBP) and leg pain. Recent pain neuroscience strategies have suggested that cortical restructuring associated with movement activating the body map representation in the brain might account for the observed improvement with the directional preference approach. Objectives To explore whether or not a motor imagery directional preference approach would result in any changes in patients with LBP and leg pain. Methods A consecutive convenience sample of patients with LBP and leg pain were recruited at two outpatient physical therapy clinics. Measurements of LBP, leg pain, fear-avoidance beliefs (FABQ), pain catastrophizing (PCS), active lumbar flexion, and straight leg raise (SLR) were compared before and immediately after a virtual (motor imagery) directional preference exercise. Results Statistically significant differences for LBP, FABQ, PCS, active lumbar flexion, and SLR were observed, but only SLR changes met or exceeded the minimally clinically important difference (MCID). Conclusions A brief virtual motor imagery extension treatment yielded some immediate positive shifts in patients presenting to physical therapy with LBP and leg pain. Our results indicate that randomized comparison trials are needed to determine the effect of this intervention on the short- and longer-term outcomes in patients with LBP and leg pain.