Higher Baseline Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Research Articles

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal achievement in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia in countries outside Western Europe: The International ChoLesterol management Practice Study

The cross-sectional observational International ChoLesterol management Practice Study study assessed achievement of European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets in patients outside Western Europe. The aim of the study was to assess LDL-C goal achievement in International ChoLesterol management Practice Study participants with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). A total of 334 patients (aged ≥18years) with definite or probable FH (Dutch Lipid Clinic Network score ≥6; 43.1% genetically confirmed) who had been receiving stable lipid-modifying therapy (LMT) for ≥3months were enrolled. The mean±standard deviation age of the patients was 58.5±13.1years, 49.1% were male, and 48.2% had coronary artery disease. Most were receiving statin (∼99%). Of these, 57.6% were on high-intensity statin therapy, 49.1% on the highest dose available, and 13.0% used a statin together with a cholesterol absorption inhibitor (CAI). Mean±standard deviation LDL-C level was 5.6±3.0mmol/L before LMT and 3.3±2.0mmol/L at enrollment. Overall, 32.0% of patients achieved their LDL-C target. Target achievement rates were 36.6% for patients with coronary artery disease, and 27.5% for those without, and 27.9%, 28.0%, and 37.5% for patients treated with a statin plus CAI, highest-dose statin (no CAI), and lower-dose statin (no CAI), respectively. LDL-C target achievement rates were low in patients with FH, even in those receiving intensive LMT. Factors that are likely to have contributed to the low LDL-C target achievement rates include high baseline LDL-C, inadequate statin dosages, and low use of CAI. Many patients would have been eligible for proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor therapy.

Cardiovascular outcomes during extended follow-up of the AIM-HIGH trial cohort

Epidemiologic studies have shown that low levels of high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) and elevated triglycerides are independent predictors of cardiovascular (CV) events, though randomized trials of HDL-C-raising therapies to reduce clinical events have been largely disappointing. The Atherothrombosis Intervention in Metabolic Syndrome with Low HDL/High Triglycerides and Impact on Global Health Outcomes (AIM-HIGH) trial failed to show that extended release niacin (ERN) reduced CV events in patients with atherogenic dyslipidemia who were on statin-based therapy. We sought to determine whether extended follow-up of AIM-HIGH participants changed these null results. AIM-HIGH was a placebo-controlled trial of 3414 patients with established CV disease, low baseline HDL-C, and elevated triglycerides levels randomized to ERN 1500-2000mg/d vs placebo. Participants also received simvastatin with or without ezetimibe to attain on-treatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels of 40-80mg/dL. The trial was halted after a mean 3-year follow-up because of futility. Among 3236 participants alive at the end of blinded study, 2613 (81%; ERN=1,312, placebo=1301) were followed a mean 1.1 additional years. Ninety-five percent of subjects remained on statin, but only 4% on ERN. At a mean total follow-up of 4.1years, there were 343 primary CV endpoints in the ERN arm and 305 CV endpoints in placebo participants (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.96, 1.30). Ischemic stroke was also not significantly different after extended follow-up in the two groups (2.2% vs 1.5%, P=.13). In patients with CV disease and atherogenic dyslipidemia on statin-based therapy, 3years of ERN treatment did not lower CV event rates. An additional year of follow-up off assigned treatment did not alter these findings.

Lipids, inflammation, and chronic kidney disease: a SHARP perspective

Accumulating evidence indicates that inflammation plays a role in the initiation and progression of chronic kidney disease. In the Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP) trial, higher baseline C-reactive protein and higher baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were both associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular events, but higher baseline C-reactive protein levels were also associated with a higher risk of nonvascular events. Simvastatin/ezetimibe reduced cardiovascular events independent of baseline C-reactive protein levels. However, this observation does not exclude inflammation as a causal factor for cardiovascular disease development in chronic kidney disease patients.

Factors That Influence Pancreatic Beta Cell Function and Insulin Resistance in Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Patients: A Sub-Analysis of the MARCH Trial.

IntroductionThe Metformin and Acarbose in Chinese as the initial Hypoglycemic treatment (MARCH) trial has demonstrated a similar efficacy in HbA1c reduction between acarbose and metformin treatments in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. The current sub-analysis of the MARCH trail aims to evaluate the baseline characteristics that may influence the improvement of pancreatic β-cell function and insulin resistance after acarbose therapy in Chinese patients with newly diagnosed T2DM.MethodsOf the 784 patients who entered the MARCH trail, 391 were assigned to the acarbose therapy group; 304 of these completed 48 weeks of follow-up of acarbose therapy. At 48 weeks, on the basis of the tertiles of change in homeostasis model assessment–beta cell function (∆HOMA-β) and homeostasis model assessment–insulin resistance (∆HOMA-IR), the subjects were divided into lowly, mediumly, and highly improved groups.ResultsIn the highly improved HOMA-β group, patients had higher systolic blood pressure (SBP), 2-h postprandial blood glucose (PBG), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c), fasting serum insulin (FINS) concentration, and HOMA-IR in comparison to the lowly improved group (p < 0.05). A positive correlation was observed between HbA1c, SBP, and highly improved ∆HOMA-β (p < 0.05), while an inverse correlation was evident between HDL-c and highly improved ∆HOMA-β (p < 0.05). The highly improved HOMA-IR group had a significantly higher body mass index (BMI), fasting blood glucose (FBG), FINS concentration, and HOMA-β in comparison to the lowly improved group (p < 0.05). A positive correlation was observed between FBG, waist circumference, and highly improved HOMA-IR (p < 0.05).ConclusionNewly diagnosed T2DM Chinese patients with lower baseline HDL-c and higher HbA1c and SBP values are more likely to achieve improvement in beta cell function whereas baseline fasting blood glucose and waist circumference were the significant factors associated with improvement in insulin resistance with acarbose therapy.Trial RegistrationThe clinical trial registry number was ChiCTR-TRC-08000231.

The Role of Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin-Kexin Type 9 Inhibitors in the Management of Dyslipidemia.

Treatment with statins substantially reduces cardiovascular morbidity and mortality both in patients with and without established cardiovascular disease. Accordingly, statins represent the cornerstone of lipid-lowering treatment. However, there are still unmet clinical needs in the management of dyslipidemia. Indeed, it is difficult to achieve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets in many patients, particularly in those at very high cardiovascular risk or in those with very high baseline LDL-C levels [e.g. with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH)]. Moreover, a sizable proportion of patients are not able to tolerate high doses of statins, mostly due to muscle-related adverse effects. In these patient populations, inhibition of proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) with monoclonal antibodies appears to represent a useful tool for achieving LDL-C targets. In the present review, we summarize the current knowledge on the effects of the PCSK9 inhibitors alirocumab and evolocumab on lipid levels in various populations and discuss the role of these agents in the management of dyslipidemia. In addition to a substantial reduction in LDL-C levels (by 50-60%), PCSK9 inhibitors also lower triglyceride, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) and lipoprotein (a) levels and increase HDL-C levels. Preliminary data suggest that PCSK9 inhibitors are safe. However, ongoing randomized, placebo-controlled trials will provide definitive evidence on the safety of these novel agents and on their effects on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Given the high cost of PCSK9 inhibitors, their use should be restricted to carefully selected, veryhigh risk patients until the results of these trials are available.

Effect on Fasting Serum Glucose Levels of Adding Ezetimibe to Statins in Patients With Nondiabetic Hypercholesterolemia

Statin therapy is associated with a slightly increased risk of developing diabetes mellitus and insulin resistance in patients without diabetes. Ezetimibe combined with statins may be considered for high-risk patients who do not achieve optimal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering on statin monotherapy or who are statin intolerant. Changes in fasting serum glucose (FSG) levels during ezetimibe, ezetimibe/statin, and statin treatments were assessed using data pooled from clinical trials in hypercholesterolemic and heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemic patients, who were or were not receiving statin therapy. Study types included first-line trials in statin-naive/wash-out patients and second-line add-on and uptitration studies in patients on stable statin therapy. Similar analyses of FSG changes were performed separately for each study type in patients who were nondiabetic at baseline. Across all study types and treatments, mean FSG increases from baseline were small (0.5 to 3.7mg/dl with ezetimibe/statin; 0.2 to 4.6mg/dl with statins) and decreased over time; between-treatment differences (0.3 to 1.4mg/dl) were nonsignificant for all comparisons. Proportions of patients with elevated FSG ≥126mg/dl during therapy were low and similar for all treatments in the overall cohort (1.2% to 4.3%). Elevations were highest (3.3% to 25.7%) among patients with baseline factors characteristic of metabolic syndrome and prediabetes, including higher FSG, body mass index, and triglyceride levels, and numerically lower baseline high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; however, these factors were not related to FSG increases. Changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, body mass index, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, and apolipoprotein B were not significantly correlated with FSG increases. In conclusion, statin therapy was associated with small FSG increases, and the addition of ezetimibe did not further increase FSG levels beyond those of statins when given to patients who are statin naive or those on statin therapy.

Correlates of Achieving Statin Therapy Goals in Children and Adolescents with Dyslipidemia

To determine the real-world effectiveness of statins and impact of baseline factors on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction among children and adolescents. We analyzed data prospectively collected from a quality improvement initiative in the Boston Children's Hospital Preventive Cardiology Program. We included patients ≤21 years of age initiated on statins between September 2010 and March 2014. The primary outcome was first achieving goal LDL-C, defined as <130 mg/dL, or <100 mg/dL with high-level risk factors (eg, diabetes, etc). Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the impact of baseline clinical and lifestyle factors. Among the 1521 pediatric patients evaluated in 3813 clinical encounters over 3.5 years, 97 patients (6.3%) were started on statin therapy and had follow-up data (median age 14 [IQR 7] years, 54% were female, and 24% obese, 62% with at least one lifestyle risk factor). The median baseline LDL-C was 215 (IQR 78) mg/dL, and median follow-up after starting statin was 1 (IQR 1.3) year. The cumulative probability of achieving LDL-C goal within 1 year was 60% (95% CI 47-69). A lower probability of achieving LDL-C goals was associated with male sex (HR 0.5 [95% CI 0.3-0.8]) and higher baseline LDL-C (HR 0.92 [95% CI 0.87-0.98] per 10 mg/dL), but not age, body mass index percentile, lifestyle factors, or family history. The majority of pediatric patients started on statins reached LDL-C treatment goals within 1 year. Male patients and those with greater baseline LDL-C were less likely to be successful and may require increased support.

Differing predictive relationships between baseline LDL-C, systolic blood pressure, and cardiovascular outcomes

BackgroundTraditional cardiovascular risk factors, such as hypertension and dyslipidemia, predispose individuals to cardiovascular disease, particularly patients with diabetes. We investigated the predictive value of baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) on the risk of vascular outcomes in a large population of patients at high risk of future cardiovascular events. MethodsData were pooled from the TNT (Treating to New Targets), CARDS (Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study), and IDEAL (Incremental Decrease in End-Points Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering) trials and included a total of 21,727 patients (TNT: 10,001; CARDS: 2838; IDEAL: 8888). The effect of baseline SBP and LDL-C on cardiovascular events, coronary events, and stroke was evaluated using a multivariate Cox proportional-hazards model. ResultsOverall, risk of cardiovascular events was significantly higher for patients with higher baseline SBP or LDL-C. Higher baseline SBP was significantly predictive of stroke but not coronary events. Conversely, higher baseline LDL-C was significantly predictive of coronary events but not stroke. Results from the subgroup with diabetes (5408 patients; TNT: 1501; CARDS: 2838; IDEAL: 1069) were broadly consistent with those of the total cohort: baseline SBP and LDL-C were significantly predictive of cardiovascular events overall, with the association to LDL-C predominantly related to an effect on coronary events. However, baseline SBP was not predictive of either coronary or stroke events in the pooled diabetic population. ConclusionsIn this cohort of high-risk patients, baseline SBP and LDL-C were significantly predictive of cardiovascular outcomes, but this effect may differ between the cerebrovascular and coronary systems.Trial Registration Number: NCT00327691 (TNT); NCT00327418 (CARDS); NCT00159835 (IDEAL).

Influence of baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol values on statin therapy persistence.

Persistence to statins is low, in part due to lack of perception of cardiovascular (CV) risk. High values of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) might increase the motivation for patients to be persistent. We investigated whether the baseline LDL-C value influences the discontinuation of statin treatment in patients with and without previous CV events. A cohort study was performed using information from the Swedish national registers concerning dispensed drugs, hospital contacts, cause of death, and socioeconomic status, and linked with data from clinical laboratories. Incident statin users 20 years of age or older and starting treatment between 2006 and 2007 were identified and followed for 1 year. Baseline LDL-C level was defined as the last available laboratory test result during 6 months before the index statin dispensing. Cox regression was used to study discontinuation and estimate the effect on persistence of the baseline LDL-C value adjusting for sex, age, income, comorbidity, previous CV events, type of prescriber, and country of birth. Subgroup analyses stratifying by previous CV events and by diagnosis of diabetes among subjects without previous CV events were performed. A total of 29,389 patients were identified; 35.4% had a previous CV event. A high baseline LDL-C value was associated with a lower discontinuation rate (hazard ratio (HR) 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72-0.91) in patients without previous CV events. When stratifying further by diabetes diagnosis, the association was confirmed only in patients without diabetes. No association between LDL-C and persistence was found in patients with previous CV events. High levels of LDL-C were positively associated with statin persistence in newly treated diabetes patients without previous CV events.

A 3 year-cumulative incidence of diabetes mellitus in a community in Shanghai and analysis of its related influential factors

Objective To investigate the 3 year-cumulative incidence of diabetes mellitus in a community in Shanghai and the analysis of related influential factors analysis. Methods The resident subjects were derived from a community-based diabetes prospective cohort(35-74 years old) in Pudong New Area. Two surveys on diabetes risk factors, physical examination, and the measurements of biochemical parameters were conducted in 2009 and 2012, respectively. A total of 798 participants with complete information and free of diabetes at baseline were included in this survey. Results The 3-year cumulative incidence of diabetes mellitus was 6.39%, that of impaired glucose regulation(IGR) was 12.59%, while the 3-year cumulative incidence from IGR to diabetes mellitus was 17.17%. The main factors influencing the incidence of diabetes mellitus were fasting plasma glucose at baseline(OR=2.882, 95%CI 1.559-5.327, P=0.001), 2 h plasma glucose at baseline(OR=1.259, 95%CI 1.023-1.550, P=0.03), and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol at baseline(OR=0.168, 95%CI 0.035-0.814, P=0.027). Conclusion The incidence of diabetes mellitus in this studied community is higher. The higher baseline glucose and(or) the lower baseline high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, the greater the risk of diabetes mellitus. (Chin J Endocrinol Metab, 2015, 31: 856-859) Key words: Diabetes mellitus; Impaired glucose regulation; Incidence; Prospective cohort study; Influence factors

Determinants of Bezafibrate-induced Improvements in LDL Cholesterol in Dyslipidemic Patients with Diabetes.

Our previous "J-BENEFIT (Japan BEzafibrate cliNical EFfectIveness and Tolerability)" study demonstrated that bezafibrate improves blood lipid profiles and glucose control in dyslipidemic patients with diabetes. However, bezafibrate did not significantly improve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), although some patients showed decreases while others showed increases in the LDL-C levels. Therefore, a subgroup analysis of the J-BENEFIT study was conducted to identify factors influencing the bezafibrate-induced changes in the LDL-C levels. Of the 3,316 patients in the J-BENEFIT study, 2,116 not treated with other lipid-lowering drugs were enrolled in the current study, and the effects of 24-week treatment with bezafibrate on the LDL-C levels were analyzed. A reduction in the LDL-C level of ≥ 25% occurred in 253 patients, and a logistic-regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with this improvement. Among the 2,116 overall patients, bezafibrate treatment significantly increased the LDL-C levels from 123.9±36.7 to 125.7±31.3 mg/dL. The subanalysis showed that the treatment responses varied according to the baseline LDL-C level, with significant decreases in the ≥ 160 and ≥ 140-＜160 mg/dL groups, no significant decrease in the ≥ 120-＜140 mg/dL group and a significant increase in the ＜120 mg/dL group. A multivariate logistic-regression analysis of the data for the patients with an LDL-C of ≥ 25% identified a female sex, the use of anti-hypertensive and hypoglycemic agents and a high baseline LDL-C level to be significant determinants of the LDL-C response to bezafibrate. Our results showed that treatment with bezafibrate improves the LDL-C levels and lipid profiles in dyslipidemic diabetic patients, especially women, subjects co-treated with anti-hypertensive or hypoglycemic agents and those with high baseline LDL-C levels.

Cholesterol-lowering effects of oat β-glucan: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background: Health claims regarding the cholesterol-lowering effect of soluble fiber from oat products, approved by food standards agencies worldwide, are based on a diet containing ≥3 g/d of oat β-glucan (OBG). Given the number of recently published randomized controlled trials (RCTs), it is important to update the findings of previous meta-analyses.Objective: The objective was to quantify the effect of ≥3 g OBG/d on serum cholesterol concentrations in humans and investigate potential effect modifiers.Design: A meta-analysis was performed on 28 RCTs comparing ≥3 g OBG/d with an appropriate control. Systematic searches were undertaken in PubMed, AGRICOLA, and Scopus between 1 January 1966 and 6 June 2013, plus in-house study reports at CreaNutrition AG. Studies were assessed with regard to inclusion/exclusion criteria, and data were extracted from included studies by reviewers working independently in pairs, reconciling differences by consensus. Estimates of the mean reduction in serum cholesterol from baseline between the OBG and control diets were analyzed by using random-effects meta-analysis models and meta-regression.Results: OBG in doses of ≥3 g/d reduced low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and total cholesterol relative to control by 0.25 mmol/L (95% CI: 0.20, 0.30; P < 0.0001) and 0.30 mmol/L (95% CI: 0.24, 0.35; P < 0.0001), respectively, with some indication of heterogeneity (P = 0.13 and P = 0.067). There was no significant effect of OBG on high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol or triglycerides and no evidence that dose (range across trials: 3.0–12.4 g/d) or duration of treatment (range: 2–12 wk) influenced the results. LDL cholesterol lowering was significantly greater with higher baseline LDL cholesterol. There was a significantly greater effect for both LDL and total cholesterol in subjects with diabetes compared with those without (although based on few studies).Conclusions: Adding ≥3 g OBG/d to the diet reduces LDL and total cholesterol by 0.25 mmol/L and 0.30 mmol/L, respectively, without changing HDL cholesterol or triglycerides.

LDL cholesterol as a novel risk factor for contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Background: Low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is associated with endothelial dysfunction, inflammation and increased vasoconstriction, which are involved in the development of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI). However, whether LDL-C is an independent risk factor of CI-AKI in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unknown. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 3236 consecutive patients undergoing PCI between January 2010 and September 2012. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine whether LDL-C is an independent risk factor of CI-AKI. CI-AKI was defined as an absolute increase in serum creatinine of ≥0.5 mg/dL or ≥25% over the baseline value within 48–72 h after contrast exposure. Results: CI-AKI was observed in 338 patients (10.4%). Patients with CI-AKI had a significantly higher rate of in hospital mortality (4.4% vs. 0.5%, p < 0.001), and significantly higher rates of other in hospital complications compared with those without CI-AKI. The LDL-C quartiles were as follows: Q1 (<2.04 mmol/L), Q2 (2.04–2.61 mmol/L), Q3 (2.61–3.21 mmol/L) and Q4 (>3.21 mmol/L). Patients with high baseline LDL-C levels were more likely to develop CI-AKI and composite end points including all-cause mortality, renal replacement therapy, non-fatal myocardial infarction, acute heart failure, target vessel revascularization or cerebrovascular accident during the observation period of hospitalization (8.9%, 9.9%, 10.5%, 12.6%, p = 0.001, and 5.0%, 5.2%, 6.1%, 8.1%, respectively; p = 0.007). Univariate logistic analysis showed that LDL-C levels (increment 1 mmol/L) were significantly associated with CI-AKI (odds ratio = 1.25, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.11–1.39, p < 0.001). Furthermore, LDL-C remained a significant risk factor of CI-AKI (odds ratio = 1.23, 95% CI, 1.04–1.45, p = 0.014), even after adjusting for potential confounding risk factors. Conclusions: Measurement of plasma LDL-C concentrations in patients undergoing PCI may be helpful to identify those who are at risk of CI-AKI and poor in hospital outcomes.

Sex-Related Differences of Coronary Atherosclerosis Regression Following Maximally Intensive Statin Therapy: Insights From SATURN

ObjectivesThe study sought to explore sex-related differences in coronary atheroma regression following high-intensity statin therapy. BackgroundGuidelines now recommend high-intensity statins in all individuals with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. MethodsSATURN (Study of Coronary Atheroma by Intravascular Ultrasound: Effect of Rosuvastatin Versus Atorvastatin) employed serial intravascular ultrasound measures of coronary atheroma volume in patients treated with rosuvastatin 40 mg or atorvastatin 80 mg for 24 months. The treatment groups did not differ significantly in change from baseline of percent atheroma volume (PAV) or total atheroma volume (TAV) on intravascular ultrasound, nor in safety or clinical outcomes. ResultsCompared with men (n = 765), women (n = 274) were older (p < 0.001) and more likely to have hypertension (p < 0.001), diabetes (p = 0.002), and higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (p = 0.01), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (p < 0.001), and C-reactive protein (CRP) (p = 0.004) levels. At follow-up, women had higher high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (p < 0.001) and CRP (p < 0.001), but similar LDL-C (p = 0.46) levels compared with men. Compared with men, women had lower baseline PAV (34.0 ± 8.0% vs. 37.2 ± 8.2%, p < 0.001) and TAV (122.4 ± 55 mm3 vs. 151.9 ± 63 mm3, p < 0.001), yet demonstrated greater PAV regression (–1.52 ± 0.18% vs. –1.07 ± 0.10%, p = 0.03) and TAV regression (–8.27 ± 0.9 mm3 vs. –6.59 ± 0.50 mm3, p = 0.11) following treatment. Greater PAV regression in women versus men occurred with rosuvastatin (p = 0.004), those with diabetes (p = 0.01), stable coronary disease (p = 0.01), higher baseline LDL-C (p = 0.02), and higher CRP (p = 0.04) levels. On multivariable analysis, female sex was independently associated with PAV regression (p = 0.01), and a sex-treatment interaction was found (p = 0.036). For participants with on-treatment LDL-C levels <70 mg/dl, women achieved greater PAV regression (–1.81 ± 0.22% vs. –1.12 ± 0.13%, p = 0.007) and TAV regression (–10.1 ± 1.1 mm3 vs. –7.16 ± 0.65 mm3, p = 0.023) than men, whereas PAV and TAV regression did not differ by sex, with LDL-C levels ≥70 mg/dl. ConclusionsWomen with coronary disease demonstrate greater coronary atheroma regression than men when empirically prescribed guideline-driven potent statin therapy. This benefit appears in the setting of lower on-treatment LDL-C levels. (CRESTOR Athero Imaging Head to Head IVUS Study [SATURN]; NCT000620542)

Trends in statin therapy initiation during the period 2000–2010 in Israel

The aim of this population-based study is to describe trends in the characteristics and treatment patterns of statin initiators over the first decade of the 21st century. New statin use was studied retrospectively using the database of Maccabi Healthcare Services (MHS), a large Israeli health maintenance organization. Statin initiators were defined as MHS members aged ≥ 30 years who first purchased statins between 2000 and 2010. The starting dose was calculated in simvastatin equivalents based on the World Health Organization's daily defined dose index. Persistence was calculated as the percentage of days covered (PDC) with statins during the first year of therapy. Statin initiation peaked in 2005 and decreased from 38.6 to 18.6 per 1,000 in the period 2005-2010. The average age at therapy initiation decreased from 58.9 (± 12.0) to 54.5 (± 11.7) years, and the average (SD) baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) decreased from 4.2 (± 1.1) to 4.0 (± 0.9) mmol/l during the study period. Women were on average 3 years older than men at treatment initiation, with a higher baseline LDL-C. Among statin initiators, the prevalence of ischemic heart disease (IHD) decreased from 17.8 to 6.7 %, and diabetes prevalence increased from 8.6 to 15.7 %, peaking in 2008 (18.0 %). The PDC with statins ranged between 52.9 and 57.7 %. Simvastatin use at initiation increased from 27.5 % in 2000 to >90 % since 2002. Starting dose increased from 18.5 (± 8.9) to 24.3 (± 13.7) mg simvastatin equivalent. Among the study population, statin initiators were increasingly characterized by a lower cardiovascular risk-namely, younger individuals without IHD and with a lower baseline LDL-C. These trends underscore the important shift towards statin initiation for primary prevention, as well as the need to balance between benefits and the potential side effect of statins.

The Association of High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol with Cancer Incidence in Type II Diabetes: A Case of Reverse Causality?

Low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and type II diabetes are associated with an increased risk for cancer. Patients with type II diabetes typically have low HDL-C; however, the association between HDL-C and cancer has not been examined in this population. A total of 11,140 patients with type II diabetes were followed for a median of 5 years. Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the association between baseline HDL-C and risk of cancer incidence and cancer death, with adjustments made for potential confounders. To explore the possibility of reverse causation, analyses were repeated for the cancers occurring in the first and second halves of follow-up. Six hundred and ninety-nine patients developed cancer, with 48% occurring within the first half of follow-up. For every 0.4 mmol/L lower baseline HDL-C, there was a 16% higher risk of cancer [HR 1.16; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.06-1.28; P = 0.0008] and cancer death (HR 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01-1.32; P = 0.03). After adjustment for confounding, the higher risk remained significant for cancer (adjusted HR 1.10; 95% CI, 1.00-1.22; P = 0.05) but not for cancer death (adjusted HR 1.08; 95% CI, 0.93-1.25; P = 0.31). The association was driven by cancers occurring within the first half of follow-up (adjusted HR 1.22; 95% CI, 1.05-1.41; P = 0.008) as no significant association was found between HDL-C and cancer in the second half of follow-up. Low HDL-C is associated with cancer risk in patients with type II diabetes. However, this association may be explained by confounding and reverse causation. HDL-C is not a risk factor for cancer in type II diabetes.

Do Genetic Modifiers of High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Triglyceride Levels Also Modify Their Response to a Lifestyle Intervention in the Setting of Obesity and Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus?

Background— High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglycerides are cardiovascular risk factors susceptible to lifestyle behavior modification and genetics. We hypothesized that genetic variants identified by genome-wide association studies as associated with HDL-C or triglyceride levels modify 1-year treatment response to an intensive lifestyle intervention, relative to a usual care of diabetes mellitus support and education. Methods and Results— We evaluated 82 single-nucleotide polymorphisms, which represent 31 loci demonstrated by genome-wide association studies to be associated with HDL-C and triglycerides, in 3561 participants who consented for genetic studies and met eligibility criteria. Variants associated with higher baseline HDL-C levels, cholesterol ester transfer protein ( CETP ) rs3764261 and hepatic lipase ( LIPC ) rs8034802, were found to be associated with HDL-C increases with intensive lifestyle intervention ( P =0.0038 and 0.013, respectively) and had nominally significant treatment interactions ( P =0.047 and 0.046, respectively). The fatty acid desaturase-2 rs1535 variant, associated with low baseline HDL-C ( P =0.017), was associated with HDL-C increases with intensive lifestyle intervention (0.0037) and had a nominal treatment interaction ( P =0.035). Apolipoprotein B (rs693) and LIPC (rs8034802) single-nucleotide polymorphisms showed nominally significant associations with HDL-C and triglyceride changes with intensive lifestyle intervention and a treatment interaction ( P &lt;0.05). Phosphatidylglycerophosphate synthase-1 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (rs4082919) showed the most significant triglyceride treatment interaction in the full cohort ( P =0.0009). Conclusions— This is the first study to identify genetic variants modifying lipid responses to a randomized lifestyle behavior intervention in overweight or obese individuals with diabetes mellitus. The effects of genetic factors on lipid changes may differ from the effects on baseline lipids and are modifiable by behavioral intervention.

LDL Lowering After Acute Coronary Syndrome: Is Lower Better?

Low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels are a major risk factor for the development of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and for recurrent events after ACS. Lowering LDL-C after ACS leads to a significant reduction in recurrent events and overall mortality. A lower limit at which LDL-C reduction fails to decrease risk has not been determined, and lowering LDL-C below current guideline-defined targets may provide incremental benefit. While the absolute risk is small, more intensive statin therapy is associated with a higher incidence of myopathy, rhabdomyolysis, liver enzyme abnormalities and incident diabetes, but not with an increase in malignancies or all-cause mortality. It is important that clinicians recognize ACS patients as being at very high risk, and provide these patients with intensive lifestyle and pharmacologic therapy for all modifiable risk factors. Within this framework, either a strategy of "intensive statin treatment after ACS" or a strategy of "aggressive LDL-C targets after ACS" would be appropriate based on currently available data. Combination lipid-lowering therapy does not have a firm evidence base at this point, but may be appropriate in patients with limited statin tolerance or very high baseline LDL-C levels. Newer therapies, such as LDL apheresis, antisense oligonucleotide sequences to apolipoprotein B (apoB) and preprotein convertase subtilin kexin 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, are currently in clinical trials and may represent important advances in LDL-C lowering therapy in the future.

Cost-effectiveness of extended-release niacin/laropiprant added to a stable simvastatin dose in secondary prevention patients not at cholesterol goal in Germany

Coronary heart disease (CHD) remains the leading cause of death in Germany despite statin use to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels; improving lipids beyond LDL-C may further reduce cardiovascular risk. A fixed-dose combination of extended-release niacin (ERN) with laropiprant (LRPT) provides comprehensive lipid management. We adapted a decision-analytic model to evaluate the economic value (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio [ICER] in terms of costs per life-years gained [LYG]) of ERN/LRPT 2 g over a lifetime in secondary prevention patients in a German setting. Two scenarios were modelled: (1) ERN/LRPT 2 g added to simvastatin 40 mg in patients not at LDL-C goal with simvastatin 40 mg; (2) adding ERN/LRPT 2 g compared with titration to simvastatin 40 mg in patients not at LDL-C goal with simvastatin 20 mg. In both scenarios, adding ERN/LRPT was cost-effective relative to simvastatin monotherapy at a commonly accepted threshold of €30,000 per LYG; ICERs for ERN/LRPT were €13,331 per LYG in scenario 1 and €17,684 per LYG in scenario 2. Subgroup analyses showed that ERN/LRPT was cost-effective in patients with or without diabetes, patients aged ≤65 or >65 years and patients with low baseline high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels; ICERs ranged from €10,342 to €15,579 in scenario 1, and from €14,081 to €20,462 in scenario 2. In conclusion, comprehensive lipid management with ERN/LRPT 2 g is cost-effective in secondary prevention patients in Germany who have not achieved LDL-C goal with simvastatin monotherapy.

Paradoxical Decrease in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol with Fenofibrate: A Quite Rare Phenomenon Indeed

Some recent clinical reports have suggested that paradoxical decreases in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels after fenofibrate treatment may be quite common. These appear to occur mainly in patients with combined fibrate/statin therapy and possibly in those with low baseline HDL-C. Reports on HDL-C reductions after fenofibrate are possibly supported by the disappointing results in terms of HDL-C responses from the recent FIELD study. A survey on 581 patients treated for 1 year or longer was carried out in our Clinical Center. This indicated that paradoxical HDL-C reductions are a relatively uncommon phenomenon. Not more than 15.3% of the present series showed an HDL-C reduction, mostly of a modest degree. Further, reductions of HDL-C appear to occur mainly in individuals with significant HDL-C elevations (>50 mg/dL), almost never in patients with low HDL-C. Otherwise, there seems to be no impact of a previous diagnosis of diabetes or hypertension on the HDL-C changes. From a very recent pharmacogenomic study on the apo A1/C3/A4/A5 gene cluster, genetic influences appear only to reduce the positive impact of fenofibrate on HDL-C, but do not indicate any risk of occurrence of HDL-C reductions. Also based on our very long experience with this drug, it appears that fenofibrate raises HDL-C levels in the vast majority of treated patients, with a particularly dramatic effect in individuals with low HDL-C and hypertriglyceridemia.