AbstractFor various reasons, the Earth's outer radiation belt often exhibits dramatic and sudden increases or decreases in the observed particle flux. In this paper, we report three dropout events of energetic electrons observed by multiple spacecraft while traveling across the outer radiation belt. The three events were first identified based on observations of a significant dropout in the >2 MeV electron flux at geosynchronous orbit. Subsequently, for each event, we analyzed the energetic electron data obtained near the magnetic equator by THEMIS spacecraft to determine the responses of the entire outer radiation belt. Our analysis is mainly based on the electron fluxes measured at energies of 52 keV, 203 keV, and 719 keV, and on the phase space densities estimated for the first adiabatic invariant μ values of 100 MeV/G, 200 MeV/G, and 300 MeV/G. The main shared feature among the three events is that while, for the lowest energy, sources from the convection and/or particle injections of plasma sheet electrons dominate over losses, the higher energies exhibit a dramatic dropout effect that penetrates deeply into L ~ 4.5 – 5. In terms of the phase space density, a similar dropout effect is clearly seen for the μ values of 200 MeV/G and 300 MeV/G, while the convection effect and/or injections dominates for μ = 100 MeV/G. What is astonishing about this dropout phenomenon is that the three events are all associated with only very weak magnetic storms with a SYM‐H minimum of ‐40 nT or larger. This implies that a significant loss of electrons deep inside the outer radiation belt can occur even during a very weak magnetic storm. Low‐altitude observations of electrons by NOAA POES satellites indicate no significant atmospheric precipitation due to strong diffusion. Our simulations with various conditions suggest that radial diffusion effect in combination with the magnetopause shadowing are responsible for the observed dropouts to a large extent for all of the three events, although the contribution by the weak atmospheric precipitation that might have been missed by the NOAA POES observations can be non‐negligible.