With the wide production and usage of nanoparticles, nanotoxicity has received worldwide researches. As a model organism, Daphnia magna has been extensively used in the nanotoxicity studies. In this review, we overviewed research advance in the toxicity of nanoparticles to Daphnia magna , including acute toxicity, chronic toxicity, bioaccumulation, and the underlying mechanisms. Nanoparticles have dose-responsive acute toxicity to Daphnia manga and their toxicity is related to types of nanoparticles and culture media. Smaller nanoparticles generally have higher toxicity to Daphnia manga , presumably due to their easier transport through cell membranes. Due to polar functional groups and organic macromolecules are able to change surface properties of nanoparticles, most studies suggest that the acute toxicity of nanoparticles might be weakened by surface modification. High concentrations of nanoparticles can suppress the growth and reproduction of Daphnia manga . Bioaccumulation studies showed that nanoparticles could accumulate in Daphnia magna via water, feeding food, and absorbing through the skin. Since the concentration of nanoparticles, exposure time and cultivation media adopted in the studies varied greatly, the body burden and bioconcentration factor of nanoparticles were largely different, which makes it hard to compare accumulation capacity of Daphnia manga to different nanoparticles. At high exposure concentrations, accumulation amount of nanoparticles by Daphnia manga could reach µg/mg level. Although the toxicity mechanisms of nanoparticles to Daphnia manga have not been fully understood, below points are generally used to explain the toxicity: nanoparticle specific toxic, the release of toxic metal ions, and forming toxic complexes with other compounds. Nanoparticles and the release of metal ions can adhere and aggregate onto surfaces of Daphnia manga , causing the physical damage, membrane permeability changes, and cell function loss. They can also promote the production of the reactive oxygen species (ROS) and free radical, leading to lipid peroxidation, protein carbonylation and DNA damage. In addition, some nanoparticles themselves are not toxic, but can form complexes with toxic substance. At the end of text, we proposed several future research needs. First, compared with the experimental cultivation media, the physical and chemical properties of natural waters are obviously different, likely to cause big difference in the toxicity results. Therefore, realistic toxicity in natural waters needs to be studied. Second, the exposure concentrations of nanoparticles in chronic experiments are much higher than that in the real water environment, and the exposure time is also not long enough compared with practical condition. Lower concentrations and longer exposure time of nanoparticles are of great significance. Third, there is no unified approach in bioaccumulation experiments, making it difficult to compare and analyze the results from different labs. A standard test method established for the bioaccumulation test is thus required. Moreover, nanoparticles can remain in Daphnia magna and transfer to their offspring and other organisms though food chains. Hence, it is necessary to study the transformation, chronic toxicity, intergenerational transfer, and migration though food chains of nanoparticles. Lastly, up to date, toxicity mechanisms of nanoparticles to Daphnia manga have yet to reach a consensus. Nanoparticle characteristics, the growth status of Daphnia magna , culture medium compositions, toxicity experimental method, and many other factors might influence the judgment of the toxicity mechanisms. In order to better understand the toxic effects caused by nanoparticles, more researches are supposed to be done to find the impacts of these factors on the toxicity mechanisms.
Read full abstract