Abstract

The dynamic of cancer is intimately linked to a dysregulation of the cell cycle and signalling pathways. It has been argued that selectivity of treatments could exploit loss of checkpoint function in cancer cells, a concept termed “cyclotherapy”. Quantitative approaches that describe these dysregulations can provide guidance in the design of novel or existing cancer therapies. We describe and illustrate this strategy via a mathematical model of the cell cycle that includes descriptions of the G1-S checkpoint and the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), the EGF signalling pathway and apoptosis. We incorporated sites of action of four drugs (palbociclib, gemcitabine, paclitaxel and actinomycin D) to illustrate potential applications of this approach. We show how drug effects on multiple cell populations can be simulated, facilitating simultaneous prediction of effects on normal and transformed cells. The consequences of aberrant signalling pathways or of altered expression of pro- or anti-apoptotic proteins can thus be compared. We suggest that this approach, particularly if used in conjunction with pharmacokinetic modelling, could be used to predict effects of specific oncogene expression patterns on drug response. The strategy could be used to search for synthetic lethality and optimise combination protocol designs.

Highlights

  • Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models of anticancer drug action have many potential applications [1,2,3]

  • In a previous study we showed that the loss of the G1-S and/or spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) checkpoints were critical to the description of cancer [8]

  • The basic cell cycle, the G1-S checkpoint, the spindle assembly checkpoint, part of the MAP kinase signal transduction pathway and apoptosis processes are incorporated in this model (Fig 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models of anticancer drug action have many potential applications [1,2,3]. Modelling the cellular pharmacodynamics of anticancer drugs, whether they are cytotoxic agents or targeted agents requires, minimally, a description of three biological processes: the cell cycle, the associated signal transduction pathways, and the apoptotic cascade. In a previous study we showed that the loss of the G1-S and/or SAC checkpoints were critical to the description of cancer [8] This was consistent with Duesberg’s theory [9] which suggested that cancer is, in essence, a disease of chromosomal instability. According to this line of thought the phenotypic hallmarks of cancer that arise are the inevitable outcome of the selection process operating on the numerous chromosomal variants

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.