The December issue of the Anatomical Record is a special issue, “Evolutionary and Functional Morphology of New World Monkeys.” New World Monkeys (platyrrhines) are small to midsized primates. They currently inhabit a wide range of habitats spanning the American continents, from southern Mexico to Northern Argentina and represent almost one-third of all living primates. This special issue focuses on our primate relatives, the New World Monkeys, placing species and structures within the perspective of evolutionary change. Brain evolution in New World Monkeys is poorly understood. Questions of interest include “What is the relationship between brain size and body size?” as well as more practical issues such as “How is a reliable data set defined?” and “Who gets to determine that reliability?” New World Monkeys appear to offer a good model to determine how cognition evolves in relation to brain size based on the fact that they colonized a large but isolated continental habitat approximately 35–40 million years ago. The authors tested a basic hypothesis of the relationship between gut size and brain size in New World Monkeys. However, formulating a hypothesis is difficult when data sets are not complete, which is a common issue. The authors report on three unique data sets, focusing on the issues of brain size and gut morphology in platyrrhines. One set of data comprised of 162 individual brain weights and body weights of adult New World Monkeys. A second set comprised of 59 individuals, with measures on gut and body weight. These were compared with previously published reports of smaller samples as well as large databases derived from museum records. Their data confirmed the variations in brain size among platyrrhines, with a variety of proposed hypotheses to explain these observations. The authors also found a large variety of relative gut size and within-gut proportions, which suggest that multiple factors are involved. They suggest potential causal factors that appear to interact in different ways among outlier taxa. New World Monkeys have diverse diets and feeding strategies, which are recognized as key components of primate natural history and evolution. Therefore, morphology and function of the primate feeding apparatus have been extensively studied to relate them to diet and feeding behaviors. However, the function and evolution of the platyrrhine feeding apparatus is not completely understood. The authors reviewed several recent studies (and currently ongoing) on how the platyrrhine skull is loaded during feeding. Gaps in knowledge were identified, highlighting the need for new data, such as data on loading regimens in the platyrrhine skull during mastication. Differences between Old World and New World Monkeys suggest that Old World Monkeys may not be an appropriate model of jaw loading patterns for platyrrhines. Some of the studies indicate the need for a broader examination of morphology using new techniques and concepts. Advances in technology are likely to improve accuracy in quantifying morphology and provide new information for form–function relationships. The authors' stress that integration of approaches will provide the greatest opportunity for advancing the knowledge of platyrrhine feeding biology. A hope of the authors is that some of their ideas will initiate further advances in the understanding of the platyrrhine masticatory apparatus. Modern platyrrhines occupy diverse habitats, which has resulted in distinct morphological, ecological, and behavioral adaptations that can be broadly correlated to specific phylogenetic groups. Successful exploitation of these habitats requires a variety of positional behaviors. Therefore, the study of locomotion is important for understanding platyrrhines' adaptive diversity. The fossil record of New World Monkeys is quite scarce but there are numerous reports of their anatomy and positional behavior in living species. The authors summarize locomotor patterns for both fossil and modern New World Monkeys. However, agreement on phylogenetic relationships between fossil and modern taxa is lacking. The authors' consider two different hypotheses to explain phylogenetic patterns. The “long lineage hypothesis” states that modern New World Monkeys are characterized by a number of long-lived species that evolved from a common ancestor and the fossil taxa are actually early affiliates of these. In contrast, the “stem platyrrhine hypothesis” states that most early Patagonian fossils bear no relationships to modern species, but instead represent an earlier radiation, which is currently mostly extinct. The authors discuss that the evolution of locomotor diversity offers a lot of insight into the adaptive radiation among platyrrhines, but resolution to competing hypotheses of platyrrhine phylogeny remains to be accomplished. The authors' review is intended to stimulate recovery of more fossils and more study of the diverse modern species, as well as provide a fresh framework for asking questions.