Research over the past 20years indicates the amount of task-specific walking practice provided to individuals with stroke, brain injury, or incomplete spinal cord injury can strongly influence walking recovery. However, more recent data suggest that attention towards 2 other training parameters, including the intensity and variability of walking practice, may maximize walking recovery and facilitate gains in non-walking outcomes. The combination of these training parameters represents a stark contrast from traditional strategies, and confusion regarding the potential benefits and perceived risks may limit their implementation in clinical practice. The purpose of this perspective is to delineate the evidence regarding the contributions of intensity and variability of locomotor training to improve mobility outcomes in individuals with acute-onset brain and spinal cord injury. The rationale and evidence supporting the utility of these training parameters in controlled laboratory settings is first described by integrating concepts in the field of neuroscience, motor learning, biomechanics, and exercise physiology into a rehabilitation intervention. Subsequently, the evidence supporting the efficacy of this paradigm is addressed, including discussions of some of the misconceptions regarding perceived negative consequences of these strategies in an effort to mitigate common clinical concerns. Finally, the utility of these strategies implemented during inpatient rehabilitation is delineated to facilitate a more comprehensive understanding of the feasibility and potential benefits early following neurologic injury. A greater understanding of how and why to integrate higher intensity, variable stepping practice will support therapists to take the next step to maximize mobility in the patients they serve.
Read full abstract