Eligibility For Liver Transplantation Research Articles

Evolving trends in liver transplantation eligibility: A shift toward inclusivity for older adults at a Canadian Transplant Center

Background: The surge of end-stage liver disease among older individuals challenges traditional age-based criteria for liver transplantation (LT), historically capped at 65 years. Our Canadian center shifted away from using chronologic age as an absolute refusal criterion since 2019, enabling those aged 65 years and older to seek LT. This study aimed to investigate temporal trends in the transplant care cascade for patients aged 65 and older at our center, pre- and post-clinical shift. Methods: A retrospective study in a single Canadian transplant center reviewed LT referrals between 2015 and 2023, analyzing proportions of patients aged 65 and above at each stage. Specific intervals, 2015–2018 and 2019–2023, were defined for pre- and post-comparisons. Results: Among the 1,007 LT referrals, 11% (n = 110) were patients aged ≥65 years, with 74% ( n = 81) of them being referred after 2019. From 2015 to 2023, older patient proportions increased at all stages of the transplant care cascade: referrals (7.4% to 12.6%), evaluations (7.6% to 11.4%), waitlisting (5.6% to 15.4%), and transplantations (5.8% to 17.5%). Post-clinical shift, the proportion of older patients referred nearly doubled (7.5% vs 13.7%; p < 0.05), with a similar increase in transplants (5.7% vs. 11.5%; p < 0.05). Conclusions: Removing the age cap increased older patient engagement in the LT care cascade. This emphasizes the crucial role of actively promoting awareness of evolving LT eligibility criteria. Concerted efforts should focus on improving transplantation accessibility in older patients, ensuring age alone does not impede the process.

Frequency of and reasons behind non-listing in adult patients referred for liver transplantation: Results from a retrospective study.

Few studies have evaluated the frequency of and the reasons behind the refusal of listing liver transplantation candidates. To assess the ineligibility rate for liver transplantation and its motivations. A single-center retrospective study was conducted on adult patients which entailed a formal multidisciplinary assessment for liver transplantation eligibility. The predictors for listing were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression. In our center, 314 patients underwent multidisciplinary work-up before liver transplantation enlisting over a three-year period. The most frequent reasons for transplant evaluation were decompensated cirrhosis (51.6%) and hepatocellular carcinoma (35.7%). The non-listing rate was 53.8% and the transplant rate was 34.4% for the whole cohort. Two hundred and five motivations for ineligibility were collected. The most common contraindications were psychological (9.3%), cardiovascular (6.8%), and surgical (5.9%). Inappropriate or premature referral accounted for 76 (37.1%) cases. On multivariable analysis, a referral from another hospital (OR: 2.113; 95%CI: 1.259-3.548) served as an independent predictor of non-listing. A non-listing decision occurred in half of our cohort and was based on an inappropriate or premature referral in one case out of three. The referral from another hospital was taken as a strong predictor of non-listing.

The Spillover Effects of Extending Liver Transplantation to Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Discrete Event Simulation Analysis.

Liver transplantation is an alternative treatment for patients with nonresectable colorectal cancer liver-only metastases (CRLM); however, the potential effects on wait-list time and life expectancy to other patients on the transplant waiting list have not been considered. We explored the potential effects of expanding liver transplantation eligibility to include patients with CRLM on wait-list time and life expectancy in Norway. We developed a discrete event simulation model to reflect the Norwegian liver transplantation waiting list process and included 2 groups: 1) patients currently eligible for liver transplantation and 2) CRLM patients. Under 2 alternative CRLM-patient transplant eligibility criteria, we simulated 2 strategies: 1) inclusion of only currently eligible patients (CRLM patients received standard-of-care palliative chemotherapy) and 2) expanding waiting list eligibility to include CRLM patients under 2 eligibility criteria. Model outcomes included median waiting list time, life expectancy, and total life-years. For every additional CRLM patient listed per year, the overall median wait-list time, initially 52 d, increased by 8% to 11%. Adding 2 additional CRLM patients under the most restrictive eligibility criteria increased the CRLM patients' average life expectancy by 10.64 y and decreased the average life expectancy for currently eligible patients by 0.05 y. Under these assumptions, there was a net gain of 149.61 life-years over a 10-y programmatic period, which continued to increase under scenarios of adding 10 CRLM patients to the wait-list. Health gains were lower under less restrictive CRLM eligibility criteria. For example, adding 4 additional CRLM patients under the less restrictive eligibility criteria increased the CRLM patients' average life expectancy by 5.64 y and decreased the average life expectancy for currently eligible patients by 0.12 y. Under these assumptions, there was a net gain of 96.36 life-years over a 10-y programmatic period, which continued to increase up to 7 CRLM patients. Our model-based analysis enabled the consideration of the potential effects of enlisting Norwegian CRLM patients for liver transplantation on wait-list time and life expectancy. Enlisting CRLM patients is expected to increase the total health effects, which supports the implementation of liver transplantation for CRLM patients in Norway. Given the Norwegian donor liver availability, adding patients with nonresectable colorectal cancer liver-only metastases (CRLM) to the liver transplantation waiting list had an overall modest, but varying, impact on total waiting list time.Survival gains for selected CRLM patients treated with liver transplantation would likely outweigh the losses incurred to patients listed currently.To improve the total life-years gained in the population, Norway should consider expanding the treatment options for CRLM patients to include liver transplantation.Other countries may also have an opportunity to gain total life-years by extending the waiting list eligibility criteria; however, country-specific analyses are required.

The type, duration, and severity of pretransplant kidney injury predict prolonged kidney dysfunction after liver transplantation.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major complication of liver transplantation (LT) associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Knowing the drivers of post-LT kidney dysfunction-with a granular focus on the type, duration, and severity of pre-LT kidney disease-can highlight intervention opportunities and inform dual-organ allocation policies. We retrospectively analyzed predictors of safety net kidney after liver transplant (KALT) eligibility and kidney replacement therapy (KRT) for > 14 days after LT. Among 557 recipients of adult deceased-donor LT, 49% had normal kidney function, 25% had acute kidney injury (AKI), and 25% had CKD±AKI at the time of LT. A total of 36 (6.5%) qualified for KALT and 63 (11%) required KRT > 14 days. In univariable analysis, factors associated with KALT eligibility and KRT > 14 days, respectively, included stage 3 AKI (OR 7.87; OR 7.06), CKD±AKI (OR 4.58; OR 4.22), CKD III-V duration (OR 1.10 per week; OR 1.06 per week), and increasing CKD stage (stage III: OR 3.90, IV: OR 5.24, V: OR 16.8; stage III: OR 2.23, IV: OR 3.62, V: OR 19.4). AKI stage I-II and AKI duration in the absence of CKD were not associated with the outcomes. Pre-LT KRT had a robust impact on KALT eligibility (OR 4.00 per week) and prolonged post-LT KRT (OR 5.22 per week), with 19.8% of patients who received any pre-LT KRT ultimately qualifying for KALT. Eligibility for KALT was similar between those who received 0 days and ≤ 14 days of KRT after LT (2.1% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.53). In conclusion, the type, duration, and severity of pre-LT kidney dysfunction have unique impacts on post-LT kidney-related morbidity, and future research must use these novel classifications to study mitigation strategies.

Assessment of Liver Transplant Eligibility in Chronic Liver Disease Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study From a Tertiary Care Hospital of Pakistan.

The burden of chronic liver disease (CLD) is increasing globally and the ultimate treatment is a liver transplant. As Pakistan is a developing country, liver transplantation is not easily available due to limited resources.This study aims to assess the patients with CLD for liver transplantation and to find the frequency of eligible candidates for liver transplantation. A cross-sectional observational study was conducted on patients with CLD from June 2022 to December 2022.Total bilirubin, serum creatinine complete blood count, serum electrolytes, and international normalised ratio (INR) were done. The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score was calculated and the frequency of eligible patients for liver transplant was determined. Data was entered and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). In our study, 149 patients were enrolled with a mean age of 46.81±15.7 years. There were 58.7% male and 41.6% female patients. The mean duration of liver cirrhosis was 18.22±11.7 months. The mean MELD score was 20.71±5.2. The common liver cirrhosis stages were stage II and stage II was found in 32.2% of each. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was present in 15.4% of patients. There were 25.5% of patients eligible for liver transplants. In our study, we found that significant numbers of patients with CLD were eligible for liver transplantation.

Cholangiocarcinoma: The Current Status of Surgical Options including Liver Transplantation.

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) poses a substantial threat as it ranks as the second most prevalent primary liver tumor. The documented annual rise in intrahepatic CCA (iCCA) incidence in the United States is concerning, indicating its growing impact. Moreover, the five-year survival rate after tumor resection is only 25%, given that tumor recurrence is the leading cause of death in 53-79% of patients. Pre-operative assessments for iCCA focus on pinpointing tumor location, biliary tract involvement, vascular encasements, and metastasis detection. Numerous studies have revealed that portal vein embolization (PVE) is linked to enhanced survival rates, improved liver synthetic functions, and decreased overall mortality. The challenge in achieving clear resection margins contributes to the notable recurrence rate of iCCA, affecting approximately two-thirds of cases within one year, and results in a median survival of less than 12 months for recurrent cases. Nearly 50% of patients initially considered eligible for surgical resection in iCCA cases are ultimately deemed ineligible during surgical exploration. Therefore, staging laparoscopy has been proposed to reduce unnecessary laparotomy. Eligibility for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) requires certain criteria to be granted. OLT offers survival advantages for early-detected unresectable iCCA; it can be combined with other treatments, such as radiofrequency ablation and transarterial chemoembolization, in specific cases. We aim to comprehensively describe the surgical strategies available for treating CCA, including the preoperative measures and interventions, alongside the current options regarding liver resection and OLT.

Successful Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Weight Loss Program Including GLP1 Receptor Agonists for Liver Transplant Candidates With High Body Mass Index.

Body mass index (BMI) >40 is considered a relative contraindication to liver transplant. However, there is little research regarding best practices for weight loss in this population. We hypothesized that providing multidisciplinary support, including the use of glucagon-like protein 1 receptor agonists would facilitate patients' achievement of weight loss necessary for transplant eligibility. Patients 18 y or older were referred to the Henry Ford Health Liver Metabolic Clinic from August 2019 to September 2023, with either BMI >40 or >35 with abdominal adiposity that would complicate surgery. Patients were provided individualized support from hepatologists, dieticians, and counselors, as well as prescribed antiobesity medication and monitored closely for weight loss progress. Among 19 patients referred to the Liver Metabolic Clinic, median baseline BMI was 42 (range, 34.6-48.8) with median goal weight loss of 14.1 kg (range, 4.1-31.4). Sixteen patients (84%) had metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis and 3 patients had alcohol-associated liver disease. Seven had comorbid hepatocellular carcinoma. Median Model for End-stage Liver Disease score was 14 (range, 7-22). Fifteen patients were treated with a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (6 patients received liraglutide, 8 received semaglutide, and 1 received tirzepatide) and 4 received phentermine. Median weight loss was 11.7 kg for all 19 patients (range, 0-33). Eight patients received a transplant and 4 more patients were waitlisted. Time from baseline to waitlisting was ~5.5 mo (median 166 d; range, 68-840). Three patients remained on treatment, whereas 4 were deceased due to progressive liver disease or infection. Providing high BMI patients with individualized dietary and medical support can facilitate weight loss necessary to achieve liver transplant eligibility.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Optimal Radiological Evaluation before Liver Transplantation.

Liver transplantation (LT) is the recommended curative-intent treatment for patients with early or intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are ineligible for resection. Imaging plays a central role in staging and for selecting the best LT candidates. This review will discuss recent developments in pre-LT imaging assessment, in particular LT eligibility criteria on imaging, the technical requirements and the diagnostic performance of imaging for the pre-LT diagnosis of HCC including the recent Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) criteria, the evaluation of the response to locoregional therapy, as well as the non-invasive prediction of HCC aggressiveness and its impact on the outcome of LT. We will also briefly discuss the role of nuclear medicine in the pre-LT evaluation and the emerging role of artificial intelligence models in patients with HCC.

Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease: Evolving Concepts and Treatments.

Alcohol is a prominent cause of liver disease worldwide with higher prevalence in developed nations. The spectrum of alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) encompasses a diverse range of clinical entities, from asymptomatic isolated steatosis to decompensated cirrhosis, and in some cases, acute or chronic liver failure. Consequently, it is important for healthcare practitioners to maintain awareness and systematically screen for ALD. The optimal evaluation and management of ALD necessitates a collaborative approach, incorporating a multidisciplinary team and accounting for concurrent medical conditions. A repertoire of therapeutic interventions exists to support patients in achieving alcohol cessation and sustaining remission, with complete abstinence being the ultimate objective. This review explores the existing therapeutic options for ALD acknowledging geographical discrepancies in accessibility. Recent innovations, including the inclusion of alcohol consumption biomarkers into clinical protocols and the expansion of liver transplantation eligibility to encompass severe alcohol-associated hepatitis, are explored.

AFP-L3 and DCP strongly predict early hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation

Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) predicts hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after liver transplant (LT) but remains an imperfect biomarker. The role of DCP (des-gamma-carboxyprothrombin) and AFP-L3 (AFP bound to Lens culinaris agglutinin) in predicting HCC recurrence remains incompletely characterized. AFP-L3 and DCP could identify patients at high risk of post-transplant HCC recurrence and serve as liver transplant exclusion criteria to defer transplant until patients receive additional risk-reducing pre-transplant locoregional therapy. This prospective cohort study included consecutive patients with HCC who underwent LT (within or down-staged to Milan criteria) between 2017 and 2022. Pre-transplant AFP, AFP-L3, and DCP measurements were obtained. The primary endpoint was the ability of biomarkers to predict HCC recurrence-free survival. This cohort included 285 patients with a median age of 67 (IQR 63-71). At LT, median biomarker values were AFP 5.0ng/ml (IQR 3.0-12.1), AFP-L3 6.7% (0.5-13.2), and DCP 1.0ng/ml (0.3-2.8). Most (94.7%) patients received pre-LT locoregional therapy. After a median post-LT follow-up of 3.1 years, HCC recurrence was observed in 18 (6.3%) patients. AFP-L3 and DCP outperformed AFP with C-statistics of 0.81 and 0.86 respectively, compared with 0.74 for AFP. A dual-biomarker combination of AFP-L3 ≥15% and DCP ≥7.5 predicted 61.1% of HCC recurrences, whereas HCC only recurred in 7 of 265 (2.6%) patients not meeting this threshold. The Kaplan-Meier recurrence-free survival rate at 3 years post-LT was 43.7% for patients with dual-positive biomarkers compared to 97.0% for all others (p <0.001). Dual-positivity for AFP-L3 ≥15% and DCP ≥7.5 strongly predicted post-LT HCC recurrence. This model could refine LT selection criteria and identify high-risk patients who require additional locoregional therapy prior to LT. Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is used to predict hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after liver transplant, but it remains an imperfect biomarker. In this prospective study, the biomarkers DCP (des-gamma-carboxyprothrombin) and AFP-L3 (AFP bound to Lens culinaris agglutinin) strongly predicted early HCC recurrence and outperformed AFP. A dual-biomarker combination of AFP-L3 ≥15% and DCP ≥7.5 predicted the majority of recurrences and could be used to further refine liver transplant eligibility criteria.

Assessment of liver transplantation eligibility for ACLF patients

Acute on Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF) is a severe condition that can be seen in all patients with liver disease and is associated with high short-term mortality. Decompensated cirrhosis and organ failures resulting can lead to an admission in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) where only few tools can be used to evaluate the safety or futility of care, including liver transplantation. High short-term mortality for patients with ACLF admitted in ICU is a reason to ethically propose a liver transplantation as a curative treatment despite the existence of multi-organ failures. However, caution is advised for patients with grade-3 ACLF as they have to be attentively selected by a multidisciplinary approach, carefully evaluated and may benefit from an early transplant with a low-risk donor graft. Recent use of perfusion machine to increase outcomes after liver transplant in these urgent situations still needs to be evaluated. This review summarizes the ACLF entity and presents some recommendations about liver transplantation (LT) candidates in terms of selection, evaluation and timing of LT.

Radiological-histopathological discordance in patients transplanted for HCC and its impact on post-transplant outcomes.

Contrast-enhanced cross-sectional imaging is the cornerstone in the diagnosis, staging, and management of HCC, including eligibility for liver transplantation (LT). Radiological-histopathological discordance may lead to improper staging and may impact patient outcomes. We aimed to assess the radiological-histopathological discordance at the time of LT in HCC patients and its impact on the post-LT outcomes. We analyzed further the effect of 6-month waiting policy on the discordance. Using United Network for Organ Sharing-Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (UNOS-OPTN) database, we examined the discordance between pre-LT imaging and explant histopathology for all adult HCC patients who received liver transplants from deceased donors between April 2012 and December 2017. Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the impact of discordance on 3-year HCC recurrence and mortality. Of 6842 patients included in the study, 66.7% were within Milan criteria on both imaging and explant histopathology, and 33.3% were within the Milan based on imaging but extended beyond Milan on explant histopathology. Male gender, increasing numbers of tumors, bilobar distribution, larger tumor size, and increasing AFP are associated with increased discordance. Post-LT HCC recurrence and death were significantly higher in patients who were discordant, with histopathology beyond Milan (adj HR 1.86, 95% CI 1.32-2.63 for mortality and 1.32, 95% CI 1.03-1.70 for recurrence). Graft allocation policy with 6-month waiting time led to increased discordance (OR 1.19, CI 1.01-1.41), although it did not impact post-LT outcome. Current practice for staging of HCC based on radiological imaging features alone results in underestimation of HCC burden in one out of three patients with HCC. This discordance is associated with a higher risk of post-LT HCC recurrence and mortality. These patients will need enhanced surveillance to optimize patient selection and aggressive LRT to reduce post-LT recurrence and increase survival.

Prospective evaluation of Gadoxetate-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography for hepatocellular carcinoma detection and transplant eligibility assessment with explant histopathology correlation

BackgroundWe aimed to prospectively compare the diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (EOB-MRI) and contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography (CECT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) detection and liver transplant (LT) eligibility assessment in cirrhotic patients with explant histopathology correlation.MethodsIn this prospective, single-institution ethics-approved study, 101 cirrhotic patients were enrolled consecutively from the pre-LT clinic with written informed consent. Patients underwent CECT and EOB-MRI alternately every 3 months until LT or study exclusion. Two blinded radiologists independently scored hepatic lesions on CECT and EOB-MRI utilizing the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) version 2018. Liver explant histopathology was the reference standard. Pre-LT eligibility accuracies with EOB-MRI and CECT as per Milan criteria (MC) were assessed in reference to post-LT explant histopathology. Lesion-level and patient-level statistical analyses were performed.ResultsSixty patients (49 men; age 33–72 years) underwent LT successfully. One hundred four non-treated HCC and 42 viable HCC in previously treated HCC were identified at explant histopathology. For LR-4/5 category lesions, EOB-MRI had a higher pooled sensitivity (86.7% versus 75.3%, p < 0.001) but lower specificity (84.6% versus 100%, p < 0.001) compared to CECT. EOB-MRI had a sensitivity twice that of CECT (65.9% versus 32.2%, p < 0.001) when all HCC identified at explant histopathology were included in the analysis instead of imaging visible lesions only. Disregarding the hepatobiliary phase resulted in a significant drop in EOB-MRI performance (86.7 to 72.8%, p < 0.001). EOB-MRI had significantly lower pooled sensitivity and specificity versus CECT in the LR5 category with lesion size < 2 cm (50% versus 79%, p = 0.002 and 88.9% versus 100%, p = 0.002). EOB-MRI had higher sensitivity (84.8% versus 75%, p < 0.037) compared to CECT for detecting < 2 cm viable HCC in treated lesions. Accuracies of LT eligibility assessment were comparable between EOB-MRI (90–91.7%, p = 0.156) and CECT (90–95%, p = 0.158).ConclusionEOB-MRI had superior sensitivity for HCC detection; however, with lower specificity compared to CECT in LR4/5 category lesions while it was inferior to CECT in the LR5 category under 2 cm. The accuracy for LT eligibility assessment based on MC was not significantly different between EOB-MRI and CECT.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03342677, Registered: November 17, 2017.

Machine Learning Models for Prediction of Posttreatment Recurrence in Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Pretreatment Clinical and MRI Features: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

BACKGROUND. Posttreatment recurrence is an unpredictable complication after liver transplant for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that is associated with poor survival. Biomarkers are needed to estimate recurrence risk before organ allocation. OBJECTIVE. This proof-of-concept study evaluated the use of machine learning (ML) to predict recurrence from pretreatment laboratory, clinical, and MRI data in patients with early-stage HCC initially eligible for liver transplant. METHODS. This retrospective study included 120 patients (88 men, 32 women; median age, 60.0 years) with early-stage HCC diagnosed who were initially eligible for liver transplant and underwent treatment by transplant, resection, or thermal ablation between June 2005 and March 2018. Patients underwent pretreatment MRI and posttreatment imaging surveillance. Imaging features were extracted from postcontrast phases of pretreatment MRI examinations using a pretrained convolutional neural network. Pretreatment clinical characteristics (including laboratory data) and extracted imaging features were integrated to develop three ML models (clinical model, imaging model, combined model) for predicting recurrence within six time frames ranging from 1 through 6 years after treatment. Kaplan-Meier analysis with time to recurrence as the endpoint was used to assess the clinical relevance of model predictions. RESULTS. Tumor recurred in 44 of 120 (36.7%) patients during follow-up. The three models predicted recurrence with AUCs across the six time frames of 0.60-0.78 (clinical model), 0.71-0.85 (imaging model), and 0.62-0.86 (combined model). The mean AUC was higher for the imaging model than the clinical model (0.76 vs 0.68, respectively; p = .03), but the mean AUC was not significantly different between the clinical and combined models or between the imaging and combined models (p > .05). Kaplan-Meier curves were significantly different between patients predicted to be at low risk and those predicted to be at high risk by all three models for the 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year time frames (p < .05). CONCLUSION. The findings suggest that ML-based models can predict recurrence before therapy allocation in patients with early-stage HCC initially eligible for liver transplant. Adding MRI data as model input improved predictive performance over clinical parameters alone. The combined model did not surpass the imaging model's performance. CLINICAL IMPACT. ML-based models applied to currently underutilized imaging features may help design more reliable criteria for organ allocation and liver transplant eligibility.

Comparison of international guidelines for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma and implications for transplant allocation in liver transplantation candidates with gadoxetic acid enhanced liver MRI versus contrast enhanced CT: a prospective study with liver explant histopathological correlation

ObjectivesTo compare the diagnostic performance of international hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) guidelines with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (EOB-MRI) and contrast-enhanced Computed tomography (CECT) and their impact on liver transplant (LT) allocation in cirrhotic patients with explant histopathology correlation.MethodsIn this prospective single-centre ethics-approved study, 101 cirrhotic patients were consecutively enrolled with informed consent from the pre-LT clinic. They underwent CECT and EOB-MRI alternately at three monthly intervals until LT or removal from LT list. Two abdominal radiologists, blinded to explant histopathology, independently recorded liver lesions visible on CECT and EOB-MRI. Imaging-based HCC scores were assigned to non-treated liver lesions utilizing Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS), European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), Asian-Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) and Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center (KLCA) guidelines. Liver explant histopathology was the reference standard. Simulated LT eligibility was assessed as per Milan criteria (MC) in reference to explant histopathology.ResultsOne hundred and three non-treated HCC and 12 non-HCC malignancy were identified at explant histopathology in 34 patients (29 men, 5 women, age 55–73 years). Higher HCC sensitivities of statistical significance were observed with EOB-MRI for LI-RADS 4 + 5, APASL and KLCA compared to LI-RADS 5 and EASL with greatest sensitivity obtained for LIRADS 4 + 5 lesions. HCC sensitivities by all guidelines with both EOB-MRI and CECT were significantly lower if all histopathology-detected HCCs were included in the analysis, compared to imaging-visible lesions only. A significantly greater variation in HCC sensitivity was noted across the guidelines with EOB-MRI compared to CECT. No significant differences in simulated LT eligibility based on MC were observed across the HCC scoring guidelines with EOB-MRI or CECT.ConclusionHCC sensitivities are variable depending on scoring guideline, lesion size and imaging modality utilised. Prior studies that included only lesions visible on pre-operative imaging overestimate the diagnostic performance of HCC scoring guidelines. Per-lesion differences in HCC diagnosis across these guidelines did not impact patient-level LT eligibility based on MC.

S3342 Inpatient Initiation of Pharmacotherapy for Obesity to Improve Liver Transplant Eligibility: A Case Report

Introduction: Obesity is one of the most prevalent chronic diseases worldwide, associated with cardiovascular disease and reduced life expectancy. Guidelines recommend pharmacotherapy for BMI 30 (or 27 with comorbidities). Despite this, many patients cannot access pharmacotherapy for obesity due to inadequate insurance coverage. We present a case of a patient with Wilson’s cirrhosis and obesity, who was admitted for decompensated cirrhosis, but could not be listed for transplant due to elevated BMI. We discuss the challenge of inpatient initiation of pharmacotherapy for obesity. Case Description/Methods: 36 year old woman with Wilson’s/NASH cirrhosis and Class III Obesity (BMI > 60) presented with decompensated cirrhosis. She was admitted with anasarca, transaminitis, hyperbilirubinemia, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), and a MELD-Na of 36. She was started on trientine and Zinc for her Wilson’s, antibiotics for SBP, and diuresis. She was evaluated by transplant surgery, who noted that her BMI and central adiposity would prohibitively increase peri-operative risk for liver transplantation and decrease chance of post-transplant success. They recommended BMI of 50 or less prior to consideration for liver transplant. The hepatology team then recommended inpatient initiation of weekly subcutaneous semaglutide to help achieve this BMI target. While there are not robust data on the use of GLP-1 agonists in decompensated cirrhosis, based on studies in NASH cirrhosis and on its pharmacokinetic profile, we felt that the potential risks of GLP-1 agonist therapy were outweighed by the benefit of improved eligibility for liver transplantation. Unfortunately, her insurance denied coverage for any weight loss medication. However, we were able to initiate liraglutide as inpatient since it does not require prior authorization. To date, she has lost 32 lbs. Discussion: This case reviews the inpatient initiation of pharmacotherapy for obesity to improve eligibility for liver transplant. Unfortunately, there were insurance barriers to obesity treatment. While semaglutide would have been covered for diabetes treatment, it was not covered for obesity. Insurance coverage decisions may therefore worsen existing health disparities. We advocate for increased access to pharmacotherapy for obesity in the inpatient setting and believe that obesity should be treated as intensively as other chronic diseases. In the future, we hope that insurance coverage will not present a barrier to potential life-saving pharmacotherapy for obesity

Current status of liver transplantation for non-B non-C liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma.

Recently, non-B non-C chronic liver diseases, including alcoholic liver disease (ALD) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), have markedly increased worldwide. Liver transplantation (LT) is an effective curative therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as well as decompensated liver cirrhosis. In Japan, where the source of liver grafts is strongly dependent on living donors, efforts have been made to unify the indications for eligibility of HCC patients for LT, leading to the development of 5-5-500 criteria. Along with the expansion of eligibility for LT, the current changing trends in underlying liver diseases of LT recipients, which are related to the rising tide of non-B non-C cirrhosis and HCC, are highlighting the importance of peri-transplant management of patients with various comorbidities. The post-LT prognosis of patients with ALD is significantly affected by de novo malignancies and metabolic syndrome-related complications as well as posttransplant alcohol relapse. NAFLD/NASH patients often suffer from obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and other metabolic syndrome-related disorders, and nonneoplastic factors such as cardiovascular events and recurrence of NAFLD/NASH have a significant impact on post-LT outcomes. Patient management in the peri-transplant period as well as risk assessment for LT are key to improving post-LT outcomes in the era of a growing number of cases of LT for non-B non-C liver diseases.

Diet Satisfaction and Adequate Food Intake in Patients with Chronic Liver Diseases

ObjectivesTo describe relationships between diet satisfaction, ability to eat, and CLD. MethodsData collected from 354 patients with CLD was used for this analysis, including 2 items from the validated Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ): item 7 “ability to eat as much as you like” (EA), and item 14 “bothered by a limitation of your diet” (SWD). Results were stratified by existing diagnosis (Cirrhosis and all-type Hepatitis) and severity of disease [Childs-Pugh score (CP-A, mild; CP-B, moderate; CP-C, severe)]; AST (abnormal > 40 U/L) and ALT (abnormal > 55 U/L). Ordinal Logistic Regression, with odds and likelihood ratios, modeled disease severity CP A-C; general linear models examined EA and SWD. All models adjusted for age and sex. Results354 CLD patients were included [mean age 50.4y (±11.2); 51% male; 222 cirrhosis; 145 hepatitis; 135 with abnormal AST; 131 abnormal ALT; 100 had CP score A; 83 CP-B; 38 CP-C] Of those included, 31% (n = 110) reported low EA (EA-L), and 25% (n = 88) reported low SWD (SWD-L). In patients with cirrhosis, 36% (n = 80) reported EA-L, and 33% (n = 73) SWD-L. 30% (n = 43) of patients with hepatitis reported EA-L, and 22% SWD-L. 33% (n = 45) of patients with abnormal AST reported EA-L, 30% (n = 41) SWD-L; 40% (n = 52) of those with abnormal ALT reported EA-L, 35% (n = 46) SWD-L. 50% (n = 19) with CP-C had EA-L, 63% (n = 24) SWD-L. 43% (n = 36) with CP-B had EA-L, 39% (n = 32) SWD-L. 25% (n = 25) with CP-A had EA-L, 17% (n = 17) SWD-L. Worsening CP scores were 22.68x (p = .0004) more likely associated with EA-L; the odds of patients with CP-C reporting EA-L was 3.3x greater compared normal CP. Similarly, worse CP scores were 56.99x (p < .0001) more likely associated with SWD-L; odds of patients with CP-C reporting SWD-L were 16.2x greater compared to normal. EA described 23% of variance in SWD (p < .0001), and SWD explained 25% of the variance in EA (p < .0001). Sex was significantly associated with SWD (0.55 ± 0.2, p < .0001), age was not. Neither were significant for EA. ConclusionsEA-L and SWD-L strongly relate to worsening disease severity as documented by CP scores. Diet satisfaction and ability to eat as much as you like should be monitored closely for patients with CLD, especially those with cirrhosis because these symptoms signal loss of lean mass– a health risk, and one that may preclude eligibility for life-saving liver transplantation. Funding SourcesNIFA National Needs Fellowship

Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018 on CT for Determining Eligibility for Liver Transplant According to Milan Criteria in Patients at High Risk for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND. LI-RADS has been investigated primarily in terms of detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with less attention given to its performance, particularly on CT, in determining eligibility for liver transplant (LT). OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to assess the performance of LI-RADS version 2018 (v2018) on CT for the diagnosis of HCC and determination of LT eligibility according to the Milan criteria (MC). METHODS. This retrospective study included 136 patients (110 men, 26 women; mean age, 53.9 ± 8.1 [SD] years) at high-risk for HCC who underwent liver protocol CT within 3 months before LT between January 2010 and December 2018. Two radiologists independently reviewed CT examinations using LI-RADS v2018; Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) classes were constructed from the LI-RADS interpretations. Histopathologic analysis of liver explants served as the reference standard for determining the presence of HCC and LT eligibility based on MC. Diagnostic performance was evaluated. Overall survival (OS) was assessed based on medical record review. RESULTS. Based on histopathologic evaluation of liver explants in the 136 patients, 27 patients had no malignancy, 77 were eligible for LT due to HCC within MC, and 32 were unsuitable for LT (i.e., HCC beyond MC in 16 patients, HCC with macrovascular invasion in 12, non-HCC malignancy in four). LR-5 exhibited per-lesion sensitivity and PPV for HCC of 55.9% and 92.8%, respectively, for reader 1 and 39.8% and 86.5% for reader 2. When considering LR-5 observations to represent HCC in assessing MC, LI-RADS had accuracy for determining LT eligibility of 92.7% for reader 1 and 85.3% for reader 2; OPTN criteria had accuracy for determining LT eligibility of 89.0% for reader 1 and 84.4% for reader 2. Five-year OS for patients within MC versus 5-year OS for patients unsuitable for LT was 92.2 months versus 56.0 months for LI-RADS, 92.6 months versus 47.6 months for OPTN criteria, and 93.3 months versus 55.1 months for histopathologic assessment of liver explants. CONCLUSION. LI-RADS v2018, as evaluated on CT in high-risk patients, shows high PPV for HCC detection and high accuracy for determining LT eligibility based on MC. LT eligibility based on preoperative LI-RADS evaluation is associated with post-LT survival. CLINICAL IMPACT. These findings support the use of LI-RADS on CT in assessing eligibility in patients who are candidates for LT.

Blood phosphatidylethanol testing and liver transplant eligibility selection: A step closer

-