Abstract

Introduction: Obesity is one of the most prevalent chronic diseases worldwide, associated with cardiovascular disease and reduced life expectancy. Guidelines recommend pharmacotherapy for BMI 30 (or 27 with comorbidities). Despite this, many patients cannot access pharmacotherapy for obesity due to inadequate insurance coverage. We present a case of a patient with Wilson’s cirrhosis and obesity, who was admitted for decompensated cirrhosis, but could not be listed for transplant due to elevated BMI. We discuss the challenge of inpatient initiation of pharmacotherapy for obesity. Case Description/Methods: 36 year old woman with Wilson’s/NASH cirrhosis and Class III Obesity (BMI > 60) presented with decompensated cirrhosis. She was admitted with anasarca, transaminitis, hyperbilirubinemia, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), and a MELD-Na of 36. She was started on trientine and Zinc for her Wilson’s, antibiotics for SBP, and diuresis. She was evaluated by transplant surgery, who noted that her BMI and central adiposity would prohibitively increase peri-operative risk for liver transplantation and decrease chance of post-transplant success. They recommended BMI of 50 or less prior to consideration for liver transplant. The hepatology team then recommended inpatient initiation of weekly subcutaneous semaglutide to help achieve this BMI target. While there are not robust data on the use of GLP-1 agonists in decompensated cirrhosis, based on studies in NASH cirrhosis and on its pharmacokinetic profile, we felt that the potential risks of GLP-1 agonist therapy were outweighed by the benefit of improved eligibility for liver transplantation. Unfortunately, her insurance denied coverage for any weight loss medication. However, we were able to initiate liraglutide as inpatient since it does not require prior authorization. To date, she has lost 32 lbs. Discussion: This case reviews the inpatient initiation of pharmacotherapy for obesity to improve eligibility for liver transplant. Unfortunately, there were insurance barriers to obesity treatment. While semaglutide would have been covered for diabetes treatment, it was not covered for obesity. Insurance coverage decisions may therefore worsen existing health disparities. We advocate for increased access to pharmacotherapy for obesity in the inpatient setting and believe that obesity should be treated as intensively as other chronic diseases. In the future, we hope that insurance coverage will not present a barrier to potential life-saving pharmacotherapy for obesity

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.