Liver Transplant Program Research Articles

Liver transplant program at Botkin Hospital. Experience of 100 surgeries

Objective: to present an analysis of the results of 100 cadaveric liver transplants performed at Botkin Hospital from July 2018 to October 2021. Materials and methods. From July 2018 to October 2021, 100 orthotopic liver transplantation (LTx) from a deceased donor were performed at the surgical clinic of Botkin Hospital. The recipients were 58 males (58%) and 42 females (42%). The mean age of the recipients was 48.73 ± 8.56 (24–66) years, while their mean MELD was 19.54 ± 4.35 (15–33). The main indications for LTx were cirrhosis resulting from chronic viral hepatitis (CVH) C (52%), nutritional-toxic cirrhosis (20%), autoimmune liver and bile duct disease (18%), CVH B (7%), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (3%). During the period under study, 119 potential liver transplant donors were evaluated. The mean age of the donors was 44.2 ± 11.12 (21–63) years. Median levels of sodium, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and bilirubin were 141 (138–146) mmol/L, 27 (20.7–47.4) units/L, 25 (17–41.5) units/L, and 9.65 (6.42–13.7) μmol/L, respectively. The median graft hepatic steatosis was 10% (5–15). LTx was performed using the piggyback technique (99/100 cases) and classic technique with inferior vena cava resection (1/100). End-to-end porto-portal vein anastomosis was performed (99/100 cases). Anastomosis of the donor organ’s portal vein with the recipient’s left gastric vein due to occlusive thrombosis of the recipient’s portal vein was carried out (1/100). In all cases, a continuous end-to-end arterial anastomosis was formed. End-to-end choledochocholedochal anastomotic strictures (95/100) and end-to-side hepaticojejunostomy (5/100) were formed. Results. Median cold ischemia time was 312.5 minutes (280–380). Mean operative time was 488.91 ± 65.34 (95% CI: 475.9–501.9) minutes, median intraoperative blood loss was 1000 (600–1500) mL. Thirty-day mortality was 2% (Clavien–Dindo class V). Early postoperative complications (Clavien–Dindo class IIIa–IVa) developed in 12/100 patients (12%). Graft arterial thrombosis occurred in 3 cases (3%), biliary anastomotic strictures in 6 (6%), and subhepatic hematoma in 2 (2%). The average intensive care unit (ICU) bed day was 2.34 ± 1.67 (1–8). Total postoperative bed-day was 14.63 ± 5.35 (10–39). During case follow-up, a prolonged form of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) was administered as immunosuppressive therapy in mono regimen (85 patients), in combination with mycophenolic acid derivatives (7), and in combination with everolimus (6). Of the 93 patients, 46 patients (49.46%) had the new coronavirus infection (COVID-19) before or after transplantation; in no case did COVID-19 lead to death. Six patients (13.04%) were hospitalized due to COVID-19. To date, 33/93 (25.48%) patients have been vaccinated, resulting in 75 (75%) liver transplant recipients immune to COVID-19. The overall 1-year survival rate was 95% and the 3-year survival rate was 91%. Conclusion. Introduction of LTx in multidisciplinary hospitals allows to, already at the start of the program, achieve immediate and long-term treatment outcomes (in decompensated diffuse liver disease) that are comparable to those of leading transplantation centers.

Impact of COVID-19 on living donor liver and kidney transplantation programs in Japan in 2020.

BackgroundAlthough many transplant programs have been forced to suspend living donor transplants due to the emergence of coronavirus disease (COVID‐19), there are relatively few real‐time databases to assess center‐level transplant activities. We aimed to delineate the actual impact of COVID‐19 on living donor transplant programs and the resumption process in Japan.MethodsIn a nationwide survey, questionnaires were sent to 32 liver transplant programs that had performed at least more than one case of living donor liver transplantation in 2019 and 132 kidney transplant programs that had performed more than one living donor kidney transplantation in 2018.ResultsThirty‐one (96.9%) and 125 (94.7%) liver and kidney transplant programs responded, respectively. In the early pandemic period, 67.7% (21/31) of liver programs and 29.8% (37/125) of kidney programs were able to maintain transplant activities similar to those during the pre‐pandemic period. After temporal suspension, 58.1% of kidney programs resumed their transplant activity after the number of local COVID‐19 cases peaked. Establishing institutional COVID‐19 screening, triage, and therapeutic management protocols was mandatory to resume transplant activity for 64.5% and 67.7% of liver and kidney programs, respectively. In the future wave of COVID‐19, 67.7% of liver programs would be affected by institutional COVID‐19 intensive care unit‐bound patient numbers, and 55.7% of kidney programs would stop if hospital‐acquired severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus‐2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) infection spreads.Conclusions: This nationwide survey revealed for the first time how living donor liver and kidneytransplant programs changed in response to the COVID‐19 pandemic in a country where living donor transplantations are predominant.

Four year experience of liver transplantation program in national cancer center of Mongolia

Four year experience of liver transplantation program in national cancer center of Mongolia

Liver Transplantation in Hepatitis B/Hepatitis D (Delta) Virus Coinfected Recipients.

Hepatitis D is caused by the hepatitis D virus (HDV); it is the most severe form of viral hepatitis in humans, running an accelerated course to cirrhosis. There is no efficacious therapy, and liver transplantation provides the only therapeutic option for terminal HDV disease. However, HDV infection is prevalent in poor countries of the world with no access to liver transplant programs; liver grafting has been performed in high-income countries, where the prevalence of the infection has much diminished as a secondary effect of hepatitis B virus vaccination, and the demand for liver transplantation outlives in aging cirrhotics who acquired hepatitis D decades ago. This review describes the evolution of liver transplantation for HDV disease from its inception in 1987 to the present time, with an outlook to its future. It reports the progress in the prophylaxis of HDV reinfections to the success of the current standard of indefinite combination of hepatitis B virus antivirals with immunoglobulins against the hepatitis B surface antigen; however, the unique biology of the virus provides a rationale to reducing costs by limiting the administration of the immunoglobulins against the hepatitis B surface antigen.

Development of a prognostic model for pediatric acute liver failure in a Brazilian center

ObjectivePediatric acute liver failure (PALF) is a heterogeneous, rare, and severe condition, which outcome is survival due to liver spontaneous recovery or death. The patients who do not recover may be allocated to liver transplantation, which is the standard treatment. This study aimed to build a prognostic model to support the clinical decision to indicate liver transplantation for patients with PALF in a Brazilian center. MethodsThe authors retrospectively analyzed the clinical variables of 120 patients in the liver transplantation program of the 'Children's Institute of the University of São Paulo, Brazil. The authors conducted a univariate analysis of variables associated with survival in PALF. Logistic multivariate analysis was performed to find a prognostic model for the outcome of patients with pediatric acute liver failure. ResultsRisk factors were analyzed using univariate analysis. Two prognostic models were built using multiple logistic regression, which resulted in 2 models: model 1(INR/ALT) and model 2 (INR/Total bilirubin). Both models showed a high sensitivity (97.9%/96.9%), good positive predictive value (89.5%/90.4%), and accuracy (88.4%/88.5%), respectively. The receiver operating characteristic was calculated for both models, and the area under the curve was 0.87 for model 1 and 0.88 for model 2. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed that model 1 was good. ConclusionThe authors built a prognostic model for PALF using INR and ALT that can contribute to the clinical decision to allocate patients to liver transplantation.

Anatomical characterization of potential liver donor in a living donor liver transplantation program in Latin America

Anatomical characterization of potential liver donor in a living donor liver transplantation program in Latin America

Editorial introductions.

Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation was launched in 1996. It is part of a successful series of review journals whose unique format is designed to provide a systematic and critical assessment of the literature as presented in the many primary journals. The field of organ transplantation is divided into 18 sections that are reviewed once a year. Each section is assigned a Section Editor, a leading authority in the area, who identifies the most important topics at that time. Here we are pleased to introduce the Section Editors for this issue. SECTION EDITORS Joseph F. MaglioccaJoseph F. MaglioccaJoseph F. Magliocca, MD, is Assistant Professor in the Division of Transplantation in the Department of Surgery at Emory University School of Medicine. Dr Magliocca, a board certified surgeon specializing in liver transplantation, also serves as Surgical Director of the Liver Transplant Program at Children's Healthcare of Atlanta. Prior to his work at Emory, Dr Magliocca was the surgical director of adult and pediatric liver transplantation as well as pancreas transplantation at the University of Florida College of Medicine. He also directed the medical student and resident education components of University of Florida's transplant and hepatobiliary surgery program. Dr Magliocca belongs to numerous professional organizations including American College of Surgeons, American Society of Transplant Surgeons, The Transplantation Society, American Society of Transplantation, International Pediatric Transplant Association, International Pancreas and Islet Transplant Association, and Association for Academic Surgery. He is a member of the Cancer Prevention and Control Research Program at Winship. Dr Magliocca currently serves as an associate editor of the American Journal of Transplantation, and is actively engaged in clinical and translational research investigating the preservation and resuscitation of liver grafts. Dr Magliocca's research interests include organ preservation, ischemia/reperfusion injury and management of immunosuppression in patients following transplantation. Laurens J. CeulemansLaurens J. CeulemansLaurens J. Ceulemans (1985) graduated as medical doctor in 2010 at KU Leuven, Belgium (MD). In 2017 he obtained his PhD with his contributions to the clinical and basic science field of intestinal transplantation and ischemia reperfusion injury. After his specialization in general surgery (2018), he completed a clinical and research fellowship in thoracic surgery and transplantation at the University Hospitals and ETH Zürich in Switzerland. This fellowship was supported by several grants including the prestigious Horlait-Dapsens and ESOT schorlarships. Since 2019 he has worked as a thoracic and transplant surgeon at the department of Thoracic Surgery and the Leuven Intestinal Failure and Transplant (LIFT) center at the University Hospitals Leuven. He is appointed as professor in Surgery at KU Leuven and his basic research focuses on both the intestine and the lung. He is the author of 100 peer-reviewed papers and actively enrolled in several transplant societies. He is a council member for IRTA since 2018 and chair of the Membership and Education committee since 2021.

Rate of and Factors Associated with Palliative Care Referral among Patients Declined for Liver Transplantation.

Background: End-stage liver disease (ESLD) is associated with high morbidity and mortality, with liver transplantation as the only existing cure. Despite reduced quality of life and limited life expectancy, referral to palliative care (PC) rarely occurs. Moreover, there is scarcity of data on the appropriate timing and type of PC intervention needed. Aim: To evaluate PC utilization and documentation in ESLD patients declined or delisted for transplant at a tertiary care medical center with a large liver transplantation program. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients discussed in Liver Transplant Committee (LTC) at our academic medical center between August 2018 and May 2020 in the United States. Patients declined or delisted for liver transplantation were included. Baseline demographics, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, decompensation events, and reason for transplant ineligibility were recorded. The primary outcome was PC referral. Secondary outcomes included survival from LTC decision, time from LTC decision to PC referral, and code status in relation to PC referral. Results: Of 769 patients discussed at LTC, 135 were declined for transplantation. Thirty-seven (27%) received referral to PC. When adjusting for body mass index and age, MELD score of 21-30 had odds ratio (OR) of 4.5 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7-12.3) and MELD score >30 had OR of 12.8 (95% CI: 3.9-47.7) for PC referral when compared with MELD score <20. When adjusting for MELD score, presence of ascites had OR of 4.6 (95% CI: 1.1-19.1) and presence of multiple complications had OR of 2.2 (95% CI: 2.2-3.8). Conclusions: Only 37 (27%) patients delisted or declined for liver transplantation were referred to PC. MELD score and degree of decompensation were important factors associated with referral. Continued exploration of these data could help guide future studies and help determine timing and criteria for PC referral.

Positive blood phosphatidylethanol concentration is associated with unfavorable waitlist-related outcomes for patients medically appropriate for liver transplantation.

Excessive alcohol use is a leading etiology of liver disease and indication for liver transplantation. Accurate measurement of alcohol use remains a challenge in the management of patients in the pre-, peri-, and post-liver transplant settings. Blood 16:0-18:1 phosphatidylethanol (PEth) concentration is a sensitive and specific biomarker of binge and moderate, chronic alcohol use. As PEth has the longest detection window of available blood-based direct alcohol biomarkers for moderate to heavy drinking, it shows promise as an indicator of patterns and chronicity of drinking. However, the utility of PEth in clinical liver transplantation is understudied. This study examines the association of PEth results with liver transplantation waitlist-focused patient outcomes. Retrospective data for all patients tested for PEth for a one-year period at a tertiary care medical center with an active liver transplantation program were abstracted. Indications for PEth testing, liver transplantation waitlist-related outcomes (e.g., listing and delisting) following testing and associations of PEth results with other parameters were analyzed. Over a one-year period, 153 PEth tests were performed on 109 individuals. The most frequent indications for PEth testing were as an objective indicator of alcohol use patterns (86.3%) and to assess alcohol as a putative etiology of liver injury (13.7%). Of the 109 patients, 56 were medically appropriate for liver transplantation. Medically acceptable candidates with unfavorable transplantation waitlist-related outcomes (delisting, deferment of transplant evaluation, deferment of listing until completion of recommended alcohol rehabilitation, and being deemed not a transplant candidate) were at least 3.41 times more likely to have a positive PEth test than those with favorable transplantation waitlist-related outcomes (odds ratio 3.41, confidence interval 3.41 to ∞, p=0.001). This single-center study reporting a comprehensive account of PEth utilization at a liver transplant center demonstrates that liver transplantation waitlist-related outcomes are associated with PEth test results. Patients with positive PEth tests were more likely to have unfavorable transplant waitlist-related outcomes. PEth testing has not been validated as a predictor of relapse to drinking in post-transplant patients and because its utility in the pre-transplant setting is unclear its use could lead to disparities in the selection of patients for liver transplantation.

The Loss of a Great One.

The Loss of a Great One.

Surgical Outcomes of Domino Liver Transplantation Using Grafts From Living Donors With Familial Amyloid Polyneuropathy.

Domino liver transplantation (DLT) using grafts from donors with familial amyloid polyneuropathy is an acceptable procedure for expanding the donor pool. The vascular and biliary reconstructions in living donor DLT (LDDLT) are technically demanding, and data on the short-term and long-term surgical outcomes of domino donors and recipients in LDDLT are limited. In this study, we identified 25 domino recipients from our liver transplantation program (1999-2018), analyzed the vascular and biliary reconstructions performed, and evaluated the surgical outcomes, including graft survival. Piggyback technique was adopted in all 25 domino donors. The only surgical complication in domino donors was hepatic vein (HV) stenosis with an incidence rate of 4%. In 22 domino recipients, right HV and middle/left HV were reconstructed separately. A total of 10 recipients had 2 arteries anastomosed, and 18 underwent duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis. HV stenosis and biliary stricture had incidence rates of 8% and 24%, respectively, in the recipients, but none of them developed hepatic artery thrombosis. The 1-year and 5-year graft survival rates were 100% each in the domino donors, and 84.0% and 67.3% in the domino recipients, respectively. In conclusion, LDDLT has acceptable outcomes without increasing the operative risk in donors despite the demanding surgical technique involved.

Evolution of liver transplant waiting list in Hungary between 1995 and 2019.

The Hungarian liver transplant program including waiting list started in 1995. Evaluation of the wait-list parameters and comparing them with those in the literature. Data of patients listed for primary liver transplantation between 1995 and 2019 were analyzed. A total of 1722 recipient candidates were registered on the liver transplant waiting list: 1608 adults (51.2% men) with mean age of 45.6 year and 114 patients aged <18 year. Virus-induced cirrhosis was the leading indication of listing (n = 451) and cholestatic liver diseases (n = 314) and alcoholic cirrhosis (n = 264) thereafter. The mean Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was 13.5 for those with chronic disease. 61% of 1618 patients listed before December 31, 2018 underwent liver transplantation and 31% were removed from the wait-list for death or clinical deterioration. After joining Eurotransplant (period of 01. 07. 2013-31. 12. 2018), the transplant rate was 67%, the waiting list removal due to death/too sick for operation decreased to 24%. The median waiting time till transplantation was 248 days for those on elective and 2 days on acute list. Patients grafted with malignancy (n = 132) waited significantly shorter time than those with chronic non-malignant liver disease (median 115.5 versus 282 days). The composition of our waiting list by primary liver disease was similar to that of countries with large burden of hepatitis C. Transplant rate was average, wait-list mortality and waiting time were in line with those observed in low-donation countries or in the case of large volume waiting list. Listing of increasing the number of patients contributed to evolution of our liver transplant program. To improve our parameters, increasing transplant activity is warranted. Orv Hetil. 2022; 163(8): 301-311.

First experience of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting at multidisciplinary hospital with a liver transplantation program

Aim: Analysis of the first experience of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting (TIPS) in patients with liver cirrhosis at a multidisciplinary hospital with a liver transplantation program.Materials and methods: The authors examined 206 patients with liver cirrhosis from July 2019 to June 2021, with 20 of them undergoing TIPS. The mean age of the patients was 47.59 ± 9.55 years (35–65 years). Dynamic follow-up was performed at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months. As a part of the dynamic follow-up, the patients underwent laboratory tests, abdomen ultrasound examination, and computed tomography imaging enhanced by the intravenous use of contrasting agent, endoscopy, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and encephalopathy assessment.Results: No in-hospital TIPS-associated mortality has been reported. Two patients died in the hospital at the 19th and 26th day following the surgery because of the progression of liver failure, the 6-week mortality rate was 10%. In one patient (5%), an intraoperative complication was reported, i.e., intra-abdominal hemorrhage secondary to the migration of the stent under the liver capsule. The length of hospital stay after surgery was 7.34 ± 1.89 days (5–26 days). Long-term outcomes were available for 17 patients. The duration of the dynamic follow-up was 13.23 ± 2.47 months (3–24 months) and 2 (11,7%) deaths were reported. One patient (5.8%) was diagnosed with a shunt thrombosis at 12 months after the surgery. Three patients underwent liver transplantation after TIPS. The current one-year survival rate is 90%.Conclusion: TIPS is a safe and effective procedure decreasing mortality and improving quality of life of patients awaiting cadaveric liver transplantation. TIPS should be widely implemented in multidisciplinary hospitals having liver transplant program.

Cost-utility analysis of normothermic machine perfusion compared to static cold storage in liver transplantation in the Canadian setting

To estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness of a liver transplant program that utilizes normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) alongside static cold storage (SCS) compared to SCS alone (control). A Markov model compared strategies (NMP vs. control) using 1-year cycle lengths over a 5-year time horizon from the public healthcare payer perspective. Primary micro-costing data from a single center retrospective trial were applied along with utility values from literature sources. Transition probabilities were deduced using the retrospective trial cohort, local transplant data, and supplemented with literature values. Scenario and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) were conducted. The NMP strategy was cost-effective in comparison to the control strategy, which was dominated. The mean cost for NMP was $456 455 (2021 US$) and the control was $519 222. The NMP strategy had greater incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gains over 5 years compared to the control, with 3.48 versus 3.17, respectively. The overarching results remained unchanged in scenario analysis. In PSA, NMP was cost-effective in 63% of iterations at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $40 941. The addition of NMP to a liver transplant program results in greater QALY gains and is cost-effective from the public healthcare payer perspective.

Editorial introductions

Editorial introductions

Superior Long-Term Outcomes of Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Cumulative Single-Center Cohort Study With 20 Years of Follow-Up.

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is an attractive alternative to deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). Although both modalities have similar short-term outcomes, long-term outcomes are not well studied. We compared the 20-year outcomes of 668 adults who received LDLT with1596 DDLTs at the largest liver transplantation (LT) program in Canada. Recipients of LDLT were significantly younger and more often male than DDLT recipients (P<0.001). Autoimmune diseases were more frequent in LDLT, whereas viral hepatitis and alcohol-related liver disease were more frequent in DDLT. LDLT recipients had lower Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores (P=0.008), spent less time on the waiting list (P<0.001), and were less often inpatients at the time of LT (P<0.001). In a nonadjusted analysis, 1-year, 10-year, and 20-year patient survival rates were significantly higher in LDLT (93%, 74%, and 56%, respectively) versus DDLT (91%, 67%, and 46%, respectively; log-rankP=0.02) as were graft survival rates LDLT (91%, 67%, and 50%, respectively) versus (90%, 65%, and 44.3%, respectively, for DDLT; log-rankP=0.31). After multivariable adjustment, LDLT and DDLT were associated with a similar hazard of patient and graft survival. Our data of 20 years of follow-up of LDLT from a single, large Western center demonstrates excellent long-term outcomes for recipients of LDLT.

A coordinated national UK liver transplant program response, prioritizing waitlist recipients with the highest need, provided excellent outcomes during the first wave of the COVID‐19 pandemic

Healthcare provision has been severely affected by COVID-19, with specific challenges in organ transplantation. Here, we describe the coordinated response to, and outcomes during the first wave, across all UK liver transplant (LT) centers. Several policy changes affecting the liver transplant processes were agreed upon. These included donor age restrictions and changes to offering. A "high-urgency" (HU) category was established, prioritizing only those with UKELD>60, HCC reaching transplant criteria, and others likely to die within 90 days. Outcomes were compared with the same period in 2018 and 2019. The retrieval rate for deceased donor livers (71%vs. 54%; P<.0001) and conversion from offer to completed transplant (63%vs. 48%; P<.0001) was significantly higher. Pediatric LT activity was maintained; there was a significant reduction in adult (42%) and total (36%) LT. Almost all adult LT were super-urgent (n=15) or HU (n=133). We successfully prioritized those with highest illness severity with no reduction in 90-day patient (P=.89) or graft survival (P=.98). There was a small (5% compared with 3%; P=.0015) increase in deaths or removals from the waitlist, mainly amongst HU cohort. We successfully prioritized LT recipients in highest need, maintaining excellent outcomes, and waitlist mortality was only marginally increased.

Impact of Portable Normothermic Blood-Based Machine Perfusion on Outcomes of Liver Transplant

Ischemic cold storage (ICS) of livers for transplant is associated with serious posttransplant complications and underuse of liver allografts. To determine whether portable normothermic machine perfusion preservation of livers obtained from deceased donors using the Organ Care System (OCS) Liver ameliorates early allograft dysfunction (EAD) and ischemic biliary complications (IBCs). This multicenter randomized clinical trial (International Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of the Portable Organ Care System Liver for Preserving and Assessing Donor Livers for Transplantation) was conducted between November 2016 and October 2019 at 20 US liver transplant programs. The trial compared outcomes for 300 recipients of livers preserved using either OCS (n = 153) or ICS (n = 147). Participants were actively listed for liver transplant on the United Network of Organ Sharing national waiting list. Transplants were performed for recipients randomly assigned to receive donor livers preserved by either conventional ICS or the OCS Liver initiated at the donor hospital. The primary effectiveness end point was incidence of EAD. Secondary end points included OCS Liver ex vivo assessment capability of donor allografts, extent of reperfusion syndrome, incidence of IBC at 6 and 12 months, and overall recipient survival after transplant. The primary safety end point was the number of liver graft-related severe adverse events within 30 days after transplant. Of 293 patients in the per-protocol population, the primary analysis population for effectiveness, 151 were in the OCS Liver group (mean [SD] age, 57.1 [10.3] years; 102 [67%] men), and 142 were in the ICS group (mean SD age, 58.6 [10.0] years; 100 [68%] men). The primary effectiveness end point was met by a significant decrease in EAD (27 of 150 [18%] vs 44 of 141 [31%]; P = .01). The OCS Liver preserved livers had significant reduction in histopathologic evidence of ischemia-reperfusion injury after reperfusion (eg, less moderate to severe lobular inflammation: 9 of 150 [6%] for OCS Liver vs 18 of 141 [13%] for ICS; P = .004). The OCS Liver resulted in significantly higher use of livers from donors after cardiac death (28 of 55 [51%] for the OCS Liver vs 13 of 51 [26%] for ICS; P = .007). The OCS Liver was also associated with significant reduction in incidence of IBC 6 months (1.3% vs 8.5%; P = .02) and 12 months (2.6% vs 9.9%; P = .02) after transplant. This multicenter randomized clinical trial provides the first indication, to our knowledge, that normothermic machine perfusion preservation of deceased donor livers reduces both posttransplant EAD and IBC. Use of the OCS Liver also resulted in increased use of livers from donors after cardiac death. Together these findings indicate that OCS Liver preservation is associated with superior posttransplant outcomes and increased donor liver use. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02522871.

Living kidney donation and reasons for denial: A report from a Brazilian single-center cross-sectional study

Chronic kidney disease is increasingly more prevalent worldwide, and kidney transplant remains the best option for patient survival. Living kidney transplants (LKT) pose advantages over deceased donor transplants, such as longer graft survival, lower ischemia time, and better HLA match. However, LKT is not always attainable for multiples reasons, with the absence of a suitable living donor being a significant barrier. Therefore, meticulous donor screening must be performed in order to guarantee donation safety. We examined medical appointments of living kidney donors evaluated at Hospital do Rim, São Paulo, between January and December 2020. Reasons for not proceeding with the donation were evaluated and were categorized as medical, surgical, immunological, psychosocial, or other. A total of 506 donor -receptor pairs were enrolled for evaluation during the study period. More than half of screened donor -receptor pairs (N=296, 58.5%) were not considered feasible for LKT. The primary cause for refusal was medical contraindication (32.1%), followed by immune (21.3%) and social (19.3%) causes. In addition, a considerable proportion of patients voluntarily withdrew themselves at variable time points during the evaluation process (N=79). In our center, most patients did not meet the criteria for kidney donation owing to medical reasons, similarly to other centers, and this reflects the importance of meticulous donor screening. In addition, the current Covid -19 pandemic affected the living transplant program, contributing to delayed complete donor and receptor evaluation.

Factors Associated with Survival of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Patients at a Safety Net Hospital in Arizona without On-Site Liver Transplant Program.

BackgroundWith the rising incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), ongoing efforts should be focused on providing equitable and state-of-the-art care to patients.PurposeThe aim of this study was to determine the survival of patients with HCC seen at a high-proportion Safety Net Hospital (h-SNH), where loco-regional therapy and hepatology services are available and liver transplantation (LT) is referred to outside facilities.Patients and MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted on all patients with HCC seen at Valley Wise Health Center (VWHC) over a ten-year period. Clinical variables, treatment modalities, survival duration, hospice, and LT referrals of 161 patients were collected from the medical records. Survival analysis was used to determine the relationship of clinically relevant variables and survival among patients with HCC. A Log rank test was used to compare univariate variables. A Cox regression analysis was used to compare and control for multiple variables.ResultsOf the 161 patients included in the study, 33% were uninsured. The median age was 59 (21 to >89) years with 47% Hispanic, 31% Caucasian, 15% African American and 7% other races included for the analysis. The median survival for the cohort was 20.1 months. In the multivariate model, insurance status, final MELD, tumor within the Milan criteria and having received treatment for HCC were associated with survival. Surveillance for HCC was associated with HCC in the univariate analysis, but not in the multivariable model. Thirty percent of patients were referred for LT and 1.25% of the entire cohort received it.ConclusionDespite the availability of treatment modalities available for HCC at VWHC and the option of liver transplantation for appropriate candidates at outside centers, OS was less than reported from programs with on-site liver transplant programs. Reasons for lower survival in centers without liver transplant programs should be further studied.