Abstract

Ischemic cold storage (ICS) of livers for transplant is associated with serious posttransplant complications and underuse of liver allografts. To determine whether portable normothermic machine perfusion preservation of livers obtained from deceased donors using the Organ Care System (OCS) Liver ameliorates early allograft dysfunction (EAD) and ischemic biliary complications (IBCs). This multicenter randomized clinical trial (International Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of the Portable Organ Care System Liver for Preserving and Assessing Donor Livers for Transplantation) was conducted between November 2016 and October 2019 at 20 US liver transplant programs. The trial compared outcomes for 300 recipients of livers preserved using either OCS (n = 153) or ICS (n = 147). Participants were actively listed for liver transplant on the United Network of Organ Sharing national waiting list. Transplants were performed for recipients randomly assigned to receive donor livers preserved by either conventional ICS or the OCS Liver initiated at the donor hospital. The primary effectiveness end point was incidence of EAD. Secondary end points included OCS Liver ex vivo assessment capability of donor allografts, extent of reperfusion syndrome, incidence of IBC at 6 and 12 months, and overall recipient survival after transplant. The primary safety end point was the number of liver graft-related severe adverse events within 30 days after transplant. Of 293 patients in the per-protocol population, the primary analysis population for effectiveness, 151 were in the OCS Liver group (mean [SD] age, 57.1 [10.3] years; 102 [67%] men), and 142 were in the ICS group (mean SD age, 58.6 [10.0] years; 100 [68%] men). The primary effectiveness end point was met by a significant decrease in EAD (27 of 150 [18%] vs 44 of 141 [31%]; P = .01). The OCS Liver preserved livers had significant reduction in histopathologic evidence of ischemia-reperfusion injury after reperfusion (eg, less moderate to severe lobular inflammation: 9 of 150 [6%] for OCS Liver vs 18 of 141 [13%] for ICS; P = .004). The OCS Liver resulted in significantly higher use of livers from donors after cardiac death (28 of 55 [51%] for the OCS Liver vs 13 of 51 [26%] for ICS; P = .007). The OCS Liver was also associated with significant reduction in incidence of IBC 6 months (1.3% vs 8.5%; P = .02) and 12 months (2.6% vs 9.9%; P = .02) after transplant. This multicenter randomized clinical trial provides the first indication, to our knowledge, that normothermic machine perfusion preservation of deceased donor livers reduces both posttransplant EAD and IBC. Use of the OCS Liver also resulted in increased use of livers from donors after cardiac death. Together these findings indicate that OCS Liver preservation is associated with superior posttransplant outcomes and increased donor liver use. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02522871.

Highlights

  • Between November 2016 and October 2019, a total of 429 patients provided informed consent to participate in the PROTECT trial, and 300 patients were randomized and received a liver allograft (153 in the Organ Care System (OCS) Liver group and 147 in the ischemic cold storage (ICS) group) (Figure 2)

  • The as-treated population consisted of 299 patients (153 in the OCS Liver group and 146 in the ICS group); 1 patient in the OCS Liver group received an allograft without having been randomized, leaving the modified intention-to-treat population consisting of 298 patients (152 in the OCS Liver group and 146 in the ICS group)

  • The donor demographic characteristics and risk factors were comparable between the 2 groups except for more donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors (28 of 151; 19%) in the OCS Liver group (11 of 143; 8%)

Read more

Summary

Methods

Study Design The PROTECT trial, a pivotal multicenter randomized clinical trial, compared posttransplant outcomes for recipients who received donor livers preserved using ICS or the OCS Liver (trial protocol in Supplement 1). Following initial acceptance of a donor liver for transplant, recipients were randomized 1:1 to the OCS or ICS control group through the Interactive Web Response System. When donor livers were deemed unsuitable for transplant during intraoperative physical assessment, recipients remained eligible but were treated as a new patient and rerandomized to a group at their subsequent donor offer acceptance. This practice avoided potential bias of knowing the randomization assignment on the clinical decision of donor or-

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call