CO2 emissions from industrial activities has been imposed several environmental problems to the human life. Mitigation actions like designing and implementing the CO2 capture systems is a beneficial way to reduce the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. In the last part of capturing process, the CO2 needs to be pressurized to be transported, stored, or used elsewhere. In the present study, five different systems for the carbon dioxide post-capture are designed and compared with each other which include a multi-stage compression, basic and modified Claude, the ejector boosted absorption systems, and the new introduced ejector powered liquefaction system (EPLS). The effect of several decision parameters on the performance of each system is evaluated and the detailed energetic and exergetic analysis of the components in each system is carried out. The results show that the new introduced EPLS system has better performance (in terms of COP and second law efficiency) than other four systems and the multi-stage compression system has the nearest values to the EPLS. The dependency of the EPLS performance to the main decision parameters including the pressure ratio and the intercooling temperature is considerably lower than other evaluated systems. In this regard, the multi-stage compression system indicates the largest dependence to the pressure ratio and intercooling temperature of compressors. The evaluations on the components of each system reveals that by the modifications in the Claude layout, the modified Claude system requires less cooling demand than other systems (585.5 kW at the basic conditions) and on the other hand, the DEBARS system has the lowest power consumption between the other systems (280.6 kW at the basic conditions). Evaluations on the exergetic efficiencies of components show that the intercoolers beside the compressors in the main subsystems and the liquid ejector in DEBARS, have the highest exergy destruction ratio in each system.
Read full abstract