Lipoprotein Lp Research Articles

Tele-Pulmonary Rehabilitation and Mediterranean-like Lifestyle, Adjunctively to Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients: Effects in Fitness and Oxidative Indicators

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), often overlooked by clinicians, may lead to negative outcomes if left untreated. In this study, we examined the efficacy and efficiency of a 12-week unsupervised tele-rehabilitation program in OSA patients and focused on the potential changes in their fitness indicators and oxidative status. Forty OSA patients were allocated into two groups: the CPAPgroup (AHI 52.0 ± 31.5 events/h; age, 49.7 ± 9.4 years; BMI, 32.1 ± 7.6 kg/m2; control group) versus the non-CPAPgroup (AHI 38.2 ± 21.5 events/h; age, 49.3 ± 10.7 years; BMI, 32.3 ± 5.1 kg/m2; intervention group; personalized recommendations for nutrition—based on the Mediterranean diet—and exercise programs). Measurements included anthropometric characteristics and body composition through whole-body bioelectrical impedance analysis. In addition, participants underwent blood sampling for reactive oxygen metabolites’ levels (d-ROM), plasma antioxidant capacity (PAT), and Lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)), as well as a 6 min walk test (6MWT). Statistically significant differences were detected in both groups (CPAPgroup versus non-CPAPgroup) after 12 weeks between Lp(a) (−32.2 ± 25.5%, p = 0.021 versus −17.7 ± 16.3%, p = 0.034) and 6MWT (16.6 ± 9.3%, p < 0.001 versus 7.5 ± 6.6%, p = 0.002). ΔNRO2 (oxygen saturation difference between nadir during sleep and resting awake) was significantly associated with d-ROMs levels (p = 0.045), resting mean arterial pressure (p = 0.024), and chest circumference in maximal inhalation and exhalation (Δchest, p < 0.001). To conclude, lifestyle interventions with unsupervised tele-exercise-rehabilitation pulmonary programs and Mediterranean-like diet may serve as adjunctive-to-CPAP therapeutic elements.

Lipoprotein (a) is associated with increased risk of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a circulating apolipoprotein B (ApoB) containing particle that has been observationally linked to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and is the target of emerging therapeutics. Recent work has highlighted the role of circulating lipoproteins in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). We sought to triangulate human observational and genetic evidence to evaluate the role of Lp(a) in AAA. We tested the association between circulating levels of Lp(a) and clinically diagnosed abdominal aortic aneurysms while controlling for traditional AAA risk factors and levels of ApoB using logistic regression among 795 individuals with and 374,772 individuals without AAA in the UK Biobank (UKB). Multivariable Mendelian randomization (MVMR) was used to test for putatively causal associations between Lp(a) and AAA controlling for ApoB. Genetic instruments for Lp(a) and ApoB were created from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of Lp(a) and ApoB comprising 335,796 and 418,505 UKB participants, respectively. The instruments were tested for association with AAA using data from a GWAS of 39,221 individuals with and 1,086,107 without AAA. Elevated Lp(a) levels were observationally associated with an increased risk of AAA (OR 1.04 per 10 nmol/L Lp(a); 95%CI 1.02-1.05; P<0.01). Clinically elevated Lp(a) levels (>150nmol/L) were likewise associated with an increased risk of AAA (OR 1.47; 95% CI 1.15-1.88; P < 0.01) when compared to individuals with Lp(a) levels <150nmol/L. MVMR confirmed a significant, ApoB-independent association between increased Lp(a) and increased risk of AAA (OR 1.13 per SD increase in Lp(a); 95%CI 1.02-1.24; P<0.02). Both observational and genetic analyses support an association between increased Lp(a) and AAA risk that is independent of ApoB. These findings suggest that Lp(a) may be a therapeutic target for AAA and drive the inclusion of AAA as an outcome in clinical trials of Lp(a) antagonists.

Pleiotropic effects of double filtration plasmapheresis.

Double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) is a semi-selective blood purification modality derived from the plasma exchange modality. DFPP can be applied to a variety of refractory disorders including metabolic disorders, organ transplants, rheumatic disorders, neurological disorders, and dermatologic disorders. Familial hypercholesterolemia and lipoprotein (a) hyperlipoproteinemia are major chronic metabolic disorders. Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) is applied for those patients to remove low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)). DFPP is used as one of the modalities in LA. In addition to removing LDL-C and Lp(a), DFPP has pleiotropic effects such as removal of lipid metabolism-related substances, C-reactive protein lowering effect, removal of adhesion molecules, removal of inflammatory cytokines, and anti-oxidative effect. This article summarizes the pleiotropic effects of DFPP based on recent clinical articles.

Is lipoprotein(a) measurement important for cardiovascular risk stratification in children and adolescents?

BackgroundElevated lipoprotein (Lp(a)) levels are associated with increased risk of atherosclerotic processes and cardiovascular events in adults. The amount of Lp(a) is mainly genetically determined. Therefore, it is important to identify individuals with elevated Lp(a) as early as possible, particularly if other cardiovascular risk factors are present. The purpose of the study was to investigate whether, in a population of children and adolescents already followed for the presence of one or more cardiovascular risk factors (elevated blood pressure (BP), and/or excess body weight, and/or dyslipidemia), the measurement of Lp(a) can be useful for better stratifying their risk profile.MethodsIn a sample of 195 children and adolescents, height, body weight, waist circumference and systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) BP were measured. Body Mass Index (BMI) and SBP and DBP z-scores were calculated. Plasma Lp(a), total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), triglycerides, glucose, insulin, uric acid and creatinine were assessed. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol was calculated with the Friedewald formula. High Lp(a) was defined as ≥ 75 nmol/L and high LDL cholesterol as ≥ 3.37 mmol/L.ResultsOur sample of children and adolescents (54.4% males, mean age 11.5 years) had median LDL cholesterol and Lp(a) values equal to 2.54 (interquartile range, IQR: 2.07–3.06) mmol/L and 22 (IQR: 7.8–68.6) nmol/L respectively. 13.8% of children had LDL cholesterol ≥ 3.37 mmol/L and 22.6 Lp(a) values ≥ 75 nmol/L. Lp(a) values were higher in children of normal weight than in those with excess weight (p = 0.007), but the difference disappeared if normal weight children referred for dyslipidemia only were excluded from the analysis (p = 0.210). 69.4% of children had normal Lp(a) and LDL cholesterol values and only 6.2% showed both elevated Lp(a) and LDL cholesterol levels. However, 16.6% of the sample, despite having normal LDL cholesterol, had elevated Lp(a) values. Multivariable analyses showed a significant association of LDL cholesterol both with Lp(a) values, and with the presence of elevated Lp(a) levels. For each mmol/L increase in LDL cholesterol the risk of having an elevated Lp(a) value increased by 73%. There was an inverse correlation between BMI z-score and Lp(a). Neither BP z-scores, nor other biochemical parameters were associated with Lp(a).ConclusionsIn our population more than one out of five children had elevated Lp(a) values, and in about 17% of children elevated Lp(a) values were present in the absence of increased LDL cholesterol. Our results suggest that Lp(a) measurement can be useful to better define the cardiovascular risk profile in children and adolescents already followed for the presence of other cardiovascular risk factors such as elevated BP, excess body weight and high LDL cholesterol.

O78 UNRAVELING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HYPERTENSION AND LIPOPROTEIN(A): INSIGHTS FROM THE GAELp(a) REGISTRY

Introduction: Hypertension (HT) and elevated levels of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) are both significant risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Understanding the relationship between these factors can provide valuable insights into cardiovascular risk stratification. This study aims to analyze the association between Lp(a) levels and HT in hypertensive patients, with a focus on identifying predictors of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) within this population. Methods: Patients included in the Argentine Group for the Study of Lp(a) [GAELp(a)], who had a diagnosis of hypertension were selected for this study. Demographic characteristics, anthropometric variables, cardiovascular risk factors, laboratory variables, and the presence of cardiovascular disease were assessed. Lp(a) levels were measured in mg/dL or nmol/L, with values exceeding 50 mg/dL or 125 nmol/L classified as elevated. Multivariate analysis was conducted to identify predictors of MACE within the study population. Results: A total of 334 hypertensive patients with recorded Lp(a) levels were included in the analysis. Thirty-eight percent of the patients exhibited elevated Lp(a) levels. In the multivariate analysis, predictors of MACE were male sex (OR 2.36, 95% CI 1.33-4.16), current smoker (OR 3.29, 95% CI 1.56-6.96), and type 2 diabetes (OR 2.86, 95% CI 1.43-5.72). However, no significant association was found between MACE and elevated Lp(a) levels. Additionally, it was observed that a substantial proportion (71.56%) of the study population were taking statins. CONCLUSION: This study underscores the importance of considering multiple risk factors, including sex, smoking status, and diabetes, in assessing cardiovascular risk among hypertensive patients. While elevated Lp(a) levels did not emerge as a predictor of MACE in this population, further research is warranted to elucidate the role of Lp(a) in cardiovascular risk stratification.

Low prevalence of testing for apolipoprotein B and lipoprotein (a) in the real world

ObjectiveApolipoprotein B (ApoB) and lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) are predictors of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk; therefore, current recommendations for CVD risk assessment and management advocate that patients receive testing for ApoB and Lp(a) in addition to the standard lipid panel. However, US guidelines around ApoB and Lp(a) testing have evolved over time and vary slightly by expert committee. The objective of this analysis was to estimate the number of insured individuals in the USA who received any component of a lipid test, or ApoB and/or Lp(a) testing, during 2019. MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional analysis to estimate the prevalence of any component of a lipid test, ApoB, and/or Lp(a) in the USA using four different claim data sources (including Medicaid, Medicare, and commercially insured enrollees). Prevalence estimates were age-, sex-, payor-, and region-standardized to the 2019 US Annual Social and Economic Supplement of the Current Population Survey. We also described the clinical profile of patients who received lipid testing between 2019 and 2021 (cohort analysis) in Optum claims database. Enrollees were grouped into four non-mutually exclusive cohorts based on their completion of any component of the lipid panel, ApoB, Lp(a), or ApoB and Lp(a). ResultsIn the prevalence cohort, over a third (38 %) of insured adults in the USA underwent testing for any component of a lipid panel in 2019. This proportion was higher for individuals aged ≥65 years compared to younger adults (62% vs 31 %). The proportion of ApoB and Lp(a) testing represented only <1 % of testing for any component of a lipid panel. In the cohort analysis, we found that lipid testing increased with age and comorbidities. ConclusionThese data should be considered by guideline-issuing agencies and organizations to develop education campaigns encouraging more frequent use of tests beyond the standard lipid panel.

Exploring the Effect of Thyroid Hormone on Serum Lipoprotein (a) Levels in Patients With Thyroid Hormone Dysfunction: A Systematic Review.

Genetic variations among people mainly determine the blood levels of lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)), and it is relatively stable throughout one's lifetime. Nevertheless, there could still be other factors that control the Lp(a) level. Thyroid hormones are known to influence the serum lipid level by regulating the expression ofkeyenzymes that are involved in lipid metabolism. Both hypo and hyperthyroidism are associatedwith changes in lipid levels. Even though thyroid hormone abnormalities have been shownto alter traditional lipid parameters like low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C), its influence onLp(a) has not been established. This review aims to identify the relationship between Lp(a) and thyroid hormones by reviewing data from correlative studies and observing treatment-related Lp(a) level changes in thyroid disorders from interventional studies. We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases with predefined search criteria and search strategies for paper identification. Individual reviewers reviewed identified papers for selection.Finalized papers were reviewed forLp(a) levels and their responses to treatment in patients with thyroid disorders to establish the relationship betweenLp(a) and thyroid hormone.We concluded that the data were limited and sometimes contradicted one another to establish a clear relationship betweenLp(a) and thyroid hormones.Even though correlative studies data showed strong indications that overt-hypothyroidism was associated with high Lp(a) levels, thyroid hormone replacement studies did not show any significant changes inLp(a) levels compared to pre-treatment in patients with both overt-hypothyroidism and subclinical hypothyroidism. More clinical trials focusing on Lp(a) with longer periods of treatment and follow-up in thyroid patients are needed to establish the relationship between the two. The possibility of dose-related Lp(a) responses to thyroid hormone treatment should also be explored.

Fibrinogen and plasma clot properties are associated with apolipoprotein B and apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins in Africans

Fibrinogen and plasma clot properties are associated with apolipoprotein B and apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins in Africans

Lipid profile and risk factors for neoatherosclerosis after drug-eluting stent implantation in acute coronary syndrome

Predictors of neoatherosclerosis in patients who received primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remain unclear. The aim of this study is to investigate the frequency and risk factors of neoatherosclerosis 1-year after the onset of ACS. This study investigated 83 patients who underwent PCI for ACS followed by 1-year follow-up optical coherence tomography. The patients were categorized into the neoatherosclerosis (n = 11) and non-neoatherosclerosis groups (n = 72). Baseline characteristics, PCI procedures, medical therapies, and blood tests at 1-year, including detailed lipid profiles, were compared between the two groups. Diabetes mellitus was more prominent in the neoatherosclerosis than in the non-neoatherosclerosis group (45% vs. 17 %, respectively, p = 0.03). Total cholesterol (171 ± 37 mg/dL vs. 145 ± 25 mg/dL, respectively, p < 0.01), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (124 ± 36 mg/dL vs. 94 ± 24 mg/dL, respectively, p < 0.01), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (94 ± 36 mg/dL vs. 72 ± 19 mg/dL, respectively, p < 0.01), and lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) (70 [19-112] mg/dL vs. 10 [3-25] mg/dL, respectively, p = 0.03) at follow-up were significantly higher in the neoatherosclerosis group. Multivariate analysis revealed that neoatherosclerosis was associated with high serum non-HDL-C (odds ratio [OR]: 1.075; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.011-1.144; p < 0.01) and high serum Lp(a) levels (>30 mg/dL) (OR: 11.0; 95 % CI: 1.492-81.02; p = 0.02). Poorly controlled non-HDL-C and Lp(a) would be risk factors of neoatherosclerosis in patients 1-year after ACS.

Therapeutic Gene Editing in Dyslipidemias.

Dyslipidemia, characterized by abnormal lipid levels in the blood, significantly escalates the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and requires effective treatment strategies. While existing therapies can be effective, long-term adherence is often challenging. There has been an interest in developing enduring and more efficient solutions. In this context, gene editing, particularly clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) technology, emerges as a groundbreaking approach, offering potential long-term control of dyslipidemia by directly modifying gene expression. This review delves into the mechanistic insights of various gene-editing tools. We comprehensively analyze various pre-clinical and clinical studies, evaluating the safety, efficacy, and therapeutic implications of gene editing in dyslipidemia management. Key genetic targets, such as low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR), proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), angiopoietin-like protein 3 (ANGPTL3), apolipoprotein C3 (APOC3), and lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)), known for their pivotal roles in lipid metabolism, are scrutinized. The paper highlights the promising outcomes of gene editing in achieving sustained lipid homeostasis, discusses the challenges and ethical considerations in genome editing, and envisions the future of gene therapy in revolutionizing dyslipidemia treatment and cardiovascular risk reduction.

Advantages of using Genetically Elevated Lipoprotein(a) Levels in Predicting 5-Year Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Relating to Coronary Artery Disease in Women.

This study aimed to investigate major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) over 5 years, in general, and depending on sex, lipoprotein(a) level, and number of kringle IV type 2 (KIV-2) repeats in the Lipoprotein(A) (LPA) gene. This study comprised 216 patients (120 women and 96 men) hospitalized with a diagnosis of "CAD, unstable angina IIB class". The three-point risk of MACEs was assessed over 5 years: cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and stroke. The number of KIV-2 repeats in the LPA gene was determined by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). The relative risk of MACE in patients with elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) was 2.0 (95% CI 1.04-3.87, p 0.05) for quartile 4 (Q4) 48 mg/dL versus quartile 1 (Q1) 6 mg/dL. This was mainly attributable to an increase in men-relative risk (RR) 2.6 (95% CI 1.10-6.16, p 0.05)-but not in women: RR 1.4 (95% CI 0.50-3.92). Mean lipoprotein(a) levels were inversely correlated with 42.5 and 7.5 for Q1 and Q4 KIV-2 repeat numbers, respectively. The relative risks of MACE for Q1 vs. Q4 KIV-2 repeats were as follows: 3.0 (95% CI 1.48-6.08, p 0.001) for all patients; 3.0 (95% CI 1.20-6.55, p 0.01) for men; 3.3 (95% CI 1.02-10.4, p 0.05) for women. Quantifying kringle IV type 2 repeat copy number in the LPA gene using qPCR more accurately reflects the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events within 5 years in women with coronary artery disease.

Elderly patients with very high plasma lipoprotein(a) concentrations and few cardiovascular consequences: a case series.

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is an atherogenic low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-like particle that is currently regarded as a non-modifiable risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The number of patients detected with elevated Lp(a) concentrations has been increasing in recent years, although the implication of this finding is unclear for patients and physicians. We screened our lipid clinic database for patients aged >65 years with very high Lp(a) concentrations, which were defined as >230 nmol/L, and cardiovascular outcomes were assessed. The patients' (n = 16) mean (±standard deviation) age was 72.2 ± 7.1 years and the mean Lp(a) concentration was 313 ± 68 nmol/L. After a cumulative 129.0 patient-year follow-up (mean: 8.1 ± 4.2 years), the mean age was 80.3 ± 7.0 years. We observed a low baseline prevalence of cardiovascular events, with only two patients having a history of cardiovascular events. Furthermore, zero incident adverse cardiovascular events were recorded over the follow-up. Therefore, very high Lp(a) concentrations and disease-free old age are not mutually exclusive. Our aggregated clinical experience is that there is only a modest association between elevated Lp(a) concentrations and adverse outcomes. Nonetheless, we still advise treating modifiable risk factors in these patients.

The association between lipoprotein(a) levels and ischemic stroke in children: A case-control study.

Pediatric arterial ischemic stroke (AIS) is a rare disorder, associated with severe morbidity. In adults, elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)), a cholesterol-like particle, is associated with ischemic stroke. However, data on Lp(a) and pediatric AIS are scarce. Therefore, we evaluated the association between Lp(a) levels and pediatric AIS. We included children who suffered an AIS (≤18years) and were treated in a tertiary center in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Two groups of children with AIS were identified: (i) neonates and (ii) children older than 29days. A case-control study was performed, with the latter group as cases and children without AIS as control group. Cases and controls were matched for age of Lp(a) testing and sex. Multivariable logistic regression models were used. Thirteen neonates and 23 children were included. Mean (SD) age of AIS was 0.6 (2.0) days and 9.2 (6.3) years, respectively. Children with AIS were matched to 62 controls. Lp(a) levels of greater than 50mg/dL were more prevalent in children with AIS compared to controls (21.7% vs. 3.2%, p=.02). A significant association was found between Lp(a) and AIS (odds ratio [OR] adjusted for age at Lp(a) testing, body mass index [BMI], measurement assay: 1.36 per 10mg/dL increase of Lp(a), 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.82, p=.041). In this study, Lp(a) levels were positively associated with the risk of AIS in children, suggesting that high Lp(a) might be an independent risk factor for AIS. This underlines the importance of Lp(a) measurement in children with AIS.

Lipoprotein(a) as underestimated cardiovascular risk factor in Russia. Time to introduce into clinical practice

An increased concentration of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is one of the main genetic residual risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases, as well as their complications. Lp(a) is a complex supramolecular complex in which the unique glycosylated apo(a) protein, which has a wide polymorphism, is linked by a disulfide bond to the apoB100 molecule (protein component of the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particle). Therefore, Lp(a) is often called LDL-like particle. Unlike all other lipoproteins, Lp(a) concentration is determined genetically, almost constant throughout the life, and has wide individual and interethnic variability. As an independent risk factor, elevated Lp(a) concentrations can significantly increase global cardiovascular risk, especially in patients with other risk factors. Modern international and national guidelines recommend measuring Lp(a) concentration not only in certain categories of patients, but also in every person at least once in their life for a correct assessment of cardiovascular risk.

Correlation between lipoprotein(a) and recurrent ischemic events post-cerebral vascular stent implantation

Background and aimThe association of Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) with recurrent ischemic events in stented patients remains uncertain. So, this research aimed to investigate the impact of elevated Lp(a) levels on the occurrence of ischemic events in this specific patient population. MethodsTotally 553 patients who underwent intracranial or extracranial artery stent implantation were included. Baseline data were collected and postoperative ischemic outcomes were followed up. Cox regression analysis was used to investigate the association between Lp(a) and outcomes, while accounting for confounding factors. Finally, we established prediction models based on nomogram. ResultsOf total 553 patients, a number of 107 (19.3%) experienced outcomes. These included 46 cases (25.4%) in group with elevated Lp(a) levels (>30 mg/dL) and 61 cases (16.4%) in non-elevated group (χ2=6.343, p=0.012). The group with elevated Lp(a) was 1.811 times more likely to experience ischemic events than the non-elevated group, each 1 mg/dL increase in Lp(a) resulted in a 1.008-fold increase in the recurrence rate of ischemic events. In addition, sex (male), previous history of coronary heart disease, decreased albumin, elevated very low density lipoprotein cholesterol and poorly controlled risk factors (including blood pressure and blood sugar) were also associated with a high risk of recurrent ischemic events after stent implantation. ConclusionLp(a) elevation was a significant risk factor for ischemic events in symptomatic patients who underwent intracranial or extracranial artery stenting.

Influence of pseudoxanthoma elasticum on the lipid profile and prognostic implications.

Background: Pseudoxanthoma elasticum (PXE) is a rare, inherited disease characterised by specific skin lesions, progressive loss of vision and early onset atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis in PXE leads to an increased rate of vascular occlusion and severe intermittent claudication. Although genetically determined, the individual course of PXE is highly variable. Up to now, there is no sufficient parameter to identify individuals at risk of rapid disease progression. This present study focused the lipid profile of patients with PXE and its possible influence on the clinical severity of peripheral artery disease (PAD). Patients and methods: 112 patients with PXE were retrospectively screened. Patients without a complete lipid profile consisting of total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TGC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) where excluded as well as patients with already initiated lipid-lowering therapy. 52 patients met the inclusion criteria. An age-adjusted ordinal regression model was applied to determine the association of each lipid fraction with the severity of PAD assessed as Fontaine classification. Results: The lipid profile of patients with PXE was unremarkable (TGC: 135.8±105.8 mg/dl; TC: 172.5±44.4 mg/dl; HDL: 63.0±18.2 mg/dl; Lp[a]: 64.7±93.5 nmol/l). Ordinal regression showed a significant association of Lp(a) with the severity of PAD with an odds ratio of 1.01 (1.00-1.02; p = 0.004), whereas the other fractions of the lipid profile had no significant influence. Conclusions: This study provides the largest evaluation of blood lipids up to now and the first characterization of Lp(a) levels in patients with PXE. We were able to provide first evidence of a correlation between elevated levels of Lp(a) and the severity of PAD. The present results suggest that determination of Lp(a) in early stages of PXE could help to identify patients at risk of rapid disease progression and with the need of intensified walking exercise training.

Lipoprotein(a) and Long-Term Plaque Progression, Low-Density Plaque, and Pericoronary Inflammation

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) is a causal risk factor for cardiovascular disease; however, long-term effects on coronary atherosclerotic plaque phenotype, high-risk plaque formation, and pericoronary adipose tissue inflammation remain unknown. To investigate the association of Lp(a) levels with long-term coronary artery plaque progression, high-risk plaque, and pericoronary adipose tissue inflammation. This single-center prospective cohort study included 299 patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent per-protocol repeated coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) imaging with an interscan interval of 10 years. Thirty-two patients were excluded because of coronary artery bypass grafting, resulting in a study population of 267 patients. Data for this study were collected from October 2008 to October 2022 and analyzed from March 2023 to March 2024. The median scan interval was 10.2 years. Lp(a) was measured at follow-up using an isoform-insensitive assay. CCTA scans were analyzed with a previously validated artificial intelligence-based algorithm (atherosclerosis imaging-quantitative computed tomography). The association between Lp(a) and change in percent plaque volumes was investigated in linear mixed-effects models adjusted for clinical risk factors. Secondary outcomes were presence of low-density plaque and presence of increased pericoronary adipose tissue attenuation at baseline and follow-up CCTA imaging. The 267 included patients had a mean age of 57.1 (SD, 7.3) years and 153 were male (57%). Patients with Lp(a) levels of 125 nmol/L or higher had twice as high percent atheroma volume (6.9% vs 3.0%; P = .01) compared with patients with Lp(a) levels less than 125 nmol/L. Adjusted for other risk factors, every doubling of Lp(a) resulted in an additional 0.32% (95% CI, 0.04-0.60) increment in percent atheroma volume during the 10 years of follow-up. Every doubling of Lp(a) resulted in an odds ratio of 1.23 (95% CI, 1.00-1.51) and 1.21 (95% CI, 1.01-1.45) for the presence of low-density plaque at baseline and follow-up, respectively. Patients with higher Lp(a) levels had increased pericoronary adipose tissue attenuation around both the right coronary artery and left anterior descending at baseline and follow-up. In this long-term prospective serial CCTA imaging study, higher Lp(a) levels were associated with increased progression of coronary plaque burden and increased presence of low-density noncalcified plaque and pericoronary adipose tissue inflammation. These data suggest an impact of elevated Lp(a) levels on coronary atherogenesis of high-risk, inflammatory, rupture-prone plaques over the long term.

A Polynesian-specific SLC22A3 variant associates with low plasma lipoprotein(a) concentrations independent of apo(a) isoform size in males.

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-like particle in which the apolipoprotein B component is covalently linked to apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)). Lp(a) is a well-established independent risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. Plasma Lp(a) concentrations vary enormously between individuals and ethnic groups. Several nucleotide polymorphisms in the SLC22A3 gene associate with Lp(a) concentration in people of different ethnicities. We investigated the association of a Polynesian-specific (Māori and Pacific peoples) SLC22A3 gene coding variant p.Thr44Met) with the plasma concentration of Lp(a) in a cohort of 302 healthy Polynesian males. An apo(a)-size independent assay assessed plasma Lp(a) concentrations; all other lipid and apolipoprotein concentrations were measured using standard laboratory techniques. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction was used to determine apo(a) isoforms. The range of metabolic (HbA1c, blood pressure, and blood lipids) and blood lipid variables were similar between the non-carriers and carriers in age, ethnicity and BMI adjusted models. However, rs8187715 SLC22A3 variant was significantly associated with lower Lp(a) concentrations. Median Lp(a) concentration was 10.60 nmol/L (IQR: 5.40-41.00) in non-carrier group, and was 7.60 nmol/L (IQR: 5.50-12.10) in variant carrier group (P<0.05). Lp(a) concentration inversely correlated with apo(a) isoform size. After correction for apo(a) isoform size, metabolic parameters and ethnicity, the association between the SLC22A3 variant and plasma Lp(a) concentration remained. The present study is the first to identify the association of this gene variant and low plasma Lp(a) concentrations. This provides evidence for better guidance on ethnic specific cut-offs when defining 'elevated' and 'normal' plasma Lp(a) concentrations in clinical applications.

The impact of lipoprotein(a) level on cardiac pathologies in diabetes: a cardiac CT study.

We aimed to explore the imaging profile of coronary atherosclerosis, perivascular inflammation, myocardial perfusion, and interstitial fibrosis in diabetes stratified by lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels. In this prospective study, we enrolled diabetic patients who had undergone computed tomography (CT) angiography, stress CT-myocardial perfusion imaging, and late iodine enhancement in 20 months. Then, we categorized them into elevated and normal groups based on an Lp(a) cutoff level of 30 mg/dL. All imaging data, including coronary atherosclerosis parameters, pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) density, stress myocardial blood flow (MBF), and extracellular volume (ECV), were collected for further analysis. In total, 207 participants (mean age: 59.1 ± 12.0 years, 111 males) were included in this study. Patients with elevated Lp(a) level had more pronounced percent atheroma volume (2.55% (1.01-9.01%) versus 1.30% (0-4.95%), p = 0.010), and demonstrated a higher incidence of positive remodeling, spotty calcification, and high-risk plaque (HRP) than those with normal Lp(a) levels (75.6% versus 54.8%, p = 0.015; 26.8% versus 9.6%, p = 0.003; 51.2% versus 30.1%, p = 0.011, respectively). Results of the multivariate analysis revealed that after adjusting for all clinical characteristics, elevated Lp(a) levels were an independent parameter associated with HRP (odds ratio = 2.608; 95% confidence interval: 1.254-5.423, p = 0.010). However, no significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of PCAT density, stress MBF, and ECV. Elevated Lp(a) levels are associated with extensive coronary atherosclerosis and HRP development. However, they are not related to perivascular inflammation, decreased myocardial perfusion, and interstitial fibrosis in diabetes. Elevated lipoprotein(a) levels are associated with extensive coronary atherosclerosis and a high incidence of HRPs. However, they are not related to perivascular inflammation, decreased myocardial perfusion, and interstitial fibrosis in diabetes. Diabetes is a known risk factor that accelerates cardiovascular disease progression. Diabetics with elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) levels had a higher percent atheroma volume and positive remodeling, spotty calcification, and HRPs. Patients with diabetes should be screened for elevated Lp(a) using CCTA for comprehensive evaluation of atherosclerotic characteristics.

Lipoprotein(a) and Coronary Plaque in Asymptomatic Individuals: The Miami Heart Study at Baptist Health South Florida.

Elevated levels of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) are independently associated with an increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events. However, the mechanisms driving this association are poorly understood. We aimed to evaluate the association between Lp(a) and coronary plaque characteristics in a contemporary US cohort without clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography, the noninvasive gold standard for the assessment of coronary atherosclerosis. We used baseline data from the Miami Heart Study-a community-based, prospective cohort study-which included asymptomatic adults aged 40 to 65 years evaluated using coronary computed tomography angiography. Those taking any lipid-lowering therapies were excluded. Elevated Lp(a) was defined as ≥125 nmol/L. Outcomes included any plaque, coronary artery calcium score >0, maximal stenosis ≥50%, presence of any high-risk plaque feature (positive remodeling, spotty calcification, low-attenuation plaque, napkin ring), and the presence of ≥2 high-risk plaque features. Among 1795 participants (median age, 52 years; 54.3% women; 49.6% Hispanic), 291 (16.2%) had Lp(a) ≥125 nmol/L. In unadjusted analyses, individuals with Lp(a) ≥125 nmol/L had a higher prevalence of all outcomes compared with Lp(a) <125 nmol/L, although differences were only statistically significant for the presence of any coronary plaque and ≥2 high-risk features. In multivariable models, elevated Lp(a) was independently associated with the presence of any coronary plaque (odds ratio, 1.40, [95% CI, 1.05-1.86]) and with ≥2 high-risk features (odds ratio, 3.94, [95% CI, 1.82-8.52]), although only 35 participants had this finding. Among participants with a coronary artery calcium score of 0 (n=1200), those with Lp(a) ≥125 nmol/L had a significantly higher percentage of any plaque compared with those with Lp(a) <125 nmol/L (24.2% versus 14.2%; P<0.001). In this contemporary analysis, elevated Lp(a) was independently associated with the presence of coronary plaque. Larger studies are needed to confirm the strong association observed with the presence of multiple high-risk coronary plaque features.