You have accessJournal of UrologyInfections/Inflammation of the Genitourinary Tract: Prostate & Genitalia1 Apr 20131162 PROSPECTIVE STUDY ASSESSING THE PRESENCE OF ENDOTOXAEMIA IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING TRANSRECTAL PROSTATE BIOPSY Sharon Sheehan, John Philpott-Howard, Wei Wang, Hemant Nemade, and Peter Thompson Sharon SheehanSharon Sheehan London, United Kingdom More articles by this author , John Philpott-HowardJohn Philpott-Howard London, United Kingdom More articles by this author , Wei WangWei Wang Beijing, China, People's Republic of More articles by this author , Hemant NemadeHemant Nemade London, United Kingdom More articles by this author , and Peter ThompsonPeter Thompson London, United Kingdom More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.799AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Despite antibiotic prophylaxis, the risk of sepsis with transrectal prostate biopsy (TRPB) is well recognised. This was a prospective bacteriological study of consecutive patients undergoing TRPB. Uniquely we examined in all patients the prevalence of endotoxaemia following biopsy and its association with the results of bacteriological cultures. METHODS 67 consecutive patients were enrolled in the study from January to July 2011. Each patient received standard prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin and metronidazole. Blood cultures and serum for endotoxin assay were collected at 5min, 60 min and 24 hours post biopsy. Prostate needle washings were also cultured. The presence of endotoxin was determined utilising the chromogenic Limulus Amoebocyte Lysate (LAL) assay. RESULTS 61/67 patients (91.0%) had positive cultures from prostate biopsy needle washings. 51/67 (76.1%) patients had Gram positive bacteria cultured; 23/67 (34.3%) of patients had Gram negative bacteria cultured. 6/67 patients (9.0%) had positive blood cultures. All of these organisms cultured were Gram positive. A total of 66 samples were received for endotoxin at 5 min, 60 samples at 60min and 60 samples at 24 h post biopsy. The lower limit of detection of the assay was 0.005 Endotoxin Units (EU)/mL and any value under this was considered undetectable; values greater than 1.000 EU/mL were considered highly significant. Endotoxin levels at the various time points were as follows: At five minutes 62/66 patients (94.0%) had detectable endotoxin, mean 2.152 EU/mL (SD +/− 4.011). Of these 21/66 (31.8%) had >1.000 EU/mL. At 60 minutes 53/60 patients (88.3%) had detectable endotoxin, mean 2.041 EU/mL (SD +/− 4.293). Of these 16/60 (26.6%) had >1.000 EU/mL. At 24 h 55/60 patients (91.6%) had detectable endotoxin, mean 2.583 EU/mL (SD +/− 4.392). Of these 24/60 (40.0%) had >1.000 EU/mL. None of the enrolled patients presented with signs or symptoms suggestive of infection after biopsy. CONCLUSIONS This study provides evidence for translocation of potentially harmful gut endotoxin during TRPB, with high levels of endotoxin detectable in approximately one-third of patients. In conjunction with the bacteraemias, this serves to highlight the potential risk of infection associated with this procedure. Clinicians may not appreciate the risk of translocation of endotoxin; other approaches to biopsy such as the transperineal route may reduce the potential for endotoxemia and infective complications. © 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 189Issue 4SApril 2013Page: e474-e475 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Sharon Sheehan London, United Kingdom More articles by this author John Philpott-Howard London, United Kingdom More articles by this author Wei Wang Beijing, China, People's Republic of More articles by this author Hemant Nemade London, United Kingdom More articles by this author Peter Thompson London, United Kingdom More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract