Life-cycle management (LCM) based on degradation diagnosis, which is called condi- tion-based maintenance (CBM) can be useful for preventing an unexpected failure and extending service life of electric power apparatuses, resulting in reduced life-cycle cost (LCC). In our previous study, we formulated numerical model of CBM and applied the model to calculate the LCC of 6.6 kV XLPE cables, for which relatively rich data on degradation are available. Assuming that cables with longer water-tree length as a nondestructively measurable replacement criterion are replaced after the diagnosis in CBM, we evaluated the economic advantage of CBM against time-based maintenance (TBM) where all the ca- bles are replaced with a certain fixed interval. To carry out reliable CBM, accurate data are necessary as well as a well-established diagnostic method. However, power apparatuses are used under various condi- tions and furthermore failure probability would be different even with the same condition, and the data available for CBM are limited. Therefore, it is important to carry out robust CBM even with the insuffi- cient and/or inaccurate data. In this study, by using the data which is intentionally formulated to be dif- ferent from the master data, we examined the influence of accuracy of the data on CBM and evaluated its reliability and robustness. The main results are as follows. In TBM, if the replacement of 6.6 kV XLPE cables is carried out with the apparent optimal interval which is calculated by using the incorrect or in- complete data, the LCC can be much larger than the optimum LCC with the accurate date. On the other hand in CBM, the LCC is smaller than that of the optimum TBM, and does not change so much with the diagnosis parameters, i.e. replacement criterion and diagnosis interval. The results suggest that CBM can contribute to reliable life-cycle management even if the correct and complete data are not available to de- termine the diagnosis parameters.
Read full abstract