U.S. presidential debates remain among the most watched political media despite their increasing levels of incivility. The 2020 Democratic primary debates were distinct as a record number of candidates sought to unseat a controversial Republican incumbent and fought against perceived party outsiders. This study content analyzes how Democratic candidates engaged in social aggression, a form of incivility attacking self-esteem and reputation with the goal to get ahead. Specifically, I examine how social, verbal, and nonverbal aggression were used by frontrunners and trailing candidates, whether populist candidates perpetrated aggression differently from non-populists, and differences by gender. Results revealed no significant differences in perpetrated aggression between the frontrunner and trailing candidates, nor between populists and non-populists. However, female candidates engaged in proportionally more social aggression than male candidates, who engaged in proportionally more verbal aggression than female candidates.
Read full abstract