We have read the article published by Yavuz et al. with a great interest [1]. They examined the mean platelet volume (MPV) in children with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) at the active and inactive stages, and they compared it with healthy controls. They found that MPV was significantly higher in patients with SLE than in controls and significantly increased in active phase compared to inactive phase. This is the first study in this subject. On the other hand, we want to make minor criticism about this study from methodological aspect. Firstly, MPV measurement technique is not clear in the study. They did not mention about the tube in which MPV was measured. Is it citrate or ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) tube? They also did not mention about the time interval between blood sampling and analysis. This time interval is important if they used EDTA anticoagulated tubes. MPV increases over time in EDTA anticoagulated samples, and this increase was shown to be proportional with the delay in time between sample collection and laboratory analysis. This is not valid for citrate tube.With impedance counting, the MPV increases over time as platelets swell in EDTA, with increases of 7.9 % within 30 min having been reported and an overall increase of 13.4 % over 24 h, although the majority of this increase occurs within the first 6 h [2]. The recommended optimal measuring time of MPV is maximum 120 min after venipuncture. For reliable MPV measurement, the potential influence of anticoagulant on the MPV must be carefully controlled by standardizing the time delay between sampling and analysis (less than 2 h). Secondly, there are significant associations of MPV with many cardiovascular risk factors like smoking, obesity, hyperlipidemia, and metabolic syndrome [3]. They excluded hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus; however, they did not mention about the body mass index of patients and controls and proportion of patients and controls with metabolic syndrome. It has been shown that obesity and metabolic syndrome increase MPV values [3]. Absolutely, these factors should be considered in MPV assessment in children like adults. Platelet activation plays a major role in the pathophysiology of diseases prone to thrombosis and inflammation, and in line with this, MPV might be a link between thrombosis and inflammation [4]. It might be speculated that inflammation existing in patients with SLE might cause increased platelet reactivity as measured by MPV in these patients. MPV is universally available with routine blood counts by automated hemograms and a simple and easy method of assessing platelet function. In comparison to smaller ones, larger platelets have more granules, aggregate more rapidly with collagen, have higher thromboxane A2 level, and express more glycoprotein Ib and IIb/IIIa receptors [2, 5]. We believe that MPV can be affected bymany inflammatory and cardiovascular risk factors. Because of that, all confounding factors must be taken into account. In addition, standardized methods must be used in MPV measurement.
Read full abstract