Removal Of Left Atrial Appendage Research Articles

Immediate electrophysiological characteristics following modified thoracoscopic ablation via unilateral approach for non-valvular atrial fibrillation

Thoracoscopic ablation has emerged as an effective therapy for patients with long-standing persistent Atrial fibrillation (LsPAF). We aimed to investigate the immediate electrophysiological characteristics following modified ablation with 3 circular and 3 linear lesions in the thoracoscopic procedure via a unilateral approach. Between May 2015 and October 2018, 40 patients underwent the one-stage hybrid procedure for LsPAF. Isolation of the pulmonary veins (PV) and left atrium posterior wall (LAPW), excision of the left atrial appendage (LAA), and high-density endocardial mapping and individualized percutaneous catheter ablation for AF termination were performed. The modified thoracoscopic procedure may enable successful PV and LAPW isolation and LAA removal. Endocardial electrophysiological examination showed 6 out of 40 (15%) patients with a right PV gap, 3 (7.5%) patients with incomplete roof lesions, and 8 (20%) patients with incomplete Dallas lesions. A total of 44 driving areas were mapped and ablated. Thirty-five patients achieved procedural AF termination. After a mean follow-up period of 26months, the success rate of a single procedure was 85%. Cox regression analysis demonstrated that the failure of procedural AF termination may be a risk factor in atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence. Endocardial electrophysiological examination is a necessary partner to thoracoscopic ablation. Our modified thoracoscopic ablation and driving areas-based ablation contribute to high rates of procedural AF termination, which may lead to reduced recurrence rate. The hybrid procedure may be an effective strategy for the management of LsPAF.

Effects of left atrial appendage surgical treatment on the incidence of ischemic cerebrovascular accidents in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac surgery

BackgroundWe sought to assess different surgical methods for left atrial appendage treatment to determine whether any could reduce the incidence of atrial fibrillation–related long-term ischemic cerebrovascular accidents. MethodsA total of 1243 patients were treated with left atrial appendage removal, and 107 patients (8.6%) were lost to follow-up and excluded. The primary outcome was the long-term incidence of ischemic cerebrovascular events (ie, ischemic stroke, excluding transient ischemic attack) and all-cause mortality. ResultsOf the 1136 patients, 37 (3.3%) had ischemic cerebrovascular events. The 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year freedoms from long-term ischemic cerebrovascular events of the left atrial appendage extracardiac ligation group were 99.7%, 94.0%, and 90.8%, respectively. The 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year survivals of the left atrial appendage intracardiac suture group were 99.7%, 94.6%, and 93.6%, respectively. There was a significant difference between the left atrial appendage extracardiac ligation group and the left atrial appendage excision group (P = .041). Seventeen patients (4.6%) had long-term ischemic cerebrovascular events in the left atrial appendage extracardiac ligation group (1.1% per year), 14 patients (3.5%) in the left atrial appendage intracardiac suture group (0.9% per year), and 6 patients (1.7%) in the left atrial appendage excision group (0.44% per year). Left atrial appendage excision can reduce the occurrence of long-term thrombotic stroke compared with left atrial appendage extracardiac ligation (95% confidence interval, 1.09-9.26; P = .035). ConclusionsFor patients with atrial fibrillation, the removal of the left atrial appendage can effectively prevent stroke caused by atrial fibrillation.

Risks and Benefits of Removal of the Left Atrial Appendage.

In patients with atrial fibrillation who are unable to take novel oral anticoagulants for stroke prophylaxis due to bleeding risk or other contraindications, left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion and exclusion devices have shown benefit. In this review, we highlight the risks and benefits associated with LAA removal. LAA, once considered a vestigial organ, has been shown to have physiological, anatomical, and arrhythmogenic properties. Device-related complications such as pericardial effusion, device embolization, device-related thrombus, while uncommon, are still present. With increased operator experience related to appendage occlusion, overall procedural complications have declined. Further refinements in device technology will help decrease complications. While benefits of appendage removal are plenty, procedural complications need to be weighed into the equation when making decisions regarding LAA occlusion.

Perioperative Results from Left Atrial Appendage Removal during Open Heart Surgery

Perioperative Results from Left Atrial Appendage Removal during Open Heart Surgery

Minimal invasive surgery for atrial fibrillation: an updated review

Despite its proven efficacy, the Cox-Maze III procedure did not gain widespread acceptance for the treatment of stand-alone atrial fibrillation (SA-AF) because of its complexity and technical difficulty. Surgical ablation for SA-AF can now be successfully performed utilizing minimally invasive surgery (MIS). This study provides an overview of state-of-the-art MIS for the treatment of SA-AF. Studies selected for this review were identified on PUBMED and exclusion and inclusion criteria were applied to select the publication to be screened. Twenty-eight studies were included; 27 (96.4%) were observational in nature whereas 1 was prospective non-randomized. The total number of patients was 1051 (range 14-114). Mean age ranged from 45.3 to 67.1 years. Suboptimal results were obtained when employing microwave and high focused ultrasound energies. In contrast, MIS ablation of SA-AF achieved satisfactory 1-year results when the bipolar radiofrequency was employed as energy source, with antiarrhythmic drug-free success rate comparable to percutaneous catheter ablation (PCA). The success rate in paroxysmal was even higher than in PCA. In contrast, ganglionated plexi ablation and left atrial appendage removal seem not to influence the recurrence of AF and the occurrence of postoperative thromboembolic events. Minimally invasive surgery ablation of SA-AF achieved satisfactory 1-year results when the bipolar radiofrequency was employed. Nevertheless, the relatively high complication rate reported suggest that such techniques require further refinement. Finally, the preliminary results of the hybrid approach are promising but they need to be confirmed.

Current and Future Alternatives to Warfarin for the Prevention of Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia in clinical practice and is associated with a nearly 5-fold increase in the risk of stroke. Warfarin has been the cornerstone of treatment to reduce stroke risk in AF patients for decades. Although effective in preventing thrombosis, warfarin is difficult to manage and is associated with a 1% to 7% yearly risk of major hemorrhage. Until recently, there were no effective oral alternatives to warfarin. Dabigatran etexilate, a direct thrombin inhibitor, was approved in 2010 for the reduction of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular AF, and the factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban was approved for a similar indication in 2011. Other late-stage orally administered agents that may be approved for this indication include apixaban and edoxaban; others at earlier stages of development will be discussed in this review as well. Nonpharmacological approaches to stroke prevention include left atrial appendage removal, ligation, or occlusion. This review examines advances in the management of stroke risk in AF patients, focusing on recently marketed and late-stage modalities. The advent of alternatives to warfarin for reducing stroke risk in AF patients may improve physicians' ability to offer safe and effective stroke prevention in all AF patients.

Treatment of lone atrial fibrillation: a look at the past, a view of the present and a glance at the future

Despite its proven efficacy, the Cox-Maze III procedure did not gain widespread acceptance for the treatment of lone atrial fibrillation (LAF) because of its complexity and technical difficulty. Surgical ablation for LAF can now be successfully performed utilizing minimally invasive techniques. This article provides an overview of the current state of the art in the surgical treatment of LAF. A brief review of pathophysiology, pharmacological treatment as well as catheter ablation is also provided. The most widely employed minimally invasive approach to LAF has been the video-assisted bilateral mini-thoracotomy or thoracoscopic pulmonary vein island creation and left atrial appendage removal or exclusion, usually with ganglionic plexi evaluation and destruction. Recently, a hybrid approach has been introduced, which combines a mono or bilateral epicardial approach with a percutaneous endocardial ablation in a single-step procedure to limit the shortcomings of both techniques. Suboptimal results of both catheter ablation and surgery suggest that success in the treatment of LAF will probably rely on a close collaboration between the surgeon and the electrophysiologist. Further studies are warranted to determine whether the hybrid approach is effective, especially in patients with long-standing persistent and persistent LAF.

Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: The Columbia Presbyterian Experience

The Maze III procedure is an effective surgical treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, it is not widely applied due to its complexity, increased operative times, and the risk of bleeding. Various energy sources have been introduced to simplify the traditional "cut and sew" approach. This study involves patients undergoing surgical atrial fibrillation ablation (SAFA) at a single institution from 1999 to 2005. Type of concomitant procedures, preoperative clinical characteristics, and chronicity of AF were evaluated in overall patient population. Parameters including surgical approach, lesion pattern, and energy source used were collected intraoperatively. Clinical outcomes examined were postoperative rhythm success, stroke, early mortality, and long-term survival. Three hundred thirty-nine patients were identified. Three hundred twenty-eight (96.8%) patients had associated cardiac disease and underwent concomitant procedures; 75.8% of patients had persistent AF. Energy sources used were microwave (49.8%), radiofrequency (42.2%), and laser (8.0%). In 41.9% of cases a pulmonary vein encircling lesion was the only lesion created. Combination lesion sets were performed in the remaining cases. Rhythm success rates at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months were 74.1%, 68.2%, 74.5%, and 71.1%, respectively. Patients who underwent surgical removal of left atrial appendage by means of stapling or simple excision had no early postoperative stroke. Early mortality was 4.9%. Postoperative survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 89.6%, 83.1%, and 78.0%. Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation is a safe and effective procedure in restoring sinus rhythm with excellent postoperative survival rates. Further advancements in the field will eventually result in minimally invasive procedures with higher success rates.