Dear Editor, We describe a case of an adverse event in which significant tissue necrosis resulted in a 56-year-old male after extravasation of propofol following elective vascular repair for bilateral iliac aneurysms. The patient’s past medical history was significant for peripheral vascular disease, diabetes mellitus, and ischemic heart disease. His postoperative course was problematic, requiring multiple surgeries for complications. On postoperative day 10 of his stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) he remained intubated and sedated, and propofol (10 mg/mL in 10 % lipid solution; AstraZeneca, Ontario, Canada) was infused interstitially in the left antecubital fossa site. It had been running alone through this dedicated line, and it was unknown how much volume was involved. The area which ultimately sloughed skin was found to be indurated. The infusion was stopped and the area treated conservatively. Over the next few days, the patient developed left arm cellulitis, skin sloughing, and purulence in a 5.1 9 5.1-cm area around the site. Initially, the area of necrosis seemed to be 5 9 3.5 cm. Daily washing, saline dressings, and Intracyte gel with Telfa were used on the wound. During his stay, the patient developed an elevated white blood cell count and temperature. Broad-spectrum antibiotic coverage was initiated after consultation with the infectious diseases service. Deep tissue cultures revealed coagulase-negative Staphylococcus with scant yeast, subsequently growing Candida albicans. One week after the incident, the necrotic fat and fascia overlying the biceps as well as thrombosed portions of the basilic and cephalic veins were debrided (Fig. 1). The wound was irrigated with a betadine-containing solution and packed open. Eventually, a vacuum-assisted closure device was put in place, and subsequent assessments indicated the base of the wound appeared to be healthy. The wound continued to improve, and on postoperative day 71, the wound was approximated with a Steri-Strip creep method, where the normal skin was pinched together and Steri-Strips applied to the edge. On post-operative day 119, the area had completely healed, and the patient was discharged home 7 days later. There are few documented incidences of extravasations of propofol resulting in injury producing tissue necrosis [1–4]. The effects of the infusion were seen quite quickly (within 2 days). In one case report, the deconditioned nature of the patient secondary to undernutrition and septic shock were thought to contribute to the necrosis induced by propofol [3]. Our patient had peripheral vascular disease and diabetes, which may have predisposed him to injury and delayed healing. To contain the amount of damage some authors recommend attempting aspiration of the fluid before needle withdrawal, as well as using Ringer’s solution or saline as a ‘‘flush-out’’ within 24 h of the injury [2, 4, 5]. This requires a proximal incision to the area where a cannula is inserted into the subcutaneous space. The solution is then infiltrated and allowed to drain. Depending on the extent of the injury, debridement may be necessary. Considering the frequency of the use of propofol in the ICU setting, this report highlights the need for careful monitoring of intravenous lines containing propofol.
Read full abstract