Reviewed by: The Cost of Inclusion: How Student Conformity Leads to Inequality on College Campuses by Blake R. Silver Laura M. Harrison Blake R. Silver. The Cost of Inclusion: How Student Conformity Leads to Inequality on College Campuses. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 2020. 243 pp. $27.50. ISBN 9780226704050. In The Cost of Inclusion: How Student Conformity Leads to Inequality on College Campuses, sociologist Blake R. Silver (2020) takes the provocative position that campus involvement may not be an unequivocal force for good. While this idea may seem counterintuitive on the surface, Silver demonstrates through in-depth research that co-curricular activities often exacerbate rather than mitigate racist and sexist tropes. Through stories of students' racialized and gendered performances, Silver argues that students replicate privilege and marginalization in co-curricular spaces. The book consists of seven chapters, organized into two parts. Part 1 of the book provides rich descriptions of some of the 158 students with whom Silver connected in his year-long ethnographic study focused on three student organizations at a non-selective public university. Chapter 1 provides an overview of the study, including Silver's immersion into the three student organizations he studied: a social justice learning community, a physical fitness club, and a volunteer organization dedicated to serving children in Central America. In the three chapters that comprise the rest of Part 1, Silver organizes his research findings into themes describing roles he observed students playing based on their identities. These themes are caregivers (women), managers/educators (white men), entertainers/associates (men of color). Chapter 2 highlights the gendered aspect of this marginalization as Silver describes women students who take on caregiving roles in organizations. As anyone who has worked closely with students knows, there are those women students to whom other students refer as the "mom of the group." These students can be counted on for everything from Band-Aids to Target runs, often genuinely seeming to relish the maternal role. As one student described Jamie, the "mom" of her learning community: Jamie in the morning is, like, "Jenna, I have sweet tea." She'll bring home donuts for me…Jamie's done a lot of stuff for me, that's [End Page 590] been really nice. Jamie is such a mom. She wants to parent me, but in a nice way. She's not one of those, "Oh, you shouldn't be doing that." She's like, "Are you okay?" Also, she cooks and cleans as a stress reliever (p. 31). Jenna's point that Jamie provides the aforementioned services without the authority side of parenthood hints at a darker side of the caregiver dynamic in this situation. Silver observes that Care-givers are expected to provide for their charges selflessly. This is one of the many places in the work where the author's participant-observer eye allows for a deeper knowledge about a phenomenon than the reader might normally observe. Resident assistant and other types of peer mentorship opportunities tend to attract students who exhibit a high level of nurture. While this can present as either good or at least benign, Silver highlights the many hours caregivers spend bailing out other students, often at the expense of their own academic and personal growth. He writes of students risking run-ins with the law, taking physical risks transporting drunk individuals, and missing class due to acts of caregiving. The demands other students place on caregivers go well beyond sweet tea and donuts, culminating in "moms" feeling both underappreciated and trapped, as one such student articulated, "I feel like people take advantage—even some of my closest friends… [They ask] "Can you do this for me? Can you do that for me?" I don't like saying no" (p. 39). In Chapters 3 and 4, Silver discusses the co-curricular experiences of the Students of Color and white men he observed. While women were often restricted to caregiving roles in the groups, Silver observed that Students of Color were over-represented in the entertainer and associate roles. The Entertainers were variously described by themselves and others as boisterous, funny pranksters who could be counted on to lighten the mood. As Silver explained...
Read full abstract