Sentence Of Last Paragraph Research Articles

Der „erste Satz“ in Grundlegung I

Abstract In this article, I try to show that the question of what the “first proposition” in Groundwork I is can be answered by textual evidence. At the end of paragraph 15 of GMS I, Kant recapitulates the “first proposition”. It is: “Eine Handlung aus Pflicht sondert den Einfluss der Neigung ganz ab.“ (“An action from duty puts aside entirely the influence of inclination.”). It is also shown that this “proposition” summarizes an important result of Kant’s argument in the preceding paragraphs 8–13 and is presupposed by the “second proposition” and by Kant’s whole argument in the paragraphs 14 and 15, which he recapitulates in the last sentence of paragraph 15.

Erratum: Association of Child Neurology (AOCN) — Indian Epilepsy Society (IES) Consensus Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of West Syndrome

The first sentence of last paragraph, column 1, page 61 should read: “In the 2004 United Kingdom Infantile Spasms study, spasm freedom was achieved in 70% of children taking high dose oral prednisolone (40–60 mg/day) and 76% of children taking ACTH (40 IU/alternate day) [21]” instead of “In the 2004 United Kingdom Infantile Spasms study, spasm freedom was achieved in 70% of children taking high dose oral prednisolone (40–60 mg/kg/day) and 76% of children taking ACTH (40 IU/alternate day) [21].”

Erratum to: ‘Justice at Sea: Fishers’ politics and marine conservation in coastal Odisha, India’

© L p i Unfortunately, the original version of this article [1] contained errors. The author has made several edits to be included in the text as shown below. Section: ‘Introduction’, middle of paragraph 5: Drop ‘additional’ in ‘additional case work’ Section: ‘Territory, nature, people, state’, second sentence paragraph 6: Change ‘Indeed, state creation itself...’ to ‘State creation in turn...’ Section: ‘State policy, turtle conservation and marine fishing’, last sentence of paragraph 3: Drop ‘usage’ in ‘popular usage meaning of a mechanized boat’ so that is reads as ‘popular meaning of a mechanized boat’ Section: ‘The Indian state, refugees and the 2005 controversy’, last sentence of paragraph 4: Drop ‘had’ ‘The Act had was partly meant to prevent....’ So that it reads as ‘The Act was partly meant to prevent...’ The additional files (1 and 2) currently placed at the bottom of the text, need to be embedded in the text and function as figures. Additional File 1 should be Figure 1 and be placed at the end of the 5 paragraph of the Introduction. This also means that “(additional file 1)” at the end of the last sentence of paragraph 5 needs to be deleted. Additional File 2 should be Figure 2 and be placed at the end of the 7 paragraph of the section entitled, “State policy, turtle conservation and marine fishing”. This also means that “(additional file 2)” at the end of the last sentence of paragraph 7 needs to be deleted. There are further changes to the Bibliography. Mahesh should be corrected to Mukul in the following references: Gupta, Charu and Mukul Sharma. 2008. Contested coastlines: Fisherfolk, nations and borders in South Asia. New Delhi: Routledge. Sharma, Mukul. 2012. Green and saffron: Hindu nationalism and Indian environmental politics. Ranikhet: Permanent Black. The following is an unpublished reference that needs to be changed in the bibliography. Chhotray, Vasudha. 2016. Nullification of citizenship: Negotiating authority without identity documents in coastal Odisha. Forthcoming. The following is a missing reference in the bibliography which is to be inserted between Forsyth and Gupta in the bibliography

Erratum to: A context-sensitive model of driving behaviour and its implications for in-vehicle safety systems

In the original publication of the article, the author has missed to include the below paragraph under the section ‘‘Factors influencing driving safety and selected driver variables’’ which appears before the subsection ‘‘3.1 Attitudes/personality.’’ ‘‘Most of the parameters that affect driver behavior quite well established, and are organized around five categories: Personality and attitudes, experience, driver state, task demands, and culture. The first four were also included as high-level determinants of driving in AIDE (Carsten, 2007) but they are evaluated here in light of both old and more recent research.’’ Also, the author has missed to include a sentence in last paragraph under the ‘‘Conclusion’’ section. The complete paragraph should read as: ‘‘The proposed ITERATE model that is designed to serve the remaining tasks in the project is presented in Fig. 9. The foundation of the ITERATE model was laid within the AIDE project (Carsten, 2007). This model summarizes the interaction between the driver variables, the environmental parameters and the vehicle model as it exposed from the literature review. In adopting this model, we must include two qualifications as follows.’’

Correction to “Statistics of multifractal processes using the maximum entropy method”

[1] In the paper “Statistics of multifractal processes using the maximum entropy method” by V. Nieves et al. (Geophysical Research Letters, 38, L17405, doi:10.1029/2011GL048716, 2011), the last sentence of paragraph [8] should be “Properties 2 and 3 also emerge from the invariant fractal structure of elevation increments across various spatial scales.” The correct affiliation for R. L. Bras is Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georogia, USA.

Correction to “Effects of hydration on the elastic properties of olivine”

[1] In the paper “Effects of hydration on the elastic properties of olivine” by S. D. Jacobsen et al. (Geophysical Research Letters, 35, L14303, doi:10.1029/2008GL034398, 2008), the sample of hydrous olivine labeled hy-Fo97 with (001) orientation in the bottom plot of original Figure 1b has been subsequently identified by Raman spectroscopy as OH-chondrodite, (Mg,Fe)5Si2O8(OH)2 [e.g., Lin et al., 1999]. The OH-chondrodite co-existed with hydrous forsterite in the synthesis run, and all other samples in the study have been confirmed to be hydrous forsterite. Upon removing the OH-chondrodite platelet from the fit, we obtain a corrected set of elastic constants (Cij) and crystallographic orientations for hy-Fo97 using a two-plane fit, displayed in corrected Figure 1 and presented in corrected Table 1. The original Table 2 of anisotropy factors has been updated and presented here in corrected Table 2. Brillouin spectra from the two remaining orientations of hy-Fo97 determine eight of the nine Cij, leaving C12 unconstrained. As a result, C12 was fixed to the value obtained for hy-Fo100 and a large uncertainty of ±5 GPa in this parameter was assumed in calculating the aggregate bulk (KS0) and shear (G) moduli. [2] In addition, a minor correction to the elastic constants of hydrous forsterite (hy-Fo100) is presented in revised Table 1 because the original calculation used an earlier estimated density of 3.19 g/cm3, instead of the actual measured X-ray density of 3.180(3) g/cm3. The measured X-ray density of 3.180(3) g/cm3 was correctly reported in the original text, but not used in the calculation of Cij. The revised Cij of hydrous forsterite are affected by only 0.2–0.3% from the original calculation as a result of the error. [3] The revised values of elastic properties for hy-Fo100 and hy-Fo97 presented in the corrected Table 1 apply to the following statements in the text: [4] The last four sentences of paragraph [1] should read: The adiabatic bulk (KS0) and shear (G0) moduli of hy-Fo100 are 125.4(±0.2) GPa and 79.6(±0.1) GPa, respectively. For hy-Fo97, we obtain KS0 = 125.2(±0.8) GPa and G0 = 77.7(±0.3) GPa. Compared with anhydrous forsterite, the combined effects of 3 mol% Fe and 0.8 wt% H2O reduce bulk and shear moduli by 2.9(±0.6)% and 4.5(±0.4)% respectively, with greater reductions expected for more iron-rich Fo90 mantle compositions. Although lattice preferred orientation (LPO) studies have not been carried out under relevant conditions of water or pressure, analysis of idealized single-crystal anisotropy for various known LPO types predicts no more than 2% effect of hydration on S-wave splitting anisotropy in olivine. [5] The last sentence of paragraph [9] should read: We measured two platelets of hy-Fo97 with fitted orientations of (100) and (010), shown in the corrected Figure 1b. [6] The last two sentences of paragraph [10] should read: The addition of 0.89 wt% H2O to forsterite in our hy-Fo100 samples shows a reduction of all Cij by 1.8–4.3%, except C33, which is reduced by only 0.8%. For hy-Fo100, we obtain KS0 = 125.4(±0.2) GPa and G0 = 79.6(±0.1) GPa, which are about 2.7% and 2.2% lower than anhydrous forsterite, respectively. [7] The first two sentences of paragraph [11] should read: Comparing the Cij of hy-Fo97 with anhydrous Fo100 to ascertain the net effect of iron and hydration shows that there is a large reduction in Cij by 2.4–6.4%, except for C23, which increased by 2.1%. For hy-Fo97, we obtain KS0 = 125.2(±0.8) GPa and G0 = 77.7(±0.3) GPa, which are 2.9% and 4.5% lower than anhydrous forsterite. [8] The last sentence of paragraph [11] should read: The aggregate hy-Fo97 velocities Vp and Vs (with only 3 mol% Fe) are 2.1% and 2.4% lower, respectively, than anhydrous forsterite, suggesting that hydrous Fo90 olivine, closer to mantle composition, would exhibit even further reduced velocities. [9] The last sentence of paragraph [13] should read: Hydration of forsterite only slightly reduces the maximum P-wave anisotropy, expressed as [(Vmax − Vmin)/Vmean] × 100, from 25.0(±0.4)% to 24.1(±0.5)% for hy-Fo100, with moderate further reduction to 23.9(±0.4)% for hy-Fo97. [10] The third sentence of paragraph [15] should read: Under horizontal shear (used to reference VSH and VSV), the hy-Fo97 olivine shows no change in shear-wave splitting anisotropy for idealized LPO type-A and type-E compared with dry forsterite. [11] The fifth sentence of paragraph [15] should read: In both cases (type-B and type-C) there is moderate 1–2% change in S-wave splitting anisotropy with hydration (corrected Table 2). Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Correction to “Ice Shelf Water plume flow beneath Filchner‐Ronne Ice Shelf, Antarctica”

[1] In the paper ‘‘Ice Shelf Water plume flow beneath Filchner-Ronne Ice Shelf, Antarctica’’ by Paul R. Holland, Daniel L. Feltham, and Adrian Jenkins (Journal of Geophysical Research, 112 , C05044, doi :10 .1029/ 2006JG003915), there are two errors. In the abstract, the sentence ‘‘The model domain is defined from measurements of ice shelf draft, and from this ISW the model is able to predict plumes that exit the cavity in the correct locations’’ should read ‘‘The model domain is defined from measurements of ice shelf draft, and from this the model is able to predict ISW plumes that exit the cavity in the correct locations.’’ In the last sentence of paragraph 15, an incorrect depth is given. The sentence should read ‘‘. . .the salinity profile decreases linearly from 34.8 psu at 2000-m depth to 34.5 psu at the surface.’’ JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 112, C07099, doi:10.1029/2007JC004387, 2007

Correction to “Magnetic phases in hemo‐ilmenite: Insight from low‐velocity and high‐field Mössbauer spectroscopy”

[1] In the paper ‘‘Magnetic phases in hemo-ilmenite: Insight from low-velocity and high-field Mossbauer spectroscopy’’ by C. Frandsen et al. (Geophysical Research Letters, 34, L07306, doi:10.1029/2006GL029063, 2007), the subscripts in the second composition of the following sentence appeared incorrectly. The last sentence of paragraph six should read as follows: [2] ‘‘We find the approximate respective compositions of the host and the lamellae are Fe0.84Mg 2+ 0.14Ti 4+ 0.98Fe 3+

Erratum: Corrigendum: Evolving symbiosis—venture capital and biotechnology

Nature Biotechnology 21, 983–984 (2003) In the version initially published, citations for the following reference should have made at the penultimate sentence in paragraph 3 and the last sentence of paragraph 5: Stephen P. Galante. An Overview of the Venture Capital Industry & Emerging Changes, 21st Annual Venture Capital Institute, September 17–21, 1995.

Correction

HomeStrokeVol. 37, No. 9Correction Free AccessCorrectionPDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessCorrectionPDF/EPUBCorrection Originally published1 Sep 2006https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000241134.68270.79Stroke. 2006;37:2444This article corrects the followingAdditive Role of Plasma von Willebrand Factor Levels to Clinical Factors for Risk Stratification of Patients With Atrial FibrillationThe version of the article entitled “Additive Role of Plasma von Willebrand Factor Levels to Clinical Factors for Risk Stratification of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation” by Lip et al that published online before print on August 3, 2006 (DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000236840.00467.84) required one correction. This correction was made to the version of the article printed in the September issue of the journal (Stroke. 2006; 37: 2294–2300) and in the current online version of the article. The correction is as follows:On page 5, column 2, in the Discussion section, the last sentence of paragraph 3, which begins with “Abnormal vWf levels have long been recognized… ”, should correctly read as “When vWf levels were analyzed according to the SPAF III risk stratification criteria, a statistically significant stepwise difference in levels was found.13” Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsRelated articlesAdditive Role of Plasma von Willebrand Factor Levels to Clinical Factors for Risk Stratification of Patients With Atrial FibrillationGregory Y.H. Lip, et al. Stroke. 2006;37:2294-2300 September 2006Vol 37, Issue 9 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000241134.68270.79 Originally publishedSeptember 1, 2006 PDF download Advertisement

Correction to “Imaging composite dike propagation (Etna, 2002 case)”

[1] In the paper “Imaging composite dike propagation (Etna, 2002 case)” by (Journal of Geophysical Research, 111, B06404, doi:10.1029/2005JB004616, 2006), in the last sentence of paragraph 12 the volume of magnitude was incorrect. The corrected values are as follows: For the 1983 and 1991–1993 cases the volume of magma erupted was very large, 100 × 106 m3 and 240 × 106 m3.

Erratum

Anthony Marcel, Christian Dobel, 2005 “Structured perceptual input imposes an egocentric frame of reference—pointing, imagery, and spatial self-consciousness” Perception 34 429 – 451 The last sentence of paragraph 3 on page 443 reads: (iv) “What is the angle between your arms or draw the shape made by your two arms”. It should read: (iv) “What is the angle between your arms? Or draw the shape made by your two arms.” The heading of column 6 of table 1 on page 444 reads: Number/total subjects showing confusion It should read: Number/total number of subjects showing confusion

Correction to “Global radiative forcing of coupled tropospheric ozone and aerosols in a unified general circulation model”

[1] In the paper ‘‘Global radiative forcing of coupled tropospheric ozone and aerosols in a unified general circulation model’’ by Hong Liao, John H. Seinfeld, Peter J. Adams, and Loretta J. Mickley (Journal of Geophysical Research, 109, D16207, doi:10.1029/2003JD004456, 2004), two corrections need to be made: [2] 1. There was an error with respect to the combined radiative forcing by ozone and aerosols presented in Table 8 and Figure 18 of Liao et al. [2004]. The last line in Table 8 should be replaced with the following correct forcings by ozone and all aerosols: 0.22 W m 2 at the top of atmosphere and 4.01 W m 2 at the surface. The correct version of Figure 18 is shown here. As a result of this correction, the last sentence in paragraph 80 should read as follows: ‘‘The combined global and annual average TOA and surface forcings are 0.22 W m 2 and 4.01 W m , respectively.’’ [3] 2. There was a typo in paragraph 34 of Liao et al. [2004]. Dust wet deposition was correct in Table 4 but was not correct in the text. The third and fourth sentences of the paragraph should read as follows: ‘‘Dry deposition is the major process for dust loss; dust dry deposition is 1490 Tg yr 1 and accounts for 84% of the total dust loss. Wet deposition is predicted to be 294 Tg yr .’’

Treatment of Guillain-Barré syndrome with corticosteroids: lack of benefit?

Guillain-Barré syndrome is an acute inflammatory neuropathy thought to be due to an autoimmune disease that ought to respond to corticosteroid treatment. The puzzle is that it does not. In this issue of The Lancet, Rinske van Koningsveld and colleagues describe a high-quality trial in which 233 patients were randomised to receive intravenous methylprednisolone 500 mg daily for 5 days or placebo, in addition to standard treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin. For the primary outcome measure, after 4 weeks, slightly more patients on the corticosteroid (68%) had improved one grade or more on a simple seven-point disability scale 1 Hughes RAC Newsom-Davis JM Perkin GD Pierce JM Controlled trial of prednisolone in acute polyneuropathy. Lancet. 1978; 2: 750-753 Summary PubMed Scopus (801) Google Scholar than patients on placebo (56%). This difference did not reach the significance level of p<0·03 required by the statistical design. After further analysis allowing for selected expected prognostic baseline variables, including age and disease severity, this result just reached statistical significance. However, the effect size was small and none of the secondary outcome measures were significantly different. Effect of methylprednisolone when added to standard treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin for Guillain-Barré syndrome: randomised trialWe noted no significant difference between treatment with methylprednisolone and IVIg and IVIg alone. Because of the relevance of prognostic factors and the limited side-effects of methylprednisolone, the potential importance of combination treatment with the drug and IVIg, however, warrants further investigation. Full-Text PDF Department of ErrorHughes RAC. Treatment of Guillain-Barré syndrome with corticosteroids: lack of benefit? Lancet 2004; 363: 181—In this Commentary (Jan 17), the last sentence of paragraph two should have read: “Meta-analysis of the two intravenous methylprednisolone trials alone shows 0·17 (−0·06 to 0·39) more improvement in the corticosteroid than the placebo-treated patients, which is still not significant.” Full-Text PDF

Correction to “Flow angle dependence of 1‐m ionospheric plasma wave turbulence for near‐threshold radar echo electric fields” by E. E. Timofeev et al.

[1] In the paper ‘‘Flow angle dependence of 1-m ionospheric plasma wave turbulence for near-threshold radar echo electric fields’’ by E. E. Timofeev, M. K. Vallinkoski, P. Pollari, J. Kangas, T. Virdi, P. J. S. Williams, and E. Nielsen (Journal of Geophysical Research, 107(A10), 1286, doi:10.1029/2000JA005023, 2002), several errors appeared in the text. [2] The authors’ affiliations were not set correctly. The correct affiliations for each author are as follows: E. E. Timofeev V. A. Fock Institute of Physics, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia M. K. Vallinkoski Sodankyla Geophysical Observatory, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland P. Pollari Department of Physics, University of Oulu, Finland Now at Computer Services Center, University of Oulu, Finland J. Kangas Department of Physics, University of Oulu, Finland Now at Sodankyla Geophysical Observatory, Sodankyla, Finland T. Virdi Department of Physics, University of Aberystwyth, UK P. J. S. Williams Department of Physics, University of Aberystwyth, UK E. Nielsen Max-Planck-Institut fur Aeronomie, Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany [3] The correct complete address for P. Pollari is Computer Services Centre, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 7600, Oulu, FIN-90014, Finland (paivio.pollari@oulu.fi). [4] The captions for Figures 8 and 9 were incorrect. The correct captions for Figures 8 and 9 are as follows: Figure 8. The near-threshold STARE radar echo Doppler shifts versus the ionospheric electric field strength. Figure 9. The near-threshold STARE radar echo Doppler shifts versus the EISCAT plasma velocity component along the STARE radar line of sight. [5] The first sentence of paragraph 16 should read as follows: The special ERRRIS (E-region Rocket and Radar InstabilityStudy)campaign inthe twospringseasonsin1988– 1989 gives enough STARE andEISCATdata to study the 1-m ionospheric plasma wave turbulence for practically all possible flow angles within the eastward and westward electrojets. [6] The first sentence in paragraph 20 should read as follows: The experimental setup in the ERRRIS campaign intervals includes the STARE radars and the EISCAT facility, which allowed simultaneous coherent and incoherent scatter measurements along the geomagnetic flux tube intersected by the two STARE beams in the E-region over Tromso. [7] The last sentence in paragraph 62 should read as follows: According to Table 3, the ratio of jet averaged currents is between 1.6 and 1.8 for the D models, whereas for model C the ratio is about 1.5. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 107, NO. A12, 1450, doi:10.1029/2002JA009771, 2002

ERRATUM

In the Editorial by London M. J., published in the February 2002 issue of Anesthesiology (2002; 96:259–61), the last sentence in paragraph 5 should have read as follows:“Possible explanations include (1) nearly all stress tests in this country use computerized 12-lead systems, (2) there is strong evidence that a positive response in multiple leads (along with greater magnitude of depression and presence of a downsloping ST-segment) is related to a larger area of myocardium at risk16,17and (3) despite calls for cost containment, thallium imaging, even after a positive exercise treadmill test is very common (as is cardiac catheterization).”

Brief Report: Corrections to the Brief Report on Refractory Sprue: Successful Treatment of Refractory Sprue with Cyclosporine

Corrections1 March 1994Corrections to the Brief Report on Refractory SprueFREEGeorge F. LongstrethGeorge F. LongstrethSearch for more papers by this authorAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-120-5-199403010-00034 SectionsAboutVisual AbstractPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail Corrections should be made to a recent brief report [1] on the treatment of refractory sprue with cyclosporine. First, in the next to last sentence of paragraph 2 of the Case Report section, DQ216 should be DQ2/6. Second, in the Acknowledgments section, the name of Dr. Martin F. Kagnoff was misspelled. Third, reference 6 was omitted from the reference list and is as follows: 6. Kagnoff M. Understanding the molecular basis of coeliac disease. Gut. 1990; 31:497-9.REFERENCE1. Longstreth GF. Successful treatment of refractory sprue with cyclosporine. Ann Intern Med. 1993; 119:1014-6. Google Scholar Comments0 CommentsSign In to Submit A Comment Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAffiliations: PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Metrics 1 March 1994Volume 120, Issue 5Page: 443 Issue Published: 1 March 1994 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 1994 by American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.PDF downloadLoading ...

Erratum

In Marshall Edelson's commentary on Adolph Grünbaum in BBS 9(2) 1986, the last sentence of paragraph two on p. 233 should have read:Why, here, in particular, does Grünbaum ignore Freud's many explicit statements that on grounds of discretion he was giving a much edited approximation to the products of free association, an imperfect illustration of what a patient's free associations might sound like—wouldn't Freud have been the first to acknowledge that this “patient” (Freud) was having a good deal of difficulty suspending judgment and conscious control over the direction of his thinking and was very reluctant to utter aloud what he was in fact consciously thinking?

Plasticity of medial gastrocnemius motor units following cordotomy in the cat

J. B. Munson, R. C. Foehring, S. A. Lofton, J. E. Zengel, and G. W. Sypert, “Plasticity of medial gastrocnemius motor units following cordotomy in the cat.” Page 629, left column, first sentence of last paragraph should read: In apparent contrast with these findings, Johnson and co-workers (38) concluded that “the effect of cordotomy [at spinal level T12 in 2- or 12-wk kittens] was to facilitate development of FOG fibers [in the MG muscle] at the expense of SO fibers” (p. 421). Page 632, left column, sentence beginning on line 7 from bottom should read: The same authors further speculate that the return of EPSP amplitude to control levels 3 mo after cordotomy “implies a competitive mechanism whereby surviving interneurons [in the distal cord] can inactivate or displace Ia terminals” (p. 72 of Ref. 50).

Correction to "Broadside-Coupled Strips in a Layered Dielectric Medium" (Letters)

In the above paper, to conform with the usual definitions of odd-and even-mode impedances, the impedance values read from Figs. 10, 14, 17, and 21 should be multiplied by two. last sentence of paragraph one on page 664 should be changed to read: The total capacitance for each mode is simply two times that obtained for the quarter-section. Mode velocities and other quantities are correct as given.