Reservations [1] about energized dissection (ED) in thyroidectomies (EDIT) and ED-induced iatrogenic catastrophes in laparoscopy exhort us to forsake adventurism, with technology un-benchmarked against standards of patient safety [2]. Surgeons embody Plato’s “techne iatrike”, Aristotle’s desire for dexterity, and artist’s sensibilities, remembering the technology as a double-edged sword, giving accolade and criticism equally [2]. The advocates of EDIT, reporting higher rate of insult to recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN), confess to essentiality of meticulous surgical technique and await prospective randomized control trails (RCT), knowledge about thyroid specific heat dispersion and heat sink engineered ED. Even RCTs cannot negate the basics of surgical precision and hemostasis [3]. A few minutes gain should not be traded off against quadrupled complications. Redundancy of assistance is made a virtue violating the team-based “systems approach”, sounding contemptuous towards training. Surgeons train in heterogeneous fiscal atmospheres with universal concerns about ethics and safety. Time advantage remains unsupported by hepatectomy experiences where the collateral damageinduced biliary sealing is a virtue, but structures around thyroid cannot be bartered as collaterals for damage. “Patient-reported outcomes” are the proper “study end points” in this era of informed patients, and “technological toy”-wielding surgeon, as altered “phonation frequency range”, and vocal flitter reported in thyroidectomies with preserved RLN indicate invisible insult during dissection. Involuntary spread of invisible energy in ED insults the precision of cold sharp dissection, something regaining respect even in laparoscopic surgery [4]. History of thyroid surgery is a study of evolution of hemostasis. Advocacy of ED for hemostasis is contemptuous for pioneers whose names live on in the hemostats that we use, i.e., Schiebervorrichtung of Fricke, Kocher, Halsted, Mayo, Crile, and Lahey. Hemostatic techniques in thyroid surgeries are an index of surgical skills. It might surprise us that the hemostatic forceps were developed to replace cautery. Even Halsted castigated Cushing (co-inventor of Bovie) by saying “The only weapon with which the unconscious patient can immediately retaliate upon the incompetent surgeon is hemorrhage”. The benchmark in hemostasis evolved despite criticism from Berry calling thyroidectomy “worse than useless” and Gross “No honest and sensible surgeon, it seems to me, would engage in it”. Invisible RLN insult from thermal spread goes undetected because only laryngeal electromyography can exclude such an insult. There are more vulnerable structures, i.e., parathyroid vasculature and the nerve of Amalita Galli Curci. ED is an environmental compromise too [4]. To submit all patients to something that has a small benefit in a small group of patients and yet has complications that are measurable in the larger group seems madness [5]. Langenbecks Arch Surg (2009) 394:911–912 DOI 10.1007/s00423-009-0504-x
Read full abstract