Existing organizational change models have not fully explained the organizational change process, or the relationship between the organizational change process and the inherent individual level and team/group level change processes (Armenakis & Bedeian, 1999). Yet, large-scale organizational change does not occur without widespread individual change; that is, employees use different work routines and employ different mental models or values, such as quality or customer service as opposed to efficiency, to guide their actions and behavior. In addition, a given organizational change often has different implications when considered for different groups, departments, or locations. This paper explores the implications of level of analysis for change by addressing three questions: (1) How does the change process vary when considered across levels of analysis? (2) What happens in actual change implementation as change initiatives move across levels of analysis? and (3) What does analysis of the change process across levels of analysis add to our understanding of how to successfully implement change? This study answers these questions by presenting and analyzing a case study and related data from a major organizational change effort involving four separate but intertwined change initiatives in the corporate audit department of one of the twenty largest U.S. banks. The paper discusses three aspects of the organizational change process which need to be more fully understood: the group level and individual level change processes inherent within organizational change, how change initiatives move from one level to another, and change process steps specific to a single level of analysis.
Read full abstract