Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Research Articles

Intravenous lidocaine improves postoperative cognition in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a randomized, double-blind, controlled study

BackgroundThe risk of postoperative cognitive dysfunction(POCD) in laparoscopic surgery should not be overlooked. Intravenous lidocaine can reduce perioperative inflammatory response in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery, while the effect of intraoperative intravenous lidocaine on postoperative cognitive function in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery has not been well studied. We investigated whether intraoperative lidocaine improves postoperative cognitive function after laparoscopic radical resection for colorectal cancer.MethodsWe conducted a prospective, randomized double blinded controlled trial to investigate the effect of intravenous lidocaine on rapid postoperative recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer. The patients were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous lidocaine or saline. The primary outcome was cognitive dysfunction defined by a decrease from pre- to postoperative ≥ 2 of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score, at the 3rd and the 7th postoperative days. Secondary outcomes were the MMSE raw score and parameters of the patients’ postoperative recovery such as agitation and length of stay in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU), length of hospital stay, markers of inflammation (white blood cell count and CRP), and incidence of complications.ResultsSeventy-three patients in the lidocaine group and 77 patients in the control group completed the trial. The rate of cognitive dysfunction was lower in the lidocaine group than that in the control group, both at the 3rd (18.57% vs. 63.64% for each group respectively; RR = 0.26, 95%CI = 0.19–0.32; p < 0.0001) and at the 7th postoperative day (12.33% vs. 53.25% for each group respectively; RR = 0.28, 95%CI = 0.22–0.35; P < 0.001). The postoperative MMSE scores were also higher in the lidocaine group than in the control group both at the 3rd (median 25 vs. 24 respectively) and at the 7th postoperative day (26 vs. 24 respectively). Also, patients in the lidocaine group displayed a lower white blood cell count than the control group at the 1st postoperative day (8.5 ± 2.7 vs. 10.4 ± 3.3; p < 0. 001). No differences were evidenced for the other secondary outcomes.ConclusionsIntraoperative intravenous lidocaine can significantly improve postoperative cognitive function in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer.Trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry (16/1/2022, registration number: ChiCTR2200055683)

Pudexacianinium (ASP5354) chloride for ureter visualization in participants undergoing laparoscopic, minimally invasive colorectal surgery

BackgroundIntraoperative ureteral injury, a serious complication of abdominopelvic surgeries, can be avoided through ureter visualization. Near-infrared fluorescence imaging offers real-time anatomical visualization of ureters during surgery. Pudexacianinium (ASP5354) chloride is an indocyanine green derivative under investigation for intraoperative ureter visualization during colorectal or gynecologic surgery in adult and pediatric patients.MethodsIn this phase 2 study (NCT04238481), adults undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery were randomized to receive one intravenous dose of pudexacianinium 0.3 mg, 1.0 mg, or 3.0 mg. The primary endpoint was successful intraoperative ureter visualization, defined as observation of ureter fluorescence 30 min after pudexacianinium administration and at end of surgery. Safety and pharmacokinetics were also assessed.ResultsParticipants received pudexacianinium 0.3 mg (n = 3), 1.0 mg (n = 6), or 3.0 mg (n = 3). Most participants were female (n = 10; 83.3%); median age was 54 years (range 24–69) and median BMI was 29.3 kg/m2 (range 18.7–38.1). Successful intraoperative ureter visualization occurred in 2/3, 5/6, and 3/3 participants who received pudexacianinium 0.3 mg, 1.0 mg, or 3.0 mg, respectively. Median intensity values per surgeon assessment were 1 (mild) with the 0.3-mg dose, 2 (moderate) with the 1.0-mg dose, and 3 (strong) with the 3.0-mg dose. A correlation was observed between qualitative (surgeon’s recognition/identification of the ureter during surgery) and quantitative (video recordings of the surgeries after study completion) assessment of fluorescence intensity. Two participants experienced serious adverse events, none of which were drug-related toxicities. One adverse event (grade 1 proteinuria) was related to pudexacianinium. Plasma pudexacianinium concentrations were dose-dependent and the mean (± SD) percent excreted into urine during surgery was 22.3% ± 8.0% (0.3-mg dose), 15.6% ± 10.0% (1.0-mg dose), and 39.5% ± 12.4% (3.0-mg dose).ConclusionsIn this study, 1.0 and 3.0 mg pudexacianinium provided ureteral visualization for the duration of minimally invasive, laparoscopic colorectal procedures and was safe and well tolerated.

The Safe Values of Quantitative Perfusion Parameters of ICG Angiography Based on Tissue Oxygenation of Hyperspectral Imaging for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study.

Safe values for quantitative perfusion parameters of indocyanine green (ICG) angiography have not been fully defined, and interpretation remains at the surgeon's discretion. This prospective observational study aimed to establish the safe values for the quantitative perfusion parameters by comparing tissue oxygenation levels from HSI images in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. ICG angiography was performed using a laparoscopic near-infrared (NIR) camera system with ICG diluted in 10 mL of distilled water. For quantitative perfusion parameters, the changes in fluorescence intensity with perfusion times were analyzed to plot a time-fluorescence intensity graph. To assess real-time tissue oxygen saturation (StO2) in the colon, the TIVITA® Tissue System was utilized for hyperspectral imaging (HSI) acquisition. The StO2 levels were compared with the quantitative perfusion parameters derived from ICG angiography at corresponding points to define the safe range of ICG parameters reflecting good tissue oxygenation. In the regression analysis, T1/2MAX, TMAX, slope, and NIR perfusion index were correlated with tissue oxygen saturation. Using this regression model, the cutoff values of quantitative perfusion parameters were calculated as T1/2MAX ≤ 10 s, TMAX ≤ 30 s, slope ≥ 5, and NIR perfusion index ≥50, which best reflected colon StO2 higher than 60%. Diagnostic values were analyzed to predict colon StO2 of 60% or more, and the ICG perfusion parameters T1/2MAX, TMAX, and perfusion TR showed high sensitivity values of 97% or more, indicating their ability to correctly identify cases with acceptable StO2. The safe values for quantitative perfusion parameters derived from ICG angiography were T1/2MAX ≤ 10 s and TMAX ≤ 30 s, which were associated with colon tissue oxygenation levels higher than 60% in the laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

How to reduce the colorectal anastomotic leakage? The MIRACLe protocol experience in a cohort in a single high-volume centre.

This article reports the results of a novel perioperative treatment implementing the gut microbiota to prevent anastomotic fistula and leakage (AL) in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resections for cancer and represents the continuation of our pilot study on 60 cases. A series of 131 patients underwent elective colorectal surgery at the S. Eugenio Hospital (Rome-Italy) between December 1, 2020, and November 30, 2022, and received a perioperative preparation following the Microbiota Implementation to Reduce Anastomotic Colorectal Leaks (MIRACLe) protocol comprising oral antibiotics, mechanical bowel preparation and perioperative probiotics. The results obtained in the MIRACLe group (MG) were compared to those registered in a Control group (CG) of 500 patients operated on between March 2015 and November 30, 2020, who received a standard ERAS protocol. Propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis was performed to overcome patients' selection bias. Patients were categorised according to perioperative preparation (MIRACLe protocol vs standard ERAS protocol) into two groups: 118 patients were in post-matched MIRACLe group (pmMG) and 356 were in post-matched Control group (pmCG). In the pmMG, only 2 anastomotic leaks were registered, and the incidence of AL was just 1.7% vs. 6.5% in the pmCG (p = 0.044). The incidence of surgical site infections (1.7% vs. 3.1%; p = 0.536), reoperations (0.8% vs. 4.2%; p = 0.136) and postoperative mortality (0% vs. 2.0%; p = 0.200) was lower in pmMG. Additionally, the postoperative outcomes were better: the times to first flatus, to first stool and to oral feeding were shorter (1 vs. 2, 2 vs. 3 and 2 vs. 3days, respectively; p < 0.001). The postoperative recovery was faster, with a shorter time to discharge (5 vs. 6days; p < 0.001). The MIRACLe protocol was confirmed to be safe and significantly able to reduce anastomotic leaks in patients receiving elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer.

Which video technology brings the higher cognitive burden and motion sickness in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: 3D, 2D-4K or 3D-4K? a propensity score study.

Technological development has offered laparoscopic colorectal surgeons new video systems to improve depth perception and perform difficult task in limited space. The aim of this study was to assess the cognitive burden and motion sickness for surgeons during 3D, 2D-4K or 3D-4K laparoscopic colorectal procedures and to report post-operative data with the different video systems employed. Patients were assigned to either 3D, 2D-4K or 3D-4K video and two questionnaires (Simulator Sickness Questionnaire-SSQ- and NASA Task Load Index -TLX) were used during elective laparoscopic colorectal resections (October 2020-August 2022) from two operating surgeons. Short-term results of the operations performed with the three different video systems were also analyzed. A total of 113 consecutive patients were included: 41 (36%) in the 3D Group (A), 46 (41%) in the 3D-4K Group and 26 (23%) in the 2D-4K Group (C). Weighted and adjusted regression models showed no significant difference in cognitive load amongst the surgeons in the three groups of video systems when using the NASA-TLX. An increased risk for slight/moderate general discomfort and eyestrain in the 3D-4K group compared with 2D-4K group (OR = 3.5; p = 0.0057 and OR = 2.8; p = 0.0096, respectively) was observed. Further, slight/moderate difficulty focusing was lower in both 3D and 3D-4K groups compared with 2D-4K group (OR = 0.4; p = 0.0124 and OR = 0.5; p = 0.0341, respectively), and higher in the 3D-4K group compared with 3D group (OR = 2.6; p = 0.0124). Patient population characteristics, operative time, post-operative staging, complication rate and length of stay were similar in the three groups of patients. 3D and 3D-4K systems, when compared with 2D-4K video technology, have a higher risk for slight/moderate general discomfort and eyestrain, but show lower difficulty focusing. Short post-operative outcomes do not differ, whichever imaging system is used.

Comparison of Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection in Management of Colorectal Carcinoma

Objective: is to compare the impact of laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery in terms of infection, hospital stay and blood loss. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Place and duration: Study was conducted at the general surgery department of Nishtar hospital, Multan from January 2020 to January 2021. Methodology: Three hundred and ten patients were enrolled in the study and divided into two groups. One group was treated with laparoscopic technique and the second group treated with open surgical technique. Main variables of study were infection rate, duration of hospital stay and mean blood loss. SPSS version 23 was used for data analysis. Mean and standard deviation for numerical data and frequency and percentages for categorical data were calculated. P value ≤0.05 was considered as significant. Results: In 16.8% patients of laparoscopic group, infection occurred and 20.6% patients in open group. But the difference was statistically insignificant, (p=0.382). The mean hospital stay in laparoscopic group was 11.21±2.53-day and14.78±3.01 days in open group. The difference was statistically significant. (p=0.000). Conclusion: Laparoscopic technique is associated with reduced rate of infection; hospital stay, and blood loss as compared to open surgery of colorectal carcinoma. Laparoscopic surgical method is preferred over open method.

Colorectal Surgery: Single Tertiary Center Experience

Objectives: Laparoscopic approach is nowadays being used widely for the treatment of various surgical diseases in many centers, but it has not considered as the gold standard in colorectal surgery yet.The aim of this study was to examine and compare the postoperative clinical and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery in the light of literatüre. Methods: 526 patients who had colorectal cancer surgery in our clinic in between May 2015 and March 2023 were enrolled in this retrospective comparative study. Patients treated with open surgery were included in Group 1 (OS group) and ones treated laparoscopically includedin Group 2 (LS group). Demographics (age,sex), types of operations, ASA scores, evaluation of resected specimen, dissected lymph nodes, T invasion of tumors in groups, postoperative complications, operation time and hospital stay times and short-term morbidity and mortality were noted and compared with each other. Results: Patients in LS group had less blood loss compared with those in OS group (median 80 mL (range 0-1300) vs 155 mL (0–2000),p&lt;0•0001), although laparoscopic surgery lasted longer than did open surgery (p&lt;0•0001). The patients who underwent the laparoscopic surgery showed faster recovery then those who underwent open surgery, regarding first passing bowel gas (p=0.045), time of first bowel motion (p=0.04), time to resume normal diet (p=0.041), and time to ambulate independently (p=0.037). Hospital stay time was significantly shorter in Laparoscopy group (p&lt;0.001). Oncological satisfaction of resection as assessed by number of removed lymph nodes, distal resection margin did not differ between groups (p=0.564, p=0.698). Although wound infection was significantly higher in OS group (p&lt;0.001), other morbidity parameters and mortality after colectomy did not differ between two groups. Conclusion: Laparoscopic colorectal surgery gives satisfactory outcomes as compared to open surgery in many aspects such as clinical and oncological outcomes and early recovery. Considering the short-term outcomes of the present study, laparoscopic colorectal surgery in experienced hands seems to be safe and feasible for the treatment of the colorectal cancers.

Pre-operative erector spinae plane block should be considered a viable option for laparoscopic colectomies.

The Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block is a recent development in the field of regional anaesthesia and has been increasingly explored for abdominal surgeries to reduce opioid use and improve pain control. Colorectal cancer is the commonest cancer in multi-ethnic Singapore and requires surgery for curative treatment. ESP is a promising alternative in colorectal surgeries, but few studies have evaluated its efficacy in such surgeries. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the use of ESP blocks in laparoscopic colorectal surgeries to establish its safety and efficacy in this field. A prospective two-armed interventional cohort study comparing T8-T10 ESP blocks with conventional multimodal intravenous analgesia for laparoscopic colectomies was conducted in a single institution in Singapore. The decision for doing an ESP block versus conventional multimodal intravenous analgesia was made by a consensus between the attending surgeon and anesthesiologist. Outcomes measured were total intra-operative opioid consumption, post-operative pain control and patient outcome. Post-operative pain control was measured by pain score, analgesia use, and amount of opioids consumed. Patient outcome was determined by presence of ileus. A total of 146 patients were included, of which 30 patients received an ESP block. Overall, the ESP group had a significantly lower median opioid usage both intra-operatively and post-operatively (p = 0.031). Fewer patients required patient-controlled analgesia and rescue analgesia post-operatively for pain control (p < 0.001) amongst the ESP group. Pain scores were similar and post-operative ileus was absent in both groups. Multivariate analysis found that the ESP block had an independent effect on reducing intra-opioid consumption (p = 0.014). Multivariate analysis of post-operative opioid use and pain scores did not yield statistically significant results. The ESP block was an effective alternative regional anaesthesia for colorectal surgery that reduced intra-operative and post-operative opioid use while attaining satisfactory pain control.

Vascular anatomical study of persistent descending mesocolon in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.

Persistent descending mesocolon (PDM) is a rare congenital atypia of fixation of the descending colon, and currently, very few detailed studies exist on its vascular anatomy. This study was conducted to evaluate the features of the vascular anatomy of PDM to help avoid intraoperative lethal injury and subsequent postoperative complications in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 534 patients who underwent laparoscopic left-sided colorectal surgery. PDM was diagnosed using preoperative axial computed tomography (CT) view. The vascular anatomical features were compared between PDM and non-PDM cases based on three-dimensional (3D)-CT angiography findings. Additionally, the perioperative short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery in the 534 patients were also compared between PDM and non-PDM cases. Of the total 534 patients, 13 patients (2.4%) presented with PDM. No branching pattern of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) specific to PDM was found. In the running direction of the IMA and sigmoidal colic artery (SA), the midline-shift of IMA and the right-shift of SA were significantly more in PDM than in non-PDM cases, respectively (38.5% vs. 2.5%, P ≤ .0001; 61.5% vs. 4.6%, P ≤ .0001). The perioperative short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery in the 534 patients were similar between PDM and non-PDM cases. Because changes in the direction of the vascular running are often observed due to adhesions and shortening of the mesentery in PDM cases, performing a detailed preoperative evaluation of vascular anatomy using imaging modalities such as 3D-CT angiography is important.

Laparoscopic versus Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block in Colorectal Surgery: A Non-Inferiority, Multicentric Randomized Double-Blinded Clinical Trial

Abstract Background Postoperative pain management after laparoscopic colorectal surgery is of utmost importance to grant a better outcome, shorter length of hospital stay, and costs. The Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a relatively new technique with great potential and is achieved through a direct blockade of pain fibers in the plane between the transversus abdominis and internal oblique muscles. Delivery can be achieved under ultrasound guidance performed by the anesthetist or under laparoscopic control performed by the surgeon, however, few studies investigated the best administration method. Aims The aim of this study was to assess if laparoscopic-assisted TAP block (L-TAPB) is as efficient as ultrasound-guided TAP block (U-TAPB) in postoperative pain control. Methods One-hundred-sixteen patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic colon resections from February 2018 to December 2021 at two Swiss hospitals, were included and randomized with a 1:1 ratio to receive either L-TAPB or U-TAPB. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients requesting reserve opioids. Secondary outcomes were total opioid consumption within the first 24 hours after surgery, postoperative pain on the visual analog scale (VAS) at 3, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery, and TAP block-related complications. Results There were almost twice as many patients in the L-TAPB group requesting opioid reserves compared to the U-TAPB group (54.5% vs. 29.8%, p=0.008) although no statistical significance was found in the overall dose in 24 hours. For all other variables (pain on the VAS at 3, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery, the need for epidural analgesia, complications related to the TAP block, and hospital stay no statistically significant difference between the L-TAPB and the U-TAPB groups was noted. Conclusions Our results, although marginal differences between groups were noted, showed the non-inferiority of the laparoscopic delivery compared to ultrasound-guided administration.

Automatic Surgical Skill Assessment System Based on Concordance of Standardized Surgical Field Development Using Artificial Intelligence

Automatic surgical skill assessment with artificial intelligence (AI) is more objective than manual video review-based skill assessment and can reduce human burden. Standardization of surgical field development is an important aspect of this skill assessment. To develop a deep learning model that can recognize the standardized surgical fields in laparoscopic sigmoid colon resection and to evaluate the feasibility of automatic surgical skill assessment based on the concordance of the standardized surgical field development using the proposed deep learning model. This retrospective diagnostic study used intraoperative videos of laparoscopic colorectal surgery submitted to the Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery between August 2016 and November 2017. Data were analyzed from April 2020 to September 2022. Videos of surgery performed by expert surgeons with Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System (ESSQS) scores higher than 75 were used to construct a deep learning model able to recognize a standardized surgical field and output its similarity to standardized surgical field development as an AI confidence score (AICS). Other videos were extracted as the validation set. Videos with scores less than or greater than 2 SDs from the mean were defined as the low- and high-score groups, respectively. The correlation between AICS and ESSQS score and the screening performance using AICS for low- and high-score groups were analyzed. The sample included 650 intraoperative videos, 60 of which were used for model construction and 60 for validation. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient between the AICS and ESSQS score was 0.81. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the screening of the low- and high-score groups were plotted, and the areas under the ROC curve for the low- and high-score group screening were 0.93 and 0.94, respectively. The AICS from the developed model strongly correlated with the ESSQS score, demonstrating the model's feasibility for use as a method of automatic surgical skill assessment. The findings also suggest the feasibility of the proposed model for creating an automated screening system for surgical skills and its potential application to other types of endoscopic procedures.

A Study of risk factors of postoperative ileus after laparoscopic colorectal resection.

Postoperative ileus (POI) is a common complication after abdominal surgery. However, the risk factors for POI after laparoscopic colorectal resection are unclear. We therefore investigated the risk factors for POI after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. This retrospective study involved 484 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for primary colorectal cancer at Hokkaido University Hospital. We categorized the patients into a POI group (n = 19) and non-POI group (n = 465). We compared sex, age, smoking, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes mellitus, body mass index (BMI), cardiac disorder, serum albumin, American Society of Anesthesiologists-physical status, tumor location, tumor stage, operative duration, stoma formation, lymph node dissection, operator, and bleeding as potential risk factors for POI between the POI group and non-POI group by univariate and multivariate analyses. The univariate analysis results showed that the POI group had a higher incidence of male sex (P = 0.036), COPD (P = 0.029), and a BMI of <20 kg/m2 (P = 0.0487) as well as a higher bleeding volume (P = 0.014). The multivariate analysis results showed that male sex (odds ratio [OR], 0.2799; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.089-0.993; P = 0.0298), COPD (0.2866; 0.095-0.862; P = 0.0262), and a BMI of <20 kg/m2 (0.2985; 0.112-0.794; P = 0.0154) were independent risk factors for POI after laparoscopic colorectal resection. Our findings suggest that male sex, COPD, and a BMI of <20 kg/m2 are independent risk factors for POI after laparoscopic colorectal surgery for treatment of colorectal cancer.

Chemical Bowel Preparation Exerts an Independent Preventive Effect Against Surgical Site Infection Following Elective Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery.

We investigated the independent clinical value of mechanical bowel preparations (MBP) and chemical bowel preparations (CBP) for preventing surgical site infection (SSI) in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery. This retrospective cohort study included 475 patients who underwent elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery between January 2018 and March 2022. CBP was introduced in January 2021 and included kanamycin (1g) and metronidazole (1g) 2 times a day, the day before surgery. In some cases, MBP was omitted in patients who planned to undergo right-sided colectomy, those with tumor obstruction, and those with poor general conditions, depending on the judgment of the physician. The primary endpoint was the overall SSI incidence, while the secondary endpoints were the incidences of incisional SSI and organ-space SSI, culture from the surgical site, and length of postoperative hospital stay. In total, 136 patients underwent CBP. MBP was omitted in 53 patients. Overall, SSI occurred in 80 patients (16.8%), including 61 cases of incisional SSI (12.8%) and 36 cases of organ-space SSI (7.6%). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that CBP exerted an independent preventive effect on overall and incisional SSI, whereas MBP did not. However, CBP was not associated with a decreased risk of overall SSI in patients who had undergone preoperative therapy, those with benign disease, and those with stoma formation in the subgroup analysis. Levels of Bacteroides species at the surgical site were significantly lower in the CBP group than in the non-CBP group. Postoperative hospital stay was significantly longer in the incisional SSI group than in the non-SSI group and was significantly longer in the organ-space SSI group than in the other groups. CBP, but not MBP, exerts an independent preventive effect on SSI, especially incisional SSI, in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

ERAS Protocol Applied to Oncological Colorectal Mini-invasive Surgery Reduces the Surgical Stress Response and Improves Long-term Cancer-specific Survival.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are known to reduce postoperative complications and improve short-term outcomes by minimizing the surgical stress response (SSR). Retrospective reviews of large cohorts suggest that they may also have an impact on long-term oncological outcomes. In 2016, Mari et al published a randomized trial on ERAS protocol and the impact on the SSR; they found that IL-6 was less expressed in patients who undergo laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an ERAS protocol compared with controls. The aim of the present study is to report the long-term oncological outcomes of patients enrolled 5 years after the conclusion of the study. Patients enrolled had received the indication for major colorectal surgery, aged between 18 and 80 years, with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grades I to III, autonomous for mobilization and walking, eligible for laparoscopic technique. In total, 140 patients were enrolled and randomized into 2 groups of 70 patients each. Among these patients, 52 in the ERAS group (EG) and 53 in the Standard group (SG) had colorectal cancer. For them, a 5-year oncological follow-up according to the NCCN16 guidelines was planned. IL-6, C-reactive protein, prolactine, white blood cell count, albumin, and prealbumin were compared between oncological patients in the EG and in the SG. EG showed lower IL-6 on postoperative day 1 (21.2±9.1 vs. 40.3 ±11.3; P<0.05) and on day 5 (14.9±6.2 vs. 38.7±8.9; P<0.05), lower C-reactive protein on day 1 (48.3±15.7 vs. 89.4±20.3; P<0.05) and on day 5 (38.3±11.4 vs. 74.3±19.7; P<0.05), and lower pre-albumine on day 5 (18.9±7.2 vs. 12.3±6.9; P<0.05) compared with SG. Median oncological follow-up was 57 months [46.5 to 60]. There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival (log rank=0.195) and disease-free survival (Log rank=0.089) between groups. Cancer-specific survival was significantly better (log rank=0.038) in the EG compared with patients in the SG. ERAS protocol applied to colorectal laparoscopic surgery for cancer is able to minimize the SSR. As a possible result, cancer-specific survival seems to be improved in patients within enhanced protocols. However, even though there may be an association between an excess of SSR and worse oncological outcomes, the favorable effect of ERAS protocols toward better overall and disease-free survival is yet to be demonstrated.

Preservation of left colic artery in laparoscopic colorectal operation: The benefit challenge

During laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer, there is controversy regarding whether the left colic artery (LCA) should be preserved at its origin.To investigate the prognostic significance of preservation of the LCA in colorectal cancer surgery.Patients were divided into two groups. The high ligation (H-L) technique (refers to ligation performed 1 cm from the beginning of the inferior mesenteric artery) group consisted of 46 patients, and the low ligation (L-L) technique (refers to ligation performed below the initiation of the LCA) group consisted of 148 patients. Operative time, blood loss, lymph nodes with tumor invasion, postoperative complications and recovery time, recurrence rate, and 5-year survival rate were compared between the two groups.The average number of lymph nodes detected in postoperative pathological specimens was 17.4/person in the H-L group and 15.9/person in the L-L group. There were 20 patients (43%) with positive lymph nodes (lymph node metastasis) in the H-L group and 60 patients (41%) in the L-L group. No statistical differences were found between the groups. Complications occurred in 12 cases (26%) in the H-L group and in 26 cases (18%) in the L-L group. The incidences of postoperative anastomotic complications and functional urinary complications were significantly lower in the L-L group. The 5-year survival rates in H-L and L-L groups were 81.7% and 81.6%, respectively, and relapse-free survival rates were 74.3% and 77.1%, respectively. The two groups were similar statistically.Complete mesenteric resection combined with lymph node dissection around the inferior mesenteric artery root while preserving the LCA is a beneficial surgical approach during laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer.

Effectiveness of fluorescence-guided methods using near-infrared fluorescent clips of robotic colorectal surgery: a case report

BackgroundThis is the first report on the application of the Da Vinci-compatible near-infrared fluorescent clips (NIRFCs) as tumor markers to localize colorectal cancer lesions during robotic surgery. In laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgeries, the accuracy of tumor marking is a critical issue that remains unresolved. This study aimed to determine the accuracy of NIRFCs in localizing tumors for intestinal resection. Indocyanine green (ICG) was also used to verify the feasibility of safely performing an anastomosis.Case presentationA patient diagnosed with rectal cancer was scheduled to undergo a robot-assisted high anterior resection. During colonoscopy 1 day prior to the surgery, four Da Vinci-compatible NIRFCs were placed intraluminally 90° around the lesion. The locations of the Da Vinci-compatible NIRFCs were confirmed using firefly technology, and ICG staining was performed before cutting the oral side of the tumor. The locations of the Da Vinci-compatible NIRFCs and the intestinal resection line were confirmed. Moreover, sufficient margins were obtained.ConclusionsIn robotic colorectal surgery, fluorescence guidance with firefly technology offers two advantages. First, it has an oncological advantage, because marking with the Da Vinci-compatible NIRFCs allows for real-time monitoring of the lesion location. This enables sufficient intestinal resection by grasping the lesion precisely. Second, it reduces the risk of postoperative complications, because ICG evaluation with firefly technology prevents postoperative anastomotic leakage. Fluorescence guidance in robot-assisted surgery is useful. In the future, the application of this technique should be evaluated for lower rectal cancer.

Efficacy of perioperative duloxetine as a part of multimodal analgesia in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgeries

BackgroundAlthough laparoscopic surgery provides earlier recovery, less morbidity and hospital stay, however, severe pain is still a problem after it. Duloxetine has been recently used in postoperative pain management. We tested perioperative duloxetine to evaluate its effect on patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.MethodsSixty patients were enrolled in this study divided into two equal groups; duloxetine group each patient received an oral duloxetine capsule (60 mg) 1st dose at night before surgery, the 2nd dose 1 h preoperative, and the 3rd dose 24 h postoperative. Placebo group received placebo capsules at the same times. The cumulative morphine consumption in 48 h, postoperative VAS score, quality of recovery (QoR-40 score), sedation, and adverse effects were evaluated.ResultsDuloxetine group had lower VAS scores compared to placebo group, (3 ± 0.69) VS. (4.17 ± 0.83), (2.5 ± 0.6) VS. (4.3 ± 0.9), (2.2 ± 0.7) VS. (3.9 ± 0.6), (1.6 ± 0.7) VS. (3.6 ± 0.8), (1.1 ± 0.8) VS. (3.7 ± 0.7), (0.7 ± 0.7) VS. (3.5 ± 0.8), (0.6 ± 0.7) VS. (3.5 ± 0.8) respectively, P ˂0.01. The cumulative morphine consumption was significantly reduced in the Duloxetine group compared to the placebo group (4.6 ± 2.9 vs. 11.3 ± 1.7 mg), P < 0.01. The total QoR-40 score for duloxetine group was (180.8 ± 4.5) vs. (156 ± 5.9) in placebo group (P < 0.01). Patients in Duloxetine group were more sedated in all the 48 h postoperatively in comparison to placebo group.ConclusionsPerioperative duloxetine had reduced postoperative pain, decreased opioid consumption, and improved the quality of recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Effects of anesthetic depth on perioperative T lymphocyte subsets in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: a prospective, parallel-controlled randomized trial

BackgroundDuring the perioperative period, the surgical stress response induced by surgical trauma tends to cause a decrease in peripheral lymphocytes. Anesthetics could reduce the stress response during surgery and prevent sympathetic nerve overexcitation. The goal of this study was to investigate how BIS-guided anesthetic depth affected peripheral T lymphocytes in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.MethodsA total of 60 patients having elective laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery were randomly assigned and analyzed (n = 30 for deep general anesthesia, BIS 35, n = 30 for light general anesthesia, BIS 55). Blood samples were collected immediately before anesthesia induction and immediately after operation, 24 h and 5 days postoperatively. The CD4+/CD8 + ratio, T lymphocyte subsets (including CD3 + T cells, CD4 + T cells, and CD8 + T cells), and natural killer (NK) cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. Serum interleukin-6 (IL-6), interferon -ɣ (IFN-ɣ), and vascular endothelial growth factor-α (VEGF-α) were also measured.ResultsThe CD4+/CD8 + ratio decreased 24 h after surgery in two groups, but the reduction did not differ between the two groups (P > 0.05). The concentration of IL-6 and the numerical rating scale (NRS) score in the BIS 55 group were significantly higher than that in the BIS 35 group 24 h after surgery (P = 0.001). There were no intergroup differences in CD3 + T cells, CD4 + T cells, CD8 + T cells, NK cells, VEGF-α, or the IFN-ɣ. Statistical analyses showed no differences between the two groups in the incidence of fever and surgical site infection during hospitalization.ConclusionsDespite the fact that patients in deep general anesthesia group had low levels of the IL-6 24 h after surgery, the deep general anesthesia was not associated to a positive effect on patients’ peripheral T lymphocytes during colorectal cancer surgery. We found no evidence that peripheral T lymphocyte subsets and natural killer cells were affected by the targeting a BIS of either 55 or 35 in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in this trial.Trial registrationChiCTR2200056624 (www.chictr.org.cn).

Incidence of colonic fistulas in patients with colon cancer submitted to robotic surgery versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

IntroductionUp to the present time, the laparoscopic approach for colon cancer is considered the gold standard. However, robotic surgery has been appraised in modern medicine. It is essential to evaluate...

The impact of sarcobesity on incisional hernia after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery

Incisional hernia is a common complication after abdominal surgery, especially in obese patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between sarcobesity and incisional hernia development after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. In total, 262 patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery were included in the present study. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the independent risk factors for the development of incisional hernia. We then performed subgroup analyses to assess the impact of visceral obesity according to clinical variables on the development of incisional hernia in laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer surgery. Forty-four patients (16.8%) developed incisional hernias after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. In the univariate analysis, the development of incisional hernia was significantly associated with female sex (P = 0.046), subcutaneous obesity (P = 0.002), visceral obesity (P = 0.002), sarcobesity (P < 0.001), and wound infection (P < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, sarcobesity (P < 0.001) and wound infection (P < 0.001) were independent predictors of incisional hernia. In subgroup analysis, the odds ratio of visceral obesity was the highest (13.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.51-37.8, P < 0.001) in the subgroup of sarcopenia. Sarcobesity may be a strong predictor of the development of incisional hernia after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer, suggesting the importance of body composition in the development of incisional hernia.