Occupants of five local government roles-legislators, elected executives, appointed executives, labor representatives, and arbitrators-were questioned on their attitudes toward labor-management conflict in government. The relation between different role occupants and attitudes toward conflict, bargaining, authoritarianism, delegation, strikes, forms of conflict resolution, and critical services was examined. Although accustomed to bargaining and compromise among themselves, occupants of elected roles were found to be less prepared than appointed role occupants to negotiate productively with labor. Also, the views of role occupants toward specific labor relations issues were more a function of role occupancy than their attitude toward general issues.
Read full abstract