We argue that the analytical energies obtained recently in Mustafa (2022) from a radial eigenvalue equation are incorrect because the truncation method used by the author forces a relationship between two model parameters. This relationship (overlooked by the author) depends on the truncation number and as a result the exact analytical energies do not correspond to a single model but are solutions to different physical models. The reason is that the radial eigenvalue equation is not exactly solvable but conditionally solvable so that one can only obtain some particular exact solutions. We also show that the exact eigenvalues obtained for a particular simpler case are also incorrect because the author overlooked that the shift of the radial coordinate leads to a change in the left boundary condition.