You have accessJournal of UrologyStone Disease: Evaluation & Medical Management (I)1 Apr 20132096 KIDNEY STONE CLINIC QUALITY: EFFECT ON HYPEROXALURIA Zeyad Schwen, Julie Riley, Yaniv Shilo, and Timothy Averch Zeyad SchwenZeyad Schwen Pittsburgh, PA More articles by this author , Julie RileyJulie Riley Pittsburgh, PA More articles by this author , Yaniv ShiloYaniv Shilo Pittsburgh, PA More articles by this author , and Timothy AverchTimothy Averch Pittsburgh, PA More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.2005AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Kidney stone clinics evaluate and manage metabolic risk factors such as hyperoxaluria with the purpose of preventing kidney stone recurrence. While dietary modification has been shown to reduce urine oxalate in controlled studies, a question remains of whether results can be reproduced in actual clinical practice, taking into account patient noncompliance and quality of care. This study also ascertains whether certain patient characteristics independently affect a patient's ability to decrease urine oxalate. METHODS Retrospectively, 267 kidney stone patients from 2005 to 2011 with urine oxalate values greater than 40 mg/d on 24-hour urine sampling were evaluated. Chart reviews for each patient included recording patient characteristics, dietary modification counseling, noncompliance, failure to keep appointments, and the change in urine oxalate values. Enteric and primary hyperoxalurics were excluded. RESULTS Overall, hyperoxaluric patients had a significant decrease in urine oxalate of 8.94 mg/d (5.8 to 12.0). 48.1% of patients were able to decrease their urine oxalate to below 40mg/d, the upper threshold of normal. From the patient characteristics we found females were able to significantly reduce urine oxalate compared to males (12.6 mg/d vs 6.55 mg/d, p=0.012), BMI negatively correlated with delta oxalate (Pearson's r = -0.213, p=0.01), and having a previous kidney stone appeared to limit a patient's delta oxalate (7.61 mg/d vs 15.1 mg/d, p=0.052). Of the 267 patients only 59% completed a second 24 hour urine sample, 27.4% of patients did not keep a follow-up appointment at some point during their treatment, and 10% were noted as being noncompliant. There was no clear effect of these compliance measures on delta oxalate. Change in urine volume, however, did negatively correlate significantly with delta oxalate (Pearson's r = -0.210, p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS Overall, patients who were seen in the outpatient kidney stone clinic who were treated with dietary management had a significant reduction in urine oxalate and almost half were able to reduce their oxalate to below the upper threshold of normal. Females and patients with a lower BMI are able to reduce urine oxalate better. There appears to be a trend towards reduced urine oxalate reduction if a patient has a previous stone history. Patient compliance and follow-up remains a significant challenge, however the only compliance measure that correlated with a greater oxalate reduction was increasing urine volume. © 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 189Issue 4SApril 2013Page: e860 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Zeyad Schwen Pittsburgh, PA More articles by this author Julie Riley Pittsburgh, PA More articles by this author Yaniv Shilo Pittsburgh, PA More articles by this author Timothy Averch Pittsburgh, PA More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...