Joint Editor Research Articles

Building Breastfeeding Research Relations and Beyond: An Interview With Fiona Dykes.

Professor Fiona Dykes is Professor Emerita of Maternal and Infant Health at the University of Central Lancashire in the United Kingdom (UCLAN). Fiona has a particular interest in the global, sociocultural, and political influences upon infant and young child feeding practices; her methodological expertise is in ethnography and other qualitative research methods. She founded the Maternal and Infant Nutrition and Nurture Unit (MAINN) in 2000 which she led until she retired from her full-time professorship in 2020. Fiona established the associated MAINN Conference in 2007. The MAINN conference is a 3 day, international, peer reviewed event held bi-annually in the United Kingdom and, more recently, in alternate years overseas (Sydney, Australia; Falun, Dalarna, Sweden; and Florida, United States). The conference draws together key researchers in the field of infant and young child feeding from around the world. Fiona was a founding member of the journal Maternal and Child Nutrition. She is author of Breastfeeding in Hospital: Mothers, Midwives and the Production Line (Routledge) and co-author, with Dr Tanya Cassidy, of Banking on Milk: An Ethnography of Donor Human Milk Relations (Routledge). She is also joint editor of several books including Infant and Young Child Feeding: Challenges to Implementing a Global Strategy (Wiley-Blackwell) and Ethnographic Research in Maternal and Child Health (Routledge). This interview was conducted on April 20, 2023, by Dr. Tanya Cassidy, and is based on a verbatim transcription and edited for readability.TC = Tanya Cassidy; FD = Fiona Dykes.

Editorial

The Journal of Geosciences Research (JGSR), a bi-annually published scientific journal by the Gondwana Geological Society (GGS) has been gradually gaining popularity for its timely release and high-quality single/ double peer-reviewed articles. It has been receiving an overwhelming response from the geoscientific community across India allowing us to accommodate the articles with the high-quality scientific information and research data in the JGSR. The priority has been given to the articles with the global or regional significance for the publication in the JGSR after peer review. We are trying to provide the maximum outreach to the articles published in the JGSR by making them available on the JGSR website and through the circulation amongst readers. With the continuous support and guidance of well-wishers and readers of the JGSR, we are constantly trying to enhance the quality of the JGSR. In this connection, I am delighted to update our erudite readers that the JGSR now has been indexed /abstracted in the Indian Citation Index (ICI), New Delhi. Besides this, we are making endeavors to index/ abstract the JGSR in many other scientific agencies/organizations in near future to disseminate the scientific information/knowledge to the wide range of geoscientific fraternity. I am pleased to share exciting news that the GGS has been granted a membership of scholarly publishers of the International repute 'Crossref'. After fulfilling the documentation to 'Crossref', the JGSR has received the Digital Object Identifier (DOI) to be used for the various articles published in it. Henceforth, the every article/ document published in the JGSR will have the specific DOI number. The DOI would facilitate the articles published in the JGSR to get the wide scale National/ International recognition. The readers of the JGSR can always find out the origin of the article/document using the permanently adhered DOI to it. I am fully aware of the long-pending demand/request from the readers to get the impact factor to the JGSR. With continuous support from the ever-energetic Joint Editor and Editorial Team and the office bearers of the GGS, we are in the process to accomplish the minimum requirements set by various scientific agencies at the International level to achieve the status of 'Scientific Citation Index (SCI)' Journal for the JGSR. We are very much sure and confident with the everlasting support from all of you to fulfill this long pending dream of ours and all the well-wishers very soon. I earnestly request all the readers of the JGSR to convey their invaluable suggestions for further improvement in the content of the JGSR. I sincerely thank our Joint Editor, Editorial Board Members and most importantly our scholarly reviewers for their unstinted support to maintain the quality content of the JGSR. Finally, I really thank the official printers of the GGS, 'M/SAishwarya Graphics' for incessant co-operation and time to time support in keeping the superb quality and timely release of the publications. Sumedh Humane Editor

Donald Edward Moggridge (1943–2021)

Donald Edward Moggridge (1943–2021)

The Future of EMDR Therapy and of theJournal of EMDR Practice and Research

After 15 years of dedicated and outstanding service, Dr. Louise Maxfield, Founding Editor of theJournal of EMDR Practice and Research,has retired from her editorial responsibilities. This editorial introduces the first issue under the joint editorship of Dr. Derek Farrell and Jenny Ann Rydberg, who highlight the need to address the future of EMDR therapy in general and theJournal of EMDR Practice and Researchin particular, and welcome a community-informed discussion on new directions.

“George Orwell Invented Journalism Studies”

To inaugurate our series of conversations with scholars in journalism studies with a view to securing some useful insights into the history and practice of journalism education, Prof. Richard Lance Keeble appeared an obvious choice. Now an Honorary Professor at Liverpool Hope University, Prof. Keeble was first director of the International Journalism MA, then director of the Journalism and Social Science BA, at City University, London (1984-2003). He was then appointed Professor of Journalism (2003-present) at Lincoln University where he also became acting head of the Lincoln School of Journalism (2010-2013) and later a Visiting Professor at Liverpool Hope University (2015-2019). Prof. Keeble has been the recipient of prestigious and distinguished prizes, namely the National Teaching Fellowship Award (2011) and the Lifetime Achievement Award for services to journalism education (2014), the latter bestowed by the Association for Journalism Education in the UK. Parallel to his academic career, Prof. Keeble has always been a practising journalist. On completion of his studies in Modern History at Keble College, Oxford University (1967-70), he started a career in journalism, first as sub editor at the Nottingham Guardian Journal/Evening Post (1970-73) and then at the Cambridge Evening News (1973-77). He was deputy editor, then editor, of The Teacher, the weekly newspaper of the National Union of Teachers (1977-84). His dual pedigree in journalism, as a practitioner and a professor, led him to take on many editorial responsibilities. He is emeritus editor of Ethical Space: The International Journal of Communication and Ethics and joint editor of George Orwell Studies and is also on the board of an impressive number of journals, among which are Journalism Studies, Digital Journalism, Journalism Education, International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics, Media Ethics, Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, to name just a few. Prof. Keeble was also Chair of the Orwell Society1 (2013-2020) and has authored or edited no less than 44 books. They include Ethics for Journalists and The Newspapers Handbook,2 respectively on their second and fifth editions, as well as several volumes on George Orwell, investigative journalism, and the British media. It was an honour and privilege to talk to Prof. Keeble in a phone interview on March 25, 2021. The conversation was transcribed while some passages were edited for clarity. I hereby express my immense gratitude for his time, generosity, expertise, and humour. It is such a thrill to start our series of interviews in a way that only makes us want more such conversations.

John Boardman, A Classical Archaeologist’s Life: The Story So Far. An Autobiography

John Boardman’s contribution to Classical Archaeology has been prodigious. The list of publications at the end of this autobiography admits to 44 books (14 of which have been translated, most of them into more than one language), 18 joint books (4 of them translated), about 10 edited books (plus 7 years as editor of JHS, editor for 17 BSA Supplements, joint editor for 20 issues of OJA and for LIMC and ThesCRA, and major editorial roles for CVA and Kerameus), and some 280 articles, with more listed as forthcoming and something published in every year from 1954 to 2016. It is hard to think that this is a record that will ever be surpassed.

Mary Howitt and <i>Howitt's Journal</i> (1847–48)

This article examines a rare phenomenon in nineteenth-century British print culture, a periodical jointly edited by a husband and wife team. Howitt’s Journal, a weekly miscellany with a progressive political agenda, ran for only eighteen months from January 1847 to June 1848, edited by William and Mary Howitt. The history of Howitt’s Journal is particularly relevant to the question of women’s agency in the world of periodicals, the ways in which women editors could have a public voice and engage in debate on political and social issues. One methodological issue the article raises is how we assess an editor’s contribution to any publication, the nature of their input, and the extent to which they drive the agenda. In the case of a joint editorship, how do we identify the contributions and responsibilities of each editor? The paper is based on an examination of Mary Howitt’s unpublished letters in the Houghton Library, Harvard, which provide new evidence of the extent of her involvement in the Journal. It tests the Howitts’ editorial style, and Mary’s in particular, against theories of editorship put forward by Patten and Finkelstein (2006) and Matthew Philpotts (2012) and suggests that these models of editorship are essentially masculine.

The Role of Regulatory Agencies in Agenda-Setting Processes: Insights from the Italian Response to the COVID-19 Infodemic.

International organizations such as the WHO have worked to raise awareness of the massive infodemic that accompanied the COVID‐19 outbreak and made it hard for people to find trustworthy sources of information and reliable guidance for their decisions. Our contribution focuses on the Italian case, where the Communications Regulatory Authority (AGCOM) was able to act as first mover in its field so as to strategically frame the problem of disinformation in the absence of a pre‐existing policy intervention. An emerging body of research shows that the activity of formally independent regulators is not necessarily limited to the implementation of delegated regulatory competencies. We discuss the implications of the activity of independent regulators for the fight against disinformation during the COVID‐19 pandemic. We find that as a political actor in its own right, the Italian media regulator claimed control over sectoral expertise in order to shape the crucial first steps of the response to the infodemic.

Commentary: Response to commentary by Davis and Kramer (2021)

Davis and Kramer (2021) in their commentary on our study (Bilgin & Wolke, 2020) state that we 'argue that leaving an infant to "cry it out", rather than responding to the child's cries, had no adverse effects on mother-infant attachment at 18months' (Davis & Kramer, 2021, p. 1). Instead, we wrote that 'contemporary practice by some parents to occasionally or often "leaving infant to cry it out" during the first 6months was not associated with adverse behavioural development and attachment at 18months' (p. 8). Based on the empirical findings of our observation study, we suggested that 'increased use of "leaving to cry it out" with age may indicate differential responding by mothers to aid the development of infant self-regulation' (p. 8). Indeed, in an editorial of our study, the joint editor of this journal concluded that 'Bilgin and Wolke responsibly conclude that there is little reason to make definitive pronouncements to parents of young infants about how much to let them cry it out, given that both the attachment theory (responding promptly early promotes security) and learning theory (ignoring crying prevents dependency) formulations were unsupported by their findings' (Zeanah, 2020, p. 1172).

John Haigh 1941–2021

John Haigh 1941–2021

Editorial – A new year and a new editor team

Editorial – A new year and a new editor team

1959: Science and art

ABSTRACT This article is an introduction to the February 1959 issue of the Bulletin, assembled under the joint editorship of Martyl Langsdorf, a Chicago artist who served as art editor of the Bulletin for many years, and Cyril Stanley Smith, professor of metallurgy at the Institute for the Study of Metals, University of Chicago. It is republished here as part of a special issue commemorating the 75th year of the Bulletin.

Letter from the joint editors

European Journal of EducationVolume 55, Issue 1 p. 1-2 LETTER FROM THE JOINT EDITORS Letter from the joint editors Richard Desjardins, Richard Desjardins Joint Editor desjardins@ucla.edu Search for more papers by this authorJanet Looney, Janet Looney Joint Editor looney@eiesp.org Search for more papers by this authorSusan Wiksten, Susan Wiksten Assistant Editor eje@eiesp.org Search for more papers by this author Richard Desjardins, Richard Desjardins Joint Editor desjardins@ucla.edu Search for more papers by this authorJanet Looney, Janet Looney Joint Editor looney@eiesp.org Search for more papers by this authorSusan Wiksten, Susan Wiksten Assistant Editor eje@eiesp.org Search for more papers by this author First published: 18 February 2020 https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12376Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. Volume55, Issue1Special Issue: Developing schools as learning organisations: how and why?March 2020Pages 1-2 RelatedInformation

Reflections on a journey withAccounting Historyas an international refereed journal, 1995–2019

Accounting History is the journal of the Accounting History Special Interest Group of the Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand. My journey as the Founding Editor (1995–2007) and as Joint Editor (from 2008) of the New Series (NS) of Accounting History, as an international refereed journal, commenced on 1 January 1995 and will conclude on 31 December 2019. The first issue of the NS was published in May 1996, with 1995 being devoted to relaunching the journal for international leadership in the field. The journal’s development has been supported by periodic conferences, colloquia and symposia, namely the Accounting History International Conference, the Accounting History Doctoral Colloquium, which was later replaced by the Accounting History International Emerging Scholars’ Colloquium, and the Accounting History Symposium. This contribution provides personal reflections of this journey from 1995 to 2019, a consecutive period of 25 years, and comprises four sections: Introduction, Looking back, Looking ahead and Conclusions.

A Conversation with Peter Diggle

Peter John Diggle was born on February 24, 1950, in Lancashire, England. Peter went to school in Scotland, and it was at the end of his school years that he found that he was good at maths and actually enjoyed it. Peter went to Edinburgh to do a maths degree, but transferred halfway through to Liverpool where he completed his degree. Peter studied for a year at Oxford and was then appointed in 1974 as a lecturer in statistics at the University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne where he gained his PhD, and was promoted to Reader in 1983. A sabbatical at the Swedish Royal College of Forestry gave him his first exposure to real scientific data and problems, prompting a move to CSIRO, Australia. After five years with CSIRO where he was Senior, then Principal, then Chief Research Scientist and Chief of the Division of Mathematics and Statistics, he returned to the UK in 1988, to a Chair at Lancaster University. Since 2011 Peter has held appointments at Lancaster and Liverpool, together with honorary appointments at Johns Hopkins, Columbia and Yale. At Lancaster, Peter was the founder and Director of the Medical Statistics Unit (1995–2001), University Dean for Research (1998–2001), EPSRC Senior Fellow (2004–2008), Associate Dean for Research at the School of Health and Medicine (2007–2011), Distinguished University Professor, and leader of the CHICAS Research Group (2007–2017). A Fellow of the Royal Statistical Society since 1974, he was a Member of Council (1983–1985), Joint Editor of JRSSB (1984–1987), Honorary Secretary (1990–1996), awarded the Guy Medal in Silver (1997) and the Barnett Award (2018), Associate Editor of Applied Statistics (1998–2000), Chair of the Research Section Committee (1998–2000), and President (2014–2016). Away from work, Peter enjoys music, playing folk-blues guitar and tenor recorder, and listening to jazz. His running days are behind him, but he can just about hold his own in mixed-doubles badminton with his family. His boyhoood hero was Stirling Moss, and he retains an enthusiasm for classic cars, not least his 1988 Porsche 924S. His favorite authors are George Orwell, Primo Levi and Nigel Slater. This interview was done prior to the fourth Spatial Statistics conference held in Lancaster, July 2017 where a session was dedicated to Peter celebrating his contributions to statistics.

Out With The Old, In With The New

Out With The Old, In With The New

2019—Letter from the Joint Editors

European Journal of EducationVolume 54, Issue 2 p. 163-164 LETTER FROM THE JOINT EDITORS 2019—Letter from the Joint Editors Richard Desjardins, Richard Desjardins Joint Editor desjardins@ucla.edu Search for more papers by this authorJanet Looney, Janet Looney Joint Editor looney@eiesp.org Search for more papers by this authorChristina Keyes, Christina Keyes Assistant Editor eje@eiesp.fr Search for more papers by this author Richard Desjardins, Richard Desjardins Joint Editor desjardins@ucla.edu Search for more papers by this authorJanet Looney, Janet Looney Joint Editor looney@eiesp.org Search for more papers by this authorChristina Keyes, Christina Keyes Assistant Editor eje@eiesp.fr Search for more papers by this author First published: 18 March 2019 https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12323 [This article was intended for the March 2019 Special Issue EJED 54:1 (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/14653435/2019/54/1) but was inadvertently missed. The publisher apologizes for this error and any confusion it may cause.] Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. Volume54, Issue2Special Issue: Lesson and learning studies – Relevant topics in the context of education policyJune 2019Pages 163-164 RelatedInformation

John Kennedy

John Kennedy

BJOG Editor-in-Chief number 8: James Young 1943-1963.

James Young was born in Edinburgh on 24 April 1883 and graduated MB ChB with first class honours from Edinburgh University in 1905. In 1910 he was awarded the gold medal for his MD thesis Reproduction of the Human Female, later published as a book. He self-funded cancer research, suggesting that a form of ‘pleomorphic bacterium’ isolated from 34 human cancers might be carcinogenic; it would be more than 50 years before the herpes virus was suggested as the cause of cervical cancer. However, he found more acceptance of his research into the causes of eclampsia, considered to be ‘a poison or toxin’ released by infarctions in the placenta (hence the term ‘pre-eclamptic toxaemia’). His comprehensive review of the topic was published in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine in 1914, following which his studies were interrupted by involvement in military campaigns in Gallipoli, Egypt, Palestine and France, about which he wrote a book, With the 52nd division in three continents. He reached the rank of lieutenant colonel, was twice mentioned in dispatches and in 1919 was awarded the Distinguished Service Order. He developed his clinical practice in the Edinburgh Royal Infirmary and the Simpson Memorial Maternity Hospital. His 1929 paper in the British Medical Journal highlighted the recurrence of pre-eclampsia in successive pregnancies; he concluded that ‘in view of the large risk of recurrence the need for antenatal supervision from an early stage in the event of the subsequent pregnancy should be clearly explained to the patient’. More controversially, he opined that ‘toxaemia in two or more pregnancies is an indication for the prevention of any further pregnancy’. In 1934 he was elected to a professorship in the University of London at the newly created British Postgraduate Medical School at Hammersmith (later to become the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology), subsequently concentrating on training, teaching and writing. In 1937 he was appointed assistant editor of our Journal, becoming joint Editor in 1943 and Editor-in-Chief from 1946 until 1963 – a record for editorial longevity. His Textbook of Gynaecology ran to 11 editions. His administrative responsibilities included being Governor of the Imperial Cancer Research Fund and Chairman of the Scientific Advisory Committee of the National Birthday Trust. He was elected honorary Fellow of the American Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and a corresponding Fellow of the German Gynaecological Society. He piloted the Journal through its acquisition by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists in 1950 (following which, for the first time, the editor was paid a salary), was widely read and wrote in a literary style that contrasts with the minimalist orthodoxy of modern scientific writing. He regarded fundamental experimental investigations as ‘gold compared with the trash of case records…while an intensive study of ten cases may be rewarding, the study of 1000 cases of the same condition is in its nature likely to be perfunctory and sterile’. A strict but kindly man, he enjoyed sharing music with his wife, daughter, stepdaughter and two stepsons. He died in the year that he demitted office as Editor. None declared. Completed disclosure of interests form available to view online as supporting information. Image is available online as supporting information to the article.

The Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal Community in its 30th year

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine the origins and development of the “Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal (AAAJ) Community”, a flourishing international interdisciplinary accounting research community. This scholarly community has emerged over some 30 years from the publication in 1988 of the inaugural issue of AAAJ under the joint editorship of James Guthrie and Lee Parker. This historical account discusses the motivation for establishing the journal and the important publishing initiatives, developments and trends across this period. The study positions the journal as a key thought leader, the catalyst for other Community activities such as the Asia-Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting conference.Design/methodology/approachThe investigation involved a selective review of the contents of AAAJ, particularly the annual editorials published since inception, and other relevant literature, analysis of the main research themes and the most cited papers, and oral history interviews with the joint editors. The future prospects for the AAAJ Community are addressed.FindingsThe AAAJ Community has shaped and led developments in interdisciplinary accounting research. Recognised for innovation and with a reputation for nurturing scholars, AAAJ continues to grow in stature as one of the world’s leading accounting journals, challenging the status quo and fostering inclusive scholarship.Research limitations/implicationsThe study does not examine the journal’s publication patterns nor assess in detail the research studies that have been published in the journal.Originality/valueThe study recognises AAAJ as central to the development of an interdisciplinary accounting research community, firmly located in the sociological, critical and interpretative tradition also associated with some other leading accounting journals.