Silence is Deadly: Judaism Confronts Wifebeating, by Naomi GraetzNaomi Graetz has written fascinating, instructive, and important book which provides an exciting example of the application of rabbinic scholarship and of feminist analysis to the study of contemporary social problem in the Jewish community. In the process, she has developed methodology for approaching the multiplicity of voices found in rabbinic literature.Jews have wanted to believe that they constitute kinder and gentler people, often, as Nietzsche pointed out, confusing degraded circumstances for superiority while denying their own abusive and dysfunctional behavior. The fact remains that beyond the myths, Jewish leaders, especially rabbis, have continually concerned themselves with questions of their own authority and expressed willingness to enforce it with physical coercion, and have allowed members of the Jewish community to use similar means to impose their will upon others.Accordingly, Graetz locates violence at the core of Jewish values, starting with the Bible itself. Although there are no specific cases of wifebeating in the Bible, Graetz amply supports her assertion that the biblical family was a very tough neighborhood to grow up in, providing particularly compelling study of the violent metaphor against women found in the prophecy of Hosea.More than the writings of most professional halakhic scholars and other feminist writers, Graetz's book will serve to put many of the long-neglected classics of rabbinic scholarship on the agenda for popular discussion. It will also enrich feminist discourse by bridging the gap in discussions which often leap from the Bible to generalizations about the Talmud to modern women writers and activists.Graetz cites not only the major texts of rabbinic literature, such as Mishnah, Tosefta, Talmud, Geonim, Maimonides, and Shulhan Arukh, but also figures such as Meir of Rothenburg, Simhah of Speyer, Jonah of Gerona, Solomon Adret, David ibn Avi Zimra, Solomon Hakohen, Hayim Palaggi, Abraham Papema, Eliezer Papu, David Pipano, Eliezer Waldenberg, Moses Feinstein, and Ovadia Joseph, now daily proof that the realm of distinguished rabbinic scholarship is not cut off from partisan politics in the Jewish community.Experts, particularly those intent on maintaining the inaccessibility of the field of rabbinic studies and especially those who reject Graetz's conclusions concerning the potential for violence within the Jewish tradition, will direct themselves exclusively to slips in citation, translation, and interpretation. However, having examined every text that she mentioned, I find that when she errs, her reading usually minimizes the potential for violence against women.For example, an even stronger case for the impact of biblical metaphorical violence against women can be made by invoking Ezekiel 16, where God's behavior is described as jealous, violent, bloody rage against his metaphoric adulterous bride, the people of Israel. Also the image of the adulterous wife's nose being cut off in Ezekiel 23 remained feature of rabbinic halakhic discourse throughout the generations.Graetz brings abundant evidence to prove her point that rabbinic texts offered formative laws and principles in support of wife-beating, but there is much more available. For example, to strengthen the conclusions she reached concerning the citation from the Tosefta Baba Kama 9 could also be added Niddah 1:6. Here husband's beating his wife is casually mentioned as one of the reasons that woman could experience vaginal bleeding prior to onset of her menstrual period, along with being sick, jumping, or carrying heavy load, non-judgmental rabbinic recognition of the fact that wife-beating could be regular aspect of life for Jewish woman.In fact, in the chapter in which she offers the rabbinic materials opposed to wifebeating, on several occasions she reads materials against wife-beating which actually approve of it. …
Read full abstract