Reviewed by: Stanley Kubrick: New York Jewish Intellectual by Nathan Abrams Nigel Morris (bio) Stanley Kubrick: New York Jewish Intellectual New Brunswick By Nathan Abrams. NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2018. 340 pp. Determining a movie's meaning from its director's biography is a suspect strategy associated with journalism rather than academia. That Steven Spielberg suffered bullying as a teenager, for example, or watched numerous movies on TV because he lacked friends, helps explain his motivation and clarifies themes discernible in his pictures, but hardly accounts for their narrative or cinematic workings, critical or commercial reception, or ability to attract funding initially. An underdog success story endorses the American Dream and enhances a marketable star profile accordingly, yet evades cultural, political, or aesthetic concerns that help determine value. Nathan Abrams instead uses biography and production context to find in Stanley Kubrick's work "Jewish moments" that for most audiences pass as "universal" (16). His account of the director's life, career, and possible meanings of his films systematically "plumbs the depths of Kubrick's Jewishness" (18), which most obituaries ignored. Employing archival research, analyses of Kubrick's films chronologically explore "four key concerns—men, menschlikayt, evil, and Jews/Jewishness" (18). The second and fourth of these may be surprising: Kubrick was not religious, and ostensibly downplayed his heritage. The tripartite subtitle—such arithmetical discourse mirroring logic that Abrams unearths in Kubrick's projects, elucidated according to Kabbalistic principles the book suggests Kubrick was aware of—is key to the enigma. That Kubrick was a native New Yorker is objective fact, yet the director moved to Britain. His intellectualism will be self-evident to any prospective reader. The Jewishness is problematic to the extent that screenwriters Dalton Trumbo and Frederic Raphael, four decades apart, deemed him a Jew-hater. [End Page 196] Abrams shows how Kubrick methodically expunged Jewishness from characters inherited from literary sources, or eliminated them entirely, right up to Eyes Wide Shut (1999). He furthermore enjoyed a long, happy marriage to a German—not merely a former Hitler Youth, but niece of the director of the hate propaganda film Jud Süss, Veit Harlan, whom Kubrick, fascinated by him, met, and whose story he considered filming. Many such revelations are not new. Abrams, however, demonstrates persuasively how Kubrick's contradictions spring from the metropolitan culture—his Columbia University education and subsequent residence in Greenwich Village—that shaped the young artist, and that they informed his entire output. Their working-through confers unity and continuity on otherwise disparate films, mostly adaptations, across various genres. Abrams is a film professor specializing in Jewish topics and representations. For Jewish cultural studies this book might seem to offer an insider's view: note the general absence of italics for Hebrew and Yiddish terms. Particularly distinctive is exegesis consciously influenced by mid-rash, a traditional Judaic inferring of scriptural significance beyond overt meanings. The term appears in the text and index but—an uncharacteristic lapse from Abrams's usual care—remains undefined. Despite this unconventional film studies strategy, Abrams explains everything patiently and engagingly for secular and non-Jewish readers, too. Reclaiming Kubrick's sensibility for Jewish cultural identity, Abrams nevertheless enriches and expands the significance of this most cerebral and influential director's work. Abrams identifies "core elements" (21) in Kubrick's practice: mis-direction and manipulation, derived from his passionate chess playing and early photojournalism, which both routinely involved staging events. Chess and photography, Abrams claims, "were extraordinarily Jewish professions or pastimes" (4)—"even if the public was unaware" (82)—as were jazz, which Kubrick aspired to perform professionally, and boxing, the topic of his first film. These interests, Abrams contends, explicitly evidence Jewish content and sensibility in Kubrick's first three, New York-situated, features before analogy, allegory, and metaphor intervened as intentional misdirection. [End Page 197] Insistence that meaning is other than transparent produces readings that are tentative and speculative, or otherwise bluntly assertive as when "performative and comedic abilities" are "commonly known as Jewish traits" (33). Abrams treads a fine line between ingenious, provocative, illuminating exegesis to which no brief review can do justice, and seeming reinforcement, if not imposition, of stereotypes while simultaneously revealing antisemitic prejudices Kubrick...