Item-rest Correlations Research Articles

Patient Safety Climate in Danish Primary Care: Adaption and Validation of the Danish Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ-DK-PRIM).

A lack of instruments to assess patient safety climate within primary care exists. The objectives of this study were as follows: 1) To adapt the Danish hospital version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ-DK) for use in primary care; 2) Test the internal consistency and the construct validity of this version; 3) Present benchmark data; and 4) Analyze variance. The SAQ-DK was adapted for use in Danish primary care settings (SAQ-DK-PRIM) and distributed to healthcare staff members from nursing homes (N = 11), homecare units (N = 4) and healthcare units (N = 2), within the municipality of Aarhus, Central Denmark Region, Denmark. Face- and content validity were assessed. The construct validity was evaluated by a set of goodness-of-fit indices. The internal reliability was evaluated using the item-rest correlations, the inter-item correlations, and Cronbach's alpha (α). The adaptation process resulted in a questionnaire of 10 items. Eight hundred and thirty healthcare staffs participated (78% of the eligible respondents). In total 586 (70.6%) responses were complete and were included in the analysis. Goodness-of-fit indices from the confirmatory factor analysis showed: Chi2=46.90CFI=0.97, RMSEA = 0.063 (90% CI: 0.044-0.084), Probability RMSEA (p close)=0.12. Internal reliability was high (Cronbach's α=0.76). Proportions of participants with a positive attitude was 41.1% and did not differ between the healthcare services. Scale mean score was 70.19 (SD: 18.05) and differed between healthcare services. The safety climate scale scores did not vary according to healthcare service type. ICC was 0.68% indicating no clustering of scores by healthcare service type. Considering the questionnaire's applicability, short length, strengthened focus on one area of interest and validity, the SAQ-DK-PRIM can serve as a valuable tool for measuring patient safety climate within primary care settings in Denmark.

Development and Validation of a Tool for Assessing Adherence to Gluten-Free Diet in Patients With Celiac Disease.

Life-long adherence to gluten-free diet (GFD) and its assessment is essential for patients with celiac disease (CeD). We have developed and validated a tool for assessing adherence to GFD which can be used by both physicians and dietitians. Phase 1: Development, content validation, and assessment of reliability of tool. Phase 2: Validation of tool against standard dietary evaluation (SDE) (gold standard), immunoglobulin A - anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies (IgA anti-tTG Ab), and gluten immunogenic peptides in urine. Overall, 380 biopsy-confirmed patients with CeD (derivation cohort: n = 100 [phase 1], n = 210 [phase 2] and independent validation cohort, n = 70) were recruited. Of an initial 90-point questionnaire, 84 items (Celiac Disease: Compliance Assessment Test [CD-CAT.v1]) were retained after content validation and pilot testing. In phase 1, upon administering CD-CAT.v1 on 100 patients, a comprehensive 35-item tool (CD-CAT.v2; α = 0.86) was obtained after removing items with low test-retest reliability and item-rest correlation values. In phase 2, upon administering CD-CAT.v2 on 210 patients, 22 items were removed having low correlation values (R < 0.4) with SDE. Finally, a 13-item tool (CD-CAT.v3; α = 0.84) was obtained with high criterion validity with SDE ( r = 0.806, P < 0.001), moderate convergent validity with celiac disease adherence test ( r = 0.602, P = 0.007), and moderate to weak correlation with urine gluten immunogenic peptides ( r = 0.46, P = 0.001) and IgA anti-tTG Ab ( r = 0.39, P = 0.008), respectively. The final 13-item tool also strongly correlated with SDE ( r = 0.78, P < 0.001) in an independent validation cohort of 70 patients with CeD. Principal component analysis identified 3 relevant subscales with a cumulative variance of 62%. The sensitivity and specificity of CD-CAT.v3 were 80% and 91%, respectively, with an area under curve of 0.905 with SDE. The obtained cutoff score of <19 from the receiver operating characteristic curve was further categorized as 13 = excellent, 14-18 = very good, 19-28 = average, and >28 = poor adherence to GFD. CD-CAT is a new and rapid tool for monitoring dietary adherence to GFD with high sensitivity and specificity, which can be administered by both physicians and dietitians.

A Newly Developed Scale for Assessing Individuals’ Perceived Threat of Potential War

Abstract Objectives: Mental health can be negatively affected by the threat of war even in the absence of direct experience of armed conflicts. But psychometric instruments that can measure the perceived threat of potential war are lacking. In the present study, we intended to develop an instrument called the Perceived Threats of Potential War Scale (PTPWS) and to examine its psychometric properties in a telephone interview study on Taiwanese individuals regarding the perceived threat of potential war between China and Taiwan. Methods: The PTPWS was tested with a representative sample of 2,000 Taiwanese individuals who were recruited based on whether they used a house telephone or a cell phone only. The PTPWS was tested item properties, using score distributions, mean and standard deviation, item–rest correlations, skewness, and kurtosis; factor structure, using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA); measurement invariance; and concurrent validity, using testing the correlations with awareness of China’s military activities, intention to emigrate, depression, and anxiety. Results: The items of the PTPWS had acceptable psychometric properties and were internally consistent. The EFA results suggested a one-factor structure for the PTPWS, which was confirmed using CFA. The results of measurement invariance indicated that the PTPWS is applicable across gender, age, and contact method groups. The concurrent validity of the PTPWS was supported by the significant differences in the PTPWS scores across subgroups with various levels of awareness of mainland China’s military activities, intention to emigrate, depression, and anxiety. Conclusion: The PTPWS has been found to be a useful and reliable measure to assess the perceived threat of potential war with China among Taiwanese individuals.

Development and psychometric testing of the Professional Interpersonal Competency Assessment Scale for Novice nurses (PICASN).

Assessing the professional interpersonal competency of novice nurses is crucial for preventing staff turnover and promoting effective work. However, none of the instruments identified in the literature specifically target novice nurses. This study aimed to develop and psychometrically test the perception dimension of the Professional Interpersonal Competency Assessment Scale for Novice nurses (PICASN) in Japan. The study comprised four steps: 1) concept identification, 2) item construction, 3) validity measure, and 4) reliability measure. A cross-sectional web-based questionnaire was administered from February to April 2023 and was completed by 203 novice nurses. Data quality was assessed using mean, item response, missing values, floor and ceiling effects, internal consistency, and item-rest correlations. Content validity index (CVI) was used to determine the instrument's validity, while exploratory factor analysis (EFA) using maximum likelihood estimation with Promax rotation was employed to assess the factor structure. Cronbach's alpha was used to evaluate reliability. The 27-item PICASN demonstrated an Item-CVI of 0.94 and a Scale-CVI of 0.88. EFA revealed two factors: 1) Basic competencies as a novice nurse (15 items) and 2) Relationship building skills within the healthcare team (12 items), which explained 80% of the variance. Internal consistency reliability was excellent at 0.94 and 0.91 for the factors, and the overall scale reliability was 0.95. The item-rest (I-R) correlation values exceeding 0.6 were considered acceptable. The PICASN demonstrates satisfactory psychometric properties, making it an effective tool for measuring professional interpersonal competency among novice nurses in Japan. This instrument serves to assist novice nurses by promoting self-awareness and offering targeted insights into specific areas requiring improvement. Additionally, it provides experienced nurses and nurse managers with valuable insights into team dynamics, guiding interventions for continuous quality improvement.

Validation of the Child-Oral-Health-Impact-Profile among adolescents in Johannesburg: A cross-sectional study.

Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQol) is described as the effect of oral conditions on the overall functioning and well-being of individuals. This study sought to determine the validity of a modified-child oral health impact profile (M-COHIP) among adolescents living with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection (ALHIV) and HIV-undiagnosed adolescents and establish the factors influencing OHRQoL among adolescents in central Johannesburg. Schools and HIV wellness centre in central Johannesburg. An interviewer-administered questionnaire was applied, followed by an oral examination. A total of 504 adolescents were included in the study. The overall mean decayed teeth for permanent dentition was 1.6 (standard deviation [s.d.]: 1.99) and caries prevalence was 62.2% (n= 309). The tool's Cronbach's alpha was 0.88. The item-rest correlations were from 0.6 to 0.85 for all items. The initial exploratory factor analysis explained 76% of the total variance. The overall M-COHIP score was 59.6 (18.2). The overall modified-COHIP scores for those not in care (schools) were higher [62.88] than those of ALHIV. The poor M-COHIP scores were associated with reporting toothache, having active decay, poor oral health-self-rating, and being selected from the school site (p 0.005). The validation study supports the use of the tool as a reliable and valid measure of OHRQoL. Future research can investigate the extent to which the tool is effective in measuring treatment outcomes and patient satisfaction.Contribution:The validated tool will be beneficial in the African context for programme assessments and overall measure of quality-of-life impacts from oral conditions.

Reliability and Factorial Structure of Indonesian Version of the Somatic Symptom Disorders – B Criteria Scale (SSD-12) in Undergraduate Students Sample

Background: Somatic symptom disorder (SSD) was one of prevalent mental health problems in community and clinical population, yet the prevalence among university students was still underexplored. A screening tool to assess SSD among university students is critical to enhance the mental health service provision in university settings. Study aims: This study aims to validate the Indonesian version of the Somatic Symptom Disorders – B Criteria Scale (SSD-12) as mental health screening tool in university student sample. Method: Forward-backward translation was conducted followed by content validity examination. A number 277 undergraduate students filled in the SSD-12 during the field test (85.5% was female, M= 19.7; SD= 1.44). Descriptive statistics, Cronbach’s Alpha reliability analysis, Pearson’s correlation, and confirmatory factor analysis were conducted to determine and examine item and scale characteristics, reliability, item-rest correlation, and factorial structure of the scale. Result: The result showed that the SSD-12 had excellent reliability as full-scale (α= .907) and had moderate and good reliability at sub-scale level (.693, .837, and .858 for cognitive, affective, and behavioral sub-scale. Confirmatory factor analysis showed acceptable fit indices for one-factor model (CFI=0.938; TLI=0.921; RMSEA=0.086; 90% CI= 0.071-0.102) and good fit indices for three-factors model (CFI=0.968; TLI=0.957; RMSEA=.064; 90% CI= 0.047-0.081). Conclusion: The Indonesian version of SSD-12 was valid and reliable to be used as screening instrument in Indonesian university student sample.

Does the Dizziness Handicap Inventory-Children and Adolescents (DHI-CA) Demonstrate Properties to Support Clinical Application in the Post-Concussion Population: A Rasch Analysis.

The purpose of this cross-sectional validation study was to evaluate the clinical utility of the DHI-CA by (1) examining its dimensionality using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and (2) calibrating DHI-CA items (using the multidimensional Rasch model) to obtain item difficulty levels. A retrospective chart review was conducted for 132 patients between the ages of 8 and 18 years (mean age = 15.3 ± 2.1 years) from a multidisciplinary post-concussion management tertiary center. Data were extracted on age, sex, and DHI-CA. EFA revealed that 12 out of 25 items did not fit in the subscale that they were originally described under, indicating poor dimensionality. Calibration of items on the Wright Maps revealed that 50% of the items pooled in the lower difficulty level, indicating a potential ceiling effect. Corrected item-rest correlations for the physical, emotional, walking/mobility, and community participation ranged from 0.44-0.66, 0.27-0.61, 0.54-0.57, and 0.32-0.69 (p < 0.001), respectively. The clinical utility of the DHI-CA was found to be questionable due to the presence of double-barreled items and the ceiling effect. Clinicians must supplement data from the DHI-CA with other measures and patient interviews to make informed clinical decisions specific to the post-concussion population until new, robust, and valid measures are developed.

Validation of the Spanish version of DYsphagia in MUltiple Sclerosis questionnaire (DYMUS).

Dysphagia is a common symptom in multiple sclerosis that can occur even early in the disease course and can lead to serious complications. Early recognition and treatment can promote comfort, safety and optimal nutritional status. Few dysphagia rating scales are available in Spanish. The aim of this study was to translate the Dysphagia in Multiple Sclerosis Questionnaire (DYMUS) into Spanish and to validate it. Forward and backward translation method was used to translate the original English version of DYMUS into Spanish. A pilot-study with 10 PwMS was carried on in order to improve the intelligibility of the instrument, comprehensibility and content validity of the questionnaire. The questionnaire was filled out by 100 PwMS who were asked a dichotomous question on their swallowing ("Do you have swallowing troubles?"). Descriptive data are presented as median and quartiles for continuous variables and frequency and percentage for categorical ones. Internal consistency reliability was estimated by Cronbach's alfa. Test-retest reliability was estimated by intraclass correlation coefficient. Concurrent validity with a speech and language therapy assessment (SLT-A) was measured with the weighted kappa statistic for the concordance for both dysphagia type and degree categories. Confirmatory factor analysis by means of structural equation models was used to verify the two-factor (solids and liquids) structure of the DYMUS questionnaire. As the goodness of fit evaluation was poor, an additional exploratory factor analysis was carried out. Internal consistency was high. The globus sensation question and the weight loss questions (item 3 and 10) are the least specific with dysphagia symptomatology so they are worst correlated with the sum of the others (item-rest correlation, 0.243 and 0.248, respectively). The test-retest reliability of the DYMUS among 40 patients using ICC was 0.75 (95% CI 0.57 - 0.86). Concurrent validity with SLT-A was poor (weighted kappa 0.37 for dysphagia type and 0.38 for dysphagia degree). The DYMUS questionnaire detected three times more dysphagia (53% versus 17%) than the dichotomous question. Confirmatory factors analysis failed to confirm the bidimensional structure (solid and liquid items) often reported in other validation studies. The subsequent exploratory factor analysis also identified two factors, but with poor interpretability. DYMUS-SP scale is not a sufficiently useful scale to detect dysphagia in PwMS due to the poor concurrent validity and the probable overdiagnosis of the condition; however, it can be helpful as a screening tool when combined with other measures.

Metaverse/Meta-Education Belief Scale

The "metaverse," which bridges augmented and virtual reality as mixed reality and includes technological phenomena such as artificial intelligence, continues to be an agenda topic. It is foreseen that the concept in question will accelerate the changes in education and teaching activities, as in many other fields. In this research, a measurement tool was developed to determine pre-service teachers' and teachers' beliefs about education in the metaverse (meta-education), especially considering the concept of the "metaverse" that entered our lives with the information age. During the development process of the measurement tool, an item pool consisting of 59 items was created by scanning the relevant literature. The opinions of five experts were received for the draft scale. Two items were added to the draft scale, and ten items were removed based on expert feedback. The scale was arranged as 41 items before the application. During the pilot application process, 203 were collected. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used for the scale's construct validity. The EFA result shows that the scale consists of 22 items and a single factor, and 44% of the total variance is explained. The item-rest correlations on the scale ranged from .64 to .77. The Cronbach alpha coefficient of the scale was found to be .90. Based on these findings, the scale can be used to determine adults' beliefs about meta-education.

Validation of the European Portuguese Language Version of the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey.

The Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS) questionnaire is a tool developed to evaluate functional and aesthetic components of rhinoplasty. It is a reliable patient-reported outcome measure, not available in the European Portuguese language. Our goal was to translate and culturally adapt the SCHNOS questionnaire to the European Portuguese language. The questionnaire was forward and backward translated and culturally adapted to the European Portuguese language following international guidelines. The authors evaluated internal consistency, correlation, and reproducibility to determine the validity of the questionnaire. The final European Portuguese version of the SCHNOS was administered to 58 native European Portuguese speakers. Both the SCHNOS-O (obstructive) and SCHNOS-C (cosmetic) showed high internal consistency with Cronbach's α of 0.93 and 0.95, respectively. Also, for the entire SCHNOS, Cronbach's α was 0.96. All the items demonstrated good item-test and item-rest correlations with the differences between pre- and postestimates being nonsignificant. The translation, adaption, and validation of the SCHNOS into European Portuguese were successfully performed. This provides another tool to help evaluate the functional and aesthetic outcomes of rhinoplasty patients.

Penyusunan Skala Penyesuaian Diri Perempuan Pekerja (SPDPP)

Women who work and have multiple roles allow them to face various challenges, obstacles and experience certain psychological impacts. To face these challenges, it is important for women who work and have multiple roles to adapt. This study aims to develop a valid and reliable adjustment tool for working women, which can be used as material for selecting or evaluating female employees in a company or can be used for working women who have multiple roles in general. This study used a quantitative approach. This research is designing a psychological scale. Respondents in this study were 389 women who worked and had multiple roles. This research produced a measurement tool called the Working Women Self-Adjustment Scale (SPDPP). SPDPP consists of 15 items that have good item discrimination and represent five aspects of adjustment evenly, where each aspect consists of 3 items. This measurement tool has good validity based on construct validity, where the value of the item-rest correlation ranges from 0.337 to 0.513. This measuring instrument also has high Cronbach's Alpha reliability with a Cronbach's Alpha value of 0.798.

UNDERSTANDING THE DIMENSIONS OF SOCIAL RESOURCES AMONG SEXUAL AND GENDER MINORITY OLDER ADULTS

Abstract Despite the growing number of recent studies on the positive role of social resources on health and well-being among SGM older adults, the multi-dimensional construct of social resources has not been examined due to a lack of adequate measures and data. This study describes the rationale behind the measurements of social resources used in the National Health, Aging, and Sexuality/Gender Study (NHAS). We analyze NHAS data collected in 2014 (N = 2,450) to assess the reliability of these social resource measurements. Out of 28 indicators of social resources (α = .82), three distinct factor structures emerged: relational social connectedness (α = .71), collective social connectedness (α = .82), and perceived social connectedness (α = .79). All item-rest correlations for each scale were moderate to strong. The scales could be used to understand various aspects of social resources and its role in enhancing health and well-being in the historically marginalized populations.

Indonesian Version of Swedish Occupational Fatigue Inventory (SOFI): Validity and Reliability Test of Worker’s Fatigue Assessment Instrument

Background: The Swedish Occupational Fatigue Inventory (SOFI) is an instrument to assess a person’s fatigue, which is not limited to workers of a company, but can also be used for the general public. SOFI can determine fatigue from physical, cognitive and psychosocial conditions.1 This study aims to translate the instrument so that it can be used in Indonesia, then assess its validity and reliability.Methods: This study was conducted using a 10-step transcultural adaptation method from ISPOR followed by item validity and reliability tests on 224 workers at a geothermal company in Indonesia. Item-total correlation and Confirmatory Factor Analysis was performed using online version 0.14.3 of JASP statistic program. And for reliability test using SPSS tool.Results: Swedish Occupational Fatigue Inventory (SOFI) has been adapted into an Indonesian version through the ISPOR transcultural adaptation method. All items in the Indonesian version of SOFI which amounted to 20 items proved the validity and reliability of this questionnaire was very good (α-Cronbach 0.969) and the Confirmatory Factor Analysis test showed: Factor model (224, p &lt; 0,001) = 337.649, CFI = 0,958, NFI = 0,924, RFI = 0,909, IFI = 0,958, TLI = 0,950, dan RMSEA = 0,070, 90% CI: 0,060 – 0,081. Fit indices results had acceptable model fits corresponding to the structure of the original instrument. Item-rest correlation range from 0.321 to 0.847, these results reveal that each item-rest correlation is extremely strong.Conclusion: The Indonesian version of SOFI is proven to have good validity and reliability as an instrument for assessing fatigue/work fatigue for workers in Indonesia.

Development and calibration data for the Illness Burden item bank: a new computer adaptive test for persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

The purpose of this study was to develop a new measure, the Re-Engineered Discharge for Diabetes Computer Adaptive Test (REDD-CAT) Illness Burden item bank, to evaluate the impact that a chronic condition has on independent living, the ability to work (including working at home), social activities, and relationships. Semi-structured interviews were used to inform the development of an item pool (47 items) that captured patients' beliefs about how a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes interferes with different aspects of their lives. The Illness Burden item bank was developed and tested in 225 people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. No items had sparse response option cells or problems with monotonicity; two items were deleted due to low item-rest correlations. Factor analyses supported the retention of 29 items. With those 29 remaining items, a constrained (common slope) graded response model fit assessment indicated that two items had misfit; they were excluded. No items displayed differential item functioning by age, sex, education, or socio-economic status. The final item bank is comprised of 27 items. Preliminary data supported the reliability (internal consistency and test-retest reliability) and validity (convergent, discriminant, and known-groups) of the new bank. The Illness Burden item bank can be administered as a computer adaptive test or a 6-item short form. This new measure captures patients' perceptions of the impact that having type 2 diabetes has on their daily lives; it can be used in conjunction with the REDD-CAT measurement system to evaluate important social determinants of health in persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Reliability and structural validity of the Danish Short 4-item version of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for Children (CES-DC4) in adolescents

BackgroundThe 4-item version of the Center of Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-DC4) is a self-reported questionnaire used to measure depressive symptoms in adolescents, but the psychometric properties of the scale have been tested to only a limited extent. The aim of this study was to examine the reliability and structural validity of the Danish CES-DC4 in 9th graders.MethodsUsing a sample of 72 adolescents 15 to 17 years of age from five 9th grade classes, the reliability of the CES-DC4 was determined by a test–retest study at a 2-week interval. Descriptive statistics of the adolescents were presented, and internal consistency, structural validity, reliability, and agreement between tests were evaluated. The structural validity of the scale was tested by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and the sumscores of the test and retest were presented.ResultsThe estimated Cronbach’s α was 0.61 (95% CI 0.50; 0.71). Inter-item and item-rest correlations indicated that one of the four items (item 20) did not fit well on the scale. CFA found a one-factor model suited for the scale, but the factor loadings indicated that item 20 contributed the least to measure the factor (0.29). Sum scores ranged from 0–9 within a possible interval of 0–12. There were no signs of systematic error of the scale. Limits of Agreement (-3.01; 3.79) were broad. The standard error of measurement (SEM = 1.25 point (95% CI.1.05; 1.47)) and intraclass correlation (ICC(2,1) = 0.60 (95% CI: 0.44; 0.73)) calculations showed low reliability of the CES-DC4.ConclusionThis study found low reliability of the CES-DC4 with low estimates of ICC and Cronbach’s α. The CES-DC4 needs revision, and removal of item 20 and adding more items from the CES-DC should be considered.

Heartache in Young Adulthood: Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of a Spanish Version of the Breakup Distress Scale

Romantic breakups are considered one of the most stressful events experienced by young adults. Although the Breakup Distress Scale (BDS) is one of the most widely used instruments to measure breakup distress, there is limited evidence regarding its psychometric properties. Thus, we sought to adapt and validate a Spanish version of the BDS. The sample consisted of 179 Dominican young adults (78% female, 87% heterosexual, and 94% currently single), between the ages of 18 and 30 who experienced at least one breakup in the last 5 years. Parallel analysis and confirmatory factor analysis provided support for a robust one-factor structure. Additionally, the BDS scores exhibited high internal consistency reliability and item-rest correlations. Moreover, structural equation modeling indicated that those who initiated the breakup experienced less breakup distress than non-initiators, congruent with the literature. These combined findings suggest that the Spanish version of the BDS has good psychometric and validity properties.

Evaluation of the Portuguese version of the London measure of unplanned pregnancy in Mozambique: A psychometric measurement study.

Robust forms of measurement such as the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy (LMUP), which recognise the complexity of the construct of pregnancy planning/intention, are being adopted worldwide. The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Mozambican Portuguese version of the LMUP. The Brazilian Portuguese interviewer-administered LMUP was culturally adapted for use in Mozambique and pre-tested with 28 women. Field testing included 524 women aged 16-42. Completion rates of LMUP items were 100%. LMUP scores 0-12 were captured. In terms of reliability (internal consistency), Cronbach's alpha was 0.90, item-rest correlations were <0.2, and all inter-item correlations were positive. In terms of construct validity, principal components analysis showed that measurement was unidimensional, confirmatory factor analysis showed good model fit, and all hypotheses were met. We conclude that the Mozambican Portuguese LMUP is reliable, valid and suitable to use in Mozambique.

Psychometric Properties of an Instrument to Assess the Fear of COVID-19 in a Sample in Argentina: a Mixed Approach.

The FCV-19S was the first instrument designed to assess the severity of fear related to COVID-19 and has already been validated in many languages. The objective of this study was to evaluate the homogeneity and construct validity of the 5-item version of the FCV19S, using an online questionnaire in 599 people. The participants’ age ranged from 18 to 65 years. Age, gender, marital status, educational level, employment status, and socioeconomic status were analyzed. In the evaluation process we assessed interitem correlation, item rest-correlation, confirmatory factor analysis: Root Mean Square Error of Approximation, Comparative Fix Index, Tucker-Lewis Index; internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha, McDonald’s omega), and the Rasch model was assessed for learning more about the psychometric properties of the scale, which allows a detailed knowledge of the strengths and weaknesses of a scale. The FCV-5S has adequate psychometric indicators from the perspective of the Classical Theory of Items. The major limitations were using a self-reported measure and having a convenience sample not necessarily representative of the general population of Argentina.

Validity, Reliability, and Confirmatory factor structure of the Persian version of Emotion and Motivation Self-Regulation Questionnaire (EMSR-Q)

Background and Aim: Emotion and Motivation Self-regulation plays an important role on student learning at classroom, so presence of appropriate tools for evaluating and assessing this structure is necessary. The aim of this study was to investigate the validity, reliability and confirmatory factor structure of the Persian version of Emotion and Motivation Self-Regulation Questionnaire (EMSR -Q). Methods: The present study had a descriptive and Psychometric design, and the statistical population included all middle and high school students of Semnan city. After providing double translation technique, Persian version of EMSR -Q carried out within 306 students from ages 12 to 16 years old. The study sample selected through random sampling method. Internal consistency and Item rest correlations methods were used to investigate the scale validity and the reliability were investigated by confirmatory factor analysis, subscales correlations, and criterion validity. Data were analyzed using SPSSV19 and LISRELV8.80 softwares. Results: Chronbach’s alpha coefficients range (0/71 to 0.86) implied appropriate Internal consistency of this scale and its subscales. Results of confirmatory factor analysis supported five factor structures (Avoidance oriented Self Regulation, Performance oriented Self Regulation, Negative Self Regulation of Stress, Positive Self Regulation of motivation, and Process Oriented Self Regulation) of scale. There were Average and meaningful correlation coefficients between the scales of Persian version of EMSR -Q with Cognitive Emotion Regulation and Educational Motivation Questionnaires. In addition, the correlation coefficients between subscales were high. Conclusion: It can be concluded that Persian version of EMSR -Q has a good validity and reliability in Iranian population and can be practical in different fields.

Validation of the Romanian Communication Skills Ability Scale – CSAS-RO – A Tool for Medical Schools

In medicine ability to communicate requires training and continuous development.AimTo validate the Communication Skills Ability Scale in Romanian. Study design: cross-sectional observational interrupted large case series. Sample and setting: all year 5 medical undergraduate students enrolled at UMF Carol Davila, Bucharest (UMFCD). A two field tests study: 1) 2nd semester of the 2017/2018 academic year (n = 361); 2) 2018/2019 academic year (n = 703).MethodologyThe Romanian translation of CSAS® was used.ResultsThe CSAS-RO confirms the 2-Factor scale; internal consistency: Cronbach-α coefficient was 0.894 for the PAS (0.870 CSAS®) and 0.754 for the NAS (0.805 CSAS®) All item-total and item-rest correlations satisfied the criterion of more than 0.30, ranging from 0.32 to 0.71 with the exception of items 17 (field test 1) and item 11 (field test 2)ConclusionCSAS-RO is valid to use with medical students. The reuse of the scale with a longitudinal study design will allow to assess any new educational needs for communication ability in medical students plus add the remaining property to test (the test-retest reliability).