Reviewed by: La Cazzaria / The Book of the Prick William Stockton (bio) Antonio Vignaly , La Cazzaria / The Book of the Prick. Ed. and Trans. Ian Frederick Moulton. New York: Routledge, 2003. 181 pp. $18.95 La Cazzaria, a Sienese dialogue written sometime between 1525 and 1527,is a dirty little book. As indicated by the English translation of its Italian title, this is a book about sex, though not just about the male member. It is also about assholes, cunts, and balls (to use the rude expletives translated from the Italian), about their relationship to one another and their relationship to church and state. Ian Frederick Moulton, author of Before Pornography: Erotic Writing in Early Modern England (Cambridge UP, 2000) and editor and translator of Vignali's text, writes of his initial encounter with the dialogue: "There is no shortage of erotic writing from sixteenth-century Europe, but nothing in my experience of early modern texts prepared me for La Cazzaria. . . . [I]n both tone and content it is unique" (3). Even coming from Moulton, this can only be an understatement. La Cazzaria is raunchy, anti-clerical, misogynistic, elitist, parodic, and deeply invested in both Sienese politics and philosophical debates over proper objects of scholarly study. It is also startlingly open in its veneration of sodomy, though its erotic focus cannot be reduced to acts between members of the same sex. Vignali's dialogue may bear some generic relation to poems such as Thomas Nashe's "The Choise of Valentines" and Lorenzo Venier's "La Puttana errante," but La Cazzaria weaves a uniquely dense web of religious, erotic, national, political, poetic, and philosophical concerns though its shockingly obscene discussion of sex. In 1992, while doing research for a dissertation that would eventually become Before Pornography,Moulton encountered an eighteenth-century French translation of La Cazzaria in the British Library. Subsequent textual history revealed that the dialogue has been translated a number of times into French and German, and even edited and annotated in Italian as recently as 1984. Yet Moulton is the first to translate the dialogue into English, a task he assumes with no little investment. Moulton is thoroughly engaged with the text, not [End Page 139] only with its language and tone, but also with its place in histories of politics, sexuality, and philosophy. These concerns form the touchstones of his nearly seventy-page introduction, entitled "The Greatest Tangle of Pricks There Ever Was: Knowledge, Sex, and Power in Renaissance Italy." Though long, the introduction provides well-organized, necessary context; in its lucidity and breath, Moulton implicitly builds a strong case for the importance of La Cazzaria to scholars in numerous fields. Moulton's outline of the text is also in- depth and comprehensive without being tedious—a welcome preparation for a dialogue that wanders, with little transition, in unforeseen directions. In part, La Cazzaria is an intellectual dialogue in the Platonic tradition. Using a similar trope to that of Castiglione in The Book of the Courtier, Vignali frames La Cazzaria as a text found by two members of the Academy of the Intronati, the Sienese Academy of which Vignali was a founding member. The principle interlocutor and author of the dialogue—Arsiccio, Vignali's academic pseudonym—has hidden the text in his study, and what we are about to read is constructed from the outset as a secret. The dialogue opens after Sodo, the younger interlocutor and another Academy member, has embarrassed himself by revealing his sexual ignorance in an earlier conversation. Arsiccio, who voices an impassioned belief in the importance of sexual knowledge, offers to educate him. What Arsiccio does offer, however, is nothing so Platonic as an education in truth. In this nexus of secrets and exposure, Arsiccio reveals many of the secrets of sex with little sense of how they connect to one another or to reality. (Foucault's truth of sex, we might say, is persistently elusive.) Sex education entails explaining the existence of pubic hair, the reason people fart when they urinate, and, to quote one of the many marginal quaestiones, "Why, as Soon as a Man Has Shit, He Looks at the Turd" (95). Yet, even though the answers to these...
Read full abstract