Intubation In Difficult Airway Research Articles

Comparison of the Laryngeal Mask Airway (CTrach(TM)) and Direct Coupled Interface-Video Laryngoscope for Endotracheal Intubation: a Prospective, Randomized, Clinical Study.

Video laryngoscopy was developed to facilitate tracheal intubation of difficult airways. We aimed to compare the efficacy of CTrach™ (CT) and Direct Coupled Interface-Videolaryngoscope (DCI-VL) in patients with normal airways. Sixty ASA I-II (American Society of Anesthesiologists) adult patients admitted for elective surgery were enrolled in this prospective study. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups, where intubation was performed via CT or DCI-VL. Time to obtain a good glottic view, total intubation time, success rates and the number of patients who required maneuvers for a good glottic view were recorded. The mean time to obtaining a good glottic view was significantly longer with CT than with DCI-VL (29.4±20.3 seconds vs. 12.8±1.9 seconds, respectively; p=0.01). Intubation was achieved on the first attempt in 28 patients in the CT group (93.3%) and in 24 in the DCI-VL group (80%) (p=0.77). The total intubation time for CT was significantly longer compared to DCI-VL (99.9±36.0 seconds vs. 39.2±21.4 seconds, respectively; p=0.01). Optimization maneuvers were required in eight and two patients in the CT and DCI-VL groups, respectively (p=0.03). Although the normal airway endotracheal intubation success rates were similar in both groups, the time to obtain a good glottic view and the total intubation time were significantly shorter with DCI-VL.

Placement of a double-lumen tube using LMA C Trach and an exchanger catheter in difficult airway intubation -A case report-

During insertion of the double lumen tube in patients with cervical vertebral fixation, the cervical neutral position should be maintained. Although flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopic intubation is the gold standard, novel techniques are needed to facilitate intubation of patients with cervical vertebral fixation in neutral position according to institutional capabilities. In this case report, insertion of the double lumen tube in the neutral position using LMA CTrach and an airway exchanger catheter in a thoracotomy patient with extremely limited head and neck motion due to fixation of the cervical vertebrae is presented.

Faucial Pillar Perforation by Glidescope Intubation with Incorrectly Placed Stylet

Glidescope GVL® is frequently used in intubation of difficult airway. We report a case of right side of faucial pillar perforation during intubation with Glidescope®. A rigid stylet can facilitate placing of endotracheal tube quickly but it may also penetrate the soft tissue to cause injuries.

Nasotracheal intubation in a difficult airway using the Storz C-MAC Videolaryngoscope, the Boedeker Bougie endotracheal introducer, and the Boedeker curved forceps.

Airway management has multiple indications for nasotracheal intubation. In this study, we focus on its indication in difficult airways. This work describes a modified procedure of nasotracheal intubation using the new Storz CMAC® Videolaryngoscope, the malleable Boedeker Bougie and the curved Boedeker Forceps in the intubation of a difficult airway manikin.

Difficult airway and difficult intubation in postintubation tracheal stenosis: a case report and literature review

Management of a “difficult airway” remains one of the most relevant and challenging tasks for anesthesiologists and pulmonary physicians. Several conditions, such as inflammation, trauma, tumor, and immunologic and metabolic diseases, are considered responsible for the difficult intubation of a critically ill patient. In this case report we present the case of a 46-year-old male with postintubation tracheal stenosis. We will focus on the method of intubation used, since the patient had a “difficult airway” and had to be intubated immediately because he was in a life-threatening situation. Although technology is of utter importance, clinical examination and history-taking remain invaluable for the appropriate evaluation of the critically ill patient in everyday medical life. Every physician who will be required to perform intubation has to be familiar with the evaluation of the difficult airway and, in the event of the unanticipated difficult airway, to be able to use a wide variety of tools and techniques to avoid complications and fatality.

Randomized controlled trial of the A.P. Advance, McGrath, and Macintosh laryngoscopes in normal and difficult intubation scenarios: a manikin study

Several videolaryngoscopes are available which may facilitate tracheal intubation in difficult airways. We compared the McGrath(®) Series 5 and the Venner™ A.P. Advance™ (APA) videolaryngoscopes with a Macintosh laryngoscope by studying the performance of experienced anaesthetists using manikins in normal and difficult airway scenarios. We recruited 48 anaesthetists into a randomized trial. Each performed tracheal intubation with each laryngoscope in one easy and one difficult laryngoscopy scenario. The primary endpoint was time to intubation. Other endpoints were time to best glottic visualization, grade of view, and number of glottic advances. There were no dropouts. In the easy scenario, the time to intubation was greater using the McGrath [median time 40.7 s, inter-quartile range (IQR) 31.0, 57.4, P<0.001] than the other devices. In the difficult scenario, the time to intubation using the APA with Difficult Airway Blade (DAB) was less (median time 23.2 s, IQR 19.8, 29.0, P<0.001) than the other devices. Time to glottic visualization was reduced using the McGrath and the APA with DAB. Glottic advances were fewer using the APA with DAB. Experienced anaesthetists required a longer time for intubation in a standard manikin using a McGrath compared with other laryngoscopes, but a shorter time for intubation in a difficult manikin using an APA with DAB, and with fewer glottic advances, compared with other laryngoscopes.

Tracheal intubation in an unanticipated difficult airway by advancing a bronchoscope and a tracheal tube introducer through a LMA Supreme™

To the Editor, We report a case involving a patient with an unanticipated difficult airway in whom tracheal intubation was achieved uneventfully by advancing a bronchoscope and a tracheal tube introducer through a LMA Supreme. The patient’s written consent was obtained for this publication. A 70 kg, 52-yr-old woman was scheduled for nephrolithotomy. She had an adequate mouth opening, a normal thyromental distance, and a Mallampati class 3 airway. Anesthesia was induced with midazolam, fentanyl, propofol, and atracurium iv. Adequate mask ventilation was achieved. Direct laryngoscopy with a Macintosh #3 blade showed a Cormack-Lehane Grade 3 laryngeal view and tracheal intubation failed in two attempts. After further mask ventilation, oral bronchoscopic (5.0 mm outer diameter [OD]) intubation was attempted but failed due to poor visualization from blood and secretions. The SPO2 decreased to 90%. A size 4 LMA Supreme (LMA International, Singapore) was inserted with a satisfactory capnographic waveform and SPO2 returned to 100%. A decision was then made to intubate the patient’s trachea via the LMA Supreme. A pediatric bronchoscope (Olympus BF XP60, 2.8 mm OD) operated by an anesthesiologist and a solid tracheal tube introducer with a coude tip (5 mm OD, Well Lead Medical, China) operated by a second anesthesiologist were advanced through the airway lumen of the LMA Supreme into the pharynx (Figure). The tracheal tube introducer was advanced under bronchoscopic guidance through the glottis into the trachea and positioned 3 cm above the carina. The bronchoscope and LMA Supreme were then removed while keeping the tracheal tube introducer in position. A 7.0 mm internal diameter (ID) tracheal tube was railroaded over the tracheal tube introducer and into the trachea, and positioning of the tracheal tube was confirmed by capnography. Ten minutes after the completion of surgery, the patient was awakened and the tracheal tube was removed. The patient’s recovery was uneventful. After failed attempts at tracheal intubation, a supraglottic airway may be inserted for lung ventilation while awaiting alternative airway equipment. In lieu of removing the supraglottic airway to attempt alternative intubation techniques, it can be kept in situ as a conduit for tracheal intubation. Ventilation is not interrupted and secretions and blood are kept posterior to the supraglottic airway allowing a clear path to the larynx. The LMA Supreme is a single-use variant of the LMA Proseal. Its curved shaft consists of a double lumen, i.e., a central lumen for gastric access within an airway lumen for respiratory tract access. Like the LMA Classic, it is difficult to pass an adequately sized endotracheal tube (ETT) directly through the LMA Supreme due to the airway luminal diameter. There are four techniques to achieve tracheal intubation with an adequately sized ETT, through the use of introducers or catheters, via the LMA Supreme. The four techniques utilize a small ETT, an Aintree Intubating Catheter, a guidewire, or a tracheal tube introducer. With the first technique, a small ETT (up to 6.0 mm ID) is mounted over a bronchoscope and inserted into the trachea through the LMA Supreme. Subsequently, an airway exchange catheter is inserted via the ETT, which is later exchanged for a full-sized ETT. Q.-J. Chu, MD X.-P. Han, MD First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China

Evaluation of air‐QTM intubating laryngeal airway as a conduit for tracheal intubation in infants – a pilot study

Air-Q™ intubating laryngeal airway (ILA) has been used successfully as a conduit for tracheal intubation in pediatric difficult airway. However, its use as an airway device and conduit for intubation in infants is not yet evaluated. The primary objective was to evaluate ILA as a conduit for tracheal intubation in infants, and secondary objectives were to evaluate ILA in terms of ease of insertion and ventilation, oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP), glottic view, and complications. Twenty infants with normal airway were included. After induction of general anesthesia and neuromuscular blockade, ILA (size 1.0/1.5) was inserted. Fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB)-guided intubation and removal of ILA with the stabilizing stylet was attempted. The mean age and weight of the infants were 7.5 ± 2.3 months and 7.3 ± 1.8 kg. The ILA sizes 1.0 and 1.5 were inserted in 10 infants each according to the weight of the infants. The mean OLP was 18.5 ± 1.8 cm H₂O, and mean time for insertion of ILA was 13.3 ± 3.9 s. Glottic view was grade I in 6, grade II in 1, grade III in 4, and grade IV in nine infants. Tracheal intubation was successful in 19/20 infants. The mean endotracheal tube (ETT) insertion time and mean total time (ILA insertion to the confirmation of ETT placement) were 95.6 ± 32.3 s and 306.42 ± 120.2 s respectively. The ILA is a safe and easy-to-use supraglottic airway device for intubation with FOB in infants with normal airway. Insertion and removal of ILA are easy with satisfactory oropharyngeal seal and ventilation.

Difficult Airway Simulator Intubation Success Rates Using Commission on Accreditation of Medical Transport Systems Training Standards

Objectives This study was undertaken to evaluate difficult airway simulator intubation success rates using Commission on Accreditation of Medical Transport Systems (CAMTS) initial and maintenance intubation training standards on transport-RN novice intubators over a 1-year period. Methods Twelve transport nurses were blinded to and randomly assigned five or six of 64 different difficult airway simulator scenarios. Intubation success rates were measured 1 month before training, 1 month after training, and 1 year later, following CAMTS initial and maintenance intubation standards. Outcome measurements included first attempt intubation rate, overall intubation success rate, number of attempts to intubation, time per attempt, time to intubation, and time between attempts. During the study, participants received no additional training or opportunities to intubate. Results First-attempt intubation rates significantly improved (P 5 .022) from 19% 1 month before training to 36% 1 month after training, but did not significantly change (P > .999) 1 year later following CAMTS maintenance standards (34%). Mean cumulative success rates did not significantly improve after four attempts or after 3.5 minutes. The overall mean time per attempt and time between attempts declined with subsequent intubation attempts. Conclusions Using initial and maintenance CAMTS standards, simulator difficult airway intubation success rates are low in novice intubators. Our results suggest that one intubation/quarter may be enough to maintain difficult airway intubation success rates. Training significantly improves intubation rates. Little advantage occurs in intubation rates after four attempts or 3.5 minutes.

A Randomized Comparison of the GlideScope Videolaryngoscope to the Standard Laryngoscopy for Intubation by Pediatric Residents in Simulated Easy and Difficult Infant Airway Scenarios

Videolaryngoscopy has been developed mainly to assist difficult airway intubation. However, there is a lack of studies demonstrating the real efficacy of its use in children. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that GlideScope (Verathon Inc, Bothell, Wash) videolaryngoscope improves tracheal intubation when used by pediatric residents in an advanced patient simulation model. Pediatric residents who passed a pediatric advanced life support course were eligible for the study. An advanced infant simulator was used, and 4 scenarios were proposed: normal airway (NA), tongue edema (TE), tongue edema and oropharyngeal edema, and cervical collar. No participant had prior experience with any videolaryngoscope. After a brief instruction in GlideScope technique, each participant performed the 4 scenarios using both the standard Miller and GlideScope laryngoscopes, in a random sequence. Sixteen residents were included. The number of failed intubations was higher with GlideScope in NA and TE scenarios (3 vs 0, in both cases). Mean (SD) time to successful intubation was significantly longer with GlideScope in the NA scenario (GlideScope, 38 [SD, 13] vs Miller, 26 [SD, 16] seconds; P = 0.043). The number of maneuvers was significantly higher with GlideScope in the tongue edema and oropharyngeal edema scenario (2.3 [SD, 1.5] vs 1.5 [SD, 1]; P = 0.04). Upper jaw injury index was significantly lower with GlideScope in NA (2.0 [SD, 1] vs 2.6 [SD, 0.8]; P = 0.008) and cervical collar (2.1 [SD, 1.0] vs 2.8 [SD, 0.5]; P = 0.011) scenarios. Participants considered GlideScope technique more difficult than standard Miller in NA (5 [SD, 2.0] vs 3 [SD, 1.3]; P = 0.04) and TE (5.9 [SD, 2.5] vs 3.9 [SD, 1.7]; P = 0.02) scenarios. In simulated scenarios of infant NA and difficult airway, when used by pediatric residents, GlideScope did not improve intubation performance when compared with the standard laryngoscope. Nevertheless, GlideScope may be safer for upper jaw injury and could have advantages in the management of complicated airway. Further studies are needed to assess if specific training will improve GlideScope intubation performance and whether the "in simulator" results translate into clinical practice.

Don't blame it on the bougie

Journal of Paramedic PracticeVol. 3, No. 4 Spotlight on ResearchDon't blame it on the bougieTim EdwardsTim EdwardsSearch for more papers by this authorTim EdwardsPublished Online:16 Aug 2013https://doi.org/10.12968/jpar.2011.3.4.198AboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail View article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails 2 April 2011Volume 3Issue 4ISSN (print): 1759-1376ISSN (online): 2041-9457 Metrics History Published online 16 August 2013 Published in print 2 April 2011 Information© MA Healthcare LimitedPDF download

A rude awakening after our fourth ‘NAP’: lessons for airway management

A rude awakening after our fourth ‘NAP’: lessons for airway management

Comparison of Bougie-Assisted Intubation with Traditional Endotracheal Intubation in a Simulated Difficult Airway

Objective. To compare the success and ease of bougie-assisted intubation (BAI) with those of traditional endotracheal intubation (ETI) in a simulated difficult airway (20.4 seconds for BAI vs. 16.7 seconds for ETI, p == 0.102). Methods. This was a prospective, randomized, crossover, single-blind study comparing BAI with ETI in a simulated difficult airway. The 35 participants included paramedics, flight nurses, and emergency medicine resident physicians. Participants were already experienced in ETI and received a brief demonstration of BAI. A simulated difficult airway was created using a Laerdal adult intubation manikin. Cervical motion was mechanically limited to provide a grade III Cormack and Lehane glottic view. Participants performed ETI and BAI in randomized order. Successful placement in the trachea and time to successful placement were recorded for both techniques by each participant. After intubating the manikin with both techniques, each participant was asked to complete a Likert-style survey assessing ease of each technique. Results. Of the 35 participants, 27 were successful with both techniques and two failed with both techniques. The remaining six participants all failed at ETI but were able to intubate using BAI. There was significantly greater success in intubating the simulated difficult airway with BAI than with ETI (94%% vs. 77%%, p == 0.0313). The order of techniques attempted did not influence this conclusion. There was no difference in average time to successful intubation (20.4 seconds for BAI vs. 16.7 seconds for ETI, p == 0.102). Thirty-two (91.4%%) of the participants completed the survey regarding ease of performing each technique. Forty-one percent rated the ease of intubation as the same for the two methods, 50%% rated BAI as easier, and 9%% rated ETI as easier (p == 0.0006). Conclusion. In a simulated difficult airway, BAI has a higher success rate than traditional ETI without increasing the time to successful intubation. Intubators perceive BAI as being easier to perform than traditional ETI in this simulated difficult airway scenario.

A comparative study on the usefulness of the Glidescope or Macintosh laryngoscope when intubating normal airways

BackgroundThe Glidescope Videolaryngoscope (GVL) is a newly developed video laryngoscope. It offers a significantly improved laryngeal view and facilitates endotracheal intubation in difficult airways, but it is controversial in that it offers an improved laryngeal view in normal airways as well. And the price of GVL is expensive. We hypothesized that intubation carried out by fully experienced anesthesiologists using the GVL with appropriate pre-anesthetic preparations offers an improved laryngeal view and shortened intubation time in normal airways. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the GVL with the Macintosh laryngoscope in normal airways and to determine whether GVL can substitute the Macintosh laryngoscope.MethodsThis study included 60 patients with an ASA physical status of class 1 or 2 requiring tracheal intubation for elective surgery. All patients were randomly allocated into two groups, GVL (group G) or Macintosh (group M). ADS (airway difficulty score) was recorded before induction of anesthesia. The anesthesiologist scored vocal cord visualization using the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) visible and the subjective ease of intubation on a visual analogue scale (VAS). The time required to intubate was recorded by an assistant.ResultsThere was a significant increase in POGO when using the GVL (P < 0.05). However, there was no difference in the time required for a successful tracheal intubation using the GVL compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope. The VAS score on the ease of intubation was significantly lower for the GVL than for the Macintosh laryngoscope (P < 0.05).ConclusionsGVL could be a first-line tool in normal airways.

Intubation in a pediatric difficult airway using an adult flexible fiber-optic bronchoscope and a j-tipped guidewire: An innovation in adversity

Management of an anticipated difficult airway relies heavily on flexible fiber-optic bronchoscope (FFB) guided awake intubations. In a pediatric patient with difficult airway, doing an awake procedure may be difficult, and hence the child is either deeply sedated or anesthesia is induced before attempting intubation with an appropriate sized FFB. We present the anesthetic management of a 6-year-old child with a lacerated tongue and fractured mandibular condyle, with subsequent inability to open his mouth, who was posted for urgent exploration and open reduction under anesthesia. Unhindered by a damaged pediatric FFB, we innovated by positioning the tip of an adult FFB just outside the larynx, passing a j-tipped guidewire through the working channel of the FFB, and successfully railroaded a naso-tracheal tube over the guidewire. The surgery, reversal and extubation, and the postoperative period were uneventful.

Noma Neonatorum: An Airway Challenge In Paediatrics

Noma Neonatorum (NN) is a devastating gangrenous disease that leads to severe tissue destruction in the face. Patients who survive Noma suffer from its sequelaefacial disfigurement, trismus and speech impediments which often necessitate extensive reconstructive surgery. These facial anatomic distortions present a challenge to attending anaesthesiologist. Reports on anaesthetic techniques for Noma sequelae are limited. We describe the anaesthetic management of a 13-month-old child with sequelae of NN. The child underwent reconstructive surgery of nose and upper lip with orotracheal intubation. We discuss the characteristic features of NN and review techniques of intubation in difficult paediatric airway. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of anaesthetic management of NN sequelae in paediatric age group in India.

Assessment of the Storz Video Macintosh Laryngoscope for Use in Difficult Airways: A Human Simulator Study

Video laryngoscopy has been shown to improve glottic exposure when compared to direct laryngoscopy in operating room studies. However, its utility in the hands of emergency physicians (EPs) remains undefined. A simulated difficult airway was used to determine if intubation by EPs using a video Macintosh system resulted in an improved glottic view, was easier, was faster, or was more successful than conventional direct laryngoscopy. Emergency medicine (EM) residents and attending physicians at two academic institutions performed endotracheal intubation in one normal and two identical difficult airway scenarios. With the difficult scenarios, the participants used video laryngoscopy during the second case. Intubations were performed on a medium-fidelity human simulator. The difficult scenario was created by limiting cervical spine mobility and inducing trismus. The primary outcome was the proportion of direct versus video intubations with a grade I or II Cormack-Lehane glottic view. Ease of intubation (self-reported via 10-cm visual analog scale [VAS]), time to intubation, and success rate were also recorded. Descriptive statistics as well as medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs) are reported where appropriate. The Wilcoxon matched pairs signed-rank test was used for comparison testing of nonparametric data. Participants (n = 39) were residents (59%) and faculty. All had human intubation experience; 51% reported more than 100 prior intubations. On difficult laryngoscopy, a Cormack-Lehane grade I or II view was obtained in 20 (51%) direct laryngoscopies versus 38 (97%) of the video-assisted laryngoscopies (p < 0.01). The median VAS score for difficult airways was 50 mm (IQR = 28–73 mm) for direct versus 18 mm (IQR = 9–50 mm) for video (p < 0.01). The median time to intubation in difficult airways was 25 seconds (IQR = 16–44 seconds) for direct versus 20 seconds (IQR = 12–35 seconds) for video laryngoscopy (p < 0.01). All intubations were successful without need for an invasive airway. In this simulation, video laryngoscopy was associated with improved glottic exposure, was perceived as easier, and was slightly faster than conventional direct laryngoscopy in a simulated difficult airway. Absence of secretions and blood limits the generalizability of our findings; human studies are needed.

Evaluation of the novel, single‐use, flexible aScope® for tracheal intubation in the simulated difficult airway and first clinical experiences

Flexible fibreoptic intubation is widely accepted as an important modality for the management of patients with difficult airways. We compared the aScope, a novel, single-use, flexible video-endoscope designed to aid tracheal intubation, with a standard flexible intubating fibrescope, by examining the performance of 21 anaesthetists during an easy and difficult intubation simulation in a manikin. Intubation success, time for intubation, and rating of the devices (using a scale from 1, excellent to 6, fail) were documented. Intubation times were similar for both flexible 'scopes in the scenarios (p = 0.59). Successful intubation rates were higher for the standard intubating fibrescope (17/21, 81%) than the aScope (14/21, 67%; p = 0.02) in the difficult intubation scenario. The median (IQR[range]) ratings for the standard fibrescope vs the aScope were respectively: overall, 2 (1.75-2 [1-2.5]) vs 3 (2-3.25 [1-5]) (p < 0.0001); picture quality 2 (1.5-2 [1-3]) vs 3 (2-4 [1-5]) (p < 0.0001). The aScope was also successfully used to facilitate tracheal intubation in five patients with anticipated or unanticipated difficult airways. Picture quality was sufficient to identify the anatomical landmarks. Although the performance of the aScope is acceptable, it does not meet the current quality of standard flexible intubation fibrescopes.

Improving rigid fiberoptic intubation: a comparison of the Bonfils Intubating Fiberscope™ with a novel modification

BackgroundThe Bonfils intubating fiberscope has a limited upward tip angle of 40° and requires retromolar entry into the hypopharynx. These factors may make its use less desirable when managing the difficult airway because most anesthesia providers are well versed in midline oral intubation rather than the lateral retromolar approach. The Center for Advanced Technology and Telemedicine at the University of Nebraska Medical Center has developed a novel fiberscope with a more anterior 60° curve to allow for easier midline insertion and intubation. The objective of this work was to evaluate the novel fiberscope, in comparison to the Bonfils intubating fiberscope, in terms of use and function in difficult airway intubation.MethodsTwenty-two anesthesia providers participated in simulated intubations of a difficult airway mannequin to compare the Bonfils intubating fiberscope with the novel curved Boedeker intubating fiberscope. The intubations were assessed based upon the following variables: recorded Cormack Lehane airway scores, requests for cricoid pressure, time to intubation, number of intubation attempts and success or failure of the procedure.ResultsParticipants using the Bonfils fiberscope recorded an average Cormack Lehane (CL) airway score of 1.67 ± 1.02 (median = 1); with the novel fiberscope, the recorded average airway grade improved to 1.18 ± 0.50 (median = 1). The difference in airway scores was not statistically significant (p = 0.34; Fishers Exact Test comparing CL grades 1&2 vs. 3&4). There was, however, a statistically significant difference in intubation success rates between the two devices. With the Bonfils fiberscope, 68% (15/22) of participants were successful in intubation compared to a 100% success rate in intubation with the novel fiberscope (22/22) (p = 0.008). After the intubation trial, the majority of participants (95%) indicated a preference for the novel fiberscope (n = 20).ConclusionsWith this data, we can infer that the novel fiberscope curvature appears to improve or maintain the quality of an intubation attempt (airway score, cricoid pressure requirement, intubation time, number of attempts, placement success). The data indicate that the novel fiberscope offers a superior intubation experience to currently available best practices. The instrument was well received and would be welcomed by most study participants should the device become clinically available in the future.

Comparison of the Pentax AWS videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh laryngoscope in simulated difficult airway intubations by emergency physicians

Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the Pentax AWS videolaryngoscope (PAV) in intubation of simulated difficult airways by emergency medical staff. Methods Emergency medical staff and students attempted to intubate a manikin using 3 difficult airways settings with both the PAV and a Macintosh (MAC) laryngoscope in a randomized order. The success of tracheal intubation, time required, number of attempts, airway adjunct use, grade of view obtained, and participant comments were recorded. Results Significantly higher success rates of intubation occurred with the PAV compared with the MAC, irrespective of the level of training or number of previous intubations. With the highest difficulty setting, success occurred in 76.4% with the PAV versus 8.8% with the MAC. The PAV also significantly improved the Cormack and Lehane grading and reduced airway adjunct use, number of intubation attempts, and damage during intubation. Conclusions The PAV may be a useful adjunct in difficult intubations by emergency medical staff.