Children, Youth and Environments Vol. 15 No. 1 (2005) ISSN: 1546-2250 Resiliency: What We Have Learned Benard, Bonnie (2004). San Francisco, CA: WestEd; 148 pages. $19.95. ISBN 0914409182. Ten years ago, resiliency was relatively new to the fields of prevention and education. Today, it is at the heart of hundreds of school and community programs that recognize in all young people the capacity to lead healthy, successful lives. This book is written for parents, social workers, students, practitioners, researchers, educators, administrators, policy makers, program developers, and anyone else motivated to enhance the intrinsic resilience of children and seeking holistic strategies that meet the requirements of the “No Child Left Behind” Act using quantifiable and proven methods. It provides an inspirational account of practices that work and the theories that support them. The roots of resiliency theory began in 1955 with Emmy E. Werner’s paper, “Risk, Resilience, and Recovery: Perspectives from the Kauai Longitudinal Study,” that focused on children who had learned to lead successful lives despite environmental hardships and extreme stresses during their upbringing (Werner 1992). During the 1970s, youth development researchers started similar “life-spanning” studies of inner-city children. According to Bonnie Benard, research editor for Resiliency in Action (1996), their research focused on “children born into seriously high-risk conditions such as families where parents were mentally ill, alcoholic or abusive.” Out of these studies the term resiliency emerged to describe people who have overcome hardships and risk factors through self-efficacy. What began as a quest to understand the extraordinary has revealed the power of the ordinary. Resilience does not come from rare and special qualities, but from the everyday magic of ordinary, normative human resources in the minds, brains, and bodies of 433 children, in their families and relationships, and in their communities. - Ann Masten (Benard 2004, p. iv) Benard (2004) states that early in her research, I began to see that perhaps the most useful role I could play would be to bring to practitioners the research that supported what they knew intuitively in their hearts and from their experience and wisdom worked to prevent health-risk behaviors and promote life success. That is what this and all my writing has been about. From this perspective, Benard discusses results and implications of studies that consistently validate resilience theory and practice. She highlights monumental studies including the most recent outcomes of the Werner and Smith 30+ year longitudinal study of over 640 “at risk” children measuring their capacity to cope with internal and external stresses. Another important study discussed is The National Longitudinal School-Based Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health) created to assess health-related behaviors of adolescents in grades 7-12 and designed to explore the causes of these behaviors, with an emphasis on the influence of social context. Karen Seashore Louis, professor of educational policy and administration at the University of Minnesota and Director of the Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement (CAREI) states in the opening editorial for the spring 1997 CAREI newsletter, The concept of resilience has, in the last decade, begun to change the way that we look at the lives of children. When policy discussions emphasize ‘children at-risk,’ the task of removing all of the factors that can create significant stresses for children seems overwhelming. Rather than promoting action, it tends to promote labeling and inaction. In an effort to redirect past approaches which often focused on problem assessment and thus led to inaction, Resiliency: What We 434 Have Learned takes on an assets-based approach, focused on creating optimal environments and conditions to support youth and to reduce daily stresses. This more positive outlook enables people who care for children to do what they can, rather than attempting to solve things over which they have no control. According to Benard (2004, p. 3-4), the goal is to synthesize and integrate some of the key research findings and their application in programs and movements that support positive youth development and resilience. The emphases here on providing a framework, research support, and a rationale for resilience-based prevention and education are in line with the profound messages of long-term developmental studies of...
Read full abstract