Intraoperative Femoral Fracture Research Articles

Risk Factors Associated With Femorotomy or Fracture During Cementless Stem Removal and Generation of an Individual Predictive Risk Score

BackgroundFemorotomy is a commonly used technique during cementless stem removal but should be preferred in selective revision cases to prevent intraoperative femoral fracture associated with deteriorated clinical outcome. Our aim was to assess the risk factors for fracture or femorotomy and develop a predictive risk stratification score. MethodsA monocentric retrospective cohort including 202 patients was analyzed. Thirty six candidate prognostic factors were assessed. ResultsThe following independent predictors of fracture or femorotomy were identified: presence of a “bracket sign” (Odds Ratio [OR]: 10.857; 95% Confidence interval [CI]: 2.613-45.115; P = .001) defined as a distal spot weld between the surface of the implant and closest endosteum, bone contact in zone 2 (OR: 4.700; 95% CI: 1.827-12.089; P = .001), 6 (OR: 4.966; 95% CI: 1.823-13.530; P = .002), 12 (OR: 9.660; 95% CI: 3.715-25.116; P < .0001), 13 (OR: 2.958; 95% CI: 1.009-8.021; P = .033), and global hypertrophy (OR: 0.170; 95% CI: 0.036-0.806; P = .026). The prognostic score, named Femorotomy INcidence Numeric scoring system, had good performance and discriminability; the area under the curve of the model was 0.924 (95% CI: 0.878-0.969). ConclusionThe only independent risk factors were those assessed on X-ray (eg, bracket sign, bone contact in zones 2, 6, 12, and 13), while global hypertrophy was protective. We noticed the importance of differentiating pedestals and “bracket signs”; the latter is an indicator of fixation of the stem. We developed a risk prediction score (Femorotomy INcidence Numeric score) of fracture or femorotomy that can be used as a companion tool to assess the risk for doing an early osteotomy of the femur.

Cementless primary or revision stem in revision hip arthroplasty for aseptic stem loosening with Paprosky type I/II femoral defect?

The use of primary or revision stem during revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) for aseptic stem loosening with Paprosky type I/II femoral defect remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent revision THA with a primary or revision stem. We retrospectively reviewed 78 patients who received revision THA for aseptic stem loosening using primary (N = 28) or revision stems (N = 50). The bone defects were classified as Paprosky type I or II. The mean follow-up duration was 72.3 ± 34.7 months. The primary outcome domains included surgical complications and implant failures. The secondary outcome domains included medical complications, 30- and 90-day readmission, and Harris hip score (HHS). The use of revision stem was associated with a higher incidence than primary stem of patient complications (60.0% vs. 32.1%, p = 0.018), including intraoperative femur fracture (28.0% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.029) and greater trochanter fracture (16.0% vs. 0%, p = 0.045). The implant survival rate was comparable between groups. HHS at the final follow-up was similar. With a lower risk of surgical complications and a similar rate of mid-term implant survival, cementless primary stem appears superior to revision stem in revision THA for aseptic stem loosening with Paprosky type I/II femoral defect.

Outcome measures and survivorship following total hip arthroplasty in adolescent population.

The most frequent indication for total hip arthroplasty (THA) in adolescent patients has been juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). However, in recent years, other causes have become more prevalent. (1) What is the survivorship following THA across the diagnostic spectrum in adolescent population? (2) How are quality of life results affected by systemic medical conditions? We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive THA in patients under 21years of age, performed at our Institution between 1993 and 2018. There were 34 prostheses implanted in 26 patients with a mean age of 18.4years (range 11 to 21). The most frequent diagnosis was JIA (14 hips), followed by avascular necrosis (10 hips). Patient reported outcomes were assessed using Harris and Oxford Hip Scores (HHS and OHS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and EuroQol-5D. Survivorship for revision and aseptic loosening was determined with Kaplan Meier analysis. At final follow-up, the overall survival rate was of 89.3% at 12-year follow-up. Three acetabular components underwent revision surgery for aseptic loosening. Clinical HHS significantly improved from 37.5 to 90.6 points (p < 0.001). Mean OHH was 37.4 points, with a final VAS of 1.64 points. Mean 5Q-5D was 0.704 with an interquartile range of 0.4 to 1.0. JIA patients displayed worse pre-operative HHS scores, and at final follow-up had worse HHS, OHS, VAS and EQ-5D scores compared to the rest of the patients. Complications included three intra-operative femoral fractures, one sciatic nerve palsy and one adductor contracture. THA in adolescent patients provides improved functional outcomes with acceptable revision rates at mid-term follow-up.

Previous corrective osteotomies of femur and pelvis are a risk factor for complications following total hip arthroplasty in hip dysplasia

BackgroundModified anatomy of dysplastic hips, bone defects and previous operations make THA (total hip arthroplasty) in patients with hip dysplasia a technically challenging procedure. MethodsOne hundred and ten patients (mean 49.2 years of age, range 19–76, female:103, male:7) underwent 122 subsequent hip arthroplasties from 2012 to 2019. These patients were reviewed at least two years after THA. Plain radiography was used to determine Crowe classification of the affected hips. Fifty-three patients had an operation in childhood before THA was done (mean 47.0 years of age, standard deviation 8.3, range 19–62) and formed the “operated group”. Among these patients, there were Chiari pelvic osteotomies, periacetabular osteotomies, femoral osteotomies, greater trochanter distalizations and soft tissue operations. Fifty-seven were not operated in childhood (mean 52.3 years of age, standard deviation 10.9, range 19–76) and formed the “non operated group”. The functional status of the patients was assessed with the Oxford Hip Score (OHS). Results122 total hip arthroplasties were performed using uncemented femoral and acetabular components. There were 13 major complications identified. Ten were in the “operated group”, of which 5 needed revision surgery. Only 3 were in the “non operated group”, with no need for revision. Aseptic loosenings of the femoral component were seen in the patients that had femoral osteotomy done in childhood. Acetabular component migration and intrapelvic migration occurred due to the initial malposition and lack of osteointegration, thus requiring early revision after just 6 months. Other major complications were peroneal palsy, deep periprosthetic infection, severe trochanteritis and intraoperative femoral fracture. OHS was significantly higher in the “non operated group” 42.3 (10–48), opposed to 39.1 (10–48) in the “operated group” (p 0.017). ConclusionCorrective osteotomies in childhood are a risk factor for complications and lower medium-term survivorship of the THA in hip dysplasia patients.

Anterior-Based Muscle-Sparing (ABMS) Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty.

The procedure is performed with the patient in the supine position. A minimally invasive Watson-Jones approach is utilized to access the hip. Fluoroscopy can be utilized intraoperatively to assess acetabular cup position, version, and inclination. Femoral canal fill and leg lengths can also be assessed with use of fluoroscopy. Nonoperative alternatives for the treatment of hip osteoarthritis include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, physical therapy, and corticosteroid injections into the hip joint. Surgical alternatives to this procedure include the posterior approach (Moore or Southern), the direct lateral approach (Hardinge), and the direct anterior approach (Smith-Petersen). The Watson-Jones approach can also be performed with the patient in the lateral decubitus position (unlike in our technique where the patient is supine). The anterolateral (Watson-Jones) approach to the hip has been shown to be superior to the historically more common posterior approach with regard to length of hospital stay and dislocation risk1,2. Supine positioning for this approach offers multiple advantages compared with lateral decubitus positioning. Leg lengths can be assessed intraoperatively both fluoroscopically and with manual palpation of the medial malleoli. Cup position can be assessed radiographically as well3. Supine positioning also allows for easily reproducible patient positioning. Compared with the historically common posterior approach to the hip for THA, the anterolateral approach to the hip leads to, on average, a lower risk of hip dislocation1,2. In a 2002 study by Masonis and Bourne, the dislocation rate for the posterior approach was 3.23% (193 of 5,981), whereas the dislocation rate was 2.18% (18 of 826) for patients who underwent THA via the anterolateral approach1. In a study by Ritter et al. in 2001, which followed patients for 1 year postoperatively, no patients in the anterolateral approach group experienced a dislocation compared with 4.21% of patients in the posterior approach group2. With use of the present technique, patients will benefit from the advantages of the anterolateral approach to the hip; however, they will also benefit from easy intraoperative leg length assessment and from radiographic assistance with regard to determining the appropriate position of the femoral and acetabular components3. In a study of 199 patients (including 98 patients who had intraoperative fluoroscopy and 101 who did not), 80% of implants in the fluoroscopy group were within the combined safe zone compared with 63% in the non-fluoroscopy group. However, this approach is not without its limitations. As mentioned in the above studies, dislocation remains a possible complication of the procedure, and a minimally invasive anterior-based approach can lead to intraoperative femoral fractures when exposure and releases are inadequate4. Femoral nerve palsies are also possible with excessive medial retraction during acetabular exposure. Additionally, the benefit of a reduction in the incidence of hip dislocation compared with a posterior approach might be overstated given improvement in posterior-approach dislocation rates if posterior soft-tissue repair is used5. Both direct anterior and anterolateral approaches have the same risks of fracture with poor exposure and of neurapraxia with excessive retraction, and there does not appear to be any difference in dislocation risk between these 2 approaches6. Although a pannus is more detrimental to a direct anterior approach, it could overlie the desired incision in the ABMS approach as well. The pannus could be held out of the field by taping it to the contralateral shoulder before preparing and draping.The preparative process is more time-consuming because both legs must be sterile for this procedure.Acetabular exposure often requires an assistant standing on the contralateral side of the table.Although not often needed, the obturator internus and gemelli might need to be released in order to ensure adequate exposure of the femur.If femoral canal exposure is still insufficient, a femoral suspension hook system might be needed. ASIS = anterior superior iliac spineTFL = tensor fasciae lataeITB = iliotibial bandPOD = postoperative dayIV = intravenousBID = twice daily.

The Supercapsular Percutaneously Assisted Total Hip (SuperPATH) Approach Revisited: Technique Improvements after the Perioperative Experience of 344 Cases.

The SuperPATH approach is a direct superior portal-assisted approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA) that utilizes the interval between the gluteus minimus and the piriformis to access the hip capsule. Patients and Methods: SuperPATH arthroplasty was performed by a single surgeon between December of 2016 and December of 2021 in 344 cases. The technique described by Chow was performed in all cases. The average length of stay was 1.3 days, and all patients were discharged for home. All patients were mobilized on the day of the operation. Six cases presented complications: four intraoperative femur fractures and two peroneal nerve palsies. No infection and no hip dislocation were noticed in any case. Modifications: We recommend that the patient be placed as far from the surgeon as possible as well as the use of a sterilized standard linen pack to elevate the foot and internally rotate the hip. In addition, regarding instrumentation, we recommend the use of a 4.5 mm drill for the first guidance femur drilling and a standard corkscrew for femoral head removal. Finally, we propose a different reduction technique using a hook. The use of the SuperPATH approach allows for maximal tissue sparing through preservation of external rotators and minimizing stretching of the gluteus medius. There is no range of motion restrictions postoperatively and patients can achieve a high level of function with a very low dislocation risk and reduced inpatient stay. Furthermore, an incision extension is possible if needed in complex cases. For surgeons familiar with the standard posterolateral approach, the SuperPATH approach is a reliable and safe method with promising results for the patient. In order to improve the surgical effect and facilitate some steps in the procedure, we share our experience and recommend some modifications.

A comparison between Austin-Moore and Corail prosthesis regarding intraoperative periprosthetic femur fractures in hip hemiarthroplasty

Hip hemiarthroplasty is considered the treatment of choice for displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly less active patients. One important complication of this procedure is an intraoperative periprosthetic femur fracture (IPF), which may lead to poor functional outcome and may increase morbidity and mortality. Our primary aim in this study is to compare between Austin-Moore and Corail prosthesis regarding IPFs. Our secondary aim is to assess patient and surgical technique related risk factors for the development of this complication. Inclusion criteria included patients older than 65 years of age who had a displaced femoral neck fracture and were operated for hip hemiarthroplasty between the years 2014–2018. Patient-specific data was collected retrospectively including age, gender, comorbidities, pre-injury ambulatory status, duration of surgery, surgical approach, use of Austin-Moore or Corail prosthesis, surgeon’s experience and type of anesthesia applied. In addition, radiographs were reviewed for measurement of calcar to canal ratio (CDR) and classification of Dorr canal type. 257 patients with an average age of 83.7 years were enrolled in the study. 118 patients (46%) were treated with an Austin-Moore prosthesis, while 139 (54%) were treated with a Corail prosthesis. A total of 22 patients (8.6%) had intraoperative fractures. Fracture prevalence was significantly higher in the Corail group compared with the Austin-Moore group (12.2% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.025). The majority of patients had a Dorr A type femoral canal, while the rest had Dorr B type canal (70% vs. 30%). There was no difference in fracture prevalence between Dorr A and B canal type patients. We didn’t find any significant risk factor for developing an IPF, neither patient wise (age, gender, and comorbidities) nor surgical technique related (surgical approach, type of anesthesia, and surgeon’s experience). Intraoperative periprosthetic fracture prevalence was significantly higher in the Corail patient group compared with the Austin-Moore group. This may be an important advantage of the Austin-Moore prosthesis over the Corail prosthesis.

Fixation of intraoperative proximal femoral fractures during THA using two versus three cerclage wires - a biomechanical study

BackgroundIntraoperative proximal femoral fractures (IPFF) are relevant complications during total hip arthroplasty. Fixation using cerclage wires (CW) represents a minimally-invasive technique to address these fractures through the same surgical approach. The goal of treatment is to mobilise the patient as early as possible, which requires high primary stability. This study aimed to compare different cerclage wire configurations fixing IPFF with regard to biomechanical primary stability.MethodsStandardised IPFF (type II, Modified Mallory Classification) were created in human fresh frozen femora and were fixed either by two or three CW (1.6 mm, stainless steel). All cadaveric specimens (n = 42) were randomised to different groups (quasi-static, dynamic) or subgroups (2 CW, 3 CW) stratified by bone mineral density determined by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry. Using a biomechanical testing setup, quasi-static and dynamic cyclic failure tests were carried out. Cyclic loading started from 200 N to 500 N at 1 Hz with increasing peak load by 250 N every 100 cycles until failure occurred or maximum load (5250 N) reached. The change of fracture gap size was optically captured.ResultsNo significant differences in failure load after quasi-static (p = 0.701) or dynamic cyclic loading (p = 0.132) were found between the experimental groups. In the quasi-static load testing, all constructs resisted 250% of the body weight (BW) of their corresponding body donor. In the dynamic cyclic load testing, all but one construct (treated by 3 CW) resisted 250% BW.ConclusionsBased on this in vitro data, both two and three CW provided sufficient primary stability according to the predefined minimum failure load (250% BW) to resist. The authors recommend the treatment using two CW because it reduces the risk of vascular injury and shortens procedure time.

Impaction Bone Grafting for Severe Femoral Bone Loss: Surgical Technique in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

The specific steps to perform this procedure include (1) preoperative planning; (2) positioning of the patient and surgical approach; (3) cautious removal of the previous components; (4) preparation of the bone graft; (5) implantation of the appropriate IBG revision system, restoring bone loss from distal to proximal and utilizing metal mesh as needed; (6) implantation of the new stem, bypassing the defect; and (7) aftercare with protected weight-bearing in order to avoid subsidence of the stem and periprosthetic fracture. There are several alternatives to the IBG technique in the setting of revision total hip arthroplasty with extensive femoral bone loss. These alternatives include distal cementless fixation (either modular or nonmodular), a megaprosthesis, or an allograft-prosthesis composite. The rationale for use of the IBG technique is restoration of bone stock. Although this issue may be irrelevant in low-demand elderly patients, we believe it is of the utmost importance among young (i.e., <60 years old) and active patients. This technique is versatile enough to be utilized in different scenarios such as periprosthetic fracture, periprosthetic joint infection (2-stage protocols), and aseptic loosening. We have reported favorable clinical and radiographic outcomes for the treatment of both aseptic and septic femoral component loosening. In all cases, we utilized vancomycin-supplemented impacted cancellous allograft without evidence of secondary effects with regard to bone incorporation, nephrotoxicity, or allergic reactions. Although it was initially contraindicated, we further extended the indication for this reconstruction alternative to cases of circumferential proximal bone loss with non-neoplastic bone defects of ≤15 cm, utilizing encompassing metal mesh and a bypassing long stem. Recently, we reported on poorer outcomes following IBG compared with the use of uncemented modular stems for the treatment of type B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures, with a significantly higher rate of infection and implant breakage for the former treatment. Nowadays, we advocate the use of this technique in young, active patients (i.e., <60 years old) with a femoral bone defect Paprosky grade IIIB or IV, in which reconstitution of bone stock is crucial to avoid an eventual implant failure in the long term. This technique requires an experienced team. This procedure should be avoided in the presence of active periprosthetic joint infection.The gluteus maximus tendon should be detached to avoid tensioning the sciatic nerve and to decrease the chance of periprosthetic femoral fracture.Massive bone loss can jeopardize correct implant orientation and restoration of biomechanics. In this scenario, surgeons might consider the intercondylar axis as a guide for femoral version.Try to avoid (if possible) trochanteric or extended trochanteric osteotomy because proximal bone stock is necessary to contain the bone grafts. In some cases, such as those in which the removal of the stem is difficult, especially with certain uncemented stem designs, an extended trochanteric osteotomy must be performed. Whether or not a cemented stem is removed, it is mandatory to remove all remaining cement in the femoral canal.Preoperative templating is a necessity to reconstruct leg length. Accurately determining the length of the mesh is the most important step to avoid shortening or overlengthening of the lower extremity.Approximately 10 cm of circumferential metal mesh should be fixed with 3 to 5 double cerclage metal wires to the remaining bone. The new femoral stem should bypass extend beyond the mesh for approximately 5 cm. If the stem does not bypass the mesh, there is an increased risk of postoperative fracture.In order to decrease the risk of intraoperative femoral fracture, the distal aspect of the femur should be secured with cerclage wires, and the proximal aspect of the femur should also be protected with cerclage wires over the mesh. As in any other complex femoral revision procedure, torsional forces in the supracondylar zone should be avoided, especially during trial or stem reduction maneuvers.Always utilize a bone graft mixed with antibiotic powder.Retrograde cementation must be done with cement that is in a more liquid state than in primary total hip arthroplasty. PO = postoperativePMMA = polymethyl methacrylateIV = intravenousLMWH = low molecular weight heparinDVT/EP = deep vein thrombosis and extended prophylaxis.

Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Osteoarthrosis Secondary to Legg-Calvé-Perthes Disease Compared with Primary Osteoarthrosis: A Case-control Study.

Objective To perform a comparative clinical, functional and radiographic evaluation of total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed with a cementless prosthesis in cases of osteoarthrosis secondary to Legg-Calvé-Perthes Disease (LCPD) and in cases of primary osteoarthrosis. Methods In the present case-control study, we reviewed medical records of patients admitted to a university hospital between 2008 and 2015 to undergo THA due to LCPD sequelae and compared them with a control group of patients who underwent the same surgery due to primary hip osteoarthrosis. We recruited patients for clinical, functional, and radiographic analysis and we compared the evaluations in the immediate postoperative period and at the last follow-up visit, considering surgical time, size of prosthetic components, and complications. Results We compared 22 patients in the study group (25 hips) with 22 patients (25 hips) in the control group, all of whom had undergone THA with the same cementless prosthesis. There was greater functional impairment in the group of patients with LCPD sequelae ( p = 0.002). There were 4 intraoperative femoral periprosthetic fractures in the LCPD group and none in the primary osteoarthrosis group ( p = 0.050). Conclusions There is an increased risk of intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture and worse clinical-functional results in patients undergoing cementless THA due to osteoarthrosis secondary to LCPD sequelae than in those who have undergone the same surgery due to primary hip osteoarthrosis.

Pneumatic femoral broaching in direct anterior approach hip arthroplasty

AimThe aim of this study is to report the safety and efficacy of the Woodpecker pneumatic broaching system in direct anterior hip arthroplasty.Methods649 primary elective anterior bikini total hip arthroplasties...

Preliminary outcomes of the cementless UNITED hip system for primary total hip arthroplasty at a minimum 2-year follow-up.

This study aimed to report the initial results of the cementless UNITED hip system in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a minimum follow-up of 2years. We retrospectively studied a consecutive series of 203 cementless THAs in 180 patients operated between 2015-2017. We included 89 female and 91 male patients with a mean age of 67 (28 to 89) years. The mean follow-up was 40 (29 to 62) months. Clinical outcome scores and radiographs were measured. Survival was calculated defining failure as the need for any further femoral or acetabular revision, irrespective of the reason. No femoral component loosening was detected. One patient had a Vancouver-B1 intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture treated with implant retention and cerclage wires. Two acetabular components were revised for aseptic loosening. Three patients suffered an acute infection treated with debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention. The mean Merle d'Aubigné et Postel scores improved from 13 (4 to 16) points preoperatively to 17 (12 to 18) points at the latest follow-up (p < 0.001). At a mean time of 40months of follow-up, the survival was 99% and 100% for the acetabular and the femoral components, respectively. This cementless design showed excellent preliminary outcomes in terms of fixation and patient satisfaction, comparable to that of other well-known similar systems.

Midterm Results of Primary Exeter Cemented Stem in a Select Patient Population.

Most North American surgeons predominantly use uncemented stems in primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) and reserve cemented stems for selected older patients and those with poor bone quality. However, data on this "selective use" strategy for cemented stems in the population at risk for periprosthetic fracture and implant loosening are limited. The purpose of this study was to describe implant survivorship, complications, and radiographic results of a specific collarless, polished, tapered cemented stem (Exeter; Stryker) used selectively in a predominantly elderly population undergoing primary THA. We identified 386 patients who underwent a total of 423 primary THAs with selectively utilized Exeter stems for the treatment of osteoarthritis between 2006 and 2017. In the same time period, 11,010 primary THAs were performed with uncemented stems and 961 with non-Exeter cemented stems. The mean patient age was 77 years, 71% were female, and the mean body mass index was 29 kg/m2. Competing risk analysis accounting for death was utilized to determine cumulative incidences of revision and reoperation. The mean follow-up was 5 years (range, 2 to 12 years). The 10-year cumulative incidence of any femoral component revision in this patient cohort was 4%, with 10 stems revised at the time of the latest follow-up. There were no intraoperative femoral fractures. The indications for revision were postoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture (n = 6), dislocation (n = 3), and infection (n = 1). There were no revisions for femoral loosening. The 10-year cumulative incidence of reoperation was 10%. The 10-year cumulative incidence of Vancouver B periprosthetic femoral fracture was 2%. Radiographically, there were no cases of aseptic loosening or osteolysis. There was a significant improvement in median Harris hip score, from 53 preoperatively to 92 at a mean follow-up of 5 years (p < 0.001). The strategy of selectively utilizing a collarless, polished, tapered cemented stem produced a low (4%) cumulative incidence of stem revision at 10 years postoperatively and resulted in no cases of aseptic loosening. The use of the Exeter stem did not eliminate postoperative femoral fractures in this predominantly elderly, female patient population. Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Short uncemented femoral component for hip revision: prognosis and risk factors associated with failure

BackgroundThe application of short femoral stems is partially restricted in revision surgery. This study will demonstrate the therapeutic effect and unsuitable situation for short stem revision.MethodsDemographic characteristics of all patients were recorded in detail (Table 1). Anteroposterior view radiographic examinations of proximal femur are necessary before and after the operation for patients. The primary outcome of interest was the survival rate of the femoral stem at the final follow-up. Risk factors for failure were also investigated. The secondary outcomes of interest included the Harris hip score, excellent to good rate and incidence of complications. The Mann–Whitney U test was performed for comparisons between continuous variables. The chi-square test was performed for comparisons between categorical variables. Cox regression analysis was used to assess the association between potential risk factors and the failure of revision surgery.ResultsA total of 381 patients with short stems were retrospectively reviewed. There were 188 males and 193 females. The average age and body mass index before revision surgery were 58.85 ± 13.46 years and 23.72 ± 3.40 kg/m2, respectively. The mid-term survival rate of the short femoral component was 94.23%. The prognosis and complications of patients between the two groups were compared. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the Harris score, complication incidence or survival rate of the femoral component. The strongest risk factor in this study was intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture during revision surgery (HR = 5.477, 95% CI = 2.156–13.913).ConclusionThree risk factors for failure were identified: ageing, osteoporosis and intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture during revision surgery. Therefore, a short femoral stem should be implanted in patients with these risk factors with additional caution.

Intraoperative Complications and Early Return to the Operating Room in Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed Through the Direct Anterior and Posterior Approaches. An Institutional Experience of Surgeons After Their Learning Curve

BackgroundProponents of the direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) claim a faster recovery, whereas critics claim an increased risk of early femoral complications. This study analyzed intraoperative and postoperative complications requiring reoperation within one year after THA through the DAA and posterior approach (PA). MethodsA total of 2348 elective, unilateral DAA THAs in patients with osteoarthritis performed between 2016 and 2019 were matched 1:1 for age (±5 years), gender, body mass index (±5), and femoral fixation with 2348 patients who underwent PA THA during the same period. Mixed-effects logistic regression was used. Odds ratios were reported for the occurrence of intraoperative femoral fracture, postoperative femoral fracture, infection, dislocation, and other etiologies requiring reoperation within one year. ResultsIntraoperative femoral fracture occurred in 12 DAA (0.5%) and 14 PA (0.6%) patients. Twenty-five patients (1.06%) in the DAA and 28 (1.19%) in the PA group underwent reoperation within the first year. Reoperations were due to periprosthetic fracture (40%), infection (28%), dislocation (23%), and other (9%). Regression analysis revealed no difference in intraoperative femoral fracture (odds ratio (OR): 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.40-1.86, P = .69), postoperative femoral fracture (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.47-2.60, P = .83), infection (OR: 1.50, 95% CI: 0.53-5.23, P = .44), or reoperation within one year for other reasons (OR: 1.50, 95% CI: 0.25-9.00, P = .65). DAA had fewer dislocations requiring reoperation (OR: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.04-0.91, P = .02). ConclusionThis comparative study did not find differences in intraoperative or postoperative fracture or infection between DAA and PA. DAA was associated with a lower likelihood of reoperation for dislocation within one year of surgery.

Single-stage total knee arthroplasty and femoral osteotomy for osteoarthritis with severe supracondylar deformity

BackgroundKnee osteoarthritis associated with extra-articular deformity (EAD) can confront the arthroplasty surgeons with challenges of bone resection and soft tissue balancing. The aim of this study was to describe a single-stage procedure associating corrective osteotomy with total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and to determine the outcome at mid- to long-term follow-up.MethodsA total of seven patients (seven knees) with knee osteoarthritis and supracondylar deformity were included in this study. Six patients were female, and one was male, with the median age of 62 years (range, 37-76 years). All patients were treated with single-stage TKA and femoral osteotomy. Osteotomy was fixed with long cemented stem. Hospital of Special Surgery (HSS) scores, collateral ligament laxity, and range of motion (ROM) were clinically evaluated preoperatively and at each follow-up. Radiographic parameters including the mechanical axis deviation (MAD), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), mechanical proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), and joint line congruence angle (JLCA) were also measured. The occurrence of perioperative complications was recorded.ResultsThe median follow-up time was 91 months (range, 38-104 months). At the last follow-up, all components were stable and no patients required revision. Nonunion of the osteotomy occurred in one patient. In all patients, the lower limb mechanical alignment improved greatly. The mean angle of MAD was restored from 10.49±6.05 cm preoperatively to 1.11±4.97 cm postoperatively. The 90° mLDFA was almost acquired in all cases, with the postoperative value of 90.79±2.40°. After operation, the mMPTA improved from 84.18±6.13° to 91.33±3.13°. The JLCA changed from 2.94±1.61° to −0.71±3.50°. The median HSS score improved from 45 (range, 34-56) preoperatively to 90 (range, 82-97) postoperatively, with the outcome of all patients rated good to excellent. The median ROM improved from 70° (range 0–110°) preoperatively to 105° (range 90–125°) postoperatively. No instability of knee joint was observed. Complications included an intraoperative split fracture of distal femur and one case of wound exudation resulting from fat liquefaction.ConclusionsFor knee osteoarthritis with femoral supracondylar deformity, single-stage TKA and corrective osteotomy was feasible but technically demanding. The use of long cemented stem for osteotomy fixation can provide reliable rotational control of the bone segments.

Bifocal femoral lengthening with intramedullary magnetic lengthening nail following osteotomy propagation

Techniques in limb lengthening have evolved since the early 1900s. The external fixation using an Ilizarov frame was the current gold standard. Recently, intramedullary devices have been utilized in limb lengthening procedures to avoid complications related to the bulky external fixators. Here, we present the case of a 41-year-old female with long-term limb length discrepancy (LLD) corrected with magnetically driven intramedullary nailing. An intraoperative fracture of the distal femur led to bifocal lengthening at both the osteotomy site and the fracture site. This case cautioned the orthopedic surgeons involved in limb lengthening surgery about potential complications that can happen during the procedure. It demonstrated the possible efficacy of bifocal lengthening procedures using a magnetically driven intramedullary nail in the setting of complex LLD.

One-Stage Total Hip Arthroplasty with Modular S-ROM Stem for Patients with Bilateral Crowe Type IV Developmental Dysplasia.

ObjectiveThe aim of the present paper was to evaluate the results of one‐stage total hip arthroplasty (THA) for patients with bilateral Crowe type IV developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).MethodsData for 58 patients (116 hips) with bilateral Crowe type IV DDH who had one‐stage THA performed by the same surgeon during the period of April 2008 to February 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The mean age of the patients was 37.3 years; 5 were men and 53 were women. All patients underwent THA through the posterolateral approach using the Pinnacle acetabular cup, a ceramic‐on‐ceramic bearing, and the modular S‐ROM stem. Subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy was performed on 86/116 hips. Intraoperative conditions were recorded. Radiographic and functional outcomes were evaluated, and complications were recorded.ResultsAll patients were followed up for an average of 71.3 ± 37.6 months (range, 12–140). The mean operative time was 276.5 ± 57.9 min (range, 175–540). The mean intraoperative blood loss was 933.6 ± 400.8 mL (range, 300–2000). The mean transfusion requirement was 1778 ± 798.0 mL (range, 575–4550). The mean length of hospital stay was 8.6 ± 3.7 days (range, 5–22). At the final follow‐up, no loosening of acetabular and femoral components was observed. No osteolysis and heterotopic ossification occurred. The mean Harris hip scores were improved from 55.4 ± 14.3 preoperatively to 91.3 ± 4.2 postoperatively (P < 0.001) In terms of complications, no perioperative deaths were recorded. Deep vein thrombosis occurred in 1 hip, with no pulmonary embolism. Intraoperative femur fracture occurred in 3 hips, nerve injury in 1 hip, and leg length discrepancy in 1 patient. Postoperative dislocation occurred in 5 hips and nonunion in 1 hip.ConclusionOur data demonstrated that one‐stage bilateral THA for bilateral Crowe type IV DDH is feasible and can effectively restore hip function.

Intraoperative Periprosthetic Fractures in Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease at King Fahad Hospital Hofuf: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Background Patients with avascular necrosis related to sickle cell disease (SCD) can be severely disabled by the severe degenerative changes of their hip. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains the only surgical option for some of these patients. Total hip arthroplasty can be a challenging procedure, and SCD patients demonstrate high percentages of medical, intraoperative, and postoperative complications and implant failure. Furthermore, the need for THA following avascular necrosis in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia is high, and the subsequent risk of periprosthetic fracture is prevalent. Therefore, it is crucial to conduct such a study.Aim of the studyThis cross-sectional retrospective study aimed to assess the prevalence and associated risk factors for periprosthetic fractures during total hip arthroplasty in sickle cell disease patients at King Fahad Hospital Hofuf, Saudi Arabia.MethodsWe collected the data of all SCD patients who had undergone THA during the study period, January 2015 to September 2020. Forty-nine SCD patients who had undergone THA during the study period were included. Patients who had undergone hip hemiarthroplasty, postoperative fractures, or had an indication of THA other than avascular necrosis were excluded. Surgeon factors, assistant factors, and surgical technique were also excluded. We then analyzed the data according to gender, age, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, implant fixation type, avascular necrosis stage, proximal femoral morphology, Vancouver classification type, sickle cell type, preoperative hemoglobin (Hb) level, and the risk of periprosthetic fractures. Descriptive statistics were presented using frequency and percentages for categorical variables, and continuous variables were summarized using means ± standard deviations. Independent t-tests and chi-square tests were used to test for associations between categorical variables. At 0.05, the significance level was set.Results Of the patients, 32.7% were male and 67.3% were female. 32.7% of the patients had advanced degenerative changes due to avascular necrosis. Among the patients, 20.4% had an intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture, 90% had a Vancouver classification class A, and 10% had a Vancouver classification class B1. According to Dorr classification, 75.5% were classified as Dorr A and 24.5% as Dorr B. Of the patients, 48 had an uncemented implant, and only 1 had cemented. The mean perioperative Hb was 9.02 + 2.02, with a minimum of 6 and a maximum of 14. No significant associations were found between the incidence of intraoperative femoral fracture and the demographic variables and the operative profile characteristics. However, a significantly higher rate of fracture was observed in patients operated on the right side compared to patients operated on the left side.ConclusionThe prevalence of periprosthetic intraoperative fracture among SCD patients at King Fahad Hospital Hofuf was 20.4% during the study period. Even with adequate perioperative management, orthopedic surgeons must be prepared to deal with high rates of intraoperative fracture. No significant association was found between the incidence of intraoperative femoral fracture in SCD patients and the demographic variables and the operative profiles. However, a significantly higher rate of fracture was observed in patients operated on the right side compared to patients operated on the left side.

Contemporary Mortality Rate and Outcomes in Nonagenarians Undergoing Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundNonagenarians (90-99 years) have experienced the fastest percent growth in primary THA utilization recently. However, there are limited data on this population. This study aimed to determine the mortality rate, implant survivorship, clinical outcomes, and complications of primary THAs in nonagenarians. MethodsOur institutional total joint registry was used to identify 144 nonagenarians who underwent 149 primary THAs for osteoarthritis only between 1997 and 2017. The mean age was 92 years, with 63% being female. Mortality, revision, and reoperation were assessed using cumulative incidence with death as a competing risk and Cox regression methods. Clinical outcomes were assessed using Harris hip scores (HHSs). Cemented femoral components were used in 68%. The mean follow-up was 4 years. ResultsThe mortality rates were 6%, 8%, 14%, and 49% at 90 days, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years, respectively. The 5-year cumulative incidences of any revision and reoperation were 1% and 4%, respectively. The mean HHS improved significantly from 48 preoperatively to 76 at 5 years (P < .001). The 5-year cumulative incidence of any complication was 69%, with the most common being periprosthetic femur fracture (7) intraoperatively, delirium (25) early postoperatively, and periprosthetic femur fracture (10) later postoperatively. Uncemented stem fixation was associated with a higher risk for intraoperative femur fracture (Hazard ratio 5, P = .04) but not with a higher 5-year periprosthetic postoperative femur fracture risk (P = .19). ConclusionNonagenarians undergoing primary THA had substantial mortality rates at 90 days (6%) and 1 year (8%). While the cumulative incidence of any revision and reoperations were low at 5 years, the high complication rate is mostly due to periprosthetic fractures. Level of evidenceLevel IV, retrospective cohort.