Intraoperative Femoral Fracture Research Articles

What features of stem increase the risk of intraoperative femoral fracture during cementless primary hip arthroplasty?

Cementless fixation has become increasingly popular in hip arthroplasty due to its shorter operation time, easier technique, biologic fixation, and avoidance of bone cement implantation syndrome compared to cemented fixation. However, intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture (IOPFx) is a disconcerting complication during cementless hip arthroplasty. Our purpose was to identify the features of cementless stem that increase the risk of IOPFx during primary hip arthroplasty. We retrospectively reviewed all 4806 hip arthroplasties that was performed in a single institution from May 2003 to December 2020. Age at the index arthroplasty, sex, body mass index, physical status, ambulatory function, side of the operation, operational history, cause of the index arthroplasty, type of arthroplasty, surgical approach, surgeon, implant information, and events during the operation were investigated. The shoulder geometry and length of stem were also reviewed. The event of interest was narrowed down to IOPFx among various records of intraoperative events. We found IOPFx of 2.6% among all the hips operated with cementless stem. In the multivariable analysis, female (OR = 1.52), childhood hip disease (OR = 2.30), stove-pipe femur (OR = 2.43), combined approach (OR = 2.60), and standard length of stem (OR = 1.59) were found to be significant risk factors of IOPFx. In conclusion, a stem with a standard length is significantly associated with risk of IOPFx compared to a shortened stem. These findings highlight the importance of careful consideration in terms of the risk of IOPFx when standard length cementless stem is chosen.

Impact of Intraoperative Femoral Fractures During Cemented Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures

BackgroundThere have been several studies on intraoperative femoral fractures (IFFs) during primary total hip arthroplasty, but it is not well understood how this complication affects the patient population undergoing cemented hemiarthroplasty. This study aimed to analyze the impact of IFFs sustained during cemented hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures. MethodsA retrospective review was conducted of all patients who were treated for Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association 31B fractures with cemented hemiarthroplasty between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2021, at a single academic level 1 trauma center. An initial cohort was constructed of all patients who sustained an IFF during their surgery, yielding 31 patients after excluding those who sustained a pathologic fracture or had incomplete data. These patients were matched 1:2 on age, sex, and body mass index to patients in a control cohort. The primary outcome measure was implant failure. Secondary outcome measures included complications, all-cause mortality, and radiographic outcomes (subsidence, femoral component loosening, acetabular wear, and heterotopic ossification) postoperatively. ResultsSubsequent implant revision was required in 3.2% (n = 1) of patients who sustained an IFF and 1.6% (n = 1) of patients who did not. After adjusting for comorbidities, there was no observed excess risk of implant failure in the fracture cohort when compared to the control cohort (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.30, P = 0.740). There was no observed excess risk of morbidity (HR = 0.69, P = 0.621) or all-cause mortality (HR = 0.23, P = 0.330). Radiographic outcomes also did not significantly differ between the 2 cohorts (P > 0.05). ConclusionsIntraoperative fractures during cemented hemiarthroplasty do not contribute to an increased risk of secondary surgery, morbidity, or mortality after surgery. They also do not adversely affect radiographic outcomes postoperatively. Level of EvidenceLevel III, Retrospective Comparative Study.

Total Hip Arthroplasty Combined with Proximal Femoral Reconstruction Effectively Treats Severe Hip Deformities: A Novel Osteotomy Technique.

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) combined with proximal femoral reconstruction is a novel osteotomy technique developed to address severe hip deformities. There is a paucity of robust clinical and radiological evidence regarding the outcomes of this novel osteotomy technique. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of THA combined with proximal femoral reconstruction during the early follow-up. This is a retrospective case series of 63 hips who underwent THA combined with proximal femoral reconstruction at a single institution between January 2020 and July 2023. The mean age of patients was 39.6 ± 12.6 years. The mean follow-up was 25.6 ± 3.8 months. Surgical characteristics and perioperative variables were evaluated to assess the efficacy of this technique. Harris hip score (HHS) was utilized to evaluate hip function. Leg length discrepancy (LLD) was evaluated in X-ray. The incidence of major adverse events including deep vein thrombosis (DVT), osteolysis, nonunion of the osteotomy, intraoperative femoral fracture, and infection was also evaluated. Paired-samples t-test was used to compare preoperative and postoperative HHS and LLD. The mean operative time was 125.1 min. The mean size of the acetabular components used was 45.2 mm, and the stem size was 7.5. The primary friction interface was ceramic-on-ceramic, accounting for 92.1% of cases. The average length of hospital stay was 8.5 days. The mean cost of treatment was 46,296.0 Yuan. There was a significant improvement in postoperative HHS (p < 0.001) and LLD (p < 0.001) compared to preoperative values. The incidence of deep venous thrombosis was 4.8%; osteolysis rates for the cup and stem were 4.8% and 6.4%, respectively. The non-union and dislocation rates were 1.6% and 3.2%, respectively. There was no incidence of postoperative infection. The novel osteotomy surgical procedure yields reliable and impressive clinical and radiological outcomes, with minimal complications. We advocate for its use in complex primary THA cases involving severe proximal femoral deformities.

Anterior Minimally Invasive Approach (AMIS) for Total Hip Arthroplasty: Analysis of the First 1000 Consecutive Patients Operated at a High Volume Center.

(1) Background: Direct anterior approach (DAA) has recently acquired popularity through improvements such as the anterior minimally invasive surgical technique (AMIS). This retrospective study examines the first 1000 consecutive THAs performed utilizing the AMIS approach in a high-volume center between 2012 and 2017. (2) Methods: 1000 consecutive THAs performed at a single institution utilizing the AMIS approach were retrospectively analyzed with a minimum five-year follow-up. Full evaluation of demographic information, clinical parameters, intraoperative complications, and radiological examinations are reported. (3) Results: Overall complication rate was 9.4% (94/1000), including 8 dislocations, 57 femoral-cutaneous nerve injuries, 12 intraoperative femoral fractures, 9 infections and 8 leg length discrepancy. Implant survival rates were 98.5% at 1 year, 97.5% at 3 years, 97% at 5 years, and 95.3% at 7 years. Causes of failure included periprosthetic fractures (0.8%), implant dislocations (0.6%), septic loosening (0.5%), aseptic mobilizations (0.2%), and symptomatic limb length discrepancies (0.2%). (4) Conclusions: Controversies persist around the direct anterior approach (DAA) for THA, primarily regarding the increased complications rate during the learning curve. However, this study advocates for widespread adoption of the DAA approach. The results demonstrate acceptable complication rates and remarkable functional outcomes, affirming its viability in the broader orthopedic patient population.

Is step-cut shortening osteotomy a better choice than transverse osteotomy for total hip arthroplasty for Crowe type III-IV hip dysplasia?

IntroductionTotal hip arthroplasty for developmental hip dysplasia is a challenging surgery due to anatomic abnormalities. Crowe III and Crowe IV hip dysplasia generally necessitates a subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy. Transverse and step-cut osteotomy are the most common procedures for shortening of femur although there is still no consensus which one is a superior method. The objective of this study was to demonstrate whether transverse or step-cut osteotomy is superior in hips who undergo arthroplasty for high riding hip dysplasia. HypothesisOur hypothesis was that higher rates of union would be achieved in patients with Crowe III-IV hip dysplasia when the step-cut osteotomy was performed compared to transverse osteotomies. Material and methodsA total of 99 hips from 90 patients (9 bilateral, 81 unilateral; 79 female, 11 male), each with a minimum follow-up duration of two years, were included in this study. The hips were classified as Crowe III (n=16) or IV (n=83). All hips were implanted cementless. Transverse or step-cut osteotomy was chosen for osteotomy type. The clinical and functional outcomes were assessed using the Harris Hip Score (HHS), limb length discrepancy (LLD), and limping. The complications and management of these were noted. The union rates were compared between osteotomy types. ResultsThe mean age at surgery was 48.8 (range, 21–79 years). The follow-up period was 64.3 months in average (range, 24 to 192 months). The mean Harris Hip Score before surgery was 35.6 (range, 18–50), and increased to 88.1 (range, 61–98) points at the most recent follow-up. The preoperative leg length discrepancy (LLD) measured 5.3cm (with a range of 3 to 6.8), while the postoperative LLD reduced to 0.8cm (with a range of 0 to 1.6). There were a total of 38 complications in 35 patients out of 99 cases, resulting in a complication rate of 38.4%. The most frequent complication observed was intraoperative femoral fractures, occurring in 13 cases. Residual limping was seen in 73.7% of all. Step-cut osteotomy was performed in 64 hips (35 CDH stem [Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA], 29 Wagner Cone stem [Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA]) and, transverse in 35 hips (22 CDH, 13 Wagner Cone). Six hips had nonunion problem and all of them were operated with a step-cut osteotomy (z-score: –7.12 and p<0.00001, Mann-Whitney U Test). ConclusionTransverse osteotomy may be a better option while performing a shortening subtrochanteric level osteotomy for total hip arthroplasty for Crowe III-IV hips. Level of evidenceLevel III; observational retrospective cohort study.

Cementless Primary Stems in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review.

Cementless primary stems in revision hip arthroplasties may be conservative options to preserve bone stock and provide adequate reconstruction of the hip biomechanics. However, there is still little evidence about indications, limitations, and outcomes. This narrative review showed that conventional standard stems were adopted in different revision settings, up to Paprosky IIIA grade bone defects. In cases of acceptable metaphyseal bone stock, when a scratch fit of at least 4 cm can be achieved, a conventional cementless stem may be an adequate solution. Mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes and survival rates were similar to long revision stems, whereas complications, surgical time, and costs were lower among conventional stems. However, unsuitable contexts for conventional stems included canal diameters larger than 18 mm and failed revision stems with cortical weakening. Even short stems can be considered in revisions, in order to preserve bone stock and stay proximal to femoral remodeling zones and bone/cement plugs. Short stems were successfully adopted up to Paprosky IIIA bone defects, achieving mid-term survival rates not inferior to long revision stems. Ageing, osteoporosis, and intraoperative femoral fractures were the main negative prognostic factors. In very select cases, a downsizing technique (from longer to shorter stems) may be adopted to simplify the procedure and reduce complications.

Total Hip Arthroplasty with Extra-small Femoral Stems in Extremely Hypoplastic Femurs: A Case-Series Study.

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with hypoplastic femurs presents a significant challenge to orthopedic surgeons due to the limited space available for implant placement. Therefore, the extra-small femoral stems have been proposed as a solution to this problem, but there are limited data on the outcomes. We aimed to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes of THA in patients with extremely hypoplastic femurs using the Bencox CM stem (Corentec), an extra-small femoral stem. We included 6 hips from 4 patients. The mean age of the patients was 41.2 years (range, 19.6-60.4 years). The mean height was 135.1 cm (range, 113.6-150.0 cm) with a mean body mass index of 25.7 kg/m2 (range, 21.3-31.1 kg/m2). The diagnoses for THA were sequelae of septic arthritis in childhood, pseudoachondroplasia, spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia, and juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Preoperative computed tomography scans were conducted to assess the extent of proximal femoral hypoplasia. The clinical outcomes were assessed using the modified Harris Hip Score, while the radiological outcomes were evaluated using radiographs. The mean follow-up was 2.3 years (range, 1.0-5.9 years). The average modified Harris Hip Score improved to 88.8 at the final follow-up. Intraoperative femoral fractures occurred in 2 cases (33.3%). During the follow-up, 1 stem underwent varus tilting from postoperative 6 weeks to 6 months without subsidence. Otherwise, all stems showed good osteointegration at the latest follow-up. No hip dislocations, periprosthetic joint infection, or loosening of the prosthesis occurred. The use of extra-small femoral stems in THA for extremely hypoplastic femurs can provide reasonable clinical and radiological outcomes with minimal complications. We suggest that this femoral stem could be a viable option for patients with extremely hypoplastic femurs.

An Atypical Iatrogenic Fracture Pattern: A New Modification of Mallory Classification for Intraoperative Femoral Fracture

An Atypical Iatrogenic Fracture Pattern: A New Modification of Mallory Classification for Intraoperative Femoral Fracture

Resection of the femoral neck: a new technique for the treatment of mallory type I intraoperative femoral fracture during total hip arthroplasty

Intraoperative femoral fracture is a common complication during cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA). Cerclage wiring has been used for this type of fractures to attain intraoperative stability of the femoral stem. We designed a new technique to treat Mallory type 1 intraoperative femoral fractures. We excised fractured femoral neck fragment and without additional fixation and lightly tapped down the femoral stem to obtain a tight contact to the femoral cortex at the subtrochanteric level. In this case series, we described this technique and reported its outcomes. From January 2015 to December 2017, 600 cementless THAs (557 patients) were done with use of a proximally coated tapered stem design at our department. Among the 600 THAs, Mallory type 1 intraoperative femoral fracture occurred in 8 hips (8 patients), and all of them were treated with the excision of the fractured femoral neck. Mean age of the 8 patients was 58.1 years (range, 30.4 to 81.3 years) at the time of surgery. We report the results of this new technique at postoperative 2 to 5 years (mean, 3.4 years). All stems were placed in the neutral position. There was no revision and no stem showed any evidence of subsidence or loosening during the follow-up. The mean Harris hip score was 85.9 points at the latest follow-up. We recommend to use the femoral neck excision technique for the treatment of Mallory type 1 intraoperative femoral fractures.

Resection of the femoral neck: a new technique for the treatment of mallory type I intraoperative femoral fracture during total hip arthroplasty.

Intraoperative femoral fracture is a common complication during cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA). Cerclage wiring has been used for this type of fractures to attain intraoperative stability of the femoral stem. We designed a new technique to treat Mallory type 1 intraoperative femoral fractures. We excised fractured femoral neck fragment and without additional fixation and lightly tapped down the femoral stem to obtain a tight contact to the femoral cortex at the subtrochanteric level. In this case series, we described this technique and reported its outcomes. From January 2015 to December 2017, 600 cementless THAs (557 patients) were done with use of a proximally coated tapered stem design at our department. Among the 600 THAs, Mallory type 1 intraoperative femoral fracture occurred in 8 hips (8 patients), and all of them were treated with the excision of the fractured femoral neck. Mean age of the 8 patients was 58.1 years (range, 30.4 to 81.3 years) at the time of surgery. We report the results of this new technique at postoperative 2 to 5 years (mean, 3.4 years). All stems were placed in the neutral position. There was no revision and no stem showed any evidence of subsidence or loosening during the follow-up. The mean Harris hip score was 85.9 points at the latest follow-up. We recommend to use the femoral neck excision technique for the treatment of Mallory type 1 intraoperative femoral fractures.

Both Acetabular and Femoral Reconstructions With Impaction Bone Grafting in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Case Series and Literature Review

BackgroundExtensive bone loss on femur and acetabulum posed a big challenge to orthopedists in total hip revision surgeries. Impaction bone grafting (IBG) as a valuable bone preservation technique could effectively address this problem. Either IBG revision on the femoral or acetabular side was well studied, while its use on both sides in one operation was not. The aim of this study is to present the outcomes of IBG on both femoral and acetabular sides at first-time hip revision. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 8 patients (mean follow-up of 5.8 years) undergoing first-time revision with IBG on both acetabular and femoral sides at our institution. The Paprosky classification system was used to classify bone defects. Freeze-dried allografts and cemented prostheses were used in all patients. Postoperative complications and rerevision rates were reported. ResultsFive patients presented a Paprosky type IIC acetabular defect, 3 with a type IIIB, IIIA, and IIC defect, respectively. Three patients presented with a type IV femoral defect, 3 with a type IIIB defect, and 2 with a type II defect. Two patients developed complications, while one had an intraoperative femoral fracture and one had delayed wound healing. At the latest follow-up, no patient had rerevisions or operations related to the prosthesis. ConclusionsIBG in combination with cemented prosthesis is a profitable biological reconstruction revision technique that could provide satisfying midterm outcomes. We first propose the use of blood clots mixed with bone grafts for potential bone incorporation enhancement, while its specific effects need to be verified in further studies.

Modified Anterolateral Minimally Invasive Surgery (ALMIS) for Total Hip Replacement: Anatomical Considerations, Range of Motion and Clinical Outcomes.

Background and Objectives: In the modified anterolateral minimally invasive surgery (ALMIS) for total hip arthroplasty (THA), the intermuscular plane between the tensor fasciae latae and the gluteus maximus (GM) is exposed, while the anterior ¼ of the GM is detached. There are scarce data regarding this surgical approach. The purpose of the present study is to thoroughly describe this approach, encompassing the anatomical background, and to present the results of a retrospective two-center study of 603 patients. Materials and Methods: The present study includes a two-center retrospective observational cohort of 603 patients undergoing the ALMIS technique with minimum 5-year follow-up. Demographics were recorded, while range of motion (ROM) of the hip joint and the Harris Hip Score (HHS) were evaluated preoperatively, at 1, 3 and 12 months postoperatively and at the final follow-up (>5 years). Surgery-related complications were also recorded. Results: The studied population's mean age was 69.4 years, while most of them were females (397; 65.8%). The mean follow-up was 6.9 years. The median HHS at the 1-month follow-up was 74, compared to the 47 preoperatively (p-value < 0.0001). At the final follow-up, median HHS was 94. At the 1-month follow-up, mean adduction was 19.9° (compared to 15.4° preoperatively; p < 0.0001), mean abduction 24.3° (18.2° preoperatively; p < 0.0001), mean flexion 107.8° (79.1° preoperatively; p < 0.0001), mean external rotation 20.1° (12.1° preoperatively; p < 0.0001) and mean internal rotation 15.3° (7.2° preoperatively; p < 0.0001). ROM further improved until the final follow-up; mean adduction reached 22°, mean abduction 27.1°, mean flexion 119.8°, mean external rotation 24.4° and mean internal rotation 19.7°. Regarding complications, 1.3% of the sample suffered anterior traumatic dislocation, in 1.8% an intraoperative femoral fracture occurred, while 1.2% suffered periprosthetic joint infection. Conclusions: The modified ALMIS technique exhibited excellent clinical outcomes at short-, mid- and long-term follow-up, by significantly improving hip ROM and the HHS. Careful utilization of this technique, after adequate training, should yield favorable outcomes, while minimal major complications should be expected.

The Watson Extraction System for removal of well-fixed femoral stems: A retrospective review of 10 cases

BackgroundRevision of well-fixed cementless femoral stems is a challenging and time-consuming aspect of revision hip arthroplasty. The Watson Extraction System (WES) is a novel, size-specific 3-D fabricated instrument that mimics the outer geometry of the implanted femoral stem. The device acts to cut circumferentially around the stem as it is impacted into place, effectively disrupting the bone-implant interface. MethodsThis is a retrospective review assessing the experience of 3 fellowship-trained adult reconstruction surgeons who used the WES to extract 10 well-fixed femoral stems during rTHA between 11/7/2020 and 11/7/2022. Outcomes and measures included: ability to remove the stem without a femoral osteotomy, femoral stem extraction time, incidence of femoral fracture, stem type used for reconstruction, blood loss, total surgical time, post-operative complications. ResultsNo femoral osteotomies were required. The mean time for stem extraction was 7 min (range, 2–13), and there were 2 (20%) intra-operative femoral fractures. The stem type utilized for reconstruction included: 4 (40%) modular, tapered style stems, 3 (30%) antibiotic spacers, 2 (20%) primary style stems, and 1 (10%) ream and broach proximally porous stem. The mean blood loss was 425 ml (range, 200–800), total surgical time was 160 min (range, 107–232), and duration of follow-up was 7 months (range, 2–22 months). ConclusionThe WES may mitigate the need for femoral osteotomy, reduce femoral stem extraction and overall intraoperative time, and decrease blood loss in rTHA. Further, reduced bone loss with use of this device may permit final reconstruction with a primary style stem.

Intraoperative complications during total hip arthroplasty: a very uncommon intraoperative femur fracture occurred in a malnourished osteoporotic patient.

Intraoperative femoral fracture is a rare but growing complication of primary total hip arthroplasty. We aimed to present an uncommon related case, assessing also the role of malnutrition and osteoporosis. We discuss the case of a 49 years old male patient, malnourished and osteoporotic, with an intertrochanteric, multifragmentary, inveterate fracture, that happened three months before. During the prosthetic surgery, a supracondylar fracture occurred. We synthesized it with a 13 holes LISS plate, 7 distal screws and 3 proximal cerclage wires. The leg was immobilized to 0° for 3 weeks and the load forbidden for 3 months. Calcium, Albumine, Total Proteins, Osteocalcin and Vitamin-D levels were below the normal range. Teriparatide was administered for 6 months. Global investigation of the patient's nutritional status is recommended before joint replacement and preoperative planning is mandatory to choose the adequate implant. Osteoanabolic therapy could be advisable to favor fracture healing.

Periprosthetic Occult Femoral Fracture: An Unknown Side Effect of Press-Fit Fixation in Primary Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty.

The objectives of this study were to examine the prevalence and risk factors for development of periprosthetic occult femoral fractures during primary cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) and to assess the clinical consequences of these fractures. A total of 199 hips were examined. Periprosthetic occult femoral fractures were defined as fractures not detected intraoperatively and on postoperative radiographs, but only observed on postoperative computed tomography (CT). Clinical, surgical, and radiographic analysis of variables was performed for identification of risk factors for periprosthetic occult femoral fractures. A comparison of stem subsidence, stem alignment, and thigh pain between the occult fracture group and the non-fracture group was also performed. Periprosthetic occult femoral fractures were detected during the operation in 21 (10.6%) of 199 hips. Of eight hips with periprosthetic occult femoral fractures that were detected around the lesser trochanter, concurrent periprosthetic occult femoral fractures located at different levels were detected in six hips (75.0%). Only the female sex showed significant association with an increased risk of periprosthetic occult femoral fractures (odds ratio for males, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-1.01; P=0.04). A significant difference in the incidence of thigh pain was observed between the occult fracture group and the non-fracture group (P<0.05). Occurrence of periprosthetic occult femoral fractures is relatively common during primary THA using tapered wedge stems. We recommend CT referral for female patients who report unexplained early postoperative thigh pain or developed periprosthetic intraoperative femoral fractures around the lesser trochanter during primary THA using tapered wedge stems.

A PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTRE RANDOMIZED COMPARATIVE STUDY ASSESSING A NEW MORPHOMETRIC-DESIGNED STEM FOR TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY: BENCHMARKING AGAINST AN ESTABLISHED COMPARATOR

Clinical success of prostheses in joint arthroplasty is ultimately determined by survivorship and patient satisfaction. The purpose of this study was to compare (non-inferiority) a new morphometric designed stem for total hip arthroplasty (THA) against an established comparator.A prospective randomised multi-centre study of 144 primary cementless THA performed by nine experienced orthopaedic surgeons was completed (70 received a fully coated collarless tapered stem and 74 received a morphometric designed proximally coated tapered stem). PROMs and blood serum markers were assessed preoperatively and at intervals up to 2-years postoperatively. In addition, measures of femoral stem fit, fill and subsidence at 2-years post-operatively were measured from radiographs by three observers, with an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.918. A mixed effects model was employed to compare the two prosthesis over the study period. A p-value &lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant.Demographics, Dorr types and blood serum markers were similar between groups. Both stems demonstrated a significant improvement in PROMs between the pre- and post-operative measurements, with no difference at any timepoint (p &gt; 0.05). The fully coated tapered collarless femoral stem had a non-significantly higher intra-operative femoral fracture rate (5.8% vs 1.4%, p = 0.24), with all patients treated with cable fixation and partial weight bearing. The mean subsidence at 2-years was 2.5mm +/− 2.3mm for the morphometric stem and 2.4mm +/− 1.8mm for the fully coated tapered collarless femoral stem (p = 0.879). There was one outlier in each group with increased subsidence (fully coated tapered collarless femoral stem 6.9mm, morphometric wedge stem 7.4mm), with both patients reporting thigh pain at 2 years.When compared with an established stem, the newer designed morphometric wedge stem performed well with comparable radiological and PROM outcomes at 2 year follow up. Continued follow-up is required for long term benchmarking.

A PROSPECTIVE, MULTICENTRE RANDOMIZED COMPARATIVE STUDY ASSESSING A NEW MORPHOMETRIC-DESIGNED STEM FOR TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY: BENCHMARKING AGAINST AN ESTABLISHED COMPARATOR

Clinical success of prostheses in joint arthroplasty is ultimately determined by survivorship and patient satisfaction. The purpose of this study was to compare (non-inferiority) a new morphometric designed stem for total hip arthroplasty (THA) against an established comparator.A prospective randomised multi-centre study of 144 primary cementless THA performed by nine experienced orthopaedic surgeons was completed (70 received a fully coated collarless tapered stem and 70 received a morphometric designed proximally coated tapered stem). PROMs and blood serum markers were assessed preoperatively and at intervals up to 2-years postoperatively. In addition, measures of femoral stem fit, fill and subsidence at 2-years post-operatively were measured from radiographs by three observers, with an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.918. A mixed effects model was employed to compare the two prostheses over the study period. A p-value &lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant.Demographics and Dorr types were similar between groups. Both stems demonstrated a significant improvement in PROMs between the pre- and post-operative measurements, with no difference at any timepoint (p &gt; 0.05). The fully coated tapered collarless femoral stem had a non-significantly higher intra-operative femoral fracture rate (5.8% vs 1.4%, p = 0.24), with all patients treated with cable fixation and partial weight bearing. The mean subsidence at 2-years was 2.5mm +/- 2.3mm for the morphometric stem and 2.4mm +/- 1.8mm for the fully coated tapered collarless femoral stem (p = 0.879). There was one outlier in each group with increased subsidence (fully coated tapered collarless femoral stem 6.9mm, morphometric wedge stem 7.4mm), with both patients reporting thigh pain at 2 years.When compared with an established stem, the newer designed morphometric wedge stem performed well with comparable radiological and PROM outcomes at 2 year follow up. Continued follow-up is required for long term benchmarking.

Conversion arthroplasty after failed extracapsular hip fracture fixation is associated with high complication rates

Background/Aim: There is no standard treatment of choice that addresses all extracapsular fractures, which account for approximately half of the elderly hip fractures. Arthroplasty is mostly favored secondary to unsuccessful fixation or unstable primary fractures. However, conversion arthroplasty complication rates are high in the literature. This study compares arthroplasty performed after unsuccessful fixation and primary arthroplasty for unstable extracapsular hip fractures. Methods: In this retrospective study, we compared the first-year results of the groups that underwent conversion arthroplasty (cHA) and the primary arthroplasties (pHA) for extracapsular hip fractures. In the cHA group, patients were indicated for operation if there was a failure of fixation after extracapsular hip fractures (n=44). In the pHA group, patients were for unstable extracapsular hip fractures (n=44). In the cHA group, failure of fixation causes were cut-out of lag screws (54.5%), cut-through of lag screws (9.1%), non-union of fractures (27.3%), and osteonecrosis of femoral heads (9.1%). While total hip replacement was applied to all patients in the cHA group, total hip replacement was applied to ten patients in the pHA group and hemiarthroplasty to 34 patients. In comparing groups, duration of operation, amount of bleeding, intraoperative complications, post-operative complications, mobilization capacities, functional status, and mortality rates were used. Results: There were 44 patients in both groups. The surgical time (134.3 [34.5)] vs. 66 [16], [P&lt;0.001]), the amount of bleeding (1000 ml [400] vs. 300ml [200], [P&lt;0.001]), the need for red blood cell transfusion in the operations (80% vs. 32%, [P&lt;0.001]), and the frequency of intraoperative femur fracture (30% vs. 0%, [P&lt;0.001]) were larger or longer in the cHA group compared to pHA group (P&lt;0.001). While 14 complications requiring surgical intervention were observed in 12 of 44 patients in the CHA group in the post-operative 1st year, four complications were observed in four of 44 patients in the pHA group. There was no difference in mortality rates (3 vs. 3, [P =1]), mobilization capacities (5.9 [2.1] vs. 5.7 [2.0], [P=0.597]), and functional status (12.5 [3.3] vs. 13.0 [2.7], [P=0.434]) between the groups. Conclusion: Arthroplasty performed as conversion surgery after unsuccessful fixation has a higher risk of intraoperative and post-operative complications than primary arthroplasty performed after extracapsular hip fractures. We believe the cases prone to implant failure, non-union, or restricted mobilization because of the patient and fracture-type reasons should be treated with primary arthroplasty.

Outcomes of total hip arthroplasty after failed free vascularized fibular grafting for osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) after vascularized fibular grafting (VFG) is technically demanding with poorer outcomes compared to primary THA in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of THA after VFG after removal of the graft with that of primary THA. ONFH patients treated by VFG at a single institution were studied retrospectively. THAs after VFG performed by single arthroplasty surgeon with a single type of THA prosthesis were enrolled in the study. A control cohort of patients was created by 1:1 matching with the THA after VFG cohort according to age, gender, and American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score from ONFH patients treated by primary THA. Early and long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups. A total of 24 hips were included in the THA after VFG group and compared with 24 primary THA hips. No significant difference was noted in stem position. The THA after VFG group had increased blood loss and longer duration of operation time. There were two cases of intraoperative femur fractures in the THA after VFG group. The femoral stem of both groups were stable, with no cases of revision, and similar HHS scores at the last follow-up. THA after VFG may have similar short to midterm outcomes with primary THA after removal of the residual abutting bone graft and correct positioning of the femoral stem.

Conversion Hip Arthroplasty Using Standard and Long Stems after Failed Internal Fixation of Intertrochanteric Fractures.

Failed internal fixation of intertrochanteric fractures (FIF-ITF) is often treated by conversion hip arthroplasty (CHA). This study aimed to evaluate the results and complications of using standard and long femoral stems in this operation. This retrospective, multi-center study enrolled 31 total hip arthroplasty (THA) and 23 hemiarthroplasties (HA) cases (30 women, 24 men; mean age 76 years) after FIF-ITF between 2012 and 2019, divided into two groups: standard stem group (n=20) and long stem group (n=34). The initial internal fixation includes 38 cases of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA), eight cases of the dynamic hip screw (DHS), and eight cases of locking proximal femoral plate (LPFP). The indications for CHA included 38 cases of failure of fixation, seven cases of nonunion, and nine cases of avascular necrosis or posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Perioperative data and complications related to fracture and operation were collected, and preoperative and postoperative clinical and radiological data were analyzed. Clinical outcomes were assessed using Harris hip score (HHS) and 36-item Short Form survey (SF-36: including physical function (PF) score and body pain (BP) score). Statistical analyses were performed using the chi-square or Fisher's exact test, and the 2-sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test. At an average of 5.6 years with a minimum of 2 years follow-up. A significant overall surgeon-related complication rate was detected (27.8% [15/54]), five cases had an intraoperative femur fracture, one case had a late periprosthetic femoral fracture, two cases had a stem penetration, one case had a cement leakage, and two patients had an early postoperative dislocation, one infection and three cases of stem loosening or subsidence. Long stems had an increased risk of complication (13/34) compared to standard stems (2/20) (P=0.031). The operation time and blood loss in the long stem group were higher than those in the standard stem group (P=0.002; 0.017). HHS and SF-36 significantly improved in both groups from preoperative to the final follow-up and did not present significant differences at the final follow-up (P > 0.05). CHA following FIF-ITF showed a successful mid-term clinical result, long stem arthroplasty should be approached with caution for the risks of higher complication rate, especially intraoperative femoral fractures.