Both Acetabular and Femoral Reconstructions With Impaction Bone Grafting in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Case Series and Literature Review

Abstract

BackgroundExtensive bone loss on femur and acetabulum posed a big challenge to orthopedists in total hip revision surgeries. Impaction bone grafting (IBG) as a valuable bone preservation technique could effectively address this problem. Either IBG revision on the femoral or acetabular side was well studied, while its use on both sides in one operation was not. The aim of this study is to present the outcomes of IBG on both femoral and acetabular sides at first-time hip revision. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 8 patients (mean follow-up of 5.8 years) undergoing first-time revision with IBG on both acetabular and femoral sides at our institution. The Paprosky classification system was used to classify bone defects. Freeze-dried allografts and cemented prostheses were used in all patients. Postoperative complications and rerevision rates were reported. ResultsFive patients presented a Paprosky type IIC acetabular defect, 3 with a type IIIB, IIIA, and IIC defect, respectively. Three patients presented with a type IV femoral defect, 3 with a type IIIB defect, and 2 with a type II defect. Two patients developed complications, while one had an intraoperative femoral fracture and one had delayed wound healing. At the latest follow-up, no patient had rerevisions or operations related to the prosthesis. ConclusionsIBG in combination with cemented prosthesis is a profitable biological reconstruction revision technique that could provide satisfying midterm outcomes. We first propose the use of blood clots mixed with bone grafts for potential bone incorporation enhancement, while its specific effects need to be verified in further studies.