Intramedullary Nailing Group Research Articles

Intramedullary Nailing Versus Open Reduction and Plate Fixation for Lateral Malleolar Fractures: A Meta-Analysis

The fixation for lateral malleolar fracture in ankle fractures is still controversial. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare clinical and radiological outcomes between intramedullary nail (IMN) and plate for lateral malleolar fractures in ankle fractures. The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from databases inception to June 2023. Data on outcomes were extracted and the methodological quality of the included studies were assessed. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software when the data extracted from included studies could be synthesized. Seven RCTs were included. The methodological quality of the included studies was moderate to high. The meta-analysis results showed that the infection rate of the IMN group was significantly lower than that of the plate group (RR = 0.38; 95%CI 0.18-0.82; p = .01). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), union rate, radiological outcomes, nerve injury rate, reoperation rate, loss of reduction, and total complication rate. Our present meta-analysis demonstrated that the IMN might be a better method for the fixation of lateral malleolar fracture in ankle fracture, as the infection rate was significantly lower than a plate.

Suprapatellar intramedullary nail combined with screw fixation has comparable surgical outcomes to minimally invasive locking plate fixation in ipsilateral tibial plateau and shaft fractures.

To compare union rate, union time, alignment, and complication rate in ipsilateral tibia plateau and shaft fractures treated via suprapatellar intramedullary nailing with screw fixation and minimally invasive locking plate fixation. A retrospective study was conducted on 48 patients who underwent minimally invasive plate fixation (n = 35) or suprapatellar intramedullary nailing with screw fixation (n = 13), for the treatment of ipsilateral tibial plateau and shaft fractures with at least 1-year follow-up. Union rate, union time, radiologic alignment, and complication rate such as malalignment, nonunion, and fracture-related infection (FRI) were investigated. Demographic data were not different between the two groups. Coronal plane alignment was 0.17 ± 4.23 in the plate group and -0.48 ± 4.17 in the intramedullary nail group (p = 0.637). Sagittal plane alignment was -0.13 ± 5.20 in the plate group and -1.50 ± 4.01 in the suprapatellar intramedullary nail group (p = 0.313). Coronal and sagittal malalignment recorded equal results: (p > 0.99), FRI (p = 0.602), nonunion and union times recorded (p = 0.656) and (p = 0.683, 0.829), respectively, and showed no significant difference between the two groups. Suprapatellar intramedullary nailing with screw fixation had similar surgical outcomes with minimally invasive locking plate fixation in ipsilateral tibial plateau and shaft fractures in terms of union rate, union time, alignment, and complication rate. Thus, frequent use of intramedullary nailing combined with screw fixation is anticipated in patients with ipsilateral tibial plateau and shaft fractures when the soft tissue condition is not desirable. Level III.

Effects of intramedullary nailing and internal fixation plates on postoperative wound infection and pain in patients with distal tibia fractures: A meta-analysis.

A meta-analysis was performed to assess the effects of intramedullary nailing (IMN) and internal fixation plates (IFP) on postoperative wound infection and pain in patients with distal tibia fractures, to provide evidence for the selection of surgical options for this group of patients. Computerised searches were performed on PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, CNKI and Wanfang databases from the inception of each library to August 2023. All published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing IMN with IFP for the treatment of patients with distal tibial fractures were selected. Literature screening, data extraction and literature evaluation were independently completed by two researchers. Data analysis was performed using the Review Manager 5.4 software. Overall, 25 RCTs with a total of 2011 patients were finally included, comprised by 1009 patients in the IMN group and 1002 patients in the IFP group. The rate of wound infection was significantly lower in the IMN group than that in the IFP group (5.05% vs. 9.58%, odds ratio [OR]: 0.52, 95% confidence intervals [CIs]: 0.37-0.73, p < 0.001). Meanwhile, the IMN group had a significantly higher rate of joint pain than that of the IFP group (14.57% vs. 2.90%, OR: 4.93, 95% CIs: 3.02-8.03, p < 0.00001), whereas the difference between the two surgical procedures in terms of operative time was not statistically significant (standardised mean differences: 0.08 95% CIs: -0.58-0.74, p = 0.82). Current clinical evidence suggests that both IMN and IFP are excellent treatments for distal tibial fractures. Although IMN is better in reducing postoperative wound infection, the risk of postoperative pain is higher. Thus, an appropriate surgical procedure should be selected in clinical practice in accordance with the actual situation of the patient, and IFP is used to reduce the incidence of postoperative joint pain when the anterior tibial soft tissue of the distal tibial fracture is in good condition, and vice versa. IMN is used to reduce the risk of infection.

SHOULDER AND ELBOW FUNCTION FOLLOWING ANTEGRADE HUMERAL NAILING AND PLATE FIXATION IN MIDDLE THIRD HUMERAL SHAFT FRACTURES

The choice of whether to perform antegrade intramedullary nailing (IMN) or plate fixation (PF) poses a conundrum for the surgeon who must strike the balance between anatomical restoration while reducing elbow and shoulder functional impairment. Most humeral middle third shaft fractures are amenable to conservative management given the considerable acceptable deformity and anatomical compensation by patients. This study is concerned with the patient reported outcomes regarding shoulder and elbow function for IMN and PF respectively.A prospective cohort study following up all the cases treated surgically for middle third humeral fractures from 2016 to 2022 at a single centre. Telephonically an analogue pain score, an American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) score for shoulder function and the Oxford Elbow score (OES) for elbow function were obtained.One hundred and three patients met the inclusion criteria. Twenty four patients participated in the study, fifteen had IMN (62.5%) and nine had PF (37.5%.). The shoulder function outcomes showed no statistical difference with an average ASES score of sixty-six for the IMN group and sixty-nine for the PF group. Women and employed individuals expressed greater functional impairment. Hand dominance has no impact on the scores of elbow and shoulder function post operatively. The impairment of abduction score post antegrade nailing was higher in the antegrade nailing group than the plated group. The OES demonstrated greater variance in elbow function in the PF group with the IMN group expressing greater elbow disfunction.This study confirms that treatment of middle third humerus shaft fractures by plate fixation is marginally superior to antegrade intramedullary nailing in preserving elbow function and abduction ability.

Biomechanical evaluation of novel intra- and extramedullary assembly fixation for proximal humerus fractures in the elderly.

Purpose: A novel intra- and extramedullary assembly fixation method was introduced, which achieved good clinical results in complex proximal humeral fractures; however, evidence of its comparability with traditional fixation is lacking. This biomechanical study aimed to compare it with traditional fixation devices in osteoporotic proximal humeral fractures. Methods: Three-part proximal humeral fractures with osteopenia were created on 12 pairs of fresh frozen humerus specimens and allocated to three groups: 1) lateral locking plate, 2) intramedullary nail, and 3) intra- and extramedullary assembly fixation. The specimens were loaded to simulate the force at 25° abduction. Thereafter, an axial stiffness test and a compound cyclic load to failure test were applied. Structural stiffness, number of cycles loaded to failure, and relative displacement values at predetermined measurement points were recorded using a testing machine and a synchronized 3D video tracking system. Results: In terms of initial stiffness and the number of cycles loaded to failure, the intra- and extramedullary assembly fixation group showed notable improvements compared to the other groups (p <0.017). The mean relative displacement value of measurement points in the intra- and extramedullary assembly fixation group was smaller than that in the other two groups. However, there was no significant difference until 10,000 cycles. The mean relative displacement of the intramedullary nail group (3.136mm) exceeded 3mm at 7,500 cycles of loading. Conclusion: In this test model, axial fixation can provide better mechanical stability than non-axial fixation. The intra- and extramedullary assembly fixation is better able to prevent the varus collapse for elderly proximal humeral fractures with posteromedial comminution.

1081 The Challenge of Fixing Multi-Fragmentary Neck of Femur Fractures: A Retrospective Case Control Study for Unstable A2 Type Neck of Femur Fractures Fixed with Dynamic Hip Screws, and Short Intramedullary Nails

Abstract Aim Not all Neck of Femur (NOF) fractures are equivalent. AO-A2 subtype are multi-fragmentary and include a lesser trochanter fracture; they can be inherently unstable. Some believe Intramedullary Nails (IMN) offer greater stability however there is concern regarding increased operative time and blood loss. This project compared operative time and perioperative blood loss between Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) and IMN used to treat matched groups of A2 NOF fractures. Method A patient list was compiled from the national hip fracture database from 01/01/2020 to 31/05/2022. Fractures were classified according to AO standards; radiographs pre- and post-surgery, blood results, and operative records were reviewed. Results A total of 41 IMNs were performed for A2 NOF fractures, a comparison group of 41 patients treated with DHS was created. Patients were matched for ASA grade. The IMN group had an average ASA of 3.0 (DHS 3.1), perioperative haemoglobin drops of 30.8 (DHS 29.8), operation time of 64 minutes (DHS 57), and Tip Apex Distance (TAD) of 19.6mm (DHS 24.8). The difference in perioperative haemoglobin drop and operating time were not statistically significant. The TAD was significantly lower in the IMN group. Conclusions There was no difference in surgical time or perioperative blood loss. An improved TAD in the IMN group, despite less surgical experience with this implant, may correlate with lower long-term rates of failure. Our project suggests IMN is a safe implant, at least in the short term for A2 fractures, but further research of long-term benefits including mobility and pain is required.

Retrograde intramedullary nailing or locked plating for stabilisation of distal femoral fractures? A comparative study of 193 patients

PurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the results of distal femoral fracture fixation of two different methods, lateral locking plate (LP) or an Intra-medullary nail (IMN), in patients managed in our institution. More specifically, to assess: (a) if there was a difference in functional outcomes between the LP and IMN groups; (b) whether the rate of complications was different between the two groups.MethodsBetween January 2009 and December 2018 adult patients with distal femoral fractures managed in our unit with either LP or IMN for extra and intra-articular fractures were eligible to participate. Demographic details, fracture type, procedures performed, time to union, complications and functional scores (Oxford Knee Score) were recorded and analysed. The mean follow up was 4 years (12–120 months).ResultsOut of 193 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 93 received an IMN whereas 100 patients were treated with LP. Mean age was 64.2 (18–99) and 70.1 (18–100) for the IMN and LP groups respectively. Overall, the two groups had similar demographics and there was no significant difference in the type of fractures sustained (p > 0.05). The Oxford Knee Score was highest for patients fixed with LP, mean 37.3 (6–48, SD 7.3) versus 28.4 (3–48, SD 14.4), (p = < 0.02) compared to the IMN group. In terms of complications, the rate of non-union was higher in the LP group 8.6% versus 4% in those patients treated with an IMN, p value < 0.01.ConclusionWhile the rate of non-union was higher in the LP group and the functional results were superior in the plating group.

Comparison of Plating Fixation versus Intramedullary Nailing in the Treatment of Fracture Both-Bone Forearm in Children: A Systemic Review

Background Both bone forearm fractures (BBFFs) are a common injury in children, account for 41.1% of all fractures in children, the third most common fractures in the pediatric population. Diaphyseal forearm fractures account for the most common location of re-fractures in the pediatric population. The most common mechanism of injury is a fall onto an outstretched hand. There are many debates in the field of pediatric orthopedics, including when to operate, what constitutes an acceptable reduction and what age does remodeling capability inherent to children become less effective. Greater controversy exists regarding the optimal method of fixation in children between the ages of 10 and 14 years. Fractures in this age group that cannot be maintained in acceptable alignment with closed reduction can be treated with either IM nails or ORIF with plates. Closed reduction and cast immobilization remains the gold standard treatment for minimally displaced and stable pediatric forearm fractures. Aim of the Work is to introduce a systematic review comparing between plating and intramedullary nailing (IMN) for children with diaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures (BBFFs) as regards union, functional outcome and complications. Methodology This study is a systematic review. Children aged 5–14 years with both-bone diaphyseal forearm fractures were included. Surgical fracture fixation with plates and screws vs. IM nails were compared. Results We found no statistical difference in functional outcome as measured by range of movement. We also found no consistent difference in complication rates between the two groups, although this is a difficult outcome to objectively compare. There were more cases of compartment syndrome in the IMN group than in the plating group, although numbers were low for both, and it was not entirely clear if the cases in the IMN groups developed post-operatively as opposed to being consequences of the injuries themselves. Radiographically we found no study reporting significant difference in time to fracture union. Duration of surgery and cosmetic result (scar) seem to favor the IMN group. Conclusion Despite methodological deficiencies of the studies included, IM nailing has been shown as an effective and safe treatment option for those fractures, associated with shorter operation time, improved cosmesis, and easier hard ware removal.

Comparison of suprapatellar intramedullary nailing versus minimal invasive locked plating for proximal tibia fractures.

To compare the radiological alignment, union time, union rate, and complication rate between suprapatellar intramedullary nails and minimally invasive locking plate fixation in the treatment of proximal tibial fractures. We retrospectively analyzed 103 patients who underwent plate fixation (n = 50) or suprapatellar intramedullary nailing (n = 53) for proximal tibial fractures involving the meta-diaphyseal junction between November 2015 and October 2020 at our institution. The union rate, union time, radiologic alignments, and complications, such as malalignment, nonunion, and deep infection, were investigated. The demographic data did not differ between the plate and suprapatellar intramedullary nail groups. The alignment of the coronal plane was 0.24 ± 3.19 in the plate group and - 0.49 ± 2.22 in the intramedullary nail group (p = 0.196). Sagittal plane alignment was - 0.29 ± 4.97 in the plate group and 0.24 ± 4.12 in the intramedullary nail group (p = 0.571), and coronal malalignment (p = 0.196), sagittal malalignment (p = 0.57), deep infection (p = 0.264), nonunion (p = 0.695), union time (p = 0.329), and final union rate (p = 0.699) were not significantly different between groups. Compared with the minimally invasive locking compression plate group, the suprapatellar intramedullary nail group yielded comparable results in terms of radiological alignment and complications. Considering that proximal tibial fractures are associated with high-energy trauma and severe soft tissue damage, we believe that a suprapatellar intramedullary nail may be a good alternative. Level III.

Does Lower Extremity Fracture Fixation Technique Influence Neurologic Outcomes in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury? The EAST Brain vs. Bone Multicenter Trial.

To determine whether lower extremity (LE) fracture fixation technique & timing (≤ 24 vs > 24 hours) impact neurologic outcomes in TBI patients. A prospective observational study was conducted across 30 trauma centers. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18, head abbreviated injury scale (AIS) score > 2, and a diaphyseal femur or tibia fracture requiring external fixation (Ex-Fix), intramedullary nailing (IMN) or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). The analysis was conducted using ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, and multivariable regression models. Neurologic outcomes were measured by discharge Ranchos Los Amigos Revised Score (RLAS-R). Of the 520 patients enrolled, 358 underwent Ex-Fix, IMN or ORIF as definitive management. Head AIS was similar among cohorts. The Ex-Fix group experienced more severe LE injuries (AIS 4-5) compared to the IMN group (16% vs 3%, p = 0.01) but not the ORIF group (16% vs. 6%, p = 0.1). Time to operative intervention varied between the cohorts with the longest time to intervention for the IMN group (median hours: Ex-Fix 15 [8-24] vs. ORIF 26 [12-85] vs. IMN 31[12-70], p < 0.001). The discharge RLAS-R score distribution was similar across the groups. After adjusting for confounders, neither method nor timing of LE fixation influenced the discharge RLAS-R. Instead, increasing age and head AIS score were associated with a lower discharge RLAS-R score (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.002-1.03 and OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.75-3.22) and a higher GCS motor score on admission (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.73,0.97) was associated with higher RLAS-R score at discharge. Neurologic outcomes in TBI are impacted by severity of the head injury and not the fracture fixation technique or timing. Therefore, the strategy of definitive fixation of LE fractures should be dictated by patient physiology and the anatomy of the injured extremity and not by the concern for worsening neurologic outcomes in TBI patients. Level III (Prognostic/Epidemiological).

Locking plate fixation versus intramedullary nail fixation for the treatment of multifragmentary proximal humerus fractures (OTA/AO type 11C): a preliminary comparison of clinical efficacy

BackgroundThis study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of locking plate and intramedullary nail fixations in the treatment of patients with OTA/AO type 11C proximal humerus fractures.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with OTA/AO type 11C1.1 and 11C3.1 proximal humerus fractures who underwent surgery at our institution from June 2012 to June 2017. Perioperative indicators, postoperative morphological parameters of the proximal humerus, and Constant–Murley scores were evaluated and compared.ResultsSixty-eight patients with OTA/AO type 11C1.1 and 11C3.1 proximal humerus fractures were enrolled in this study. Overall, 35 patients underwent open reduction and plate screw internal fixation, and 33 patients underwent limited open reduction and locking of the proximal humerus with intramedullary nail internal fixation. The total cohort had a mean follow-up duration of 17.8 months. The mean operation time of the locking plate group was significantly longer than that of the intramedullary nail group (P < 0.05), while the mean bleeding volume was significantly higher in the locking plate group than that in the intramedullary nail group (P < 0.05). The initial neck–shaft angles, final neck–shaft angles, forward flexion ranges, or Constant–Murley scores did not show significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05). Complications, including screw penetrations, acromion impingement syndrome, infection, and aseptic necrosis of the humeral head, occurred in 8 patients (8/35, 22.8%) in the locking plate group and 5 patients in the intramedullary nail group (5/33, 15.1%; including malunion and acromion impingement syndrome), with no significant difference between the groups (P > 0.05).ConclusionsSimilar satisfactory functional results can be achieved with locking plates and intramedullary nailing for OTA/AO type 11C1.1 and 11C3.1 proximal humerus fractures, with no significant difference in the number of complications between these two techniques. However, intramedullary nailing has advantages over locking plates for OTA/AO type 11C1.1 and 11C3.1 proximal humerus fractures in terms of operation time and bleeding volume.

Tolérance de la position à genoux après enclouage centromédullaire ou fixation par plaque sans complications

IntroductionDistal tibia fractures often occur in younger, high demand patients, though the literature surrounding management remains contentious. This study sought to quantitatively determine differences in kneeling ability and self-reported knee function in patients managed with either intramedullary nailing (IMN) or open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with compression plating following distal tibia fracture to assist in the pre-operative consent process. HypothesisThere is no difference in kneeling tolerance following either tibial nailing or plate fixation of distal tibia fractures. Material and methodsRetrospective sampling of public hospital data with outpatient prospective functional testing were completed. The primary outcome measure was the Kneeling Test (KT). Secondary outcome measures were The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) for the knee joint. There were 28 patients recruited (18 IMN and 10 ORIF) with a mean age of 44 years. Mean overall follow-up was 13.3 months (range 8–25, SD 3.6). All fractures had completely healed without post-operative complication. ResultsThe IMN affected limb had a significantly worse overall kneeling function than their non-affected limb (mean KT: 70.4 vs 94.9 respectively, p<0.005) Additionally, the IMN group performed significantly worse when compared to the ORIF group (mean KT 70.4 vs 92.5 respectively, p<0.005). No significant differences (p>0.05) in kneeling function existed for the ORIF group when comparing affected to non-affected limbs. Secondary outcome analysis showed significantly worse overall WOMAC and FJS in the IMN group compared to the ORIF group (mean WOMAC 19.3 vs 6.9 respectively, p=0.040; mean FJS 38.3 vs 75.9 respectively, p=0.005). DiscussionThe use of intramedullary nailing for the treatment of distal tibia fracture results in a mean reduction of 20% in kneeling tolerance in comparison to ORIF. The resulting kneeling tolerance is comparable to that of patients post-total knee arthroplasty. The present findings should assist in the consent process for patients with high kneeling demands in sportive, professional or cultural pastimes. Level of evidenceIV; retrospective cohort study with quantitative outcome measurement.

In silico biomechanical analysis of poller screw-assisted small-diameter intramedullary nail in the treatment of distal tibial fractures.

Objective: To evaluate the biomechanical effects of Poller screws (PS) combined with small-diameter intramedullary nails in the treatment of distal tibial fractures at different locations and on different planes. Methods: Nine finite element (FE) models were used to simulate the placement of the intramedullary nail (IMN) and the PS for distal tibial fractures. Structural stiffness and interfragmentary motion (IFM) through the fracture were investigated to assess the biomechanical effects of the PS. The allowable stress method was used to evaluate the safety of the construct. Results: With the axial load of 500N, the mean axial stiffness of IMN group was 973.38 ± 95.65N/mm, which was smaller than that at positions A and B of the coronal group and sagittal group (p < 0.05). The shear IFM of the IMN group was 2.10 ± 0.02mm, which were smaller than that at positions A and B of the coronal group and sagittal group (p < 0.05). Under physiological load, the stresses of all internal fixation devices and the nail-bone interface were within a safe range. Conclusion: In the treatment of distal tibial fractures, placing the PS in the proximal fracture block can obtain better biomechanical performance. The IMN fixation system can obtain higher structural stiffness and reduce the IFM of the fracture end by adding PS.

Comparison of Fixation Techniques for Lower Extremity Rotationplasty.

Rotationplasty is a reconstructive, limb-sparing surgery indicated for patients with lower extremity musculoskeletal tumors. The procedure involves rotation of the distal lower extremity to allow the ankle to function as the new knee joint and provide an optimum weight-bearing surface for prosthetic use. Historically there is limited data comparing fixation techniques. The purpose of this study is to compare clinical outcomes between intramedullary nailing (IMN) and compression plating (CP) in young patients undergoing rotationplasty. A retrospective review of 28 patients with a mean age of 10±4 years undergoing a rotationplasty for either a femoral (n=19), tibial (n=7), or popliteal fossa (n=2) tumor was performed. The most common diagnosis was osteosarcoma (n=24). Fixation was obtained with either an IMN (n=6) or CP (n=22). Clinical outcomes of patients undergoing rotationplasty were compared between the IMN and CP groups. Surgical margins were negative in all patients. The mean time to union was 24 months (range 6 to 93). There was no difference in the meantime to the union between patients treated with an IMN versus those with a CP (14±16 vs. 27±26mo, P =0.26). Patients undergoing fixation with an IMN were less likely to have a nonunion (odds ratio: 0.35, 95% confidence interval: 0.03-3.54, P =0.62). Postoperative fracture of the residual limb only occurred in patients undergoing CP fixation (n=7, 33% vs. n=0, 0%, P =0.28). Postoperative fixation complications occurred in 13 (48%) patients, most commonly a nonunion (n=9, 33%). Patients undergoing fixation with a CP were more likely to have a postoperative fixation complication (odds ratio: 20, 95% CI: 2.14-186.88, P <0.01). Rotationplasty is an option for limb salvage for young patients with lower extremity tumors. The results of this study reveal fewer fixation complications when an IMN can be used. As such, IMN fixation should be considered for patients undergoing a rotationplasty, though equipoise should be shown by surgeons when determining technique.

Intramedullary nail versus minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for displaced extraarticular proximal tibia fractures: a prospective comparative cohort study.

The treatment of extraarticular proximal tibial fractures is challenging. As the optimal fixation technique is still debated, the purpose of this study was to compare minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) and intramedullary nail (IMN) fixation. A prospective matched comparative studywas conducted on patients with displaced extraarticular proximal tibia fractures treated with MIPO (n = 29) versus IMN (n = 30) fixation. Outcomes collected were the Johner-Wruhs grading, range of motion (ROM), union rate, time to union, malunion, coronal and sagittal alignment, and post-operative complications. Union rates were similar between the MIPO and IMN groups (93% vs. 97%, P = 1.0). The IMN group had an earlier time to union (15 vs. 18weeks, P < 0.001) and superior functional outcomes at one year (effective Johner-Wruhs score: 80% vs. 55%, P = 0.04). There was a significantly higher incidence of anterior knee pain in the IMN group (23% vs. 0%, P = 0.02) and there was a trend for more infections in the MIPO group (21% vs. 13%, P = 0.73). IMN fixation of extraarticular proximal tibia fractures was associated with a shorter union time and better functional scores compared to MIPO.

Biomechanical comparison of intramedullary nail and plate osteosynthesis for extra-articular proximal tibial fractures with segmental bone defect.

Purpose: Proximal tibial fractures are common, but the current available internal fixation strategies remain debatable, especially for comminuted fractures. This study aimed to compare the biomechanical stability of three internal fixation strategies for extra-articular comminuted proximal tibial fractures. Methods: A total of 90 synthetic tibiae models of simulated proximal tibial fractures with segmental bone defects were randomly divided into three groups: Single lateral plating (LP), double plating (DP) and intramedullary nailing (IN). Based on the different number of fixed screws, the above three groups were further divided into nine subgroups and subjected to axial compression, cyclic loading and static torsional testing. Results: The subgroup of intramedullary nailing with five proximal interlocking screws showed the highest axial stiffness of 384.36 ± 35.00N/mm. The LP group obtained the lowest axial stiffness performance with a value of 96.59 ± 16.14N/mm. As expected, the DP group offered significantly greater biomechanical stability than the LP group, with mean static axial stiffness and mean torque increasing by approximately 200% and 50%, respectively. According to static torsional experiments, the maximum torque of the DP subgroup was 3,308.32 ± 286.21N mm, which outperformed all other groups in terms of torsional characteristics. Conclusion: Utilizing more than four distal screws did not provide improved biomechanical stability in the LP or DP groups, while a substantial increase in the biomechanical stability of DP was obtained when an additional medial plate was used. For the intramedullary nailing group, increasing the number of proximal interlocking screws could significantly improve biomechanical stability, and the intramedullary nailing with three proximal interlocking screws had similar static and cyclic stiffness as the DP group. The intramedullary nailing with five proximal screws had better axial stability, whereas DP had better torsional stability.

A Comparison of Tip-Apex Distance at Various Angles of Fixation Devices in Hip Fractures.

Background Intertrochanteric neck of the femur (NOF) fractures are very common, and the majority are fixed using dynamic hip screws (DHS) or intramedullary (IM) nails with a fixed angle.The aim of this study was to assess which angle of fixation has a better tip-apex distance (TAD) on X-ray and lower complication rates. Methods We included patients with intertrochanteric hip fractures fixed using a DHS or an IM nail. We included patients who had complete radiological and clinical records and a minimum follow-up of 24 months. We measured the TAD and recorded the number of implant cutouts, fracture site nonunions, and periprosthetic fractures. Results A total of 107 patients were included, 35 IM nails and 72 DHS. There were four cases of implant cutouts within the DHS group and none in the IM nail group. All four cutout cases were fixed using 135° angle DHS, and two had TAD of more than 25 mm. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that the implant fixation device (p=0.002) and the angle of fixation (p<0.001) are the most important predictors of TAD. Conclusion Smaller angle (130° or 125°) fixation devices allow better positioning of the lag screw and consequently better TAD, which leads to a lower probability of implant cutout in patients undergoing fracture of the neck of the femur surgery.

A comparison of exchange nailing and plate augmentation over a retained intramedullary nail in aseptic oligotrophic and atrophic femoral shaft pseudoarthrosis.

This study aims to evaluate the success of plate augmentation over a retained intramedullary nail (IMN) against exchange nailing performed with autologous bone grafting in oligotrophic and atrophic pseudoarthrosis of the femoral shaft. Between May 2005 and October 2020, a total of 42 of 56 patients (28 males, 14 females; mean age: 47.3±17.2 years; range, 19 to 84 years) with aseptic atrophic or oligotrophic femoral nonunion were retrospectively analyzed. The patients, 20 were operated with plate over a retained IMN, and the rest (n=22) by exchange nailing. Data including demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients, treatment success, duration of surgery, blood loss during surgery, infection rates, length of hospital stay, time to bridging of the nonunion site, and time to obliteration of the fracture line (solid union) were recorded. The mean follow-up was 23.8±20.4 (range, 12 to 96) months in the plate over an IMN group and 34.7±27.4 (range, 12 to 90) months in the exchange nailing group. At the final follow-up, solid union occurred in all of the patients in the plate augmentation over a retained IMN group, and 21 of 22 (95.45%) patients in the exchange nailing group. Blood loss during surgery was significantly less in the plate augmentation over IMN group (p=0.027). There was no statistically significant difference in the other variables between the two groups (p>0.05). Our study results demonstrate that plate over a retained IMN is effective as exchange nailing in the surgical treatment of oligotrophic and atrophic pseudoarthrosis of the femoral shaft. However, it can be speculated that plate application over IMN is more advantageous in terms of blood loss during surgery.

Complications of proximal humerus fractures

Introduction. Proximal humerus fractures, resulting from direct or indirect trauma, pose a significant clinical challenge. The choice of surgical intervention is influenced by various factors including patient age, comorbidities, bone quality, activity level, fracture characteristics, and the surgeon?s expertise. This study aims to assess the frequency and nature of complications arising from the surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures. Material and Methods. In this retrospective analysis, 51 patients were included, with 22 males and 29 females. Two surgical techniques were employed: osteosynthesis using locking plates in 27 patients (average age 54.6 years) and intramedullary nailing in 24 patients (average age 58.4 years). The assessment of outcomes was conducted using the Constant Shoulder Score, and statistical analysis was performed using the Student?s T-test. Results. Complications were observed in 12 patients (23.5%), comprising 7 males and 5 females. In the locking plate group, where 8 complications occurred, the mean Constant score was 77.44, while the intramedullary nail group, with 4 complications noted, had a mean Constant score of 70.25. No statistically significant difference was found in the incidence of complications based on gender or the type of surgical technique used. Conclusion. The study found a higher incidence of complications in male patients and those treated with locking plates, though these differences were not statistically significant. These findings emphasize the need for personalized surgical planning and highlight the complexity of managing proximal humerus fractures.

Use of minimally invasive cerclage wiring for displaced major fragments of femoral shaft fractures after intramedullary nailing promotes bone union and a functional outcome

BackgroundFemoral shaft fractures caused by high energy trauma can be very challenging due to the large variability in fracture morphology and poor functional outcomes. Displaced major fragments of femoral shaft fractures are difficult to manage after closed reduction and intramedullary nailing (IMN). The minimally invasive cerclage wiring (CW) procedure has become an optimal tool for major fragment resetting and stabilization after IMN. However, arguments continue for the potential risk of arterial injury, blood supply disruption, and delayed bone union or non-union with the CW procedure. The surgical algorithm for treating femoral shaft fractures with displaced major fragments remains controversial. Thus, emphasis is placed on whether the CW procedure can promote the bone union rate and improve functional outcomes without significant complications.MethodsWe performed a retrospective study on all patients of femoral shaft fractures with displaced major fragments between June 2015 and August 2019 in our trauma centre. Eligible patients were included and stratified into the CW group and IMN group. Demographics, radiological data, callus formation, union time, and functional outcomes were critically compared between the two groups.ResultsThirty-seven patients were included in the present study according to our inclusion/exclusion criteria, of whom 16 (43.2%) were stratified into the CW group, and 21 (56.8%) into the IMN group. The modified radiographic union score for femorae (mRUSH) in the CW group and IMN group was significantly different (11.94 ± 1.29 vs. 7.95 ± 0.74, 6 months; 15.88 ± 0.50 vs. 10.33 ± 0.91, 12 months) (p < 0.0001). The mean union time was significantly different between the CW and IMN groups (7.9 ± 3.2 months vs. 20.1 ± 8.48 months) (p < 0.0001). Bone union at 12 months differed significantly between the CW and IMN groups (15 vs. 5) (p < 0.05). The Harris Hip Score in the CW group was significantly higher than that in the IMN group (88.19 ± 4.69 vs. 76.81 ± 5.26, 12 months; 93.19 ± 4.68 vs. 87.57 ± 5.38, 24 months) (p < 0.01). The Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Score was significantly different between the CW and IMN groups (78.50 ± 5.65 vs. 67.71 ± 4.65, 12 months; 89.50 ± 5.05 vs. 75.81 ± 8.90, 24 months) (p < 0.0001).ConclusionsMinimally invasive CW is an optimal supplement for IMN in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures with displaced major fragments. As illustrated, the benefits of CW potentially include promotion of the bone union rate and improvement in functional outcomes.