Comparison of Plating Fixation versus Intramedullary Nailing in the Treatment of Fracture Both-Bone Forearm in Children: A Systemic Review

Abstract

Background Both bone forearm fractures (BBFFs) are a common injury in children, account for 41.1% of all fractures in children, the third most common fractures in the pediatric population. Diaphyseal forearm fractures account for the most common location of re-fractures in the pediatric population. The most common mechanism of injury is a fall onto an outstretched hand. There are many debates in the field of pediatric orthopedics, including when to operate, what constitutes an acceptable reduction and what age does remodeling capability inherent to children become less effective. Greater controversy exists regarding the optimal method of fixation in children between the ages of 10 and 14 years. Fractures in this age group that cannot be maintained in acceptable alignment with closed reduction can be treated with either IM nails or ORIF with plates. Closed reduction and cast immobilization remains the gold standard treatment for minimally displaced and stable pediatric forearm fractures. Aim of the Work is to introduce a systematic review comparing between plating and intramedullary nailing (IMN) for children with diaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures (BBFFs) as regards union, functional outcome and complications. Methodology This study is a systematic review. Children aged 5–14 years with both-bone diaphyseal forearm fractures were included. Surgical fracture fixation with plates and screws vs. IM nails were compared. Results We found no statistical difference in functional outcome as measured by range of movement. We also found no consistent difference in complication rates between the two groups, although this is a difficult outcome to objectively compare. There were more cases of compartment syndrome in the IMN group than in the plating group, although numbers were low for both, and it was not entirely clear if the cases in the IMN groups developed post-operatively as opposed to being consequences of the injuries themselves. Radiographically we found no study reporting significant difference in time to fracture union. Duration of surgery and cosmetic result (scar) seem to favor the IMN group. Conclusion Despite methodological deficiencies of the studies included, IM nailing has been shown as an effective and safe treatment option for those fractures, associated with shorter operation time, improved cosmesis, and easier hard ware removal.