HomeCirculationVol. 103, No. 3 Free AccessCorrectionPDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessCorrectionPDF/EPUB Originally published23 Jan 2001https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.103.3.476Circulation. 2001;103:476This article corrects the followingLimitation of Excessive Extracellular Matrix Turnover May Contribute to Survival Benefit of Spironolactone Therapy in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure In the article, “Limitation of Excessive Intracellular Matrix Turnover May Contribute to Survival Benefit of Spironolactone Therapy in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure: Insights from the Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study (RALES),” by Zannad et al that appeared in a previous issue of the journal (Circulation. 2000;102:2700–2706 ), some sentences contained incorrect information.In Results, under Baseline Levels of ECM Turnover Markers (page 2702), the sentence: “However, ischemic heart disease (5.3 versus 4.7 μg/L for ischemic versus nonischemic, P=0.02) and baseline treatment with digoxin (4.7 versus 5.4 μg/L for on digoxin versus off digoxin, P=0.001) were independently associated with baseline PIIINP levels” should be replaced with the following:However, ischemic heart disease (5.3 versus 4.7 μg/L for ischemic versus nonischemic, P=0.02) and baseline treatment with digoxin (5.4 versus 4.7 μg/L for on digoxin versus off digoxin, P=0.001) were independently associated with baseline PIIINP levels.In addition, under Prognostic Significance of Serum Levels of ECM Turnover in the Discussion (page 2705), the statement, “On the other hand, we found that patients chronically treated with digitalis had a lower level of PIIINP. This is consistent with the finding that digoxin reduces death due to the progression of heart disease” should be replaced with the following:On the other hand, we found that patients chronically treated with digitalis had a higher level of PIIINP. This is inconsistent with the finding that digoxin reduces death due to the progression of heart disease.In the article by Nelson et al that appeared in a previous issue of the journal (Circulation. 2000;102:3053–3059), the order of authors in the author line was incorrect. The correct author list follows:Gregory S. Nelson, PhD; Ronald D. Berger, MD, PhD; Barry J. Fetics, MSE; Maurice Talbot, RN; Julio C. Spinelli, PhD; Joshua M. Hare, MD; David A. Kass, MD Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited By Bakris G, Vassalotti J, Ritz E, Wanner C, Stergiou G, Molitch M, Nesto R, Kaysen G and Sowers J (2010) National Kidney Foundation consensus conference on cardiovascular and kidney diseases and diabetes risk: an integrated therapeutic approach to reduce events, Kidney International, 10.1038/ki.2010.292, 78:8, (726-736), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2010. Williams E, Katholi R and Karambelas M (2006) Use and side-effect profile of spironolactone in a private cardiologist's practice, Clinical Cardiology, 10.1002/clc.4960290405, 29:4, (149-153), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2006. Related articlesLimitation of Excessive Extracellular Matrix Turnover May Contribute to Survival Benefit of Spironolactone Therapy in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure Faiez Zannad, et al. Circulation. 2000;102:2700-2706 January 23, 2001Vol 103, Issue 3 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics Copyright © 2001 by American Heart Associationhttps://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.103.3.476 Originally publishedJanuary 23, 2001 PDF download Advertisement
Read full abstract