Parallel connection of an electrophysiology recording system (EP system) to equipment for conduction system pacing (CSP) has been widely used for fine monitoring of intracardiac electrograms and pacing evaluation. We experienced a case showing unexpected pacing threshold exacerbation under specific conditions when the EP system was connected in parallel. We evaluated the underlying mechanism using an ex vivo model. An ex vivo pacing and intracardiac electrogram monitoring model was generated using an oscilloscope, pacing system analyzer (PSA), EP system, and simulated heart. The discrepancy between expected output at the PSA and the actual measured output value at the simulated heart was measured under various conditions and using various combinations of pacing equipment. Parallel connection of the EP system was associated with reduced electrical output from the PSA as recorded at the simulated heart. The unexpected adverse effects were particularly noticeable when using an RMC-5000 EP system with the pacing function on. The trouble is completely resolved by simply turning off the pacing function of the system. There is a possibility that the EP system might increase the pacing threshold in CSP when the PSA and EP system is are deployed in parallel. The issue may provoke pseudo failure of CSP due to the high pacing threshold. When the RMC-5000 is used for conduction system pacing in parallel with a PSA for the pacing test, the pacing function of RMC-5000 should be turned off.
Read full abstract