Intrafraction Prostate Motion Research Articles

Prostate intra-fraction motion recorded by transperineal ultrasound.

Infra-fraction motion of the prostate was recorded during 3.423 fractions of image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) in 191 patients, 14 of which were treated by intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and 177 of which were treated by volumetric arc therapy (VMAT). The prostate was imaged by three-dimensional and time-resolved transperineal ultrasound (4D-US) of type Clarity by Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden. The prostate volume was registered and the prostate position (center of volume) was recorded at a frequency of 2.0 samples per second. This raw data set contains a total of 1.985.392 prostate and patient couch positions over a time span of 272 hours, 52 minutes and 34 seconds of life radiotherapy as exported by the instrument software. This data set has been used for the validation of models of prostate intra-fraction motion and for the estimation of the dosimetric impact of actual intra-fraction motion on treatment quality and side effects. We hope that this data set may be reused by other groups for similar purposes.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer: Improving treatment delivery efficiency and accuracy

PurposeIn stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer, intrafraction motion is an important source of treatment uncertainty as it could not be completely smoothed through fractionation. Herein, we compared different arrangements and beam qualities for extreme hypofractionated treatments to minimize beam delivery time and so intrafractional errors. MethodsA retrospective dataset of 11 patients was used. Three volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) beam arrangements were compared for a prescription dose of 40 Gy/5 fractions: two full arcs, 6 MV flattening filter free (FFF); one full arc, 6 MV FFF; one full arc, 10 MV FFF. A plan quality index was defined to compare achievement of the planning goals. Plan complexity was evaluated with the modulation factor. Dose delivery accuracy and efficiency were measured with patient-specific quality assurance plans. ResultsAll treatment plans fulfilled all dose objectives. No statistical differences were found both in plan quality and complexity. Very accurate dose delivery was achieved with the three arrangements, with mean γ passing rates >96.5 % (2 %/2 mm criteria). Slightly but significantly higher γ passing rates were observed with single-arc 6 MV FFF. Contrariwise, statistically significant reductions of the delivery time were obtained with single-arc geometries: the average delivery times were 1.6 min (−46.1 %) and 1.3 min (−56.2 %) for 6 and 10 MV FFF respectively. ConclusionsThe high-quality, very fast and accurate dose delivery of single-arc plans confirmed the suitability of this arrangement for prostate SBRT. In particular, the significant reduction of delivery time would improve treatment robustness against intrafraction prostate motion.

Inter-fractional error and intra-fractional motion of prostate and dosimetry comparisons of patient position registrations with versus without fiducial markers during treatment with carbon-ion radiotherapy.

A few reports have discussed the influence of inter-fractional position error and intra-fractional motion on dose distribution, particularly regarding a spread-out Bragg peak. We investigated inter-fractional and intra-fractional prostate position error by monitoring fiducial marker positions. In 2020, data from 15 patients with prostate cancer who received carbon-ion beam radiotherapy (CIRT) with gold markers were investigated. We checked marker positions before and during irradiation to calculate the inter-fractional positioning and intra-fractional movement and evaluated the CIRT dose distribution by adjusting the planning beam isocenter and clinical target volume (CTV) position. We compared the CTV dose coverages (CTV receiving 95% [V95%] or 98% [V98%] of the prescribed dose) between skeletal and fiducial matching irradiation on the treatment planning system. For inter-fractional error, the mean distance between the marker position in the planning images and that in a patient starting irradiation with skeletal matching was 1.49 ± 1.11mm (95th percentile = 1.85mm). The 95th percentile (maximum) values of the intra-fractional movement were 0.79mm (2.31mm), 1.17mm (2.48mm), 1.88mm (4.01mm), 1.23mm (3.00mm), and 2.09mm (8.46mm) along the lateral, inferior, superior, dorsal, and ventral axes, respectively. The mean V95% and V98% were 98.2% and 96.2% for the skeletal matching plan and 99.5% and 96.8% for the fiducial matching plan, respectively. Fiducial matching irradiation improved the CTV dose coverage compared with skeletal matching irradiation for CIRT for prostate cancer.

Electromagnetic Transmitter-Based Prostate Gating for Dose-Escalated Linac-Based Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: An Evaluation of Intrafraction Motion.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) is as a standard treatment for prostate cancer (PCa). Tight margins and high dose gradients are needed, and the precise localization of the target is mandatory. Our retrospective study reports our experience regarding the evaluation of intrafraction prostate motion during LINAC-based SBRT evaluated with a novel electromagnetic (EM) tracking device. This device consists of an integrated Foley catheter with a transmitter connected to a receiver placed on the treatment table. We analyzed 31 patients who received LINAC-based SBRT using flattening filter-free (FFF) volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). The patients were scheduled to be treated for primary (n = 27) or an intraprostatic recurrent PCa (n = 4). A simulation CT scan was conducted while the patients had a filled bladder (100-150 cc) and an empty rectum, and an EM tracking device was used. The same rectal and bladder conditions were employed during the treatment. The patients received 36.25 Gy delivered over five consecutive fractions on the whole prostate and 40 Gy on the nodule(s) visible via MRI, both delivered with a Simultaneous Integrated Boost approach. The CTV-to-PTV margin was 2 mm for both the identified treatment volumes. Patient positioning was verified with XVI ConeBeam-CT (CBCT) matching before each fraction. When the signals exceeded a 2 mm threshold in any of the three spatial directions, the treatment was manually interrupted. A new XVI CBCT was performed if this offset lasted >20 s. We analyzed data about 155 fractions. The median and mean treatment times, calculated per fraction, were 10 m31 s and 12 m44 s (range: 6 m36 s-65 m28 s), and 95% of the fractions were delivered with a maximum time of 27 m48 s. During treatment delivery, the mean and median number of XVI CBCT operations realized during the treatment were 2 and 1 (range: 0-11). During the treatment, the prostate was outside the CTV-to-PTV margin (2 mm), thus necessitating the stoppage of the delivery +/- a reacquisition of the XVI CBCT for 11.2%, 8.9%, and 3.9% of the delivery time in the vertical, longitudinal, and lateral direction, respectively. We easily integrated an EM-transmitter-based gating for prostate LINAC-based SBRT into our normal daily workflow. Using this system, a 2 mm CTV-to-PTV margin could be safely applied. A small number of fractions showed a motion exceeding the predefined 2 mm threshold, which would have otherwise gone undetected without intrafraction motion management.

Ultra-hypofractionated prostate cancer radiotherapy: Dosimetric impact of real-time intrafraction prostate motion and daily anatomical changes

PurposeTo retrospectively assess the differences between planned and delivered dose during ultra-hypofractionated (UHF) prostate cancer treatments, by evaluating the dosimetric impact of daily anatomical variations alone, and in combination with prostate intrafraction motion. MethodsProstate intrafraction motion was recorded with a transperineal ultrasound probe in 15 patients treated by UHF radiotherapy (36.25 Gy/5 fractions). The dosimetric objective was to cover 99 % of the clinical target volume with the 100 % prescription isodose line. After treatment, planning CT (pCT) images were deformably registered onto daily Cone Beam CT to generate pseudo-CT for dose accumulation (accumulated CT, aCT). The interplay effect was accounted by synchronizing prostatic shifts and beam geometry. Finally, the shifted dose maps were accumulated (moved-accumulated CT, maCT). ResultsNo significant change in daily CTV volumes was observed. Conversely, CTV V100% was 98.2 ± 0.8 % and 94.7 ± 2.6 % on aCT and maCT, respectively, compared with 99.5 ± 0.2 % on pCT (p < 0.0001). Bladder volume was smaller than planned in 76 % of fractions and D5cc was 33.8 ± 3.2 Gy and 34.4 ± 3.4 Gy on aCT (p = 0.02) and maCT (p = 0.01) compared with the pCT (36.0 ± 1.1 Gy). The rectum was smaller than planned in 50.3 % of fractions, but the dosimetric differences were not statistically significant, except for D1cc, found smaller on the maCT (33.2 ± 3.2 Gy, p = 0.02) compared with the pCT (35.3 ± 0.7 Gy). ConclusionsAnatomical variations and prostate movements had more important dosimetric impact than anatomical variations alone, although, in some cases, the two phenomena compensated. Therefore, an efficient IGRT protocol is required for treatment implementation to reduce setup errors and control intrafraction motion.

Simulating an intra-fraction adaptive workflow to enable PTV margin reduction in MRIgART volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate SBRT.

This study simulates a novel prostate SBRT intra-fraction re-optimization workflow in MRIgART to account for prostate intra-fraction motion and evaluates the dosimetric benefit of reducing PTV margins. VMAT prostate SBRT treatment plans were created for 10 patients using two different PTV margins, one with a 5 mm margin except 3 mm posteriorly (standard) and another using uniform 2 mm margins (reduced). All plans were prescribed to 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions and adapted onto each daily MRI dataset. An intra-fraction adaptive workflow was simulated for the reduced margin group by synchronizing the radiation delivery with target position from cine MRI imaging. Intra-fraction delivered dose was reconstructed and prostate DVH metrics were evaluated under three conditions for the reduced margin plans: Without motion compensation (no-adapt), with a single adapt prior to treatment (ATP), and lastly for intra-fraction re-optimization during delivery (intra). Bladder and rectum DVH metrics were compared between the standard and reduced margin plans. As expected, rectum V18 Gy was reduced by 4.4 ± 3.9%, D1cc was reduced by 12.2 ± 6.8% (3.4 ± 2.3 Gy), while bladder reductions were 7.8 ± 5.6% for V18 Gy, and 9.6 ± 7.3% (3.4 ± 2.5 Gy) for D1cc for the reduced margin reference plans compared to the standard PTV margin. For the intrafraction replanning approach, average intra-fraction optimization times were 40.0 ± 2.9 seconds, less than the time to deliver one of the four VMAT arcs (104.4 ± 9.3 seconds) used for treatment delivery. When accounting for intra-fraction motion, prostate V36.25 Gy was on average 96.5 ± 4.0%, 99.1 ± 1.3%, and 99.6 ± 0.4 for the non-adapt, ATP, and intra-adapt groups, respectively. The minimum dose received by the prostate was less than 95% of the prescription dose in 84%, 36%, and 10% of fractions, for the non-adapt, ATP, and intra-adapt groups, respectively. Intra-fraction re-optimization improves prostate coverage, specifically the minimum dose to the prostate, and enables PTV margin reduction and subsequent OAR sparing. Fast re-optimizations enable uninterrupted treatment delivery.

Quantifying Intrafraction Motion and the Impact of Gating for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Stereotactic Radiation therapy for Prostate Cancer: Analysis of the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Arm From the MIRAGE Phase 3 Randomized Trial

Real-time intrafraction tracking/gating is an integral component of magnetic resonance imaging-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) and may have contributed to the acute toxicity reduction during prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy observed on the MRgRT-arm of the MIRAGE (MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING-GUIDED Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer) randomized trial (NCT04384770). Herein we characterized intrafraction prostate motion and assessed gating effectiveness. Seventy-nine patients were treated on an MR-LINAC. Real-time cine imaging was acquired at 4Hz in a sagittal plane. If >10% of the prostate area moved outside of a 3-mm gating boundary, an automatic beam hold was initiated. An in-house tool was developed to retrospectively extract gating signal for all patients and identify the tracked prostate in each cine frame for a subgroup of 40 patients. The fraction of time the prostate was within the gating window was defined as the gating duty cycle (GDC). A total of 391 treatments from 79 patients were analyzed. Median GDC was 0.974 (IQR, 0.916-0.983). Fifty (63.2%) and 24 (30.4%) patients had at least 1 fraction with GDC ≤0.9 and GDC ≤0.8, respectively. Incidence of low GDC fractions among patients appeared stochastic. Patients with minimum GDC <0.8 trended toward more frequent grade 2 genitourinary toxicity compared with those with minimum GDC >0.8 (38% vs 18%, P = .065). Prostate intrafraction motion was mostly along the bladder-rectum axis and predominantly in the superior-anterior direction. Motion in the inferior-posterior direction was associated with significantly higher rate of acute grade 2 genitourinary toxicity (66.7% vs 13.9%, P = .001). Gating limited mean prostate motion during treatment delivery in fractions with a GDC <0.9 (<0.8) to 2.9 mm (2.9 mm) versus 4.1 mm (4.7 mm) for ungated motion. Fractions with large intrafraction motion were associated with increased toxicity and their occurrence among patients appears stochastic. Real-time tracking/gating effectively mitigated this motion and is likely a major contributing factor of acute toxicity reduction associated with MRgRT.

Dosimetric Impact of Intrafraction Prostate Motion and Interfraction Anatomical Changes in Dose-Escalated Linac-Based SBRT

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of intrafraction prostate motion and interfraction anatomical changes on dose metrics and the effect of beam gating and motion correction in dose-escalated Linac-based SBRT. Thirteen patients (56 fractions) with organ-confined prostate cancer underwent dose-escalated FFF-VMAT SBRT. Accurate patient setup was ensured by CBCT, and real-time 3D prostate motion data were obtained using a novel electromagnetic tracking device. Treatment was interrupted when the signals exceeded a 2 mm threshold in any of the three spatial directions and couch position was corrected unless the offset was transient. Prostate trajectories with and without beam gating and motion correction events were reconstructed and analyzed. Rectum and bladder volumes on each daily CBCT were recorded and compared with volumes at simulation. The prostate motion observed for each fraction was incorporated into the patient original treatment plan with an isocenter shift method. Actually, delivered treatments were then obtained by recalculating the reconstructed motion-encoded plan on deformed CTs reflecting the patient CBCT-anatomy of the day. Non-gated treatments were also simulated using the prostate motion data assuming that no treatment interruptions have occurred. Treatment interruptions because of target motion trespassing the predefined threshold occurred in 25 fractions (45%). Rectum and bladder volume changes were relevant in most patients. The mean relative dose differences between actually delivered and planned treatments were -3.0% [-18.5 - 2.8] for CTV D99% and -2.6% [-17.8 - 1.0] for PTV D95% over all 56 fractions. However, the median cumulative CTV coverage with 93% of the prescribed dose turned out to be satisfactory. Urethra sparing was slightly degraded and a mean reduction of rectum and bladder dose was seen in all but two dose metrics: the maximum dose to rectum mucosa and the bladder D40%. Nevertheless, only 2 major deviations in rectum mucosa D0.035cc were observed at the end of the treatment. The greatest contribution to target missing and OARs doses came from the interfraction anatomical variations, while intrafraction prostate motion marginally contributed in gated treatments. In non-gated treatments, further deteriorations by 2.4 - 2.8% in minimum target coverage metrics and by 3.1 - 11.6% in bladder dose parameters would have occurred on average. The implemented motion management strategy and the strict patient preparation regimen, along with current PTV margins, robustness of original treatment plans, and fast FFF beam delivery, ensured no significant degradations of dose metrics due to both intrafraction motion and interfraction anatomical changes. Non-gated treatments would have more widely deteriorated the dosimetry of some individual fractions. Thus, continuous monitoring, beam gating and motion correction are recommended to safely deliver dose-escalated prostate SBRT.

Treatment Delivery Gating of MRI-Guided Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: An Exploratory Analysis of a Phase III Randomized Trial of CT-Vs. MR-Guided Radiotherapy (MIRAGE)

Compared to CT-guided radiotherapy, MRI-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) has been shown to reduce acute physician-scored and patient-reported gastrointestinal and genitourinary (GU) toxicities associated with prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the MIRAGE randomized trial (NCT04384770). We hypothesize that real-time intrafraction tracking/gating is important and is a critical enabler of aggressive margin reduction with MRgRT. 79 patients received MRgRT on the MIRAGE trial with a planning margin of 2mm around the prostate and proximal seminal vesicles, which were treated to 40 Gy in five fractions on an MR-Linac. Tracking was performed at 4 frames/second in the sagittal plane during treatment with a gating boundary of 3mm for automatic beam hold. An in-house tool was developed to extract treatment time and beam gating status based on treatment logs and real-time cine images. The ratio of the time that the target was within the gating window/total time of target inside or outside the gating boundary was defined as the duty cycle (DC). Target contours were extracted from each frame of tracking and overlaid to create a motion-convolved target occupancy map. Minimum isotropic expansions of the prostate to cover 85%, 90% and 95% of the intrafraction motion were calculated with and without gating. Median treatment time per fraction including image guidance procedure and beam delivery was 24.3 min (IQR: 22.2-27.7 min). The median time for image guidance 5.4 min (IQR: 4.2-6.7 min). A total of 391 treatment fractions were analyzed and the median DC per fraction was 0.974 (IQR: 0.926 -0.983). 89 (22.8%) and 35 (9.0%) of fractions had DC<90% and <80%, respectively, corresponding to 50/79 (62.3%) and 24/79 (30.4%) of patients having at least one fraction with a DC<90% and <80%, respectively. The minimum duty cycle of all fractions was lower among patients with grade ≥2 GU toxicity compared to those with grade 0-1 GU toxicity (mean 79.8% vs. 85.9%, p = 0.06). The proportion of patients with grade ≥2 GU toxicity was also greater in patients with a minimum gating cycle <80% (37.5% vs. 18.2%, p = 0.06). Gating significantly decreased the minimum isotropic expansion of the prostate to cover 85%, 90% and 95% of the intrafraction motion (p<0.0001 for all). Prostate intrafraction motion tended to be along the bladder-rectum axis secondary to bladder filling, rectal gas and bulk motion. Fractions with large prostate motion were mostly stochastic. A large fraction (30%) of patients had at least of one treatment fraction with DC<80%, which correlated with increased acute GU toxicity. Gating effectively reduces the expansion needed to cover prostate intrafraction motion, and is necessary for real-time motion management given the unpredictable nature of prostate motion.

Planning CT Identifies Patients at Risk of High Prostate Intrafraction Motion.

Prostate motion (standard deviation, range of motion, and diffusion coefficient) was calculated from 4D ultrasound data of 1791 fractions of radiation therapy in N = 100 patients. The inner diameter of the lesser pelvis was obtained from transversal slices through the pubic symphysis in planning CTs. On the lateral and craniocaudal axes, motility increases significantly (t-test, p < 0.005) with the inner diameter of the lesser pelvis. A diameter of >106 mm (ca. 6th decile) is a good predictor for high prostate intrafraction motion (ca. 9th decile). The corresponding area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC) is 80% in the lateral direction, 68% to 80% in the craniocaudal direction, and 62% to 70% in the vertical direction. On the lateral x-axis, the proposed test is 100% sensitive and has a 100% negative predictive value for all three characteristics (standard deviation, range of motion, and diffusion coefficient). On the craniocaudal z-axis, the proposed test is 79% to 100% sensitive and reaches 95% to 100% negative predictive value. On the vertical axis, the proposed test still delivers 98% negative predictive value but is not particularly sensitive. Overall, the proposed predictor is able to help identify patients at risk of high prostate motion based on a single planning CT.

Reducing the margin in prostate radiotherapy: optimizing radiotherapy with a general-purpose linear accelerator using an in-house position monitoring system.

To study the feasibility of optimizing the Clinical Target Volume to Planning Target Volume (CTV-PTV) margin in prostate radiotherapy(RT) with a general-purpose linear accelerator using an in-house developed position monitoring system, SeedTracker. A cohort of 30 patients having definitive prostate radiotherapy treated within an ethics-approved prospective trial was considered for this study. The intrafraction prostate motion and the position deviations were measured using SeedTracker system during each treatment fraction. Using this data the CTV-PTV margin required to cover 90% of the patients with a minimum of 95% of the prescription dose to CTV was calculated using van Herk's formula. The margin calculations were performed for treatment scenarios both with and without applying the position corrections for observed position deviations. The feasibility of margin reduction with real-time monitoring was studied by assessing the delivered dose that incorporates the actual target position during treatment delivery and comparing it with the planned dose. This assessment was performed for plans generated with reduced CTV-PTV margin in the range of 7mm-3mm. With real-time monitoring and position corrections applied the margin of 2.0mm, 2.1mm and 2.1mm in LR, AP and SI directions were required to meet the criteria of 90% population to receive 95% of the dose prescription to CTV. Without position corrections applied for observed position deviations a margin of 3.1mm, 4.0mm and 3.0mm was required in LR, AP and SI directions to meet the same criteria. A mean ± SD reduction of 0.5 ± 1.8% and 3 ± 7% of V60 for the rectum and bladder can be achieved for every 1mm reduction of PTV margin. With position corrections applied, the CTV D99 can be delivered within -0.2 ± 0.3 Gy of the planned dose for plans with a 3mm margin. Without applying corrections for position deviations the CTV D99 was reduced by a maximum of 1.1 ± 1.1 Gy for the 3mm margin plan and there was a statistically significant difference between planned and delivered dose for 3mm and 4mm margin plans. This study demonstrates the feasibility of reducing the margin in prostate radiotherapy with SeedTracker system without compromising the dose delivery accuracy to CTV while reducing dose to critical structures.

Dose evaluation of inter- and intra-fraction prostate motion in extremely hypofractionated intensity-modulated proton therapy for prostate cancer.

Inter- and intra-fractional prostate motion can deteriorate the dose distribution in extremely hypofractionated intensity-modulated proton therapy. We used verification CTs and prostate motion data calculated from 1024 intra-fractional prostate motion records to develop a voxel-wise based 4-dimensional method, which had a time resolution of 1s, to assess the dose impact of prostate motion. An example of 100 fractional simulations revealed that motion had minimal impact on planning dose, the accumulated dose in 95% of the scenarios fulfilled the clinical goals for target coverage (D95>37.5Gy). This method can serve as a complementary measure in clinical setting to guarantee plan quality.

Transperineal ultrasound is a good alternative for intra-fraction motion monitoring for prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy.

To report our experience in a prospective study of implementing a transperineal ultrasound system to monitor intra-fractional prostate motion for prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). This IRB-approved prospective study included 23 prostate SBRT patients treated between 04/2016 and 11/2019 at our institution. The prescription doses were 36.25Gy to the Low-Dose planning target volume (LD-PTV) and 40Gy to the High-Dose PTV (HD-PTV) in five fractions with 3mm planning margins. The transperineal ultrasound system was successfully used in 110 of the 115 fractions. For intra-fraction prostate motion, the real-time prostate displacements measured by ultrasound were exported for analysis. The percentage of time prostate movement exceeded a 2mm threshold was calculated for each fraction of all patients. T-test was used for all statistical comparisons. Ultrasound image quality was adequate for prostate delineation and prostate motion tracking. The setup time for each fraction under ultrasound-guided prostate SBRT was 15.0±4.9 min and the total treatment time per fraction was 31.8±10.5 min. The presence of an ultrasound probe did not compromise the contouring of targets or critical structures. For intra-fraction motion, prostate movement exceeded 2mm tolerance in 23 of 110 fractions for 11 of 23 patients. For all fractions, the mean percentage of time when the prostate moved more than 2mm in any direction during each fraction was 7%, ranging from 0% to 62% of a fraction. Ultrasound-guided prostate SBRT is a good option for intra-fraction motion monitoring with clinically acceptable efficiency.

PO-1885 GPS-based intrafraction prostate motion monitoring and management during prostate cancer SBRT

PO-1885 GPS-based intrafraction prostate motion monitoring and management during prostate cancer SBRT

Prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy: quantifying intra-fraction motion and calculating margins using the new BIR geometric uncertainties in daily online IGRT recommendations.

To measure the magnitude of intra-fraction prostate motion (IFPM) during stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) delivered without intra-fraction tracking.To assess if current margins adequately cover IFPM.To derive margins using new guidelines. IFPM was determined in 20 patients receiving 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions using 97 pairs of pre- and post-treatment cone beam CT (CBCT) scans. Correlation of time between CBCT acquisitions and motion was determined. The magnitude of IFPM was compared to current margins (6 mm isotropic, 3 mm posterior). Margins were calculated using IFPM alone and updated guidelines. The averaged 3D root mean square IFPM was 2.5 mm (4.2 mm). Independent prostate motion was predominantly posterior (70%) and inferior (63%). There was weak correlation between posterior (ρ = 0.38) and inferior (ρ = 0.36) IFPM and time. IFPM greater than current margins occurred in 8 of 97 fractions, six in the posterior direction. Margins were ≤3.5 mm using IFPM alone and ≤3.3 mm Left 3.5 mm Right, 7.0 mm inferior, 3.7 mm superior, 4.4 mm anterior and 3.3 mm posterior using new guidelines, compensating for motion in 92% of fractions. Our current SBRT margins account for 92% of IFPM, predominantly posterior and inferior. Although updated guidelines suggest an increase in margins inferiorly, any increase must be balanced against the possibility of increased toxicity, particularly if biochemical control and side-effects are favourable with current practice. The difference between current clinical margins and those determined using updated guidance is demonstrated. The implications must be considered against clinical outcomes.

Intrafraction motion during CyberKnife® prostate SBRT: impact of imaging frequency and patient factors

To determine the relationship between imaging frequencies and prostate motion during CyberKnife stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer. Intrafraction displacement data for 331 patients who received treatment with CyberKnife for prostate cancer were retrospectively analysed. Prostate positions were tracked with a large variation in imaging frequencies. The percent of treatment time that patients remained inside various motion thresholds for both real and simulated imaging frequencies was calculated.Results: 84,920 image acquisitions over 1635 fractions were analysed. Fiducial distance travelled between consecutive images were less than 2, 3, 5, and 10mm for 92.4%, 94.4%, 96.2%, and 97.7% of all consecutive imaging pairs respectively. The percent of treatment time that patients received adequate geometric coverage increased with more frequent imaging intervals. No significant correlations between age, weight, height, BMI, rectal, bladder or prostate volumes and intrafraction prostate motion were observed. There are several combinations of imaging intervals and movement thresholds that may be suitable for consideration during treatment planning with respect to imaging and calculation of the marginbetween the clinical target volume and planning target volume (CTV-to-PTV), resulting in adequate geometric coverage for approximately 95% of treatment time. Rectal toxicities and treatment duration need to be considered when implementing combinations clinically.

Dosimetric Impact of Intrafraction Prostate Motion and Interfraction Anatomical Changes in Dose-Escalated Linac-Based SBRT

The dosimetric impact of intrafraction prostate motion and interfraction anatomical changes and the effect of beam gating and motion correction were investigated in dose-escalated linac-based SBRT. Fifty-six gated fractions were delivered using a novel electromagnetic tracking device with a 2 mm threshold. Real-time prostate motion data were incorporated into the patient's original plan with an isocenter shift method. Delivered dose distributions were obtained by recalculating these motion-encoded plans on deformed CTs reflecting the patient's CBCT daily anatomy. Non-gated treatments were simulated using the prostate motion data assuming that no treatment interruptions have occurred. The mean relative dose differences between delivered and planned treatments were -3.0% [-18.5-2.8] for CTV D99% and -2.6% [-17.8-1.0] for PTV D95%. The median cumulative CTV coverage with 93% of the prescribed dose was satisfactory. Urethra sparing was slightly degraded, with the maximum dose increased by only 1.0% on average, and a mean reduction in the rectum and bladder doses was seen in almost all dose metrics. Intrafraction prostate motion marginally contributed in gated treatments, while in non-gated treatments, further deteriorations in the minimum target coverage and bladder dose metrics would have occurred on average. The implemented motion management strategy and the strict patient preparation regimen, along with other treatment optimization strategies, ensured no significant degradations of dose metrics in delivered treatments.

Dosimetry implications of VMAT delivery angles and intra-fraction motion for SBRT prostate treatments.

For a cohort of retrospectively treated patients with prostate carcinoma using a Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) technique and with implanted localization fiducials, this study determined whether there were any correlations between theoretical fiducial visibility using intra-fraction megavoltage imaging and intra-fraction motion induced dosimetric effects. Treatment planning data for 20 retrospective patients that used a SBRT prostate technique were investigated in this study. An in-house script was created that split each of the 360-degree volumetric modulated arc therapy arcs into 12 sectors, with each sector being 30 degrees. The script created a total of 24 sectors for each SBRT plan ranging from 180 to 210 degrees to 180 to 150 degrees. Resulting data was assessed to determine whether there was dosimetric impact from intra-fractional prostate motion and if it correlated with the theoretical fiducial visibility. Forty percent of the 4 highest CTV D98% mean dose differences occurred within the angles of 240 and 270 degrees and 25% occurred between the angles of 90 and 120 degrees. The 4 highest average percentage differences in PTV D98% coverage during angular sectors of 270 to 240 degrees, 90 to 120 degrees, 240 to 270 degrees and 60 to 90 degrees were -1.19%, -1.14%, -1.10%, and 1.01% respectively. It was also the case for the PTV D95%in sectors 90 to 120 degrees, 240 to 270 degrees, 270 to 240 degrees and 270 to 300 degrees, which reduced by -0.97%, -0.93%, -0.92%, and -0.82% respectively. From the 4 highest rectal dose differences in V32Gy and V18Gy, it was found that 50% of the highest rectum V32Gyand V18Gy dose increases occurred between the angles of 90 and 120 degrees and 37.5% occurred between the angles of 240 and 270 degrees. The MU for each sector showed that 240_270, 240_210, 270_240, and 120_90 had the highest average MU with 150.8, 134.6, 129.2, and 124.3 respectively. This study demonstrated that there is a high correlation between dosimetric impact of intra-fractional motion and the theoretical fiducial visibility. As a result, modification to treatment plans to enable fiducial visibility at all angular sectors throughout a treatment may not be required. Further sector analysis tests are required to develop patient specific megavoltage imaging gantry angles for SBRT prostate patients.

Implementing online position monitoring for prostate radiotherapy using an in-house position monitoring system: User experience and impact on workforce.

To evaluate the feasibility of prostate intrafraction motion monitoring using the SeedTracker real-time image guidance system in order to improve targeting accuracy in prostate radiotherapy. SeedTracker was used to monitor prostate gold fiducial seeds with kV x-ray imaging during radiotherapy in 30 patients. Feedback from radiation therapists was collected via the use of a user evaluation form. The impact on treatment time was established by using a record and verify system. The effective dose and a risk of exposure-induced cancer death (REID) were estimated for a 60-year-old patient when using the SeedTracker system. A total of 22 radiation therapists completed user evaluation forms. The time taken to prepare a reference data set for one patient varied with three (13.6%) radiation therapists taking less than 2 min, 10 (45.5%) between 2 and 4 min, eight (36.4%) between 4 and 6 min and one (4.5%) between 6 and 8 min. The useability of the SeedTracker system was reported as 'easy' by 21 (95.5%) radiation therapists and 'hard' by 1 (4.5%) radiation therapist. Mean treatment time changed from 6 to 7 min with prostate-only radiotherapy treatment and from 6.9 to 10.2 min with prostate and whole pelvis radiotherapy treatments. The maximum effective dose with the SeedTracker was 1.6276 mSv, and increase in REID was 0.007%. The SeedTracker real-time image guidance system is a feasible tool to use in radiotherapy departments to monitor and correct for prostate intrafraction motion.

Sequential monoscopic image-guided motion compensation in tomotherapy stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer.

To manage intra-fractional motions, recent developments in tomotherapy enable a unique capability of adjusting MLC/jaw to track the moving target based on the intra-fractional motions detected by sequential monoscopic imaging. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of motion compensation with a realistic imaging rate for prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). The obtained results will guide optimizing treatment parameters and image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) in tomotherapy using this approach. Ten retrospective prostate cases with actual prostate motion curves previously recorded through the Calypso system were used in this study. Based on the recorded peak-to-peak motion, these cases represented either large(>5mm) or median (≤ 5mm) intra-fractional prostate motions. All the cases were re-planned on tomotherapy using 35Gy/5 fractions SBRT regimen and three different jaw settings of 1cm static, 2.5cm static, and 2.5cm dynamic jaw. Two motion compensation methods were evaluated: a complete compensation that adjusted the jaw and MLC every 0.1 s (the same rate as the Calypso motion trace), and a realistic compensation that adjusted the jaw and MLC at an average imaging interval of 6 s from sequential monoscopic images. An in-house 4D dose calculation software was then applied to calculate the dosimetric outcomes from the original motion-free plan, the motion-contaminated plan, and the two abovementioned motion-compensated plans. During the process, various imaging rates were also simulated in one case with unusually large motions to quantify the impact of the KV-imaging rate on the effectiveness of motion compensation. The effectiveness of motion compensation was evaluated based on the PTV coverage and OAR sparing. Without any motion-compensation, the PTV coverage (PTV V100%) of patients with large prostate motions decreased remarkably to 55%-82% when planning with the 1cm jaw but to a less level of 67-94% with the 2.5cm jaw. In contrast, motion compensation improved the PTV coverage(>92%) when combined with the 2.5cm jaw, but less effective, around 75%-94%, with the 1cm jaw. For OAR sparing, the bladder D1cc, bladder D10cc, and rectum D1cc all increased in the motion-contaminated plans. Motion compensation improved OAR sparing to the equivalent level of the original motion-free plans. For patients with median prostate motion, motion-induced degradation in PTV coverage was only observed when planning with the 1cm jaw. After motion compensation, the PTV coverage improved to better than 94% for all three jaw settings. Additionally, the effectiveness of motion compensation depends on the imaging rate. Motion compensation with a typical rate of two KV images per gantry rotation effectively reduces motion-induced dosimetric uncertainties. However, a higher imaging rate is recommended when planning with a 1cm jaw for patients with large motions. Our results demonstrated that the performance of sequential monoscopic imaging-guided motion compensation on tomotherapy depends on the amplitude of intra-fractional prostate motion, the plan parameter settings, especially jaw setting, gantry rotation, and the imaging rate for motion compensation. Creating a patient-specific imaging guidance protocol is essential to balance the effectiveness of motion compensation and achievable imaging rate for intra-fractional motion tracking.