Intra-aortic Balloon Counterpulsation Research Articles

Experience of using intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation during coronary bypass surgery and coronary stenting in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and mitral regurgitation of ischemic genesis

AIM: To analyze the changes in the degree of mitral regurgitation (MR) of ischemic origin and of clinical outcomes in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and multi-vascular coronary artery disease during use of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABC).
 MATERIALS AND METHODS: The results of the treatment of 186 patients with ischemic mitral insufficiency who underwent intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation as a preoperative preparation in connection with a low LVEF were outlined in this manuscript. The patients were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 included 132 patients who underwent coronary bypass surgery while Group 2 included 54 patients who underwent coronary artery stenting. The dynamics of MR and LVEF before and after left ventricular revascularization were studied on the basis of echocardiographic data.
 RESULTS: In group 1, there was a decrease in the degree of mitral regurgitation by 58% using IABC (p 0.05) in the early postoperative period (based on the measurement of vena contracta, v.c., the width of the regurgitation jet on the valve), and by 54% (p 0.05) in more than 6 months following surgical treatment. In group 2, there was a significant decrease in the degree of MR (based on v.c.) by 42% (p 0.05) in the early postoperative period and by 41% (p 0.05) in more than 6 months following surgical treatment.
 CONCLUSION: The use of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with low LVEF, moderate and severe MI, and with significant coronary artery pathology, led to the reduction in the duration of surgical treatment and the time of using artificial blood circulation through by excluding the need for the correction of MI, both directly during surgical revascularization and in the long-term period (more than 6 months).

Management of refractory septic shock. Can intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation be the answer?

Refractory septic shock (RSS) is a subset of septic shock that does not respond to standard resuscitation and to high-dose vasopressor therapy. Management of RSS remains challenging and is associated with increased mortality. There is a dire need to identify a novel therapeutic strategy for the management of RSS. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) are potential options for the management of RSS. Since ECMO is expensive, requires high expertise, and has more complications, IABP can be a feasible therapeutic option. IABP may help clinicians buy the time by supporting the organ perfusion while treating sepsis. Judicious patient selection can be the key. Well designed clinical trials may be the way forward.

Catastrophic Cardiac Events During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

BackgroundPerioperative complications of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are decreasing but can be catastrophic when they occur. Systematic reports of the nature of these events are lacking in the contemporary era. Our study aimed to report the incidence, outcomes, and perioperative management of catastrophic cardiac events in patients undergoing TAVR and to propose a working strategy to address these complications. MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study of patients who developed catastrophic cardiac events during or immediately after TAVR between 2015 and 2019 at a single academic centre. ResultsOf 2102 patients who underwent TAVR, 51 (2.5%) developed catastrophic cardiac events. The causes included cardiac perforation and tamponade (n = 19, 37.3%), acute left- ventricular failure (n = 10, 19.6%), coronary artery obstruction (n = 10, 19.6%), aortic-root disruption (n = 7, 13.7%), and device embolization (n = 5, 9.8%). Twenty-four patients (47.0%) with catastrophic cardiac events required stabilization by either intra-aortic balloon counter-pulsation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The in-hospital mortality rate increased by 11.7-fold for patients with catastrophic cardiac events compared with those without (25.5% vs 2.0%, P < 0.001). Patients who developed aortic root disruption had the highest mortality rate (42.8%) compared with the others. The incidence of catastrophic cardiac events remained stable over a 5-year period, but the associated mortality decreased from 38.5% in 2015 to 9.1% in 2019. ConclusionsCatastrophic cardiac events during TAVR are rare, but they account for a dramatic increase in perioperative mortality. Early recognition and development of a standardized perioperative team approach can help manage patients experiencing these complications.

Support with Impella versus intra-aortic balloon pump in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background:The survival benefit and safety of Impella support versus intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock were investigated in several observational trials that revealed mixed results. Thus, in order to provide new evidence-based medical evidence for clinical treatment, we undertook a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of Impella versus IABP in AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock.Methods:We will search the EMBASE, Web of Knowledge, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library from inception to Mar 2021 to retrieve relevant studies. Two independent authors will extract the information from the selected studies. Disagreements will be resolved through a discussion with a third review author. The outcomes include mortality and complications. The quality of randomized trials will be assessed by Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized controlled trials and the risk of bias in non-randomized studies - of Interventions for non-randomized, observational studies. Review Manager software (v 5.4; Cochrane Collaboration) will be used for the meta-analysis.Results:The present meta-analysis will compare the efficacy and safety of Impella versus IABP in AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock.Conclusions:The results of our review will be reported strictly following the PRISMA criteria and the review will add to the existing literature by showing compelling evidence and improved guidance in clinic settings.OSF registration number:10.17605/OSF.IO/SKEQ7.Ethics and dissemination:Ethical approval and patient consent are not required because this study is a literature-based study. This systematic review and meta-analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

LEVOSEMINDAN VERSUS INTRA-AORTIC BALLOON PUMP IN LOW EJECTION FRACTION CABG PATIENTS

Background: Preoperative left ventricular dysfunction is an independent risk factor for perioperative mortality and morbidity and is also associated with postoperative low cardiac output syndrome. IABP improved outcomes in high-risk cardiac patients. However, installation of the balloon has many disadvantages. Recently, a new drug named Levosimendan is commonly used as an inotropic support. it does not increase oxygen demand of myocardium.Aim of the work: The purpose of our study was to compare the efficiency of levosimendan versus intra-aortic balloon pump in patients with poor left ventricular function undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with ejection fraction less than 35%.Patients and Methods: sixty patients were randomized into 2 groups, according to the treatment they received - either levosimendan (Group A) or intra-aortic balloon counter pulsation (Group B). and compared with respect to The use of inotropic drugs, weaning from CPB, Hemodynamics, transfusion requirements, ICU stay, hospital stay and in-hospital mortality.Results: There were no differences in preoperative characteristics including patients’ age, sex, BMI, and comorbidities. The Levosemindan group had reduced transfusion requirements and shorter ICU stay as compared to IABP group.Conclusion: levosimendan infusion after induction of anesthesia is a good choice with an acceptable option in comparison to IABP. The use of levosimendan in high-risk cardiac patients is comparable to IABP in improving hemodynamics during and after conventional on-pump CABG and results in a shorter ICU stay.

ECMO pour choc cardiogénique réfractaire post cardiotomie : expérience du service de chirurgie cardiaque du CHU de Grenoble Alpes

ObjectiveThe objective of our study is to detail our experience relating to ECMO implantations for post-cardiotomy refractory shock, by analyzing the pre-ECMO factors (history, type of surgery, LVEF), factors relating to ECMO (implantation time, duration) and post-ECMO factors (weaning, complications) in order to highlight those possibly associated with high mortality. MethodsThis is a univariate and multivariate retrospective study of ECMO data implemented between 2011 and 2019 at the Grenoble Alpes University Hospital Center following cardiac surgery. The time to implantation of ECMO was less than 3hours (intraoperative) between 3 and 24hours (early postoperative) and between 24 and 48hours after aortic unclamping (late postoperative). Preoperative or postoperative intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (CPBIA) could be associated. Results114 veino-arterial ECMOs were implanted for refractory cardiogenic shock after 5702 cardiac surgeries (1.9%) with a survival rate of 30.7%. The mean age of the patients was 68.6+- 10.5 years. The implantation of ECMO was performed intraoperatively in 71 patients (62.2%), early postoperatively in 22 patients (19.2%) and late postoperatively in 21 patients (18.4%). The duration of assistance was less than 48hours in 27 patients (23.6%), between 48hours and one week in 58 patients (50.9%) and more than one week in 29 patients (25.5%). Univariate analysis revealed a statistically significant association between mortality rate and male sex (P=0.002), association absent with other preoperative characteristics, delay in implantation of ECMO, installation of CPBIA, post-operative characteristics and resuscitation suites. Multivariate analysis of the entire study population demonstrated that the use of ECMO for cardio-respiratory arrest was the only independent risk factor for mortality (OR=7.57 [1.41-40, 62]). After multivariate reanalysis excluding patients with ECMO placement for cardio respiratory arrest, age, preoperative renal failure, type of procedure and EuroSCORE II were risk factors for mortality. ConclusionIn this study, male gender, type of intervention, occurrence of cardiac arrest were significantly associated with the death rate. A study of greater power, multicentric, and with a larger sample, will have to be carried out to reach significance.

Traditional Chinese and Western medicine nursing of a patient after intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation

Traditional Chinese and Western medicine nursing of a patient after intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation

The Preference, Effect, and Prognosis of Intra-Aortic Balloon Counterpulsation in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Backgrounds Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation is increasingly used in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. The aim of this study was to explore the preference, effect, and prognosis of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock patients. Methods Data of acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock patients at the Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital were collected retrospectively. A propensity score was calculated with a logistic regression which contained clinically meaningful variables and variables selected by Lasso and then used to match the control group. The cumulative incidence curve and Gray's test were employed to analyse the effect and prognosis of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation on mortality. Results A total of 1962 acute myocardial infarction cases admitted between May 2015 and November 2018 were identified, and 223 cases with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock were included as the study cohort, which contained 34 cases that received IABP and 189 cases that did not receive IABP. Patients with higher alanine aminotransferase (OR = 1.93, 95% CI 1.29-2.98), higher triglyceride (OR = 3.71, 95% CI 1.87-7.95), and higher blood glucose (OR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.99-1.18) had a higher probability of receiving intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation. In the propensity score matching analysis, 34 cases received intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation and 102 matched controls were included in the comparison. By comparing the cumulative incidence of in-hospital mortality, there was no statistically significant difference between the intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation group and matched control group (P = 0.454). Conclusion The use of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation may not improve the prognosis of the acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock patients.

Traditional Chinese and Western medicine nursing of a patient after intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation

Traditional Chinese and Western medicine nursing of a patient after intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation

Takotsubo syndrome after mitral valve surgery: a case report.

BackgroundTakotsubo syndrome is a frequent entity; however, it has never been described after a mitral valve surgery.Case summary We present the case of a 79-year-old woman, with background of atrial fibrillation and a left atrial appendage closure device, who was admitted for elective mitral valve replacement, because of asymptomatic severe primary mitral regurgitation. Biologic mitral valve was implanted without incidences, but in the postoperative, she developed cardiogenic shock. Electrocardiogram (ECG) showed inverted T waves in precordial leads and an echocardiography showed severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction with mid to distal diffuse hypokinesis, and better contractility in basal segments. Troponin levels were mildly elevated. With the suspicion of a postoperative acute coronary syndrome, a coronary angiography was performed and showed no significant coronary lesions. The haemodynamic situation was compromised for the next 48 h, in which vasoactive support and intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation were implemented. After 48 h, the haemodynamic situation suddenly improved. The ECG was normalized, and a control echocardiogram showed partial recovery of the LV function with resolution of regional wall motion abnormalities. The patient could be discharged at 1 week. The clinical picture was interpreted as a stress cardiomyopathy after mitral valve surgery.Discussion Takotsubo syndrome is a threatening condition; complications in acute phase could lead to a fatal outcome. Mitral valve surgery has to be considered as a trigger for this entity, after excluding coronary involvement, specially of left circumflex artery.

Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation: current evidence-based and unresolved issues

This literature review provides the current evidence-based research regarding the role of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in the treatment of patients in various clinical situations. These include patients with acute coronary syndrome, complicated or uncomplicated by cardiogenic shock, accompanied by high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions, accompanying patients in need of coronary artery bypass surgery in various conditions as a ‘bridge’ to decision-making or treatment. Because the introduction of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation into clinical practice, it has been the most common method of hemodynamic support in high-risk patients. The classical strategy for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction has evolved over the last decade from a thrombolysis scenario to a primary coronary revascularisation scenario, which resulted in a larger patient cohort. The currently available data, however, do not support the routine use of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation by most of this population. Current studies have shown that the use of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation did not lead to a decrease in 30-day mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome and cardiogenic shock who received therapy with the strategy of early myocardial revascularisation as the planned primary goal. The expediency of using high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention as an accompanying method is ambiguous, whereas the use of the method as a ‘bridge’ to surgical myocardial revascularisation may be justified and requires additional research. The article provides the current recommendations for the treatment of patients. Research results and unresolved issues are being discussed.Received 3 June 2020. Revised 4 August 2020. Accepted 24 August 2020.Funding: The study did not have sponsorship.Conflict of interest: Authors declare no conflict of interest.

Patient survival after acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention within the left main coronary artery according to time of admission

Abstract Background Previously published studies assessing the time effect of primary percutaneous intervention (PCI) on long-term clinical outcomes in an overall group of patients with acute coronary syndromes has been widely investigated. It has been suggested that night-time admission may negatively influence long-term overall mortality. Patients treated within the left main coronary artery (LMCA) belong a narrow group of high-risk procedures that require an operator and a team with high skills. Purpose The aim of the presented study was to assess the relationship between the time of pPCI (day- vs. night-time) and overall mortality among patients treated due to AMI within the LMCA. Methods This observational study was performed on 443,805 patients hospitalised due to non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) or ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Patients were prospectively enrolled between January 2006 and December 2018 in the ongoing Polish Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes (PL-ACS). From the overall group of patients, the authors selected 5,404 patients treated within the LMCA. After taking exclusion criteria into consideration, the patients were divided according to time of PCI treatment: daytime hours (7:00 a.m.-10:59 p.m.) – 2,809 patients and night-time hours (11:00 p.m. - 6.59 a.m.) – 473 patients. Results Patients treated during night-time and daytime did not differ significantly in age (70.79 [61.52–79.73] vs. 69.73 [60.8–78.82] years, p=0.13) or gender – males (67.6% vs. 67.0%, p=0.79). Patients treated during daytime presented with significantly higher rate of STEMIs (67.2% vs. 49.9%) and lower rate of NSTEMIs (32.8% vs. 50.1%) in comparison to those treated during night-time (p&amp;lt;0.001). The 30-day and 12-month overall mortality rates were significantly greater among patients treated during night-time hours (20.3% vs. 14.9%, p=0.003) and (31.7% vs. 26.2%, p=0.001). Kaplan-Maier survival curves confirmed this relationship (p=0.001). Multiple regression analysis did not confirm that the time of pPCI (day- vs. night-time) is significantly related to survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.96–1.55, p=0.099). However, significance was achieved for the left ventricle ejection fraction (HR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.94–0.95, p&amp;lt;0.001), systolic blood pressure on admission (HR: 0.995; 95% CI: 0.991–0.998, p=0.005), age (HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.03–1.05, p&amp;lt;0.001), the use of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.03–1.05, p&amp;lt;0.001) and diagnosed peripheral artery disease (HR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.2–2.01, p&amp;lt;0.001). Conclusions The time of pPCI (day- vs. night-time) in patients with AMI and treated within the LMCA is related to the overall 30-day and 12-month survival which is poorer in those treated during the night-time. However, this relationship was not confirmed by multiple regression analysis and was not found to be significant among other stronger predictors. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Comparison of Safety between Different Kinds of Heparins in Patients Receiving Intra-Aortic Balloon Counterpulsation

Background The present study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of low molecular-weight-heparin (LMWH) and unfractionated heparin (UFH) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients receiving intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP). Materials and Methods We retrospectively analyzed a total of 344 patients receiving IABP for cardiogenic shock, severe heart failure, ventricular septal rupture, or mitral valve prolapse due to AMI. A total of 161 patients received UFH (a bolus injection 70 U/kg immediately after IABP, followed by infusion at a rate of 15 U/kg/hour and titration to for 50 to 70 seconds of activated partial thromboplastin time. A total of 183 patients received LMWH (subcutaneous injection of 1.0 mg/kg every 12 hours for 5 to 7 days and 1.0 mg/kg every 24 hours thereafter). Events of ischemia, arterial thrombosis or embolism, and bleeding during IABP were evaluated. Major bleeding was defined as a hemoglobin decrease by >50 g/L (vs. prior to IABP) or bleeding that caused hemodynamic shock or life-threatening or requiring blood transfusion. Results Subjects receiving UFH and LMWH did not differ in baseline characteristics. Ischemia was noted in five (3.1%) and two (1.1%) subjects in UFH and LMWH groups, respectively. Arterial thromboembolism occurred in three (1.9%) subjects in the UFH group, but not in the LMWH group. Logistic regression analysis failed to reveal an association between ischemia or bleeding with heparin type. Major bleeding occurred in 16 (9.9%) and six (3.3%) patients in the UFH and LWMH groups, respectively ( p = 0.014). Regression analysis indicated that LMWH is associated with less major bleeding. Conclusion LMWH could reduce the risk of major bleeding in patients receiving IABP. Whether LMWH could reduce arterial thromboembolism needs further investigation.

The Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Rotational Atherectomy under Intra-Aortic Balloon Counterpulsation Assistance for Complex and Very High-Risk Coronary Interventions in Contemporary Practice: An Eight-Year Experience from a Tertiary Center.

The use of Complex and High-risk Coronary Interventions (CHIPs) has increased in recent years. Both rotational atherectomy (RA) and hemodynamic support are important parts of CHIPs. This study aimed to retrospectively investigate the procedure results and clinical outcomes of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP)-assisted RA in the contemporary drug-eluting stent era. All consecutive patients who received RA under in-procedure IABP assistance from April 2010 to March 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. A total of 63 patients (77.7 ± 10.1 years, 69.8% male) were recruited, of whom 51 underwent RA with primary IABP assistance and 12 underwent bailout IABP. RA could be completed in 61 (96.8%) of the patients. Overall, vessel perforation, profound in-procedure shock, and ventricular arrhythmia occurred in 1.6%, 4.8% and 3.2% of the patients, respectively. The in-hospital, 30-day and 90-day major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rates were 22.2%, 27.4% and 36.1%, respectively, mostly driven by mortality. The MACE rates were significantly higher in the bail-out group in the hospital (50.0% vs. 15.7%, p = 0.018) at 30 days (58.3% vs. 20.0%, p = 0.013) and 90 days (66.7% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.020). Bail-out IABP was associated with increased MACEs, implying that the use of IABP should be implemented at the beginning of RA if a complex procedure is anticipated.

Arterial elastance modulation by intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with acute decompensated heart failure and low-output state

: Heart failure is characterized by ventriculo-arterial decoupling which decreases myocardial efficiency and is exacerbated by tachycardia and by increased total peripheral resistance that worsen static arterial elastance; unlike aortic pressure by itself, this measure is independent of the function of the ventricle. Therefore, it is an index which describes arterial properties.We investigated the effect of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation on arterial elastance, a variable which can be obtained non-invasively, in patients with acute decompensated heart failure deteriorated in low output state.17 out of 24 patients admitted for acute decompensated heart failure underwent intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation insertion for hemodynamic worsening condition despite medical therapy.Hemodynamic variables were obtained with a pulmonary artery catheter; arterial elastance and cardiac power index were calculated.Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation was associated with a decrease of the arterial elastance median value (1.64 vs. 1.28 mmHg/ml- P = 0.04) along withan increase in cardiac power index (0.29, vs 0.40, W/m; P = 0.02 ). Mixed venous saturation (53 mmHg, vs 70 mmHg; P = 0.007) and pulmonary mean arterial pressure (41 vs 30 mmHg; P = 0.005) significantly changed after intraortic balloon counterpulsation insertion. No significant changes in heart rate (median 80, vs 80, bpm; P = 0.809) were observed.Intraortic balloon counterpulsation may effectively improve arterial elastance on top of a conservative use of inotropes/vasopressors, with a significant improvement in hemodynamics.

Outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with high-risk non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome within the first 24 hours of admission

Aim. The current myocardial re-vascularisation guidelines recommend that the coronary re-vascularisation of patients with high-risk non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACSs) should be performed within 24 hours of admission. In real clinical practice; however, it is not always possible to keep coronary bypass surgery on schedule owing to various reasons. The aim of the current study, which presents cases of successful adherence to the surgical schedule, was to explore the need for 24/7 cardiac surgery services and to evaluate the outcomes of early (i.e. during the first 24 hours) coronary artery bypass grafting in 21 patients with high-risk NSTE-ACSs.Methods. The medical records of patients undergone coronary bypass surgery for high-risk NSTE-ACSs within the first 24 hours of admission between 2017 and 2019 were retrospectively analysed.Results. The mean age of the patients was 64.3 ± 5.6 years. Myocardial infarction was confirmed in 52.4 % (n = 11) of the subjects and progressive angina pectoris in 47.6 % (n = 10). The average waiting time to surgery was 17.8 ± 4.7 hours. Besides, 9.5 % (n = 2) of the cases, who had received dual antiplatelet therapy, exhibited a shorter waiting time to surgery. Patients were characterised by extremely severe clinical and angiographic status as follows: one in three had post-infarction cardiosclerosis and a first-degree family history of obesity; one in four had a history of percutaneous coronary intervention; and 61.9 % (n = 13) were found to have a left main coronary artery lesion, in 79.6 % (n = 10) of whom the left main coronary artery stenosis appeared to be greater than 80 %, necessitating the intra-aortic balloon counter-pulsation therapy in 33.3 % (n = 7) overall. Also, the mean cardiopulmonary bypass time turned out to be 88.6 ± 27.1 minutes, with an aortic clamping time of 47.6 ± 14.7 minutes. The in-hospital mortality rate was 14.3 % (n = 3), with cardiac and respiratory failure as well as mediastinitis (in one patient) being among the causes of adverse outcomes. So far, none of the studied cases has required re-sternotomy due to bleeding or perioperative acute cerebrovascular accident.Conclusion. In high-risk NSTE-ACS patients with severe clinical and angiographic status, emergency coronary bypass surgery performed within 24 hours of admission may prove an effective treatment option that can help save patients’ lives through complete re-vascularisation.Received 31 March 2020. Revised 2 May2020. Accepted 16 May 2020. Funding: The study is supported as a part of the research program "Complete myocardial revascularization in patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome with coronary artery bypass grafting". Conflict of interest: Authors declare no conflict of interest. Author contributionsConception and design: A.B. NishonovData collection and analysis: A.B. NishonovDrafting the article: A.B. Nishonov, R.S. TarasovCritical revision of the article: S.V. Ivanov, T.S. Golovina, L.S. BarbarashFinal approval of the version to be published: A.B. Nishonov, R.S. Tarasov, S.V. Ivanov, T.S. Golovina, L.S. Barbarash

Investigation and analysis of the development status of critical care medicine in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region in 2019

To comprehensively understand the basic construction of intensive care unit (ICU) in the secondary and tertiary hospitals in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, and to provide a theoretical basis for the development direction of critical care medicine and the rational allocation of medical resources in our region. On the March 14th, 2020, a cross-sectional survey of 147 ICU in 122 hospitals in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region was conducted using an online questionnaire. The survey included 6 modules: the basic conditions of the hospital, ICU profile, ICU human resources status, equipment allocation, technology development, and ICU quality control. Among the 147 ICUs, there were 69 ICUs in tertiary hospital and 78 ICUs in secondary hospital. 75.51% (111/147) were comprehensive ICU and 24.49% (36/147) were specialized ICU. The total number of ICU beds was 1 818, accounted about 2.43% (1 818/74 912) of the total number of hospital beds. In ICU terms of human resourse, physicians/beds ratio was 0.54:1, and nurses/beds ratio was 1.55:1. Physicians/beds ratio in the secondary hospitals was 0.52:1, and nurses/beds was 1.45:1; physicians/beds ratio in the tertiary hospital was 0.56:1, and nurses/beds ratio was 1.79:1. The ICU management model was mainly closed management (82.99%, 122/147), and the proportion of closed management in tertiary hospitals was 88.41% (61/69), which was higher than that in secondary hospitals (78.21%, 61/78). In aspect of ICU equipment, the invasive ventilator/bed ratio, enteral nutrition infusion pump/bed ratio, and blood purifier/bed ratio in the tertiary hospitals were significantly higher than those in the secondary hospitals [0.70 (0.46, 1.00) vs. 0.45 (0.33, 0.67), 0.18 (0.00, 0.56) vs. 0.00 (0.00, 0.13), 0.08 (0.00, 0.13) vs. 0.00 (0.00, 0.10), respectively, all P < 0.01]. In the tertiary hospital, the chest sputum excretion device, blood gas analyzer, blood purification instrument, transport ventilator, fiber bronchoscope, enteral nutrition infusion pump, bedside ultrasound machine, continuous hemodynamics and oxygen metabolism monitor, electroencephalogram bispectral index monitor, bedside electroencephalography machine and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) were also superior to the secondary hospitals. ICU technologies, such as deep venipuncture, jejunal nutrition tube placement, percutaneous tracheotomy, invasive blood pressure monitoring, invasive hemodynamic monitoring, bedside ultrasound examination, continuous blood purification, fiber bronchoscopy, high frequency ventilation, intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP), and ECMO had also performed better than secondary hospitals. In the management of ICU medical quality control, in tertiary hospitals, the proportions of single or isolated room for patients with drug-resistant bacteria, 1-hour bundle and hemodynamic monitoring for patients with septic shock, routine prone position ventilation and lung recruitment for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), common analgesic, and use of personal digital assistant (PDA) for pre-operation scan code by nurses and electronic medical record for routine rounds were significantly higher than those in secondary hospitals (91.30% vs. 85.90%, 68.12% vs. 48.72%, 85.51% vs. 70.51%, 28.99% vs. 12.82%, 85.51% vs. 61.54%, 76.81% vs. 61.54%, 71.01% vs. 29.49, 49.28% vs. 28.21%, respectively), and the differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.05). 89.74% (70/78) ICU in secondary hospitals and 89.86% (62/69) of tertiary hospitals used acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) to evaluate the severity of critically ill patients; in terms of sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), the difference between the secondary hospitals and the tertiary hospitals was not statistically significant (51.28% vs. 62.32%, χ2 = 1.814, P = 0.178). Although the ICU construction of the tertiary hospitals in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region is more complete than secondary hospitals, there is a big gap between the requirements of the national guidelines and the developed regions in the east. The ICU's investment in human resource, equipment and supporting facilities allocation, promotion of suitable technology, and medical quality control management should be increased to promote the development of critical care medicine in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region.

External validation and comparison of the CardShock and IABP-SHOCK II risk scores in real-world cardiogenic shock patients.

Mortality from cardiogenic shock remains high and early recognition and risk stratification are mandatory for optimal patient allocation and to guide treatment strategy. The CardShock and the Intra-Aortic Balloon Counterpulsation in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock (IABP-SHOCK II) risk scores have shown good results in predicting short-term mortality in cardiogenic shock. However, to date, they have not been compared in a large cohort of ischaemic and non-ischaemic real-world cardiogenic shock patients. The Red-Shock is a multicentre cohort of non-selected cardiogenic shock patients. We calculated the CardShock and IABP-SHOCK II risk scores in each patient and assessed discrimination and calibration. We included 696 patients. The main cause of cardiogenic shock was acute coronary syndrome, occurring in 62% of the patients. Compared with acute coronary syndrome patients, non-acute coronary syndrome patients were younger and had a lower proportion of risk factors but higher rates of renal insufficiency; intra-aortic balloon pump was also less frequently used (31% vs 56%). In contrast, non-acute coronary syndrome patients were more often treated with mechanical circulatory support devices (11% vs 3%, p<0.001 for both). Both risk scores were good predictors of in-hospital mortality in acute coronary syndrome patients and had similar areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (area under the curve: 0.742 for the CardShock vs 0.752 for IABP-SHOCK II, p=0.65). Their discrimination performance was only modest when applied to non-acute coronary syndrome patients (0.648 vs 0.619, respectively, p=0.31). Calibration was acceptable for both scores (Hosmer-Lemeshow p=0.22 for the CardShock and 0.68 for IABP-SHOCK II). In our cohort, both the CardShock and the IABP-SHOCK II risk scores were good predictors of in-hospital mortality in acute coronary syndrome-related cardiogenic shock.

Impact of timing of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation on mortality in cardiogenic shock - a subanalysis of the IABP-SHOCK II trial.

Conflicting results exist on whether initiation of intraaortic balloon pumping (IABP) before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has an impact on outcome in this setting. Our aim was to assess the outcome of patients undergoing IABP insertion before versus after primary PCI in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. The IABP-SHOCK II-trial randomized 600 patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock to IABP-support versus control. We analysed the outcome of patients randomized to the intervention group regarding timing of IABP implantation before or after PCI. Of 600 patients included in the IABP-SHOCK II trial, 301 were randomized to IABP-support. We analysed the 275 (91%) patients of this group undergoing primary PCI as revascularization strategy surviving the initial procedure. IABP insertion was performed before PCI in 33 (12%) and after PCI in 242 (88%) patients. There were no differences in baseline arterial lactate (p = 0.70), Simplified Acute Physiology Score-II-score (p = 0.60) and other relevant baseline characteristics. No differences were observed for short- and long-term mortality (pre vs. post 30-day mortality: 36% vs. 37%, odds ratio 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-2.12, p = 0.99; one-year mortality: 56% vs. 48%, hazard ratio 1.08, 95% CI 0.65-1.80, p = 0.76; six-year-mortality: 64% vs. 65%, hazard ratio 1.00, 95% CI 0.63-1.60, p = 0.99). In multivariable Cox regression analysis timing of IABP-implantation was no predictor for long-term outcome (hazard ratio 1.08, 95% CI 0.66-1.78, p = 0.75). Timing of IABP-implantation pre or post primary PCI had no impact on outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Fulminant myocarditis triggered by OC43 subtype coronavirus: a disease deserving evidence-based care bundles

Fulminant myocarditis triggered by OC43 subtype coronavirus: a disease deserving evidence-based care bundles