Reviewed by: Making War at Fort Hood: Life and Uncertainty in a Military Community by Kenneth T. MacLeish Keith Brown Making War at Fort Hood: Life and Uncertainty in a Military Community. By Kenneth T. MacLeish. Princeton nj: Princeton University Press, 2013. ix + 265 pp. Map, photographs, tables, notes, references, index. $29.95 cloth. In this theoretically rich, empathic, and revelatory ethnography, Kenneth MacLeish ably tackles the challenges that face all US anthropologists who engage with the military. As the discipline has increasingly shifted left politically and reputations are built on robust critique—be it anti-imperialist, anti-capitalist, anti-nationalist, or anti-militarist—the task of establishing the kind of respect for the dignity and positionality of those on whose voices ethnographers depend for their insight is tricky when they are part of a military-industrial complex that embodies so much that US anthropologists in general oppose. MacLeish, refreshingly, does not engage in adversarial framings or dwell on these in-house anxieties. In his close focus on a small community of US Army veterans battling their own combat injuries and an overstretched and underresourced care delivery system, he shows more than he tells about the inconsistences, injustices, and indignities of military service in the long decade of intensive deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan. Gently [End Page 180] criticizing colleagues’ stereotypes of military life (42), the book demonstrates his close attention to military hierarchy and symbolism, habits, and ideals. The portraits MacLeish paints of his principal interlocuters are vivid. They impressively convey not just the content but also the affect, tone, and mood of their observations and interventions. His account of Dime’s yelling into the microphone, for example (207), or Stewart’s stand-up-ready riff on civilian overthanking (191–92), are captivating reminders of the virtue of paying attention. Together with the unique perspectives offered by Cindy, an army wife who ran the “Foundation” that provided MacLeish’s ethnographic anchor, they also demonstrate the analytical acuity of non-anthropologists. The book is impressive and engaging in theoretical terms. Beyond the near-obligatory references to neoliberalism’s pernicious effects on institutions and in particular on the delivery of care, it offers provocative and (to this reader at least) fresh insights on topics of recurrent anthropological interest: power, embodiment, intimacy, and debt. The chapter on injuries and trauma, whether visible or invisible, inflicted swiftly or slowly, by a surfeit of moisture (foot rot, fungus) or not enough (dehydration, kidney infection), is built on the narratives and experiences of combat in Iraq offered by veterans in the bureaucratic limbo of recovery and rehabilitation. Drawing on literature from anthropology and beyond, MacLeish deftly points out how the reality of violence violates the boundaries by which we, and the institutions we construct, order the world—and how the burden of repair, though structural in nature, is thrust onto the wounded themselves. MacLeish’s depiction of a significant staged ceremony honoring veterans for their service is an ethnographic and theoretical tour de force. Besides an account of social forces that is reminiscent of Gluckman’s classic Analysis of a Social Situation in Zululand, but further enriched by Dime’s and Stewart’s cameos, MacLeish also draws on a range of economic writings, notably including Georges Bataille’s concept of the “accursed share,” to speak to the nature and societal consequences of the unrepayable debt that soldiers impose on civilians by their service, in a context where the military-civilian disconnect is so profound and deep. This is a marvelous book, at once rooted in and derived from intimate encounters with memorable individuals, while also urging its readers to think beyond the methodological individualism and blinkered moralism that can so easily creep into the anthropology of the US military. In offering both intimate, personal accounts of military service and sophisticated reflection on its contemporary function and meaning, MacLeish has made an incisive contribution to military anthropology that will be of particular value to students of violence, care, US society, or fine ethnographic writing. Keith Brown Brown University Copyright © 2015 Center for Great Plains Studies, University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Read full abstract