Purpose - Carriers are obliged to provide ships with seaworthiness suitable to withstand the accidental hazards encountered during voyages. Non-compliance negligence refers to a violation of a significant notice of duty that is a maritime law obligation to the carrier. Consider the carrier s liability for these violations. Design/Methodology/Approach - Incompetent negligence is divided into superior negligence and voyage negligence. It examines the basis for the carrier s voyage negligence and the responsibility structure of the manager s negligence, and also examines the carrier s liability limitations. Accordingly, I. Introduction II. Time to fulfill the duty of caution in seaworthiness III. Who is responsible for non-compliance negligence IV. Proof of responsibility and Carrier s Limitation of Liability V. Organize papers in order of conclusion. Findings - The carrier must be equipped with various equipment, necessities, and required documents necessary for the ship s own seaworthiness, as well as the crew to operate the vessel, and the necessary documents to operate the ship, so the carrier can meet all of these conditions. Should be given great care. The carrier must prove that the carrier s negligence is presumed in the event of damage due to the vessel s non-compliance, and that the carrier has taken all reasonable measures to prevent such damage in order to indemnify the carrier. In other words, the carrier will be able to avoid liability for damages by proving that he has taken great care to provide a ship with seaworthiness. The carrier s liability is limited to damages caused by non-compliance, otherwise it is indemnified under Article 4, Article 1 of The Hague / Hague Visby Rules. Research Implications - The purpose of this study is to derive a range of responsibilities to carriers and shippers according to changes in international maritime transport rules and to draw up solutions in case of problems.